1
|
Hao SB, Bridges L, Honaker MD. Infectious Complications After Modified Purse-String Stoma Closure. Am Surg 2025; 91:203-207. [PMID: 39305499 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241257473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Purpose: Current society guidelines recommend purse-string closure technique for stoma reversal, which has been shown to reduce but not eliminate the risk of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at the original stoma site, a complication associated with increased morbidity and cost. We studied an adjunctive technique to further reduce the risk of SSI. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on adult patients who underwent stoma reversal between May 2016 - July 2022. Stoma reversal was performed with purse-string closure, and placement of a strip of povidone-iodine soaked non-adherent pad in the remaining two cm opening at the prior stoma site. This pad was taken out on post-operative day one and changed to wet-to-dry saline moistened gauze. Results: 82 patients were identified. The cohort had a median BMI 26.5 [IQR 23.0-31.0] and median age 57.5 [IQR 45.8-67.0]. Mean time from original surgery to reversal was nine months. 59.8% identified as female, 24.4% were currently smoking, 18.3% were had diabetes. The cohort experienced a 11.0% readmission rate and 18.3% rate of stoma site hernia with a mean follow up of 17 17 months. No patient developed an SSI. Conclusion: In this cohort study with known risk factors for SSI, no patients undergoing stoma reversal experienced a post-operative SSI. The adjunctive technique of a povidone-iodine soaked non-adherent pad in addition to purse-string closure should be further examined in conjunction with surgical bundles to reduce the risk of SSI and overall morbidity of stoma reversal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett B Hao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Lindsey Bridges
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Michael D Honaker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Obi M, Beffa L, Melland-Smith M, Messer N, Kanters A, Judeeba S, Baier K, Miller B, Krpata D, Prabhu A, Steele SR, Rosen M, Holubar SD, Petro C. The rate of ileostomy site incisional hernias: more common than we think? Hernia 2024; 28:2311-2320. [PMID: 39325325 PMCID: PMC11530484 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03163-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incisional hernias (IH) rates after diverting loop ileostomy reversal (DLI-R) have been reported up to 24%. We aimed to characterize the incidence rate and risk factors associated with DLI-R site IH formation within 1-year in a large patient cohort. METHODS A retrospective review at a single quaternary referral center hospital of adult patients who underwent DLI-R over a 5-year period and abdominal computerized tomography (CT) imaging performed within 1-year for any indication postoperatively was conducted. All CTs scans were independently reviewed by staff surgeons to determine the presence of a fascial defect at the DLI-R site. RESULTS 2,196 patients underwent DLI-R; of these, 569 (25.9%) underwent CT imaging for any indication. Mean patient age, 54.8 (± 14.9), BMI 27.6 kg/m2. 87 (15%) patients had a parastomal hernia at time of DLI-R. After median follow-up of 10 months, 203 patients (35.7%) had IH at the DLI-R site. Age (p = 0.14), sex (p = 0.39), race (p = 0.75), and smoking status (p = 0.82) weren't associated with IH after DLI-R. Comorbidities weren't significantly associated with IH following DLI-R. In univariate analysis, increased BMI (p < 0.001), presence of a parastomal hernia (p = 0.008), and suture type (p = 0.01) were associated with IH development. On multivariate analysis, BMI remained significant, and polyglyconate compared to polydioxanone suture were associated with higher rates of IH (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION We observed that the rate of incisional hernias within 1-year of diverting ileostomy reversal was indeed common at 36%. Granted, a high percentage of the population was excluded due to heterogeneity in radiographic evaluation that could be mitigated in future prospective studies. Our study suggests that IH preventative strategies include weight loss for overweight and obese patients prior to DLI-R and that the optimal suture for DLI-R is polydioxanone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Obi
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lucas Beffa
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Megan Melland-Smith
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Nir Messer
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Arielle Kanters
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sami Judeeba
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Baier
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Benjamin Miller
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - David Krpata
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ajita Prabhu
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Rosen
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Clayton Petro
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duhoky R, Piozzi GN, Rutgers MLW, Mykoniatis I, Siddiqi N, Naqvi S, Khan JS. An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study. J Pers Med 2024; 14:725. [PMID: 39063979 PMCID: PMC11278481 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rauand Duhoky
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
- School of Computing, Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Marieke L. W. Rutgers
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Ioannis Mykoniatis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Najaf Siddiqi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Syed Naqvi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Jim S. Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (R.D.); (G.N.P.)
- Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dewantoro D, Manson P, Brazzelli M, Ramsay G. Reversal of stoma with biosynthetic mesh fascial reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:632-642. [PMID: 38374538 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM Temporary stoma formation remains a common part of modern-day colorectal surgical operations. At the time of reversal, a second procedure is required when the bowel is anastomosed and the musculature is closed. The rate of incisional hernia at these sites is 30%-35% with conventional suture closure. Mesh placement at this site is therefore an attractive option to reduce hernia risk, particularly as new mesh types, such as biosynthetic meshes, are available. The aim of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the use of mesh for prophylaxis of incisional hernia at stoma closure and to explore the outcome measures used by each of the included studies to establish whether they are genuinely patient-centred. METHOD This is a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the published literature regarding the use of mesh at stoma site closure operations. Comprehensive literature searches of major electronic databases were performed by an information specialist. Screening of search results was undertaken using standard systematic review principles. Data from selected studies were input into an Excel file. Meta-analysis of the results of included studies was conducted using RevMan software (v.5.4). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT data were analysed separately. RESULTS Eleven studies with a total of 2008 patients were selected for inclusion, with various mesh types used. Of the included studies, one was a RCT, seven were nonrandomized comparative studies and three were case series. The meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies shows that the rate of incisional hernia was lower in the mesh reinforcement group compared with the suture closure group (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.37) while rates of infection and haematoma/seroma were similar between groups (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.41-1.21 and OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.80, respectively). The results of the RCT were in line with those of the nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSION Current evidence indicates that mesh is safe and reduces incisional hernia. However, this is not commonly adopted into current clinical practice and the literature has minimal patient-reported outcome measures. Future work should explore the reasons for such slow adoption as well as the preferences of patients in terms of outcome measures that matter most to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dickson Dewantoro
- Department of General Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Manson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miriam Brazzelli
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - George Ramsay
- Department of General Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lake SP, Deeken CR, Agarwal AK. Reinforced tissue matrix to strengthen the abdominal wall following reversal of temporary ostomies or to treat incisional hernias. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:823-832. [PMID: 38577081 PMCID: PMC10989334 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal wall deficiencies or weakness are a common complication of temporary ostomies, and incisional hernias frequently develop after colostomy or ileostomy takedown. The use of synthetic meshes to reinforce the abdominal wall has reduced hernia occurrence. Biologic meshes have also been used to enhance healing, particularly in contaminated conditions. Reinforced tissue matrices (RTMs), which include a biologic scaffold of native extracellular matrix and a synthetic component for added strength/durability, are designed to take advantage of aspects of both synthetic and biologic materials. To date, RTMs have not been reported to reinforce the abdominal wall following stoma reversal. AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of using an RTM to reinforce the abdominal wall at stoma takedown sites. METHODS Twenty-eight patients were selected with a parastomal and/or incisional hernia who had received a temporary ileostomy or colostomy for fecal diversion after rectal cancer treatment or trauma. Following hernia repair and proximal stoma closure, RTM (OviTex® 1S permanent or OviTex® LPR) was placed to reinforce the abdominal wall using a laparoscopic, robotic, or open surgical approach. Post-operative follow-up was performed at 1 month and 1 year. Hernia recurrence was determined by physical examination and, when necessary, via computed tomography scan. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, time to return to work, and hospital readmissions. Evaluated complications of the wound/repair site included presence of surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation. RESULTS The observational study cohort included 16 male and 12 female patients with average age of 58.5 years ± 16.3 years and average body mass index of 26.2 kg/m2 ± 4.1 kg/m2. Patients presented with a parastomal hernia (75.0%), incisional hernia (14.3%), or combined parastomal/incisional hernia (10.7%). Using a laparoscopic (53.6%), robotic (35.7%), or open (10.7%) technique, RTMs (OviTex® LPR: 82.1%, OviTex® 1S: 17.9%) were placed using sublay (82.1%) or intraperitoneal onlay (IPOM; 17.9%) mesh positioning. At 1-month and 1-year follow-ups, there were no hernia recurrences (0%). Average hospital stays were 2.1 d ± 1.2 d and return to work occurred at 8.3 post-operative days ± 3.0 post-operative days. Three patients (10.7%) were readmitted before the 1-month follow up due to mesh infection and/or gastrointestinal issues. Fistula and mesh infection were observed in two patients each (7.1%), leading to partial mesh removal in one patient (3.6%). There were no complications between 1 month and 1 year (0%). CONCLUSION RTMs were used successfully to treat parastomal and incisional hernias at ileostomy reversal, with no hernia recurrences and favorable outcomes after 1-month and 1-year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer P Lake
- Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States
| | | | - Amit K Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX 77026, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramírez-Giraldo C, Van-Londoño I, Monroy DC, Navarro-Alean J, Hernández-Ferreira J, Hernández-Álvarez D, Rojas-López S, Avendaño-Morales V. Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:267. [PMID: 37975888 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04560-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to identify which risk factors are associated with the appearance of an incisional hernia in a stoma site after its closure. This in the sake of identifying which patients would benefit from a preventative intervention and thus start implementing a cost-effective protocol for prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting incidence, risk factors, and follow-up time for appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure were included. A fixed-effects and random effects models were used to calculate odds ratios' estimates and standardized mean values with their respective grouped 95% confidence interval. This to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and the appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure. RESULTS Seventeen studies totaling 2899 patients were included. Incidence proportion between included studies was of 16.76% (CI95% 12.82; 21.62). Out of the evaluated factors higher BMI (p = 0.0001), presence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.0023), colostomy (p = 0,001), and end stoma (p = 0.0405) were associated with the appearance of incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure, while malignant disease (p = 0.0084) and rectum anterior resection (p = 0.0011) were found to be protective factors. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic mesh placement should be considered as an effective preventative intervention in high-risk patients (obese patients, patients with parastomal hernia, colostomy, and end stoma patients) with the goal of reducing incisional hernia rates in stoma site after closure while remaining cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | | | - Danny Conde Monroy
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jorge Navarro-Alean
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Susana Rojas-López
- Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia
- Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Satora M, Żak K, Frankowska K, Misiek M, Tarkowski R, Bobiński M. Perioperative Factors Affecting the Healing of Rectovaginal Fistula. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6421. [PMID: 37835064 PMCID: PMC10573987 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectovaginal fistula is rare, but a severe complication in gynecology, which despite the effort of clinicians is still not treated successfully in many cases. According to statistics, the healing rates of surgery in patients with RVF range from 20 to 100%. The treatment effectiveness depends on the etiology of fistula, the age of the patients, the presence of comorbidities, the type of surgery and many other factors. Considering the low efficiency of treatment and the high risk of recurrence, the question of possible methods to improve the results occurs. In our review, we analyzed both modifiable and non-modifiable factors which may influence the treatment, healing rate and future fate of the patients. Taking into account all analyzed risk factors, including age, comorbidities, smoking status, microbiology, medications, stoma and stool features, we are aware that rectovaginal fistula's treatment must be individualized and holistic. In cases of poorly healing RVF, the drainage of feces, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis or the implementation of estrogen therapy may be useful. Moreover, microbiome research in women with RVF and towards estrogen therapy should be performed in order to create treatment algorithms in women with fistulae. Those interventions, in our opinion, may significantly improve the outcome of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Satora
- I Chair and Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Student Scientific Association, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (K.Ż.); (K.F.)
| | - Klaudia Żak
- I Chair and Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Student Scientific Association, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (K.Ż.); (K.F.)
| | - Karolina Frankowska
- I Chair and Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Student Scientific Association, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (K.Ż.); (K.F.)
| | - Marcin Misiek
- Department of Gynecology, Holy Cross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland;
| | - Rafał Tarkowski
- I Chair and Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marcin Bobiński
- I Chair and Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eklöv K, Bringman S, Löfgren J, Nygren J, Everhov ÅH. PHaLIR: prevent hernia after loop ileostomy reversal-a study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter study. Trials 2023; 24:575. [PMID: 37684648 PMCID: PMC10486037 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07430-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer is a common cancer worldwide. Surgery for rectal cancer with low anterior resection often includes the formation of a temporary protective loop ileostomy. The temporary ostomy is later reversed in a separate operation. One complication following stoma closure is the development of a hernia at the former stoma site, and this has been reported in 7-15% of patients. The best method to avoid hernia after stoma closure is unclear. The most common closure is by suturing only, but different forms of mesh have been tried. Biological mesh has in a randomized trial halved hernia incidence after stoma reversal. Biosynthetic mesh and retromuscular mesh are currently being evaluated in ongoing studies. METHODS The present multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study will compare standard suture closure of the abdominal wall in loop ileostomy reversal with retromuscular synthetic mesh at the stoma site. The study has been approved by the Regional Ethical Review board in Stockholm. Patients aged 18-90 years, operated on with low anterior resection and a protective loop ileostomy for rectal cancer and planned for ileostomy reversal, will be considered for inclusion in the study. Randomization will be 1:1 on the operation day with concealed envelopes. The estimated sample size is intended to evaluate the superiority of the experimental arm and to detect a reduction of hernia occurrence from 12 to 3%. The operation method is blinded to the patients and in the chart and for the observer at the 30-day follow-up. The main outcome is hernia occurrence at the stoma site within 3 years postoperatively, diagnosed through CT with strain. Secondary outcomes are operation time, length of hospital stay, pain, and 30-day complications. DISCUSSION This double-blinded randomized controlled superiority study will compare retromuscular synthetic mesh during the closure of loop ileostomy to standard care. If this study can show a lower frequency of hernia with the use of prophylactic mesh, it may lead to new surgical guidelines during stoma closure. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03720262. Registered on October 25, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Eklöv
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Sven Bringman
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Jenny Löfgren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Nygren
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa H Everhov
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mao Y, Xi L, Lu C, Miao J, Li Q, Shen X, Yu C. Incidence, risk factors, and predictive modeling of stoma site incisional hernia after enterostomy closure: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:201. [PMID: 37296427 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02805-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stoma site incisional hernia (SSIH) is a common complication, but its incidence and risk factors are not well known. The objective of this study is to explore the incidence and risk factors of SSIH and build a predictive model. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis on the patients who underwent enterostomy closure from January 2018 to August 2020. Patient's general condition, perioperative, intraoperative, and follow-up information was collected. The patients were divided into control group (no occurrence) and observation group (occurrence) according to whether SSIH occurred. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the risk factors of SSIH, following which we constructed a nomogram for SSIH prediction. RESULTS One hundred fifty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The incidence of SSIH was 24.4% (38 cases), of which 14 were treated with hernia mesh repair, and the others were treated with conservative treatment. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 68 years (OR 1.045, 95% CI 1.002 ~ 1.089, P = 0.038), colostomy (OR 2.913, 95% CI 1.035 ~ 8.202, P = 0.043), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR 1.181, 95% CI 1.010 ~ 1.382, P = 0.037), malignant tumor (OR 4.838, 95% CI 1.508 ~ 15.517, P = 0.008) and emergency surgery (OR 5.327, 95% CI 1.996 ~ 14.434, P = 0.001) are the independent risk factors for SSIH. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results, a predictive model for the occurrence of SSIH was constructed to screen high-risk groups of SSIH. For patients at high risk for SSIH, how to deal with the follow-up and prevent the occurrence of SSIH is worth further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghuan Mao
- Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ling Xi
- Department of Gerontology, Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chen Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ji Miao
- Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| | - Xiaofei Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| | - Chunzhao Yu
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li S, Zhong L, Zhou D, Zhang X, Liu Y, Zheng B. Predictors of Psychological Distress among Patients with Colorectal Cancer-Related Enterostomy: A Cross-sectional Study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2023; 36:85-92. [PMID: 36662041 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000911012.63191.4c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify variables that may predict psychological distress in patients with an enterostomy. METHODS Investigators recruited 77 patients with a stoma from a stoma clinic according to the inclusion criteria. Patients' psychological distress was assessed with the Distress Thermometer (DT) tool, and their personality type was determined by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Researchers also collected demographic and disease-related data. Predictive values were estimated using multiple regression analyses. RESULTS The mean DT score of all patients was 5.94 (SD, 1.81), and approximately 85.7% consistently suffered from psychological distress. Being unmarried and having peristomal complications were associated with higher psychological distress, whereas having a monthly income 5,000 ¥ or more was associated with lower levels of distress. Moreover, patients with a melancholic personality type tended to have higher DT scores, which could act as a strong independent predictor for psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with a stoma endured moderate to severe psychological distress during follow-up care. Exploring the related factors that predict the levels of psychological distress could enable clinicians to identify at-risk patients as early as possible and thus provide optimal care for improving patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqing Li
- At the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China, Siqing Li, MD, is Enterostomal Therapist, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liping Zhong, MS, is Enterostomal Therapist, Radiology Department. Danyan Zhou, MS, is Nursing Student, Xinhua College of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Also at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Xiumin Zhang, MS, is Nurse, Intensive Care Unit; Yuxia Liu, MS, is Nurse, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery; and Baojia Zheng, MD, is Health Manager, Health Management Center. Acknowledgment: Siqing Li and Liping Zhong contributed equally to this study, and Baojia Zheng and Yuxia Liu contributed equally to this study. The authors thank the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University for its free database use. This study was supported financially by the Young Talents of Sun Yat-sen University (N: N2020Y05). The authors have disclosed no other financial relationships related to this article. Submitted March 19, 2022; accepted in revised form May 2, 2022
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khor SN, Cheok SHX, Sultana R, Tan EKW. Incidence of incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer surgery & analysis of associated risk factors in Asian population: Is laparoscopy any better? Asian J Surg 2023; 46:99-104. [PMID: 35165026 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia is one of the common morbidities after major colorectal cancer surgery. We aim to compare the incidence of incisional hernias between laparoscopic and open surgery. We also aim to identify associated risk factors of incisional hernia among Asian population who has undergone major resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS Data of patients who had undergone major colorectal cancer surgery in year 2015 from a single institution was collected. Data were extracted from electronic clinical records from our institution's database. Incisional hernias were identified by clinical examination and computed tomography (CT) scan performed during post-operative follow up as part of colorectal cancer surveillance. Follow up data of up to 3 years were extracted. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify associated risk factors for development of incisional hernia. Propensity score matching analysis was performed for laparoscopic and open resection. RESULTS 502 patients were included in the study. With a minimum follow up of 3 years, overall incisional hernia incidence rate of 13% was identified. Incisional hernias after laparoscopic and open surgery were 12.3% and 13.8% (p = 0.688) respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) of >23kg/m2, ASA of III/IV and post-operative anastomotic leak were associated with development of incisional hernias. On multivariable analysis, female gender (OR 2.102, 95%CI: 1.155, 3.826), BMI of ≥23 kg/m2 (OR 2.862 95%CI: 1.582, 5.181), ASA III/IV (OR 2.052, 95%CI: 1.169, 3.602), were significantly associated with development of incisional hernia. Propensity scores matched analysis showed laparoscopic surgery did not significantly reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. CONCLUSION The overall incidence of incisional hernia seems lower in Asian population. Our study demonstrated no significant difference in incisional hernia rates between patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery. Female gender, higher BMI, and higher ASA are associated with increased risk of developing incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao Nan Khor
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, S169608, Singapore.
| | - S H X Cheok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, S169608, Singapore.
| | | | - Emile Kwong Wei Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, S169608, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case-control study. Hernia 2021; 26:467-472. [PMID: 34767104 PMCID: PMC9012710 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02508-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The closure of a stoma is frequently associated with an acceptable morbidity and mortality. One of the most frequent complications is incisional hernia at the stoma site, which occurs in 20%–40% of cases, higher than incisions in other parts of the abdomen. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the presentation of incisional hernia after stoma closure, this in order to select patients who are candidates for prophylactic mesh placement during closure. Methods An unpaired case–control study was conducted. This study involved 164 patients who underwent a stoma closure between January 2014 and December 2019. Associated factors for the development of incisional hernia at the site of the stoma after closure were identified, for which it was performed a logistic regression analysis. Results 41 cases and 123 controls were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 35.21 ± 18.42 months, the mean age for performing the stoma closure was 65.28 ± 14.07 years, the most frequent cause for performing the stoma was malignant disease (65.85%). Risk factor for the development of incisional hernia at the stoma site after its closure was identified as a history of parastomal hernia (OR 5.90, CI95% 1.97–17.68). Conclusions The use of prophylactic mesh at stoma closure should be considered in patients with a history of parastomal hernia since these patients present a significantly higher risk of developing a hernia.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nyman J, Lindmark M, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K. Surgical treatment of stoma-related hernias: retrospective cohort study of damage claims to the Swedish National Patient Insurance Company 2010-2016. BMC Surg 2021; 21:390. [PMID: 34727915 PMCID: PMC8565032 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01383-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Parastomal hernia and stoma-site hernia are common stoma complications. Parastomal hernia repair is associated with high complication and recurrence rates. Insurance data can provide novel information on the consequences of perioperative complications from the patient’s point of view. The aim was to investigate what types of complications associated with stoma-related hernia surgery that cause patients to apply for economic compensation through the patient insurance system and to investigate demographic and clinical differences among cases based on gender and type of center at which the surgery was performed. Methods A national patient damage claim database was searched for ICD-10 codes related to parastomal and stoma-site hernia surgery over a seven-year period. Medical records were screened for claims associated with parastomal hernia repair, relocation or reversal due to parastomal hernia, or stoma-site hernia repair. Claims were classified according to one of four primary complaints: surgical, anesthetic, medical or other. Clinical and demographic differences between genders and hospital types were investigated. Reasons for non-compensation were analyzed. Results Thirty claims met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen were related to parastomal hernia repair, seven to stoma-site hernia repair, three to stoma reversal and two to relocation due to parastomal hernia. Twenty-five claims were primarily surgical, two related to anesthesia and three classified as other. Seven claims were granted compensation. No demographic or clinical differences were found apart from female gender being associated with previous parastomal hernia repair [6 women and 0 men (p = 0.02)]. Conclusion Surgical complaints predominated. Few claims were compensated, reflecting the complexity and unsatisfactory outcomes of these procedures. Many claims were identified in relation to the incidence of stoma-related hernia surgery. Trial registration Due to its retrospective and descriptive nature, the study was not registered in any registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Nyman
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Mikael Lindmark
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ulf Gunnarsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karin Strigård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD, Musters GD, Coultre SEL, de Jonge WJ, van Heurn LE, Derikx JP. Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery in infants: A retrospective analysis of incidence and risk factors. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56:2107-2112. [PMID: 33618851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incisional hernia (IH) is a complication following abdominal surgery extensively studied in adults but less so in infants. This study aimed to identify the incidence, high risk diseases and risk factors of IH following abdominal surgery in infants. METHODS Infants undergoing abdominal surgery before the age of three years in our tertiary centre between 1998 and 2018 were included. Patient demographics, peri‑operative details and the course during follow up were retrospectively extracted from patient records. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors. RESULTS The incidence of incisional hernia was 5.2% (107/2055). Necrotizing enterocolitis (12%), gastroschisis (19%), and omphalocele (17%) had the highest incidences of IH. Wound infection (OR: 5.3, 95%-CI:2.9-9.5), preterm birth (OR: 4.2, 95%-CI:2.6-6.7) and history of stoma (OR 1.7, 95%-CI:1.1-2.8) were significant risk factors for IH. Whilst age at surgery, surgical approach and total number of operations did not significantly influence IH development. The IH resolved in 15% (16/107) without surgery. CONCLUSION One in twenty infants experiences IH following abdominal surgery, which is higher than previously described. Understanding the incidence of IH and associated risk factors will allow physicians to identify infants that may be at increased risk for IH and to possibly act pre-emptively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Gijsbert D Musters
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S E Le Coultre
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wouter J de Jonge
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of General, Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lw Ernest van Heurn
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joep Pm Derikx
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zelga P, Kluska P, Zelga M, Piasecka-Zelga J, Dziki A. Patient-Related Factors Associated With Stoma and Peristomal Complications Following Fecal Ostomy Surgery: A Scoping Review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2021; 48:415-430. [PMID: 34495932 DOI: 10.1097/won.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ostomy creation is often an integral part of the surgical management of various diseases including colorectal malignancies and inflammatory bowel disease. Stoma and peristomal complications may occur in up to 70% of patients following ostomy surgery. The aim of this scoping literature review was to synthesize evidence on the risk factors for developing complications following creation of a fecal ostomy. DESIGN Scoping literature review. SEARCH STRATEGY Two independent researchers completed a search of the online bibliographic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and EMBASE for all articles published between January 1980 and December 2018. The search comprised multiple elements including systematic literature reviews with meta-analysis of pooled findings, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, observational studies, other types of review articles, and multiple case reports. We screened 307 unique titles and abstracts; 68 articles met our eligibility criteria for inclusion. The methodological rigor of study quality included in our scoping review was variable. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS We identified 6 risk factors associated with an increased likelihood of stoma or peristomal complications (1) age more than 65 years; (2) female sex; (3) body mass index more than 25; (4) diabetes mellitus as a comorbid condition; (5) abdominal malignancy as the underlying reason for ostomy surgery; and (6) lack of preoperative stoma site marking and WOC/ostomy nurse specialist care prior to stoma surgery. We also found evidence that persons with a colostomy are at a higher risk for prolapse and parastomal hernia. IMPLICATIONS Health care professionals should consider these risk factors when caring for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery and manage modifiable factors whenever possible. For example, preoperative stoma site marking by an ostomy nurse or surgeon familiar with this task, along with careful perioperative ostomy care and education of the patient by an ostomy nurse specialist, are essential to reduce the risk of modifiable risk factors related to creation of a fecal ostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zelga
- Piotr Zelga, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Piotr Kluska, MD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Marta Zelga, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Transplantology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
- Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, PhD, Research Laboratory for Medicine and Veterinary Products in the GMP Quality System, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- Adam Dziki, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Piotr Kluska
- Piotr Zelga, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Piotr Kluska, MD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Marta Zelga, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Transplantology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
- Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, PhD, Research Laboratory for Medicine and Veterinary Products in the GMP Quality System, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- Adam Dziki, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Marta Zelga
- Piotr Zelga, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Piotr Kluska, MD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Marta Zelga, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Transplantology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
- Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, PhD, Research Laboratory for Medicine and Veterinary Products in the GMP Quality System, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- Adam Dziki, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Joanna Piasecka-Zelga
- Piotr Zelga, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Piotr Kluska, MD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Marta Zelga, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Transplantology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
- Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, PhD, Research Laboratory for Medicine and Veterinary Products in the GMP Quality System, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- Adam Dziki, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Adam Dziki
- Piotr Zelga, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Piotr Kluska, MD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Marta Zelga, MD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Urology and Transplantology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
- Joanna Piasecka-Zelga, PhD, Research Laboratory for Medicine and Veterinary Products in the GMP Quality System, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
- Adam Dziki, MD, PhD, Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Veld JV, Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, van Halsema EE, Consten ECJ, Siersema PD, Ter Borg F, van der Zaag ES, de Wilt JHW, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, van Hooft JE, Tanis PJ. Comparison of Decompressing Stoma vs Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:206-215. [PMID: 31913422 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Bridge to elective surgery using self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is a debated alternative to emergency resection for patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer because of oncologic concerns. A decompressing stoma (DS) might be a valid alternative, but relevant studies are scarce. Objective To compare DS with SEMS as a bridge to surgery for nonlocally advanced left-sided obstructive colon cancer using propensity score matching. Design, Setting, and Participants This national, population-based cohort study was performed at 75 of 77 hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 4216 patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer treated from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were identified from the Dutch Colorectal Audit and 3153 patients were studied. Additional procedural and intermediate-term outcome data were retrospectively collected from individual patient files, resulting in a median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range, 15-57 months). Data were analyzed from April 7 to October 28, 2019. Exposures Decompressing stoma vs SEMS as a bridge to surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary anastomosis rate, postresection presence of a stoma, complications, additional interventions, permanent stoma, locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Propensity score matching was performed according to age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, prior abdominal surgery, tumor location, pN stage, cM stage, length of stenosis, and year of resection. Results A total of 3153 of the eligible 4216 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 69.7 [11.8] years; 1741 [55.2%] male); after exclusions, 443 patients underwent bridge to surgery (240 undergoing DS and 203 undergoing SEMS). Propensity score matching led to 2 groups of 121 patients each. Patients undergoing DS had more primary anastomoses (104 of 121 [86.0%] vs 90 of 120 [75.0%], P = .02), more postresection stomas (81 of 121 [66.9%] vs 34 of 117 [29.1%], P < .001), fewer major complications (7 of 121 [5.8%] vs 18 of 118 [15.3%], P = .02), and more subsequent interventions, including stoma reversal (65 of 113 [57.5%] vs 33 of 117 [28.2%], P < .001). After DS and SEMS, the 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 11.7% for DS and 18.8% for SEMS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.28; P = .20), the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 64.0% for DS and 56.9% for SEMS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60), and the 3-year overall survival rates were 78.0% for DS and 71.8% for SEMS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.22; P = .26). Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that DS as bridge to resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer is associated with advantages and disadvantages compared with SEMS, with similar intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. The existing equipoise indicates the need for a randomized clinical trial that compares the 2 bridging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce V Veld
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke J Amelung
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Wernard A A Borstlap
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emo E van Halsema
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmus A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Predictors of hernia after loop ileostomy closure: a single-center retrospective review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1695-1702. [PMID: 32451647 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aims were to determine the rate of incisional hernia after closure of a loop ileostomy (LI) and to identify any perioperative risk factors that may be associated with hernia development. METHODS We performed an IRB-approved retrospective review that included consecutive patients who underwent LI closure from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was identification of hernia on physical exam or by abdominal imaging. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of ileostomy site hernia. RESULTS A total of 243 consecutive patients had LI closure during the study timeframe. The overall rate of hernia formation was 11.9% (29/243). The median time to discovery of the hernia was 16.4 (range, 2.2-55.9) months with a median follow-up time of 49 months. Although LI performed in conjunction with sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis consisted of only 19% of ileostomy cases, 62% of hernias were (18/29) identified in this cohort. Rates of hernia formation increased with respect to body mass index (underweight 0%; normal 4.6%; overweight 13.8%; obese 21%). The multivariable model identified increased BMI (underweight/normal weight versus overweight: OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.06-16.04; underweight/normal weight versus obese: OR 8.74, 95% CI 2.17-35.23) and surgical indication (reference variable: diverticulitis; rectal cancer: OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.76; Crohn's/ulcerative colitis: OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.53; other: OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.64) as significant predictors of ileostomy site hernia. CONCLUSION The development of a hernia at the site of LI closure was influenced mostly by BMI, surgical indication, and operative time.
Collapse
|
18
|
Mohamedahmed AYY, Stonelake S, Zaman S, Hajibandeh S. Closure of stoma site with or without prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1477-1488. [PMID: 32588121 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03681-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate comparative outcomes of the closure of temporary stoma site with or without prophylactic mesh reinforcement METHODS: A systematic online search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane database, The Virtual Health Library, Clinical trials.gov and Science Direct. Studies comparing the reversal of stoma with and without prophylactic mesh reinforcement were included. Stoma site incisional hernia (SSIH), surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, seroma formation, haematoma formation, bowel obstruction, anastomosis leak, length of hospital stay (LOS) and secondary operation to repair the SSIH were the evaluated outcome parameters. RESULTS Six comparative studies reporting a total of 1683 patients who underwent closure of stoma with (n = 669) or without (n = 1014) prophylactic mesh reinforcement were included. Use of mesh was associated with a significantly lower risk of SSIH (OR 0.22, P = 0.003) and need for surgical intervention to repair SSIH (OR 0.32, P = 0.04) compared with no use of mesh. However, it was associated with significantly longer operative time (MD 47.78, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in SSI (OR 1.09, P = 0.59), bowel obstruction (OR 1.11, P = 0.74), seroma formation (OR 2.86, P = 0.19), anastomosis leak (OR 1.60, P = 0.15), haematoma formation (OR 1.25, P = 0.75) or LOS (MD - 0.45, P = 0.31) between two groups. CONCLUSION Prophylactic mesh reinforcement during the closure of temporary stoma may significantly reduce the risk of SSIH and surgical intervention to repair the hernia without increasing the risk of SSI or other morbidities. However, it may increase the procedure time. Future higher-quality randomised evidence is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Stephen Stonelake
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shafquat Zaman
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shahin Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Goldwag JL, Wilson LR, Ivatury SJ, Pauli EM, Tsapakos MJ, Wilson MZ. Stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR): A study protocol for a pilot trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020; 19:100582. [PMID: 32577580 PMCID: PMC7300121 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A quality metric for centers performing rectal cancer surgery is a high percentage of sphincter sparing procedures. These procedures often involve temporary bowel diversion to minimize the complications of an anastomotic leak. The most common strategy is a diverting loop ileostomy which is then closed after completion of adjuvant therapy or the patient recovers from surgery. Loop ileostomy is not without complications and the closure is complicated by a one in three chance of incisional hernia development. Strategies to prevent this problem have been designed using a variety of techniques with and without mesh placement. This proposed pilot study will test the safety and efficacy of a novel stoma closure technique involving permanent mesh in the retro rectus position during ileostomy closure. The study will prospectively follow 20 patients undergoing ileostomy closure using this technique and evaluate for safety of the procedure, quality of life, and feasibility for a larger randomized controlled trial. Patients will be followed post procedurally and evaluated for 30-day complications, as well as followed up with routine cancer surveillance computed tomography every 6 months in which the presence of stoma site incisional hernias will be evaluated. The results of this pilot study will inform the design of a multiple center, blinded randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of permanent mesh placement to decrease the incidence of prior stoma site incisional hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenaya L Goldwag
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Lauren R Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Srinivas J Ivatury
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Eric M Pauli
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Tsapakos
- Department of Radiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Matthew Z Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Post surgical rectovaginal fistula: who really benefits from stoma diversion? Updates Surg 2020; 73:165-171. [PMID: 32449033 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00810-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
To analyze the role of stoma diversion and timing of stoma maintenance in the healing of post-surgical Recto Vaginal Fistulae (psRVF). A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry. All patients with a psRVF diagnosed at IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar di Valpolicella from January 2002 to December 2016 were analyzed. The baseline treatment was a fecal diversion. Patients were divided into two groups according to healing time: < 6 months (Group 1) or > 6 months (Group 2). 2043 women underwent rectal resections in the study period. We recorded 37 patients with psRVF (1.8%). Nineteen women (51.3%) healed (Group 1) within 6 months. The median time of psRVF recovery in group 1 was 99.7 days. Concomitant local treatment of the fistula did not influence the healing rate (p 0.8). Colostomies were significantly higher in group 1 (p 0.003). The size of the psRVF influenced the success rate of fistula healing with loop stoma (p 0.07). A multivariate analysis the presence of fever and pelvic abscess (pelvis sepsis) were significantly associated with diversion failure (p 0.035). A step-up approach with the maintenance of loop stoma at least for six months for all patients with psRVF could be changed. Patients with larger fistula and pelvic sepsis at index procedure should be addressed earlier to a specific second-level treatment.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the incidence of and risk factors for stoma site hernia after closure of a temporary diverting ileostomy. METHOD In a non-comparative cohort study, charts (n = 216) and CT-scans (n = 169) from patients who had undergone loop ileostomy closure following low anterior resection for rectal cancer 2010-2015 (mainly open surgery) at three hospitals were evaluated retrospectively. Patients without hernia diagnosis were evaluated cross-sectionally through a questionnaire (n = 158), and patients with symptoms of bulging or pain were contacted and offered a clinical examination or a CT scan including Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS In the chart review, five (2.3%) patients had a diagnosis of incisional hernia at the previous stoma site after 8 months (median). In 12 patients, the CT scan showed a hernia, of which 8 had not been detected previously. The questionnaire was returned by 130 (82%) patients, of which 31% had symptoms of bulging or pain. Less than one in five of patients who reported bulging were diagnosed with hernia, but the absolute majority of the radiologically diagnosed hernias reported symptoms. By combining clinical and radiological diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of hernia was 7.4% during a median follow up time of 30 months. Risk factors for stoma site hernia were male sex and higher BMI. CONCLUSION Hernia at the previous stoma site was underdiagnosed. Less than a third of symptomatic patients had a hernia diagnosis in routine follow up. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate if prophylactic mesh can be used to prevent hernias, especially in patients with risk factors.
Collapse
|
22
|
Seyfried S, Lucas V, Galata C, Reißfelder C, Weiß C, Kienle P, Hardt J. Incisional hernia rate after ileostomy closure in lateral pararectal stoma versus transrectal stoma placement: follow-up of the randomized PATRASTOM trial. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:445-451. [PMID: 31652025 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Because damage to the rectus abdominis muscle during ileostomy placement and reversal might be a risk factor for the development of stoma-site incisional hernia (SSIH), we hypothesized that positioning of the stoma lateral to the rectus abdominis muscle might prevent SSIH. METHOD To investigate whether a lateral pararectal stoma position lowers the incidence of SSIH in comparison with a transrectal position, a follow-up study of the PATRASTOM trial, which had randomized stoma placement (lateral pararectal versus transrectal), was conducted. All former participants were invited simultaneously for a follow-up visit in September 2016, 2 years after database closure of the PATRASTOM trial. For patients who were not able to attend the follow-up, the electronic chart as well as MRI/CT scans were reviewed with regard to the presence of SSIH. RESULTS Follow-up - either clinical or radiological - was available for 47 of the 60 PATRASTOM participants. The median duration of follow-up was 3.4 years (interquartile range 3.0-4.1 years). SSIH occurred in 3 of 23 patients (13.0%) in the lateral pararectal group compared with 7 of 24 patients (29.2%) in the transrectal group (P = 0.287). Four of the 10 patients diagnosed with SSIH had already undergone or were scheduled for hernia repair. Of the patient and procedure characteristics which may have an impact on the development of incisional hernia none was a significant risk factor for SSIH. CONCLUSION In the present follow-up study, no difference in the incidence of SSIH was found between lateral pararectal and transrectal stoma construction in an elective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - V Lucas
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Galata
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Weiß
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Kienle
- Department of Surgery, Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J Hardt
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wilson M, Goldwag J, Wilson L, Ivatury S, Tsapakos M. The prevalence of fascial defects at prior stoma sites in patients with colorectal cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_56_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
24
|
Brook AJ, De Haes F, Smart NJ, Mansfield SD, Daniels IR. Incidence of and risk factors for stoma-site incisional herniation after reversal. BJS Open 2019; 3:415. [PMID: 31183458 PMCID: PMC6551400 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A J Brook
- Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW UK
| | - F De Haes
- Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW UK
| | - N J Smart
- Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW UK
| | - S D Mansfield
- Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW UK
| | - I R Daniels
- Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after closure of temporary ileostomy for colorectal malignancy. Hernia 2018; 23:743-748. [PMID: 30426253 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1855-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incisional hernia is a major complication after stoma closure and can cause uncomfortable symptoms. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for hernia formation with the aim of reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. METHODS A total of 134 oncology patients underwent closure of a temporary loop ileostomy between May 2004 and December 2013. The incidence of incisional hernia was determined by routine follow-up computed tomography scanning every 6 months. The relationships between patients' characteristics, including age, sex, obesity, diabetes mellitus, surgical site infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hypoalbuminemia, smoking, and presence of a midline hernia and the occurrence of incisional hernia were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 47 months (range 8-130). Hernias occurred in 23.9% of patients (32/134). The median time to detection of hernias was 8 months (range 2-39). The Chi-squared test revealed significant differences in obesity (P = 0.0003), hypertension (P = 0.0057), and incisional hernia history (P = 0.0000) between patients with and without incisional hernia. Multivariable analysis and univariate analysis revealed that hypertension and the presence of midline incisional hernia were risk factors for incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS Hypertension and the presence of a midline incisional hernia were the major risk factors for incisional hernia after loop ileostomy closure. These risk factors can be addressed before planning surgery.
Collapse
|