1
|
Morikawa T, Hamamoto S, Gonda M, Taguchi K, Unno R, Torii K, Isogai M, Kawase K, Nagai T, Iwatsuki S, Etani T, Naiki T, Okada A, Yasui T. Evaluation of thermal effects of surgical energy devices: ex vivo study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:27365. [PMID: 39521906 PMCID: PMC11550423 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78624-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the direct and indirect thermal effects of various surgical energy devices using an ex-vivo model. Two types of three devices were evaluated: ENSEAL™ X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer (X1) and ENSEAL™ G2 Curved Tissue Sealer (G2) as vessel sealing systems (VSSs), and HARMONIC® HD1000i Shears (HA) as an ultrasonic activating device (USAD). Each device was activated once under DRY or WET conditions. The tissue's maximum temperature (MT), steam MT surrounding the activation site, and steam spread area (SSA) were measured. Under WET conditions, the median MT of a porcine common carotid artery at 1 mm from the activation site by X1, G2, and HA were 84.4, 83.3, and 50.5 °C, respectively. The direct thermal effect of HA was the lowest among the three devices. VSSs showed higher tissue MT under WET conditions compared with DRY conditions. Conversely, USAD showed the opposite trend. G2 demonstrated a significantly higher MT than X1 and HA (P < 0.05). A significant decrease in SSA was observed with decreasing grasping range. In conclusion, VSSs generated higher temperatures than USAD, especially under WET conditions. Surgeons should consider minimizing thermal effects by creating DRY conditions or performing gradual incisions when using VSS devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiharu Morikawa
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Shuzo Hamamoto
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
| | - Masakazu Gonda
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Midori Municipal Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazumi Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Rei Unno
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Koei Torii
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Masahiko Isogai
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kengo Kawase
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Takashi Nagai
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Shoichiro Iwatsuki
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Toshiki Etani
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taku Naiki
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Atsushi Okada
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1, Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Gerardi C, Lettieri E, Nocco U, Botteri E, Bracale U, Caracino V, Carrano FM, Cassinotti E, Giovenzana M, Giuliani B, Iossa A, Milone M, Montori G, Peltrini R, Piatto G, Podda M, Sartori A, Allocati E, Ferrario L, Asperti F, Songia L, Garattini S, Agresta F. High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2548-2565. [PMID: 36333498 PMCID: PMC9638482 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09734-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present paper aims at evaluating the potential benefits of high-energy devices (HEDs) in the Italian surgical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles, as well as the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, with respect to standard monopolar or bipolar devices. METHODS A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in 2021 assuming the hospital perspective, comparing HEDs and standard monopolar/bipolar devices, within eleven surgical settings: appendectomy, hepatic resections, colorectal resections, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, esophago-gastrectomy, breast surgery, adrenalectomy, and pancreatectomy. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deployed considering a multi-methods approach. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used: (1) a systematic literature review for the definition of the comparative efficacy and safety data; (2) administration of qualitative questionnaires, completed by 23 healthcare professionals (according to 7-item Likert scale, ranging from - 3 to + 3); and (3) health-economics tools, useful for the economic evaluation of the clinical pathway and budget impact analysis, and for the definition of the organizational and accessibility advantages, in terms of time or procedures' savings. RESULTS The literature declared a decrease in operating time and length of stay in using HEDs in most surgical settings. While HEDs would lead to a marginal investment for the conduction of 178,619 surgeries on annual basis, their routinely implementation would generate significant organizational savings. A decrease equal to - 5.25/-9.02% of operating room time and to - 5.03/-30.73% of length of stay emerged. An advantage in accessibility to surgery could be hypothesized in a 9% of increase, due to the gaining in operatory slots. Professionals' perceptions crystallized and confirmed literature evidence, declaring a better safety and effectiveness profile. An improvement in both patients and caregivers' quality-of-life emerged. CONCLUSIONS The results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to HEDs introduction, their economic sustainability, and feasibility, as well as the potentialities in process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nereo Vettoretto
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Chirurgia, V.le Ciotti 154, 25018, Montichiari, BS, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Lettieri
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Nocco
- S.C. Ingegneria Clinica, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Associazione Italiana Ingegneri Clinici, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Chirurgia, V.le Ciotti 154, 25018, Montichiari, BS, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- U.O.C. Chirurgie Generale e Oncologica Mini Invasiva, A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Caracino
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, AUSL Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | | | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Giovenzana
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale San Paolo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Giuliani
- Unit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale San Paolo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Iossa
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale di Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Roberto Peltrini
- U.O.C. Chirurgie Generale e Oncologica Mini Invasiva, A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giacomo Piatto
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Ospedale di Montebelluna (TV), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Ospedale di Montebelluna (TV), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Ferrario
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Federica Asperti
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Letizia Songia
- S.C. Ingegneria Clinica, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Associazione Italiana Ingegneri Clinici, Milan, Italy
- SC Ingengeria Clinica, ASST di Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Silvio Garattini
- Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Piemontese A, Cohen L, Wright GWJ, Robledinos-Antón N, Jamous N, Tommaselli GA, Galvain T. Adopting a portfolio of ultrasonic and advanced bipolar electrosurgery devices from a single manufacturer compared to currently used ultrasonic and advanced bipolar devices: a probabilistic budget impact analysis from a Spanish hospital perspective. J Med Econ 2023; 26:179-188. [PMID: 36646702 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2169496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Advanced energy devices are commonly used in electrosurgery, including ultrasonic and advanced bipolar (ABP) devices. Smoke evacuation and reusable dispersive electrodes are also utilized during electrosurgery to improve staff and patient safety. This study assessed the budget impact of adopting a portfolio of Ethicon energy devices compared to devices from other manufacturers from a Spanish hospital perspective. METHODS The main analysis compared the Ethicon advanced energy device portfolio (ultrasonic and ABP devices) to Non-Ethicon advanced energy devices. It was assumed that 4,000 procedures using one advanced energy device each were performed annually, and the cost impact of operating room time, length of stay, and transfusions were considered. A probabilistic budget impact analysis with 10,000 iterations was conducted for generalizability to other hospitals in Spain and Europe. Secondary analysis assessed whether cost savings from the Ethicon advanced energy device portfolio could offset costs of adopting smoke evacuation and reusable dispersive electrodes (Full Ethicon energy portfolio). RESULTS In the main analysis, the annual budget impact of introducing the Ethicon advanced energy device portfolio was cost saving in 79.8% of probabilistic iterations (mean: -€945,214; 95% credible interval [CrI]: -€3,242,710; €1,285,942) with a mean budget impact per procedure of -€236 (95% CrI: -€811; €321). In the secondary analysis, adding smoke evacuation and reusable dispersive electrodes was still cost saving in 75.3% of iterations compared to Non-Ethicon advanced energy devices (mean: -€778,208; 95% CrI: -€3,075,086; €1,464,728) with a mean budget impact per procedure of -€97 (95% CrI: -€384; €183). Savings resulted from differences in operating room time, length of hospital stay, and volume of disposable electrodes. CONCLUSIONS Adopting Ethicon advanced energy devices demonstrated economic benefits compared to non-Ethicon devices. Introducing the advanced portfolio may improve surgical care quality and the full portfolio was cost saving while improving OR safety for staff and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Piemontese
- EMEA Health Economics & Market Access, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, Diegem, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Nadine Jamous
- EMEA Health Economics & Market Access, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, Diegem, Belgium
| | | | - Thibaut Galvain
- Global Health Economics, Johnson and Johnson Medtech, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charalambides M, Afxentiou T, Pellino G, Powar MP, Fearnhead NS, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, Simillis C. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing energy devices used in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:413-423. [PMID: 35132505 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02586-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare energy devices used for intraoperative hemostasis during colorectal surgery. METHODS A systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Cochrane were searched from inception to August 11th 2021. Intraoperative outcomes were operative blood loss, operative time, conversion to open, conversion to another energy source. Postoperative outcomes were mortality, overall complications, minor complications and major complications, wound complications, postoperative ileus, anastomotic leak, time to first defecation, day 1 and 3 drainage volume, duration of hospital stay. RESULTS Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, reporting on 680 participants, comparing conventional hemostasis, LigaSure™, Thunderbeat® and Harmonic®. Harmonic® had fewer overall complications compared to conventional hemostasis. Operative blood loss was less with LigaSure™ (mean difference [MD] = 24.1 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 46.54 to - 1.58 ml) or Harmonic® (MD = 24.6 ml; 95% CI - 42.4 to - 6.7 ml) compared to conventional techniques. Conventional hemostasis ranked worst for operative blood loss with high probability (p = 0.98). LigaSure™, Harmonic® or Thunderbeat® resulted in a significantly shorter mean operative time by 42.8 min (95% CI - 53.9 to - 31.5 min), 28.3 min (95% CI - 33.6 to - 22.6 min) and 26.1 min (95% CI - 46 to - 6 min), respectively compared to conventional electrosurgery. LigaSure™ resulted in a significantly shorter mean operative time than Harmonic® by 14.5 min (95% CI 1.9-27 min) and ranked first for operative time with high probability (p = 0.97). LigaSure™ and Harmonic® resulted in a significantly shorter mean duration of hospital stay compared to conventional electrosurgery of 1.3 days (95% CI - 2.2 to - 0.4) and 0.5 days (95% CI - 1 to - 0.1), respectively. LigaSure™ ranked as best for hospital stay with high probability (p = 0.97). Conventional hemostasis was associated with more wound complications than Harmonic® (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27; CI 0.08-0.92). Harmonic® ranked best with highest probability (p = 0.99) for wound complications. No significant differences between energy devices were identified for the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSIONS LigaSure™, Thunderbeat® and Harmonic® may be advantageous for reducing operative blood loss, operative time, overall complications, wound complications, and duration of hospital stay compared to conventional techniques. The energy devices result in comparable perioperative outcomes and no device is superior overall. However, included RCTs were limited in number and size, and data were not available to compare all energy devices for all outcomes of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Charalambides
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - T Afxentiou
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - G Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - M P Powar
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - R J Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - J Wheeler
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - C Simillis
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu CH, Chen CH, Ho TW, Shih MC, Wu JM, Kuo TC, Yang CY, Tien YW. Pancreatic neck transection using a harmonic scalpel increases risk of biochemical leak but not postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:301-308. [PMID: 32998842 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of a harmonic scalpel on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has not been addressed. This study assessed the effect of pancreatic neck transection using a harmonic scalpel on rate and severity of POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent PD at National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2015 and March 2019. We compared rate and severity of POPF between patients who underwent pancreatic neck transection using a harmonic scalpel versus electrosurgical unit. RESULTS Of 422 consecutive PDs, the pancreatic neck was transected using a harmonic scalpel or electrosurgical unit in 144 and 278 patients, respectively. Use of a harmonic scalpel significantly increased risk of biochemical leak (25.7% versus [vs] 10.8%; P < 0.05) but not clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF; 30.2% vs 26.4%; P = 0.41). Harmonic transection was an independent predictor of biochemical leak (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93; P < 0.05) but not CR-POPF (OR = 0.83; P = 0.41) or other major complications (OR = 0.72; P = 0.27). There was no significant intergroup difference in postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSION Pancreatic neck transection using a harmonic scalpel increased risk of biochemical leak but not CR-POPF or other major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Hui Wu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hsuan Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei City Hospital Heping Fuyou Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Te-Wei Ho
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chieh Shih
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Ming Wu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Chun Kuo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yao Yang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wen Tien
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferko N, Wright GWJ, Syed I, Naoumtchik E, Tommaselli GA, Gangoli G. A device category economic model of electrosurgery technologies across procedure types: a U.S. hospital budget impact analysis. J Med Econ 2021; 24:524-535. [PMID: 33851557 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1915626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The electrosurgical technology category is used widely, with a diverse spectrum of devices designed for different surgical needs. Historically, hospitals are supplied with electrosurgical devices from several manufacturers, and those devices are often evaluated separately; it may be more efficient to evaluate the category holistically. This study assessed the health economic impact of adopting an electrosurgical device-category from a single manufacturer. METHODS A budget impact model was developed from a U.S. hospital perspective. The uptake of electrosurgical devices from EES (Ethicon Electrosurgery), including ultrasonic, advanced bipolar, smoke evacuators, and reusable dispersive electrodes were compared with similar MED (Medical Energy Devices) from multiple manufacturers. It was assumed that an average hospital performed 10,000 annual procedures 80% of which involved electrosurgery. Current utilization assumed 100% MED use, including advanced energy, conventional smoke mitigation options (e.g. ventilation, masks), and single-use disposable dispersive electrode devices. Future utilization assumed 100% EES use, including advanced energy devices, smoke evacuators (i.e. 80% uptake), and reusable dispersive electrodes. Surgical specialties included colorectal, bariatric, gynecology, thoracic and general surgery. Systematic reviews, network meta-analyses, and meta-regressions informed operating room (OR) time, hospital stay, and transfusion model inputs. Costs were assigned to model parameters, and price parity was assumed for advanced energy devices. The costs of disposables for dispersive electrodes and smoke-evacuators were included. RESULTS The base-case analysis, which assessed the adoption of EES instead of MED for an average U.S. hospital predicted an annual savings of $824,760 ($101 per procedure). Savings were attributable to associated reductions with EES in OR time, days of hospital stay, and volume of disposable electrodes. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these base-case findings. CONCLUSIONS Category-wide adoption of electrosurgical devices from a single manufacturer demonstrated economic advantages compared with disaggregated product uptake. Future research should focus on informing comparisons of innovative electrosurgical devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Elena Naoumtchik
- Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Gaurav Gangoli
- Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
LigaSure for the Creation of Bloodless Breast Pockets in Patients Undergoing Transaxillary Breast Augmentation. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e3295. [PMID: 33425607 PMCID: PMC7787310 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: The energy-based LigaSure device is widely utilized to facilitate dissection and hemostasis during various open and endoscopic procedures. Previous studies have demonstrated that this device can reduce intraoperative blood loss in various surgical settings. The present study aimed to report our experience with LigaSure and the advantages of using this device during transaxillary submuscular pocket dissection over those of a monopolar electrocautery dissector in patients undergoing breast augmentation. Methods: A total of 156 patients who underwent transaxillary breast augmentation between November 2019 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Submuscular pocket dissection using LigaSure was performed in 92 patients and a conventional technique using a monopolar electrocautery dissector was performed in the remaining 64 patients. A bloodless breast pocket was defined as a clear operating field with little or no blood staining at any stage of the procedure. All endoscopic procedures were recorded to determine whether bloodless pockets had been established. The amount of postoperative drainage at 1 day after surgery was also assessed to compare between the LigaSure and conventional groups. Results: Bloodless breast pockets were successfully established in 83 patients (90.2%) in the LigaSure group and in 38 patients (59.4%) in the conventional group (P < 0.001). Postoperative drainage amount at 1 day following surgery was significantly lower in the LigaSure group than in the conventional group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the LigaSure system is a safe and effective alternative in breast augmentation requiring transaxillary submuscular dissection.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim SM, Bae JM, Choi MG, Lee JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial. Chin J Cancer Res 2018; 30:492-499. [PMID: 30510360 PMCID: PMC6232358 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. Methods Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. Results Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). Conclusions It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Mi Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Moon Bae
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Gew Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Sung Sohn
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cheng H, Clymer JW, Qadeer RA, Ferko N, Sadeghirad B, Cameron CG, Amaral JF. Procedure costs associated with the use of Harmonic devices compared to conventional techniques in various surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 10:399-412. [PMID: 30087572 PMCID: PMC6063248 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s164747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As compared to conventional techniques, recent meta-analyses have reported cost savings with Harmonic devices; however, only in thyroidectomy. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the costs associated with Harmonic devices versus conventional techniques across a range of surgical procedures. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 01, 2016 without language restrictions to identify randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic devices to conventional techniques and reporting procedure costs (operating time plus operating equipment/consumables/device costs). Costs were pooled using the ratio of geometric means, and a random effects model was applied. Sensitivity analyses varying statistical methods, number of included studies, and cost outcomes were completed to test the robustness of the results. Results Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 561 and 540 participants had procedures performed with Harmonic devices and conventional methods, respectively, with procedures including gastrectomy, thyroidectomy, colectomy, cholecystectomy, Nissen fundoplication, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. As compared to conventional methods, Harmonic devices reduced total procedure costs by 8.7% (p=0.029), resulting in an absolute reduction of US$227.77 from mean conventional technique costs, derived primarily from a reduction in operating time costs. When operating time costs, excluding operating equipment/consumables/device costs, were analyzed, costs were reduced by $544 per procedure with the use of Harmonic devices. The results from all sensitivity analyses demonstrated cost reductions with Harmonic devices. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that despite a higher device cost, Harmonic devices provide a statistically significant reduction in procedure costs, derived primarily from a reduction in operating time costs, across surgical procedures. In addition to functionality benefits, Harmonic devices may represent a potentially cost saving method to reduce overall hospital resource use. Future research should focus on potential costs and benefits from use of Harmonic devices in procedures not covered here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicole Ferko
- Cornerstone Research Group, Burlington, ON, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Suhardja TS, Norhadi S, Ee E, Hodgkins B. Comparison of the Thunderbeat and Other Energy Devices in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Single-Center Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:1417-1421. [PMID: 29870293 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The THUNDERBEAT (TB) is a relatively novel energy device that is used in laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR), which integrates both ultrasonic and bipolar energy. There are limited data on its use in LCR, compared with bipolar diathermy (LigaSure™ [LS]) or ultrasonically generated heat (Harmonic ACE [HA]). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing LCR with TB versus LS or HA, for both benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Methods: This study is a prospective trial using retrospective controls in patients undergoing LCR. The study period was over 6 months from June 2015, during which all elective laparoscopic colonic resections were performed using TB only. The retrospective control population included all consecutive patients who underwent LCR during the preceding 6 months, using either LS or HA. The primary outcome measure was the total operative time. Secondary outcome measures evaluated were rates of postoperative surgical complications, mortality, and length of stay. Results: A total of 114 patients were included in the study. Median operative time was not significantly different between LS/HA and TB arms (246 versus 240 minutes, P = .779). Both arms showed no device failure. There was equivalent rate of intraoperative complications (P = .755) and conversion to open surgery (P = .075). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative morbidity (P = .938) and mortality (P = .392) observed between the two arms. There was also no difference in the length of stay between LS/HA and TB arms (6 versus 7 days, P = .085). Conclusions: Our dataset has the largest number of cases comparing TB and other energy devices in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. They all appear to be equally safe and effective. Operating the TB device does not require a steep learning curve and utilizes similar techniques transferable from the use of other conventional energy devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Surya Suhardja
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Dandenong, Australia
| | - Shana Norhadi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Dandenong, Australia
| | - Eric Ee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Dandenong, Australia
| | - Brian Hodgkins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Dandenong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The prognostic role of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized, adjusted studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:404-419. [PMID: 29398320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of allogeneic perioperative blood transfusions (APTs) on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing curative-intent gastrectomy is still a highly debated topic. Two meta-analyses were published in 2015, and new studies report conflicting results. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, updated to March 1, 2016. Thirty-eight non-randomized studies reporting data on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and postoperative complications (PCs) were included. An inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. APTs showed an association with worse OS, DFS, DSS and an increased number of PCs. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.49, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.32-1.69 (p < .00001; Q-test p = .001, I-squared = 56%). After outlier exclusion, the HR for OS was 1.34 (95% CI = 1.23-1.45, p < .00001; Q-test p = .64, I-squared = 0%). The HR for DFS was 1.48 (95% CI = 1.18-1.86, p = .0007; Q-test p = .31, I-squared = 16%), and the HR for DSS was 1.66 (95% CI = 1.5-2.19, p = .0004; Q-test p = .96, I-squared = 0%). The odds ratio for PCs was 3.33 (95% CI = 2.10-5.29, p < .00001; Q-test p = .14, I-squared = 42%). This meta-analysis showed a significant association between transfusions and OS, DFS, DSS and PCs. The quality of the evidence was low. Aggregation, selection and selective reporting bias were detected. The biases shifted the results towards significance. Further studies using accurate adjustment methods are needed. Until such additional studies are performed, caution in administering transfusions and optimization of cancer patient blood management are warranted.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheng H, Clymer JW, Sadeghirad B, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Amaral JF. Performance of Harmonic devices in surgical oncology: an umbrella review of the evidence. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16:2. [PMID: 29301552 PMCID: PMC5755263 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1298-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed an umbrella review of systematic reviews summarizing the evidence on the Harmonic scalpel (HS) compared with conventional techniques in surgical oncology (including lymph node dissection). METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to end of March of 2017 for meta-analyses or systematic reviews of randomized trials comparing HS to conventional techniques in surgical oncology. We assessed the quality of included systematic reviews with AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) and assessed the certainty in evidence for each pooled outcome using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). RESULTS We identified ten systematic reviews on breast cancer (n = 3), gastric cancers (n = 3), oral, head, and neck cancers (n = 1), and colon cancers (n = 3). Most reviews received a higher rating using AMSTAR. For operative time, systematic reviews reported a reduction of 25 to 29 min for HS compared with conventional methods across oncology types, with the exception of breast cancer where little differences were observed (very low to moderate quality of evidence (GRADE)). For blood loss and drainage volume, the majority of reviews reported statistically significant reductions with HS, and reductions ranged from 42 to 141 mL, and from 42 to 292 mL, respectively (very low to moderate quality of evidence). Hospitalization days were reported to decrease with use of HS by 0.2 to 3.2 days; however, reductions were only statistically significant for half of the included reviews (low to moderate quality of evidence). Regarding perioperative complications, two of six reviews reported a significantly reduced risk with HS use (breast cancer surgery) (moderate to high quality evidence)). CONCLUSION Across surgical oncology types, the majority of included systematic reviews showed a statistically significant or numerical improvement in surgical outcomes with use of the HS compared with conventional methods. Well-designed randomized studies with large sample sizes will help to provide more precise estimates and reduce the risk of heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Cheng
- Ethicon Inc, 4545 Creek Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45242 USA
| | | | - Behnam Sadeghirad
- Cornerstone Research Group, 3228 South Service Road, Suite 204, Burlington, Ontario L7N 3H8 Canada
| | - Nicole C. Ferko
- Cornerstone Research Group, 3228 South Service Road, Suite 204, Burlington, Ontario L7N 3H8 Canada
| | - Chris G. Cameron
- Cornerstone Research Group, 3228 South Service Road, Suite 204, Burlington, Ontario L7N 3H8 Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Easley JT, McGilvray KC, Hendrickson DA, Bruemmer J, Hackett ES. Vessel sealer and divider instrument temperature during laparoscopic ovariectomy in horses. Vet Surg 2017; 47:O26-O31. [PMID: 29205394 DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the temperature of a vessel sealer and divider device during unilateral paralumbar laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing, sedated mares. STUDY DESIGN Prospective study. ANIMALS Fifteen healthy research mares. METHODS Healthy mares with normal ovarian palpation and ultrasonographic appearance were enrolled. Horses were restrained in standing stocks and sedated. A right or left paralumbar ovariectomy was performed with a laparoscopic portal and 2 instrument portals. Ovaries were excised with traumatic forceps and a blunt tip vessel sealer and divider. Temperatures of the vessel sealer and divider were recorded with a thermocouple device adhered to the tip of the instrument. Variables were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS Surgical time was 30 minutes (IQR, 25-32) including use of the vessel sealer and the divider for 4.1 minutes (IQR, 3.2-5.8). The tip of the instrument reached temperatures of 77°C (IQR, 72-85) during activation and 64°C (IQR, 61-67) at end cycle. The median increase in end-cycle instrument tip temperature per activation cycle was 2°C (IQR, -1-6). All mares returned to their intended use. CONCLUSION Despite the instrument temperatures observed during unilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy, surgical complications were minimal. The clinical relevance of the increase in instrument tip temperature of the vessel sealer and divider is presently unclear, but surgeons should use the instrument with caution, especially in close proximity to viscera. The increase in temperature observed at the tip of the vessel sealer and divider during unilateral ovariectomy could be associated with morbidity. The clinical relevance of instrument tip heating during other procedures, such as adhesiolysis and intestinal resection, is unknown and should be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah T Easley
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Kirk C McGilvray
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Dean A Hendrickson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Jason Bruemmer
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Eileen S Hackett
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27:e12-e17. [PMID: 28234706 PMCID: PMC5377999 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Ferromagnetic heating is a new electrosurgery energy modality that has proven effective in hemostatic tissue dissection as well as sealing and dividing blood vessels and vascularized tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a ferromagnetic-based laparoscopic vessel sealing device with respect to sealing and dividing vessels and vascularized tissue and to compare performance against current vessel sealing technologies. Materials and Methods: A laparoscopic vessel sealing device, Laparoscopic FMsealer (LFM), was studied for efficacy in sealing and dividing blood vessels and comparative studies against predicate ultrasonic, Harmonic Ace+(US), and/or bipolar, LigaSure 5 mm Blunt Tip and/or Maryland (BP), devices in vivo using a swine model and in vitro for comparison of seal burst pressure and reliability. Mann-Whitney and Student t test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: In division of 10 cm swine small bowel mesentery in vivo, the laparoscopic FMsealer [12.4±1.8 sec (mean±SD)], was faster compared with US (26.8±2.5 s) and BP (30.0±2.7 s), P<0.05 LFM versus US and BP. Blinded histologic evaluation of 5 mm vessel seals in vivo showed seal lateral thermal spread to be superior in LFM (1678±433 μm) and BP (1796±337 μm) versus US (2032±387 μm), P<0.001. In vitro, seal burst strength and success of sealing 2 to 4 mm arteries were as follows (mean±SD mm Hg, % success burst strength >240 mm Hg): LFM (1079±494 mm Hg, 98.1% success) versus BP (1012±463, 99.0%), P=NS. For 5 to 7 mm arteries: LFM (1098±502 mm Hg, 95.3% success) versus BP (715±440, 91.8%), P<0.001 in burst strength and P=NS in % success. Five 60 kg female swine underwent 21-day survival studies following ligation of vessels ranging from 1 to 7 mm in diameter (n=186 total vessels). Primary seal was successful in 97%, 99% including salvage seals. There was no evidence of postoperative bleeding at sealed vessels at 21-day necropsy. Conclusion: The Laparoscopic FMsealer is an effective tool for sealing and dividing blood vessels and vascularized tissue and compares favorably to current technologies in clinically relevant end points.
Collapse
|
15
|
Viability of Airborne Tumor Cells during Excision by Ultrasonic Device. Surg Res Pract 2017; 2017:4907576. [PMID: 28492061 PMCID: PMC5401725 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4907576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2016] [Revised: 02/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Laparoscopic surgery has become more widely used, but peritoneal dissemination and port-site metastasis have been reported to occur in these surgeries. One reason for these problems is the ultrasonically activated scalpel (UAS) used for laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the viability of airborne cells released during cancer dissection using a UAS. Methods. Flank tumors measuring about 2 cm were induced in male NOD-Cg-Rag1tm1MomIL2rgtm1wjl/SzJ mice by subcutaneous injection of 1 × 106 HepG2 cells. Dissection was performed with UAS (in high or low power modes) and PowerStar bipolar scissors. The mist of released tissue was collected in cell culture medium. The viability of the cellular material was assessed with trypan blue exclusion cell counting, counting after immunofluorescence staining, and flow cytometric analysis. Results. Large quantities of cellular debris were trapped in the tissue dispersed by both devices. In all experiments, there were significantly more viable cells produced by the UAS in high power mode. By using suction at the excision site, the number of viable cancer cells was reduced. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that viable cancer cells can be released into the nearby environment during tumor ablation with a UAS.
Collapse
|
16
|
Pogorelić Z, Katić J, Mrklić I, Jerončić A, Šušnjar T, Jukić M, Vilović K, Perko Z. Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal). J Surg Res 2017; 212:101-107. [PMID: 28550895 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base using three different instruments for sealing and cutting of mesoappendix. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total number of 99 patients (54 males and 45 females) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of suspected appendicitis between December 2013 and May 2015 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided in three groups based on instrument used for sealing of mesoappendix: group 1 (Ultracision; n = 36), group 2 (LigaSure; n = 32), and group 3 (MiSeal; n = 31). Lateral thermal damage, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of surgery, hospital stay, and economic value were compared within groups. RESULTS The median age of patients was 14 y (range 3-17). A histopathologic analysis revealed a positive diagnosis of appendicitis in 84 patients (85%). The median lateral thermal damage on appendiceal base using Ultracision, LigaSure, and MiSeal was 0.10 mm, 0.16 mm, and 0.10 mm respectively, and on mesoappendix, 0.08 mm, 0.13 mm, and 0.08 mm, respectively. Significantly higher thermal damage was found on mesoappendix (P = 0.015) and appendiceal base (P = 0.012) in patients treated with LigaSure than in patients from other groups. There were no statistical differences among the groups regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications (P = 0.098). No significant difference in thermal damage between appendicitis and nonappendicitis group was found (P = 0.266). CONCLUSIONS Using of Ultracision, LigaSure, and MiSeal for sealing of mesoappendix in laparoscopic appendectomy in children is safe and useful. LigaSure produces significantly greater lateral thermal damage compared with other instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenon Pogorelić
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
| | - Josip Katić
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Ivana Mrklić
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Ana Jerončić
- Department for Research in Biomedicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Šušnjar
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Miro Jukić
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Katarina Vilović
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Cytology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Zdravko Perko
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:1760-8. [PMID: 27456017 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3217-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
AIM Energy devices represent an alternative to clips and staplers for vessel sealing. Outcome data of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with use of a novel combined ultrasonic and bipolar energy device (TB, Thunderbeat™) was gathered. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery using TB were prospectively included between November 2011 and January 2016. Large vessels were dissected using the energy device without additional clips or staplers. The type of procedure, operative time, length of stay, complications, blood transfusions, number and type of vessels being dissected, and need for additional clips were noted. RESULTS Six hundred eighty-three patients underwent 758 procedures with dissection of 1310 large vessels. No additional hemoclips or vascular staplers were used. There were 0.7 % (5/758) intraoperative and 2.6 % (20/758) postoperative bleeding complications. Eleven bleeding occurred at the stapler line of anastomosis, leaving 1.8 % (14/758) bleeding that were potentially related to inadequate hemostasis. Failure of large vessel dissection occurred in two cases (0.15 %, 2/1310) and device-related complications in 1.1 % (8/758). Two of 42 conversions (5.5 %) were bleeding-related. CONCLUSION TB provides a reliable and effective hemostasis. However, ligation failure may occur. As with any kind of electrosurgery, the hot tip of the instruments bears the risk of potentially fatal thermal injuries.
Collapse
|
18
|
Corral M, Ferko N, Hogan A, Hollmann SS, Gangoli G, Jamous N, Batiller J, Kocharian R. A hospital cost analysis of a fibrin sealant patch in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 8:507-519. [PMID: 27703386 PMCID: PMC5036832 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s112762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite hemostat use, uncontrolled surgical bleeding is prevalent. Drawbacks of current hemostats include limitations with efficacy on first attempt and suboptimal ease-of-use. Evarrest® is a novel fibrin sealant patch that has demonstrated high hemostatic efficacy compared with standard of care across bleeding severities. The objective of this study was to conduct a hospital cost analysis of the fibrin sealant patch versus standard of care in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding. Methods The analysis quantified the 30-day costs of each comparator from a hospital perspective. Published US unit costs were applied to resource use (ie, initial treatment, retreatment, operating time, hospitalization, transfusion, and ventilator) reported in four trials. A “surgical” analysis included resources clinically related to the hemostatic benefit of the fibrin sealant patch, whereas a “hospital” analysis included all resources reported in the trials. An exploratory subgroup analysis focused solely on coagulopathic patients defined by abnormal blood test results. Results The surgical analysis predicted cost savings of $54 per patient with the fibrin sealant patch compared with standard of care (net cost impact: −$54 per patient; sensitivity range: −$1,320 to $1,213). The hospital analysis predicted further cost savings with the fibrin sealant patch (net cost impact of −$2,846 per patient; sensitivity range: −$1,483 to −$5,575). Subgroup analyses suggest that the fibrin sealant patch may provide dramatic cost savings in the coagulopathic subgroup of $3,233 (surgical) and $9,287 (hospital) per patient. Results were most sensitive to operating time and product units. Conclusion In soft tissue and hepatic problematic surgical bleeding, the fibrin sealant patch may result in important hospital cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole Ferko
- Cornerstone Research Group, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Hogan
- Cornerstone Research Group, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oh SY, Choi B, Lee KG, Choe HN, Lee HJ, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Yang HK. Ultrasonically Activated Shears Reduce Blood Loss without Increasing Inflammatory Reactions in Open Distal Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:494-501. [PMID: 27613551 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies regarding ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) were performed without controlled surgical procedures or consideration of potential thermal injury due to high temperature of active blade of UAS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UAS through a comparison with conventional monopolar electrocautery (CME) in open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS From October 2011 to November 2012, 56 gastric cancer patients eligible for open distal gastrectomy were randomized into UAS or CME groups. Primary endpoints were estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery and amount of drainage through the fifth postoperative day. Secondary endpoints were operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, changes in cytokine levels in serum, peritoneal irrigation saline, and peritoneal drainage, and inflammatory markers of serum. (Registration-number of ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01971775). RESULTS EBL was lower in the UAS group than that in the CME group (339.8 ± 201.2 vs. 428.6 ± 165.8 mL, p = 0.021). However, the amount of postoperative drainage was not significantly different between the two groups. Although the complication rate was not different between the two groups, there were three cases of intra-abdominal bleeding requiring transfusion only in the CME group. Inflammatory markers from the cytokine assays and serum laboratory tests showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS UAS reduced EBL without increasing inflammatory reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Young Oh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boram Choi
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Goo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwi-Nyeong Choe
- Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Joo Lee
- Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun-Suhk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk-Joon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Ho Kim
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. .,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Giraudo G, Arolfo S, Mistrangelo M, Morino M. The Thunderbeat and Other Energy Devices in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections: Analysis of Outcomes and Costs. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 27:1225-1229. [PMID: 27420752 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The THUNDERBEAT™ (TB) is a recently developed energy-based device. To date, there are no clinical studies comparing TB and other energy sources, such as standard electrosurgery (ES), ultrasonic coagulating shears (US) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and costs in patients undergoing LCR with TB, US, EBVS, or ES for both benign and malignant colorectal diseases. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients undergoing LCR. Unselected consecutive patients who had the laparoscopic dissection conducted by using TB were compared with consecutive patients undergoing LCR with US, EBVS, or ES. RESULTS Mean operative time did not significantly differ between the groups (P = .947). Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the ES group (P < .001). Device-related complications occurred in 2.5% of ES patients, in 2.5% of US patients, and in 5% of EBVS patients, while no complications occurred in TB patients (P = .768). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complication rates between the groups. Mean postoperative hospital stay was similar in the groups. Cost analysis showed no significant differences between US (1519.1 ± 303 €), EBVS (1474.4 ± 372.8 €), and TB (1474.3 ± 176.3 €) (P = .737). CONCLUSION This is the first clinical study comparing TB and other energy-based devices in LCR. They all appear to be equally safe and effective. Costs of surgery are very similar. Further large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino , Torino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giraudo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino , Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Arolfo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino , Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino , Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Allaix ME, Furnée EJ, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Morino M. Energy Sources for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Is One Better than the Others? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:264-9. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edgar J.B. Furnée
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trilling B, Riboud R, Abba J, Girard E, Faucheron JL. Energy vessel sealing systems versus mechanical ligature of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:903-8. [PMID: 26841803 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2508-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the development of new devices, our ligation technique of the inferior mesenteric artery changed from mechanical ligature (ML) to energized vessel sealing systems (EVSS) ligature. The aim of this study was to determine if EVSS could be considered as safe and effective as the more convention ML of the inferior mesenteric vessels division during elective laparoscopic left colectomy. METHODS Between 2001 and 2014, 200 consecutive patients (111 males) of mean age 54.1 years were operated laparoscopically for a symptomatic sigmoid diverticulitis. Vascular interruptions were performed using mechanical ligatures including double clipping, staples or surgical thread (100 patients) or, starting from 2006, with EVSS thereafter (100 patients). Section of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed systematically at its origin in our institution for teaching purposes. Technical results were prospectively collected perioperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS There was no mortality. Mean operating time was 253.7 and 200.7 min in the ML and EVSS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean hospital stay was 10.4 and 8.1 days (p < 0.001). Thirty-day complications occurred in 31 versus 25 % of patients (p = 0.26). Leakage with peritonitis occurred in 3 patients in the ML group. Hemorrhagic events occurred in both groups (2 in ML group versus 1 in EVSS group). Limitations of the study are its retrospective design and the bias due to the comparison of two historical cohorts. CONCLUSIONS EVSS for the inferior mesenteric artery are as safe and effective as ML in elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease with lower operative time and hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Trilling
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michalon University Hospital, CS 10 217, 38 043, Grenoble cedex, France.,Grenoble Alpes University, UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Romain Riboud
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michalon University Hospital, CS 10 217, 38 043, Grenoble cedex, France.,Visceral Surgery Department, Voiron Regional Hospital, Voiron, France
| | - Julio Abba
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michalon University Hospital, CS 10 217, 38 043, Grenoble cedex, France
| | - Edouard Girard
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michalon University Hospital, CS 10 217, 38 043, Grenoble cedex, France.,Grenoble Alpes University, UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Michalon University Hospital, CS 10 217, 38 043, Grenoble cedex, France. .,Grenoble Alpes University, UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sran H, Sebastian J, Hossain MA. Electrosurgical devices: are we closer to finding the ideal appliance? A critical review of current evidence for the use of electrosurgical devices in general surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13:203-215. [PMID: 26690270 DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2016.1134312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Over the last decade, the use of electrosurgical devices has become commonplace across all surgical specialities. The current market is large enough to warrant a comparative review of each device. This has even more impetus given the budgetary constraints of NHS organisations. This review aims to compare the benefits and drawbacks of the most popular electrosurgical devices, whilst conducting a critical review of the literature. Structured searches using databases Medline and EMBASE were conducted. The search was restricted to English language papers only. Due to the abundance of literature, this review will focus on common general surgical procedures alone. Despite a plethora of available devices, individual preference still dictates use. Conventional diathermy may always have its place, but may see a decline in use if costs improve. Newer devices have shown comparable precision and added advantages.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques. Int J Surg Oncol 2015; 2015:397260. [PMID: 26075090 PMCID: PMC4446499 DOI: 10.1155/2015/397260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2015] [Revised: 03/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The ultrasonic Harmonic scalpel has demonstrated clinical and surgical benefits in dissection and coagulation. To evaluate its use in gastrectomy, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the Harmonic scalpel to conventional techniques in gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. International databases were searched without language restrictions for comparisons in open or laparoscopic gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy. The meta-analysis used a random-effects model for all outcomes; continuous variables were analyzed for mean differences and dichotomous variables were analyzed for risk ratios. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for study quality, type of conventional technique, and imputation of study results. Ten studies (N = 935) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with conventional hemostatic techniques, the Harmonic scalpel demonstrated significant reductions in operating time (−27.5 min; P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (−93.2 mL; P < 0.001), and drainage volume (−138.8 mL; P < 0.001). Results were numerically higher for conventional techniques for hospital length of stay, complication risk, and transfusions but did not reach statistical significance. Results remained robust to sensitivity analyses. This meta-analysis demonstrates the clear advantages of using the Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional techniques, with improvements demonstrated across several outcome measures for patients undergoing gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen J, Manwaring PK, Scott RR, Manwaring KH, Glasgow RE. Ferromagnetic Heating for Vessel Sealing and Division. Surg Innov 2015; 22:329-37. [DOI: 10.1177/1553350615580648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Vessel sealing technologies have improved surgical efficiency and outcomes. Ferromagnetic technology has potential utility in this area. The aim of this study was to evaluate ferromagnetic heating in sealing and dividing vessels. Methods. A novel ferromagnetic (FM) sealer, FMsealer, was developed for sealing and dividing vessels. Using a swine in vivo model, the following endpoints were evaluated: (1) proof of concept, (2) 21-day survival surgery, and (3) comparison with ultrasonic (US) and/or bipolar (BP) devices for subjective outcomes. Seal burst strengths were measured in vitro. Mann-Whitney and Student’s t test were used. Results. After showing proof of concept, 5 swine underwent survival splenectomy, nephrectomy, hysterectomy, and mesenteric vessel division (arteries ranging from 1 to 7 mm in diameter) with necropsy after day 21 showing no evidence of surgical site bleeding. FM was equivalent to BP in tissue retention and superior to BP in spread/tissue desiccation, sticking, and charring ( P ≤ .01). The FM was superior to US and BP in speed of 10 cm mesentery division (mean ± SD seconds): FM (12.9 ± 1.0 seconds), US (23.3 ± 4.4 seconds), BP (46.1 ± 5.2 seconds) ( P ≤ .01 FM vs US or BP). Seal burst strength and success of sealing a 5-mm carotid artery were as follows (mean ± SD mmHg, % success burst strength >240 mm Hg): FM (710 ± 206 mm Hg, 94% success), US (848 ± 565 mm Hg, 79%), and BP (619 ± 373 mm Hg, 83%). Conclusion. Ferromagnetic heating is an effective and efficient technology for sealing and dividing of vessels. An initial prototype of the FMsealer compared favorably with commercially available products based on ultrasonic and bipolar technologies.
Collapse
|
27
|
Choi MG, Oh SJ, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S, Bae JM. Ultrasonically activated shears versus electrocautery in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Gastric Cancer 2015; 17:556-61. [PMID: 24048759 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-013-0301-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 08/30/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) is gaining popularity in open surgery but without concrete evidence. We conducted a prospectively randomized study to assess the efficacy of ultrasonic dissection in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS Patients with gastric cancer who were to undergo gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n = 125) or the UAS group (n = 128). RESULTS The mean operating time was significantly reduced in the UAS group (89.3 ± 15.6 min) when compared to the conventional group (97.8 ± 17.2 min; p < 0.001). However, we did not find any significant difference in operative blood loss, the amount of postoperative abdominal drainage, or the rate of postoperative complications between the groups. A multivariate analysis for operating time revealed that the use of UAS, female gender and BMI less than 25 were significantly associated with reduced operating time. The operating time was significantly longer in the conventional group than in the UAS group (B 7.786; 95 % CI 4.103-11.468; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the use of UAS significantly reduced the operating time, especially in male patients, regardless of the BMI status. CONCLUSIONS The use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer was a safe and efficient method, especially in terms of reducing operating time for male patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min-Gew Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Abstract
Since its invention nearly 20 years ago, the Covidien LigaSure device along with its ForceTriad generator has dominated the Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealing market. The LigaSure was used for surgical procedures, both open and laparoscopic. The purpose of this review is to provide evidence of the safety and utility of the LigaSure device compared to more traditional means of hemostasis and its ultrasonic competitor, particularly in laparoscopic applications. We will provide evidence related to electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing in general and look specifically at Covidien's newest product, the LigaSure Maryland Jaw Device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisar Zaidi
- Endocrine Surgical Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Houben P, Büchler MW, Schemmer P. Use of an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device during recipient hepatectomy for liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219:e59-e63. [PMID: 25260682 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2014] [Revised: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Houben
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Naguib N. Simple technique for laparoscopic appendicectomy to ensure safe division of the mesoappendix. Scand J Surg 2014; 103:73-4. [PMID: 24522348 DOI: 10.1177/1457496913519527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Naguib
- Department of Surgery, Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection—better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399:297-305. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1156-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 12/22/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
33
|
Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:3056-72. [PMID: 23609857 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2823-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2012] [Accepted: 11/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instruments that apply energy to cut, coagulate, and dissect tissue with minimal bleeding facilitate surgery. The improper use of energy devices may increase patient morbidity and mortality. The current article reviews various energy sources in terms of their common uses and safe practices. METHODS For the purpose of this review, a general search was conducted through NCBI, SpringerLink, and Google. Articles describing laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgeries using single or multiple energy sources are considered, as are articles comparing various commercial energy devices in laboratory settings. Keywords, such as laparoscopy, energy, laser, electrosurgery, monopolar, bipolar, harmonic, ultrasonic, cryosurgery, argon beam, laser, complications, and death were used in the search. RESULTS A review of the literature shows that the performance of the energy devices depends upon the type of procedure. There is no consensus as to which device is optimal for a given procedure. The technical skill level of the surgeon and the knowledge about the devices are both important factors in deciding safe outcomes. CONCLUSIONS As new energy devices enter the market increases, surgeons should be aware of their indicated use in laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open surgery.
Collapse
|
34
|
Factors influencing laparoscopic colorectal operative duration and its effect on clinical outcome. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013; 22:437-42. [PMID: 23047389 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e31826020a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify factors affecting laparoscopic colorectal operative duration and determine the impact of prolonged operative time. METHODS Data were collected prospectively on all laparoscopic colorectal operations performed within 1 institution over a period of 4 years. Patients' demographics, CR-POSSUM scores, intraoperative details, surgeon experience, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and assessed in relation to operative duration. RESULTS Two hundred laparoscopic colorectal operations were performed (137 cancers, 63 benign). Operation duration correlated to operation type (P<0.001) and CR-POSSUM mortality risk (P = 0.03). Operative duration positively correlated with incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and length of stay (P = 0.05). Operation time >180 minutes was associated with increased incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS The type of laparoscopic colorectal surgical operation performed has a significantly greater impact upon operative duration than individual patient parameters, pathology, or surgical experience. Operative time is associated with a greater risk of complications and longer hospital stay.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kosuta M, Cosola D, de Manzini N. Intraoperative Accidents. Updates Surg 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
36
|
Dowson HM, Gage H, Jackson D, Qiao Y, Williams P, Rockall TA. Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a prospective cost analysis. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14:1424-30. [PMID: 22340515 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02988.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Cost has been perceived to be a factor limiting the development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This study aimed to compare the costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. METHOD Patients undergoing laparoscopic or open elective colorectal surgery were recruited into a prospective study to evaluate the healthcare costs of each operative procedure in a district general hospital in England. All healthcare resources used (operation, hospital and community) were recorded and converted to costs in British pounds, 2006-2007. Costs of laparoscopic and open surgery were compared. RESULTS In all, 201 consecutive patients consented and were recruited (131 laparoscopic, 70 open). Operative costs were greater in the laparoscopic group (£2049 vs£1263, P < 0.001) due to the costs of disposable instruments, but the hospital costs were less (£1807 vs£3468, P < 0.001) due to longer lengths of stay in the open group. Community costs were similar in the two groups and had little impact on the overall costs, which were not significantly different (£3875 laparoscopic vs£4383 open, P = 0.308). In the subgroup of patients with a stoma, overall costs in the laparoscopic group are higher (not significant). CONCLUSION The costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery are broadly equivalent. If there is an associated improvement in patient benefit, then laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be considered to be cost effective compared with open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Dowson
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Radiofrequency versus ultrasonic energy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis of operative time and blood loss. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2917-24. [PMID: 22580873 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2285-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2011] [Accepted: 03/26/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various energy sources are available for tissue dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS) and ultrasonic energy (UE) devices are widely used to provide hemostatic dissection in laparoscopic procedures. Nevertheless, available evidenced-based data comparing their operative results still are scarce. This study conducted a metaanalysis of controlled clinical trials comparing EBVS and UE in terms of operative time and intraoperative blood losses in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched using medical subject headings and free text words. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials using EBVS and UE in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were considered for inclusion in the study. Random effects models were used in case of heterogeneity to obtain summary statistics for the overall difference in operating time and blood loss between instruments. RESULTS Four studies comparing EBVS with UE for 397 patients (200 EBVS vs. 197 UE patients) were included in the study. The findings showed that EBVS was associated with a significantly shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss than UE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The metaanalysis indicated that EBVS is associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss than UE in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity of the included trials and the limited number of studies with a high level of evidence. More adequately designed RCTs with a larger number of patients are required to confirm the results of this metaanalysis.
Collapse
|
38
|
Janssen PF, Brölmann HAM, van Kesteren PJM, Bongers MY, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Huirne JAF. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure™ compared to conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2884-91. [PMID: 22538682 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2274-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the effects of LigaSure™ versus conventional bipolar techniques on operating time and blood loss during laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS In three teaching hospitals, 100 women undergoing a laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy were randomized for LigaSure or conventional bipolar instruments. Primary outcome was operating time (from initial skin incision to removal of the specimen). Secondary outcome measures were total operating time (from initial skin incision to skin closure), time to dissect the ovarian and infundibulopelvic ligaments, intraoperative blood loss, and subjective judgment of the instrument used. RESULTS There were no differences in operating time and total operating time using LigaSure versus conventional bipolar instruments: 41.0 vs. 39.2 min (p = 0.78; 95 % CI = -10.9 to 14.5) and 54.6 vs. 58.6 min (p = 0.46; 95 % CI = -14.8 to 6.8), respectively. The mean blood loss using LigaSure versus conventional bipolar instruments was 38 vs. 33 mL (p = 0.73; 95 % CI = -22.7 to 32.2). Various subjective efficacy and instrument handling parameters of the two instruments varied among participating centers. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in operating time and blood loss with the use of LigaSure compared to conventional bipolar instruments during laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy, even after correction for potential confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra F Janssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1181 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrothermal and ultrasonic devices for abdominal surgical hemostasis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2892-901. [PMID: 22538684 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2276-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate hemostatic techniques are essential for optimal intra- and postoperative results. A number of different hemostatic techniques and devices have been developed over the past few years, but which device should be preferred during laparoscopic and open abdominal procedures? METHODS We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and costs of vessel-sealing devices with those of other electrothermal or ultrasonic devices in abdominal surgical procedures. RESULTS Seven RCTs that included 554 patients met the inclusion criteria. Various procedures that used a vessel-sealing device (LigaSure™) (n = 264) were compared to ultrasonic devices (n = 139) and mono- (n = 20) or bipolar devices (n = 130). LigaSure was favored in two studies with respect to less blood loss, shorter operating time, and lower costs. However, no differences were observed in the other studies. Considering the relatively low number of complications, all hemostatic devices used may be considered relatively safe. None of the studies reported on quality of life or cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Vessel-sealing devices may be considered safe and their use may reduce costs due to reduced blood loss and shorter operating time in some abdominal surgical procedures compared to mono- or bipolar electrothermal devices. Wider-ranging RCTs of sufficient quality that assess (cost) effectiveness are required to make firm conclusions.
Collapse
|
40
|
Hotta T, Takifuji K, Yokoyama S, Matsuda K, Higashiguchi T, Tominaga T, Oku Y, Watanabe T, Nasu T, Hashimoto T, Tamura K, Ieda J, Yamamoto N, Iwamoto H, Yamaue H. Literature review of the energy sources for performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4:1-8. [PMID: 22347536 PMCID: PMC3277876 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2010] [Revised: 10/26/2011] [Accepted: 12/08/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease has become widespread as a minimally invasive treatment. This is important because the increasing availability of new devices allows us to perform procedures with a reduced length of surgery and decreased blood loss. We herein report the results of a literature review of energy sources for laparoscopic colorectal surgery, focused especially on 6 studies comparing ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) and other instruments. We also describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques using UCS for colorectal cancer. The short-term outcomes of surgeries using UCS and Ligasure for laparoscopic colorectal surgery were superior to conventional electrosurgery. Some authors have reported that the length of surgery or blood loss when Ligasure was used for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is less than when UCS was used. On the other hand, a recent study demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the short-term outcomes of UCS and Ligasure for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It is therefore suggested that the choice of technique used should be made according to the surgeon’s preference. We also describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques using UCS (Harmonic ACE) for colorectal cancer with regard to the retroperitoneum dissection, dissection technique, dissection technique around the feeding artery, and various other dissection techniques. We therefore review the outcomes of using various energy sources for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques with UCS (Harmonic ACE) for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Hotta
- Tsukasa Hotta, Katsunari Takifuji, Shozo Yokoyama, Kenji Matsuda, Takashi Higashiguchi, Toshiji Tominaga, Yoshimasa Oku, Takashi Watanabe, Toru Nasu, Tadamichi Hashimoto, Koichi Tamura, Junji Ieda, Naoyuki Yamamoto, Hiromitsu Iwamoto, Hiroki Yamaue, Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Adamina M, Champagne BJ, Hoffman L, Ermlich MB, Delaney CP. Randomized clinical trial comparing the cost and effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealers versus clips and vascular staplers for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1703-12. [PMID: 21997317 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The widespread use of laparoscopy has resulted in a variety of instruments being used routinely for vascular control. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the cost-effectiveness of bipolar vessel sealer (BVS) compared with clips and vascular stapler (CVS) in straight laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS Patients scheduled for elective colorectal resection, including benign and malignant diseases, were randomized to either BVS or CVS for vascular control. Patients whose operation was converted to an open approach before pedicle ligation were excluded. The primary endpoints were duration of operation, including time taken to control vascular pedicles, and cost of disposable instruments for vascular control. RESULTS Of 114 patients randomized to BVS (60 patients) or CVS (54), 14 did not receive the allocated vascular control device, leaving 55 and 45 respectively for analysis. The BVS reduced the time spent for vascular control by a mean of 6·9 min (P = 0·031) and reduced the cost of disposable instruments for vascular control by US $ 80·7 per patient (P = 0·043). For total colectomy, the BVS reduced the operating time by 103·6 min (P = 0·023) and the time taken for vascular control by 16·8 min (P = 0·022). For left colectomy, it decreased the time to vascular control by 9·3 min (P = 0·021). In multivariable analysis, the cost of disposable instruments for vascular control was independently reduced by randomization to BVS, type of procedure, female sex and estimated blood loss. The mean cost reduction was $ 88·2 for left colectomy (P = 0·037), $ 377·7 (P = 0·005) for total colectomy and $ 366·9 (P = 0·012) for proctectomy. Conversely, use of the BVS increased the cost of instruments used for vascular control in right colectomy by $ 92·6 (P = 0·012). CONCLUSION BVS devices are expedient and cost-efficient in proctectomy, left and total colectomy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Adamina
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-5047, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Janssen PF, Brölmann HAM, van Kesteren PJM, Bongers MY, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Huirne JAF. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2011; 118:1568-75. [PMID: 21895949 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03089.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of LigaSure versus the conventional bipolar technique on operating time and blood loss during laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING Three teaching hospitals. POPULATION Women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS 140 women undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomised for LigaSure or conventional bipolar instruments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was operating time from initial skin incision till detachment of the uterus. Secondary outcome measures were total operating time (from initial skin incision till final skin closure), time to dissect the adnexal ligaments, intra-operative blood loss and subjective evaluation by the surgeon of the instrument used. RESULTS No differences in operating time (from initial skin incision till uterine detachment and initial skin incision till final skin closure) using LigaSure versus conventional bipolar instruments: 97.6 versus 91.8 minutes (P = 0.39, 95% CI - 7.6 to 19.2), and 148.1 versus 142.1 minutes (P = 0.46, 95% CI - 10.1 to 22.3), respectively. The mean blood loss using LigaSure versus conventional bipolar was 234.1 versus 273.1 ml (P = 0.46, 95% CI -39.1 to 52.7). Various subjective efficacy and instrument handling parameters were significantly different between the two instruments and between the different participating centres. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in operating time and blood loss between the use of LigaSure and the use of conventional bipolar instruments during laparoscopic hysterectomy, even after correction for potential confounders. User satisfaction parameters were assessed as significantly different by surgeons of the participating centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P F Janssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colectomy is a common procedures for both benign and malignant conditions. Increasingly more colectomy has been performed laparoscopically and there are several available instruments being used for this procedure. Of which three common dissecting instruments are: monopolar electrocautery scissors (MES), ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS). OBJECTIVES The aim is to assess the safety and effectiveness of these instruments. SEARCH STRATEGY Studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Trials Register. Major journals were specifically hand searched. All randomised controlled trials were included. SELECTION CRITERIA All patients underwent elective laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted right, left or total colectomy or anterior resection for either benign or malignant conditions were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently selected studies from the literature searches, assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data. The three primary outcomes were: overall blood loss, complications and operating time. MAIN RESULTS Six randomised controlled trials including 446 participants. Two trials compared three types of instruments (MES vs UCS vs EBVS). One trial compared MES and UCS. One trial compared UCS and EBVS. One trial compared 5 mm versus 10 mm EBVS. One trial compared the technique of laparoscopic staplers and clips versus EBVS in pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy. The limitation of this review is the heterogeneity of the trials included. The measured outcomes were covered by one to three studies with small number of participants. With this in mind, there was significant less blood loss in UCS compared to MES. The operating time was significantly shorter with the use of EBVS than MES. No difference between UCS and EBVS apart from EBVS appeared to be handling better than UCS in one study. Haemostatic control was better in UCS and EBVS over MES. No definite conclusion on the cost difference between these three instrument but this would lie in the balance between the instrument cost and the operating time. The handling of 5 mm EBVS was better than 10 mm and its main advantage was trocar flexibility. Laparoscopic staplers/clips used for pedicle ligation in colectomy associated with more failure in vessel ligation and cost more when compared to EBVS. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The limitations of this review is the small number of trials and heterogeneity of the studies included. With the current evidence it is not possible to demonstrate which is the best instrument in laparoscopic colectomy. Hopefully more data would follow and subsequent updates of this review could become more informative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samson Tou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville West, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5011
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vasilev SA, Lentz SE. Intraoperative and Perioperative Considerations in Laparoscopy. Gynecol Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118003435.ch8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
45
|
Koch CA, Olsen SM, Martin EJ, Moore EJ. Ultrasonic shears in free-tissue transfer: increased efficiency and cost savings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 144:201-5. [PMID: 21493416 DOI: 10.1177/0194599810391846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The harvest of some microvascular free flaps for head and neck reconstruction entails tedious and time-consuming dissection of multiple perforating vessels and/or muscular attachments. The objective of this study is to investigate the use of ultrasonic shears as a means to decrease operative time and increase surgical efficiency in the harvest of microvascular free flaps. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A prospective study of all people undergoing fibula (FFF) or anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects was conducted from October 1, 2005, through December 30, 2009. RESULTS There were 69 FFF and 39 ALT free flaps performed by a single surgeon during the study period. Ultrasonic shears were used in 53 (76.8%) FFF and 26 (80.6%) ALT free flaps, whereas traditional dissection techniques were used in 16 (23.2%) FFF and 13 (19.4%) ALT free flaps. The use of ultrasonic shears significantly decreased the harvest time of FFF and ALT free flaps an average of 14.5 and 16.3 minutes, respectively. The average cost savings associated with the use of ultrasonic shears was $492 for FFF and $543 for ALT free flaps compared to traditional dissections techniques. Similar rates of complications were observed when ultrasonic shears were used compared to traditional techniques. CONCLUSIONS The use of ultrasonic shears in the harvest of microvascular free flaps decreases operative time, leading to significantly decreased costs without an increased risk of complications compared to traditional dissection techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody A Koch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Park NY, Seong WJ, Chong GO, Hong DG, Cho YL, Park IS, Lee YS. The effect of nonperitonization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for minimizing the incidence of lymphocyst formation after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010; 20:443-8. [PMID: 20375812 DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181d1895f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effect of nonperitonization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy using bipolar electrocautery after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with peritonization and open lymphadenectomy using monopolar electrocautery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of 180 patients who underwent a radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for cervical cancer from August 1998 to August 2007. The patients were composed of the Peritonization + Laparotomy group (group A; n = 98, 196 PLND) and the Nonperitonization + Laparoscopy group (group B; n = 82, 164 PLND). Group B left the peritoneum in front of the PLND open. Two closed-suction drains were placed at each side of the PLND. RESULTS Group B statistically showed a lesser total amount of lymphatic drainage (P = 0.001), shorter duration of inserted drains (P < 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), compared with group A. The formation of lymphocysts occurred in 30 patients (41 lymphocysts) of group A and 5 patients (5 lymphocysts) of group B. Lymphocyst formation of group B had a statistically lower incidence than that of group A (P < 0.001). Lymphocyst formation was associated with an increase in the total amount of lymphatic drainage in group A (P = 0.090) and group B (P = 0.041) and a pathologic type of adenocarcinoma in group B (P = 0.016). Surgical experiences were not correlated with lymphocyst formation. CONCLUSIONS The omission of peritonization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy using bipolar electrocautery in early-stage cervical cancer were more effective than peritonization and open lymphadenectomy using monopolar electrocautery in minimizing the incidence of lymphocyst formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nae Yoon Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D. Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 2010; 4:5. [PMID: 20338045 PMCID: PMC2852382 DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-4-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 272] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2009] [Accepted: 03/25/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery comprises of many different types of procedures for various diseases. Depending upon the operation and modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors the intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rate vary. In general, surgical complications can be divided into intraoperative and postoperative complications and usually occur while the patient is still in the hospital. METHODS A literature search (1980-2009) was carried out, using MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane library. RESULTS This review provides an overview how to identify and minimize intra- and postoperative complications. The improvement of different treatment strategies and technical inventions in the recent decade has been enormous. This is mainly attributable to the increase in the laparoscopic approach, which is now well accepted for many procedures. Training of the surgeon, hospital volume and learning curves are becoming increasingly more important to maximize patient safety, surgeon expertise and cost effectiveness. In addition, standardization of perioperative care is essential to minimize postoperative complications. CONCLUSION This review summarizes the main perioperative complications of colorectal surgery and influencable and non-influencable risk factors which are important to the general surgeon and the relevant specialist as well. In order to minimize or even avoid complications it is crucial to know these risk factors and strategies to prevent, treat or reduce intra- and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kirchhoff
- Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The lack of consensus on how to define and grade adverse postoperative events has greatly hampered the evaluation of surgical procedures. A new classification of complications, initiated in 1992, was updated 5 years ago. It is based on the type of therapy needed to correct the complication. The principle of the classification was to be simple, reproducible, flexible, and applicable irrespective of the cultural background. The aim of the current study was to critically evaluate this classification from the perspective of its use in the literature, by assessing interobserver variability in grading complex complication scenarios and to correlate the classification grades with patients', nurses', and doctors' perception. MATERIAL AND METHODS Reports from the literature using the classification system were systematically analyzed. Next, 11 scenarios illustrating difficult cases were prepared to develop a consensus on how to rank the various complications. Third, 7 centers from different continents, having routinely used the classification, independently assessed the 11 scenarios. An agreement analysis was performed to test the accuracy and reliability of the classification. Finally, the perception of the severity was tested in patients, nurses, and physicians by presenting 30 scenarios, each illustrating a specific grade of complication. RESULTS We noted a dramatic increase in the use of the classification in many fields of surgery. About half of the studies used the contracted form, whereas the rest used the full range of grading. Two-thirds of the publications avoided subjective terms such as minor or major complications. The study of 11 difficult cases among various centers revealed a high degree of agreement in identifying and ranking complications (89% agreement), and enabled a better definition of unclear situations. Each grade of complications significantly correlated with the perception by patients, nurses, and physicians (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS This 5-year evaluation provides strong evidence that the classification is valid and applicable worldwide in many fields of surgery. No modification in the general principle of classification is warranted in view of the use in ongoing publications and trials. Subjective, inaccurate, or confusing terms such as "minor or major" should be removed from the surgical literature.
Collapse
|