Anastomotic leakage after small bowel resection in emergency laparotomy is a severe complication. A consensus on the risk factors for anastomotic leakage has not been established, and it is still unclear if peritonitis is a risk factor. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if an entero-entero/entero-colonic anastomosis is safe in patients with peritonitis undergoing abdominal acute care surgery.

A systematic literature review based on PRISMA guidelines was performed, searching the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for studies of anastomosis in peritonitis. Patients with an anastomosis after non-planned small bowel resection (ischemia, perforation, or strangulation), including secondary peritonitis, were included. Elective laparotomies and colo-colonic anastomoses were excluded. Due to the etiology, traumatic perforation, in-vitro, and animal studies were excluded.

This review identified 26 studies of small-bowel anastomosis in peritonitis with a total of 2807 patients. This population included a total of 889 small-bowel/right colonic resections with anastomoses, and 242 enterostomies. All studies, except two, were retrospective reviews or case series. The overall mortality rates were 0-20% and anastomotic leakage rates 0-36%. After performing a risk of bias evaluation there was no basis for conducting a meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as low.

There was no evidence to refute performing a primary small-bowel anastomosis in acute laparotomy with peritonitis. There is currently insufficient evidence to label peritonitis as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in acute care laparotomy with small-bowel resection.

The review was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews on 14/07/2020 with the ID: CRD42020168670.

For the 8-29% colorectal cancers that initially manifest with obstruction, emergency surgery (ES) was traditionally considered the only available therapy, despite high morbidity and mortality rates and the need for colostomy creation. More recently, malignant obstruction of the left colon can be temporized by endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), used as bridge to surgery (BTS), facilitating a laparoscopic approach and increasing the likelihood that a primary anastomosis instead of stoma would be used. Despite these attractive outcomes, the superiority of the BTS approach is not clearly established. Few authors have stressed the potential cancer risk associated with perforations that may occur during endoscopic stent placement, facilitating neoplastic spread and negatively impacting prognosis. For this reason, the current literature focuses on long-term oncologic outcomes such as disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrence rate that do seem not to differ between the ES and BTS approaches. This lack of consensus has spawned differing and sometimes discordant guidelines worldwide. In conclusion, 20 years after the first description of a colonic stent as BTS, the debate is still open, but the growing number of articles about the use of SEMS as a BTS signifies a great interest in the topic. We hope that these data will finally converge on a single set of recommendations supporting a management strategy with well-demonstrated superiority.

Few studies compare management and outcomes of obstructive colonic cancer, depending on the tumor site. We aim to evaluate the differences in patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and outcomes of emergency surgery for obstructive right-sided versus left-sided colonic cancers.

Between 2000 and 2009, 71 consecutive patients had an emergency colectomy following strict and clear definition of obstruction in a single institution. We retrospectively analyzed pre, per, and postoperative data that were prospectively collected.

There were 31 and 40 patients in the right and left group, respectively. Patients aged over 80 were more frequent in the right group (p = 0.03). At operation, ileocecal valve was less often competent in the right group (p = 0.03). The one-stage strategy was more frequent in the right group (p = 0.008). Patients in the right group had a higher rate of nodes invasion (p = 0.04). One- and two-year mortality rate in the right group had a tendency to be higher.

Patients presenting with a right obstructive colonic cancer are older, have a more advanced locoregional disease, and are more often treated in a one-stage strategy than patients with a left obstructive tumor.

Self-expandable stents for obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC) offer an alternative to operative management. The objective of the study was to determine stent utilization for CRC obstruction in the province of Ontario between April 1, 2000, and March 30, 2009. Colonic stent utilization characteristics, poststent insertion health outcomes, and health care encounters were recorded. 225 patients were identified over the study period. Median age was 69 years, 2/3 were male, and 2/3 had metastatic disease. Stent use for CRC increased over the study period and gastroenterologists inserted most stents. The median survival after stent insertion was 199 (IQR, 69-834) days. 37% of patients required an additional procedure. Patients with metastatic disease were less likely to go on to surgery (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.32, p < 0.0001). There were 2.4/person-year emergency department visits (95% CI 2.2-2.7) and 2.3 hospital admissions/person-year (95% CI 2.1-2.5) following stent insertion. Most admissions were cancer or procedure related or for palliation. Factors associated with hospital admissions were presence of metastatic disease, lack of chemotherapy treatment, and stoma surgery. Overall the use of stents for CRC obstruction remains low. Stents are predominantly used for palliation with low rates of postinsertion health care encounters.

The wheel of industrialization that spun throughout the last century resulted in urbanization coupled with modifications in lifestyles and dietary habits. However, the communities living in developing economies are facing many problems related to their diet and health. Amongst, the prevalence of nutritional problems especially protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and micronutrients deficiencies are the rising issues. Moreover, the immunity or susceptibility to infect-parasitic diseases is also directly linked with the nutritional status of the host. Likewise, disease-related malnutrition that includes an inflammatory component is commonly observed in clinical practice thus affecting the quality of life. The PEM is treatable but early detection is a key for its appropriate management. However, controlling the menace of PEM requires an aggressive partnership between the physician and the dietitian. This review mainly attempts to describe the pathophysiology, prevalence and consequences of PEM and aims to highlight the importance of this clinical syndrome and the recent growth in our understanding of the processes behind its development. Some management strategies/remedies to overcome PEM are also the limelight of the article. In the nutshell, early recognition, prompt management, and robust follow up are critical for best outcomes in preventing and treating PEM.

Emergency large bowel surgery (ELBS) is known to carry an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have reported morbidity and mortality rates up to 14.3%. However, there has not been a recent study to document the outcomes of ELBS following several major changes in surgical training and provision of emergency surgery. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the current outcomes of ELBS.

A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively maintained database of the clinical records of all patients who had ELBS between 2006 and 2013. Data pertaining to patient demographics, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade, diagnosis, surgical procedure performed, grade of operating surgeon and assistant, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality were analysed.

A total of 202 patients underwent ELBS during the study period. The mean patient age was 62 years and the most common cause was colonic carcinoma (n=67, 33%). There were 32 patients (15.8%) who presented with obstruction and 64 (31.7%) had bowel perforation. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 14.8% (n=30). A consultant surgeon was involved in 187 cases (92.6%) as either first operator, assistant or available in theatre.

ELBS continues to carry a high risk despite several major changes in the provision of emergency surgery. Further developments are needed to improve postoperative outcomes in these patients.

We prospectively audited adverse events for surgical patients with colorectal cancer who died under surgical care to test the hypothesis that increased critical care and consultant input could be associated with a reduction in adverse events.

Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer who died under surgical care in Scotland from 1996 to 2005 underwent peer review audit using established methodologies through the Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality.

In the 10-year study period, 3029 patients with colorectal cancer, mean age 76 (13-105) years, died under surgical care, of whom 80% had presented as an emergency admission. Operative intervention was performed in 1557 (51%) patients of whom 1030 (34%) patients had a resection of the cancer. The annual number of patients dying after a cancer resection decreased significantly (P = 0.009). Significant decreases in adverse events were noted over time with a 67% fall in adverse events relating to critical care (P = 0.009), a 37% fall for surgical care (P = 0.04) and a significant increase in consultant anaesthetist and consultant surgeon input, but there was a 9% increase in delay as an adverse event (P = 0.006). The documented anastomotic leakage rate in patients who died increased from 8% in 1996 to 19% in 2005 (P = 0.016).

The number of patients dying with colorectal cancer after surgery has decreased in recent years. Adverse events in these patients have significantly reduced over a decade with increased consultant involvement although there is the potential for further improvement.

The author presents a historical overview of cancer surgery of the last century. At the last quarter of the century the main characteristic of this process has been the significant extension of surgical radicality. Three new surgical methods appeared and have been routinely used at the Surgical Clinic of the Szeged University School, to increase surgical radicality, to improve survival rate without impairing the postoperative quality of life. 1.) Subtotal colectomy (STC) involves an extended resection of the colon over the splenic flexure. In a period of 8 years a total of 72 STCs were performed for the treatment of large bowel obstructions or symptomatic stenosis caused by cancer of the left colon. STC offers: a) one stage treatment for colonic obstruction in emergency surgery, b.) removal of the tumor with sufficient oncological radicality, c.) primary reconstruction of the digestive tract, with a safe ileocolic anastomosis even in emergency cases. Based on a study about postoperative quality of life of STC operated patients, it proved to be normal. 2.) The author reports a total of 108 middle and low third rectal cancer cases operated on by total mesorectal excision (TME) by the method of Heald. The oncological basis of this procedure is the horizontal regional metastatization of rectal cancer. The author succeeded in 60% of cases to perform an anterior resection with preservation of the anal sphincter, and to decrease the early (within two years after surgery) local recurrence rate from 14.5% to 6.4%, compared to the group of patients operated on by traditional technic. 3.) A total of 154 patients with locally advanced - stage IV - colorectal cancer underwent extended surgery of multivisceral resections as a treatment of cancer process involving adjacent abdominal organs. Surgery was performed to treat advanced cancer of the colon in 112 cases and the one of the rectum in 42 cases. The mortality rate was 7% in the colon cancer group, and 12% in the group of rectal cancer patients. In their tumor-free postoperative period 90% of colon cancer patients and 95% of rectal cancer patients had an improved quality of life. The 5 years survival rate was 40% in the colon group and 22% in the rectal cancer group. In the group of patients having more than 3 simultaneously tumorous organs, in spite of the multiple organ resections, no 5 years survival has been recorded.

This study sought to identify and compare the current practice of surgeons in Australia, the UK and the US when presented with a left-sided colonic emergency.

Questionnaires were posted to 500 US, 500 UK and 500 Australian surgeons. Demographic data were collected regarding the surgeon's age and surgical interest, as well as their preferred method of managing left-sided colonic emergencies (namely obstruction and perforation in stable and unstable patients). The results were analysed using the chi-squared test.

Completed questionnaires were received from 224 UK surgeons (45%), 180 US surgeons (36%) and 259 Australian surgeons (52%). All the US surgeons had an interest in gastrointestinal surgery, while 31% of the UK surgeons and 22% of Australian surgeons had an interest in colorectal surgery. In a haemodynamically stable patient with a good anaesthetic risk presenting with a complete sigmoid obstruction, significantly more UK (84%) and Australian surgeons (70%) would perform a resection and anastomosis than US surgeons (54%, p<0.0001). Of those with a colorectal interest, 97% of UK surgeons and 80% of Australian surgeons would opt for resection and anastomosis. In a haemodynamically stable patient with a good anaesthetic risk with a perforation of the sigmoid colon and purulent peritonitis, 46% of UK surgeons, 32% of Australian surgeons and 33% of US surgeons would opt for resection and anastomosis, and among colorectal surgeons, 68% of UK surgeons and 50% of Australian surgeons would opt for resection and anastomosis.

The management of left-sided colonic emergencies varies depending on geographic location and degree of colorectal subspecialization. While the literature suggests that single-stage procedures are accepted and safe, the reasons for this variation are explored.

Algae, which are used as supplementary nutrients in various countries, are products rich in protein, vitamins and minerals. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of algae extracts on the healing of colonic anastomosis in malnourished rats.

Seventy-two rats were randomized to three groups. Group 1 was fed with standard diet for 15 days, before and after the colonic anastomosis. Groups 2 and 3 were fed with a malnutrition diet for 15 days prior to colonic anastomosis and then with the basic diet for 15 days there after. Group 3 also received an extract of algae derived from Cholerella sp. via oral gavage postoperatively, in addition to the basic diet. Rats were killed on the 3rd, 7th and 15th postoperative day. Blood samples were collected to evaluate prealbumin, transferring and albumin levels. Anastomotic bursting pressures (BPs), histopathology and tissue hydroxyproline levels were evaluated after killing.

In group 3, the prealbumin level on the 3rd postoperative day and transferrin and albumin levels on the 7th and 15th postoperative days were significantly increased compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). Tissue hydroxyproline levels and anastomotic BPs of group 3 were significantly higher than in group 2 on the 3rd, 7th and 15th postoperative days (P < 0.05). Histopathological examination of the anastomosis revealed significantly better healing patterns for group 3 than for groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05).

Extract derived from Cholerella sp. microalgae has favourable effects on healing of experimental colon anastomoses.

Acute colonic obstruction due to malignancy is often a surgical emergency. Surgical decompression with colostomy with or without resection and eventual re-anastomosis has traditionally been the treatment of choice. These procedures have been associated with a significant morbidity and mortality rate. Preoperative colonic stenting is effective for decompressing the obstructed colon and may allow for surgery to be performed on an elective basis.

Although randomized clinical data are lacking, the role for preoperative stenting in the emergent management of acute malignant colonic obstruction has been supported by cost-effectiveness analysis studies and several pooled analyses that demonstrate efficacy and safety.

This review evaluates the latest developments in colonic stent technology, indications for use in the preoperative setting, and evidence to support their use in this setting.

To compare primary resection and anastomosis (PRA) with and without defunctioning stoma to Hartmann's procedure (HP) as the optimal operative strategy for patients presenting with Hinchey stage III-IV, perforated diverticulitis.

The choice of operation for perforated diverticulitis lies between HP and PRA. Postoperative mortality and morbidity can be high, and the long-term consequences life-altering, with no established criteria guiding clinicians towards selecting a particular procedure.

Probability estimates for 6879 patients with Hinchey III-IV perforated diverticulitis were obtained from two databases (n = 204), supplemented by expert opinion and summary data from 12 studies (n = 6675) published between 1980 and 2005. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from each strategy. Factors considered were the risk of permanent stoma, morbidity, and mortality from the primary or reversal operations. Decision analysis from the patient's perspective was used to calculate the optimal operative strategy and sensitivity analysis performed.

A total of 135 PRA, 126 primary anastomoses with defunctioning stoma (PADS), and 6619 Hartmann's procedures (HP) were considered. The probability of morbidity and mortality was 55% and 30% for PRA, 40% and 25% for PADS, and 35% and 20% for HP, respectively. Stomas remained permanent in 27% of HP and in 8% of PADS. Analysis revealed the optimal strategy to be PADS with 9.98 QALYs, compared with 9.44 QALYs after HP and 9.02 QALYs after PRA. Complications after PRA reduced patients QALYs to a baseline of 2.713. Patients with postoperative complications during both primary and reversal operations for PADS and HP had QALYs of 0.366 and 0.325, respectively. HP became the optimal strategy only when risk of complications after PRA and PADS reached 50% and 44%, respectively.

Primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma may be the optimal strategy for selected patients with diverticular peritonitis as may represent a good compromise between postoperative adverse events, long-term quality of life and risk of permanent stoma. HP may be reserved for patients with risk of complications >40% to 50% after consideration of long-term implications.

This study compares primary resection with anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure in an adult population with acute colonic diverticulitis.

Comparative studies published between 1984 and 2004 of primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure were included. The primary end point was postoperative mortality. Secondary end points included surgical and medical morbidity, operative time, and length of postoperative hospitalization. Random effects model was used and sensitivity analysis was performed.

Fifteen studies, including 963 patients (57 percent primary resection with anastomoses, 43 percent Hartmann's procedures), were analyzed. Overall mortality was significantly reduced with primary resection and anastomosis (4.9 vs. 15.1 percent; odds ratio = 0.41). Subgroup analysis of trials matched for emergency operations showed significantly decreased mortality with primary resection and anastomosis (7.4 vs. 15.6 percent; odds ratio = 0.44). No significant difference in mortality was observed in trials matched for severity of peritonitis Hinchey > 2 (14.1 vs. 14.4 percent; odds ratio = 0.85). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant heterogeneity between the studies for the primary outcome.

Patients selected for primary resection and anastomosis have a lower mortality than those treated by Hartmann's procedure in the emergency setting and comparable mortality under conditions of generalized peritonitis (Hinchey > 2). The retrospective nature of the included studies allows for a considerable degree of selection bias that limits robust and clinically sound conclusions. This analysis highlights the need for high-quality randomized trials comparing the two techniques.

Reversal of Hartmann's is a major surgical procedure and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality.

This study retrospectively analysed the data at a single centre over an eight-year period to assess the clinical results and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's.

One hundred and ten Hartmann's procedures were performed during the period. Only 66 (61%) of patients had a reversal. Advanced age and comorbidity were the primary reasons for not reversing. Complications among the 66 patients (36 males and 30 females) who underwent reversal occurred in 26 (41%). There were no deaths. Patients who underwent reversal were ASA 2 (60%), ASA 3 (25%) and ASA 4 (4.6%). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between complications following reversal and ASA grade (P =0.01), and hypertension (P = 0.03) There was no correlation between the patient variables and anastomotic leakage. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant influence of hypertension, smoking and ASA grade on complications.

About 40% of patients who undergo Hartmann's procedure will not have a reversal. Reversal is a feasible operation for selected patients, but there is a high complication rate.

Acute colonic obstruction because of malignancy is often a surgical emergency. Surgical decompression with colostomy with or without resection and eventual re-anastomosis is the traditional treatment of choice. Endoscopic colonic stent insertion effectively decompresses the obstructed colon, allowing for surgery to be performed electively. This study sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of colonic stent vs. surgery for emergent management of acute malignant colonic obstruction.

Decision analysis was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of two competing strategies in a hypothetical patient presenting with acute, complete, malignant colonic obstruction: (1) emergent colonic stent followed by elective surgical resection and re-anastomosis; (2) emergent surgical resection followed by diversion (Hartmann's procedure) or primary anastomosis. Cost estimates were obtained from a third-party payer perspective. Primary outcome measures were mortality, stoma requirement, and total number of operative procedures.

Colonic stent resulted in 23% fewer operative procedures per patient (1.01 vs. 1.32 operations per patient), an 83% reduction in stoma requirement (7% vs. 43%), and lower procedure-related mortality (5% vs. 11%). Colonic stent was associated with a lower mean cost per patient ($45,709 vs. $49,941).

Colonic stent insertion followed by elective surgery appears more effective and less costly than emergency surgery under base-case conditions. This finding remains robust over a wide range of assumptions for clinical inputs in sensitivity analysis. Our findings suggest that colonic stent insertion should be offered, whenever feasible, as a bridge to elective surgery in patients presenting with malignant colonic obstruction.

This systematic literature review was designed to summarize and compare the reported outcomes of one-stage and two-stage operations for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis.

This review identified 98 published studies (1957-2003) dealing with the surgical management of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, either with primary resection and anastomosis or with the Hartmann's procedure. Aggregated results of adverse outcomes were calculated but statistical comparisons were not appropriate because of data and design heterogeneity.

Operative mortality data from patients with diverticular peritonitis undergoing Hartmann's procedure (n = 1,051) were derived from 54 studies. Considering the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal procedures together, the mortality rate was 19.6 percent (18.8 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 0.8 percent for its reversal), the wound infection rate was 29.1 percent (24.2 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 4.9 percent for its reversal), and stoma complications and anastomotic leaks (in the reversal operation) occurred in 10.3 and 4.3 percent, respectively. Of 569 reported cases of primary anastomosis from 50 studies, the aggregated mortality rate was 9.9 (range, 0-75) percent with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.9 (range, 0-60) percent and a wound infection rate of 9.6 (range, 0-26) percent.

Reported mortality and morbidity in patients with diverticular peritonitis who underwent primary anastomosis were not higher than those in patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure were. This suggests that primary anastomosis is a safe operative alternative in certain patients with peritonitis. Despite inclusion of only patients with peritonitis in this analysis, selection bias may have been a limitation and a prospective, randomized trial is recommended.

For complicated diverticulitis Hartmann's procedure remains the favored option in patients with acute complicated sigmoid disease, but there has been increasing interest in primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage. This study compared primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage and Hartmann's procedure.

Between January 1994 and November 2001, 60 patients underwent emergency laparotomy for diverticular peritonitis (Hinchey stages III and IV). Primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage was performed in 27 patients and Hartmann's procedure in 33. All data were collected prospectively on a standardized form.

Mortality with intraoperative colonic lavage was 11% and with Hartmann's procedure 12%. The incidence of postoperative complication was significantly higher after Hartmann's procedure. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer after Hartmann's procedure than after primary resection with intraoperative colic lavage.

Primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage compares favorably with Hartmann's procedure for diffuse purulent peritonitis in complicated diverticulitis. It should be an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in stercoral peritonitis.

The surgical management of left-sided large bowel emergency patients remains controversial. There has been an increasing trend towards primary reconstructive surgery. The main dilemma remains appropriate patient selection for primary anastomosis.

The records of 323 patients who presented as acute emergencies and underwent surgery between January 1990 and December 2000 for left-sided colorectal cancer and diverticular disease were reviewed, to compare the outcome of resection and primary anastomosis with Hartmann's procedure. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to whether the presentation was with localized or generalized peritonitis, or with obstruction.

Resection and anastomosis was carried out in 176 (55.7%) patients with a 30-day mortality of 5.7%. Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 9 (5.1%) patients, with no difference between the three groups. Wound sepsis occurred in 8 (4.5%) patients, and the median hospital stay was 13 days. Hartmann's resection was associated with a higher incidence of systemic and surgical morbidity (39.5% and 24.3%, respectively). The mortality rates in those selected for primary anastomosis (5.7%) compared favourably with those undergoing Hartmann's resections (20.4%) (P < 0.001).

Emergency primary anastomosis in left-sided disease can be performed with a low morbidity and mortality in selected patients, even in the presence of a free perforation with diffuse peritonitis. Patients selected for staged resection, were those with major comorbid disease.

Radical surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer. Major changes in the principles of rectal cancer resection have been recently described (total mesorectum excision) whereas there have been few changes in the principles of colonic cancer resection. This chapter presents surgical procedures for curative treatment of colorectal cancer in both the elective and emergency settings.

Fifteen to twenty percent of patients with primary colorectal cancers present with intestinal obstruction. Traditionally, different approaches have been used in the management of right-sided and left-sided colonic obstruction. Recently, single-stage resection with primary anastomosis in left colonic obstruction has been shown to have good results. The objective of this study was to compare the operative results of patients who had emergency operations for right-sided and left-sided obstructions from primary colorectal cancers.

This is a retrospective study including 243 patients who underwent emergency operations for obstructing colorectal cancers from 1989 to 1997. Primary resection of the tumor-bearing segment followed by primary anastomosis was attempted when the conditions were feasible. The operative results of patients with right-sided tumors were compared with those of patients with left-sided tumors.

One hundred seven patients had obstruction at or proximal to the splenic flexure (right-sided lesions), and 136 had lesions distal to the splenic flexure (left-sided lesions). The primary resection rate was 91.8%. Of the 223 patients with primary resection, primary anastomosis was possible in 197 patients. Among the 101 primary anastomoses in patients with left-sided obstruction, segmental resection with on-table lavage was performed in 75 patients and subtotal colectomy was performed in 26. The overall operative mortality rate was 9.4%, although that of the patients with primary resection and anastomosis was 8.1%. The anastomotic leakage rate for those with primary resection and anastomosis was 6.1%. There were no differences in the mortality or leakage rates between patients with right-sided and left-sided lesions (mortality: 7.3% versus 8.9%, p = 0.79; leakage: 5.2% versus 6.9%, p = 0.77). Colocolonic anastomosis did not show a significant difference in leakage rate when compared with ileocolonic anastomosis (6.1% versus 6.0%, p = 1.0).

This study showed that primary resection and anastomosis for left-sided malignant obstruction, either by segmental resection with on-table lavage or subtotal colectomy, was not more hazardous than primary anastomosis for right-sided obstruction. The single-stage procedure should be the objective for the treatment of patients with obstructing colorectal cancers, except when patients are hemodynamically unstable during surgery or when the condition of the bowel is not optimal for primary anastomosis.

Classically a primary colonic anastomosis is not performed in the presence of left colonic peritonitis. Recently there has been a trend towards resection and anastomosis in selected patients, but no prospective study concerning the safety of this approach has been published. The objective of this study was to define the role of intraoperative colonic lavage with resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) in left colonic peritonitis, and to evaluate the differences in outcome in patients with diffuse or localized peritonitis.

Between January 1994 and December 1998, 127 patients underwent emergency operation for a distal large bowel perforation. RPA was the operation of choice and was performed in 61 patients, 38 with localized and 23 with diffuse peritonitis. Septic shock, faecal peritonitis, immunocompromised status and American society of Anesthesiologists grade IV were contraindications to the one-stage procedure. Alternative operations used in high-risk patients were Hartmann's procedure in 55 patients, subtotal colectomy in eight and colostomy in three.

There were two deaths (3 per cent) among 61 patients treated by RPA and one (2 per cent) case of clinical anastomotic dehiscence. Overall morbidity was 39 per cent and the overall mean(s.d.) hospital stay was 18(15) days. No statistical differences were observed between patients with localized and diffuse peritonitis treated by RPA.

RPA may be the operation of choice in selected patients with left colonic diffuse peritonitis.

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy which is occurring with increasing incidence in the elderly. As the age of the population increases so the importance of this malignancy will gradually increase. In addition a high proportion of elderly patients present with intestinal obstruction secondary to colorectal cancer and therefore the management of intestinal obstruction in the elderly becomes an important surgical consideration. This review discusses the management of colorectal cancer in patients over the age of 75 in both the elective and emergency situations with particular reference to screening, surgical management and the use of adjuvant therapy.

The study contained herein was undertaken to verify if immediate resection with anastomosis with on-site lavage in emergency treatment of left colon obstruction is a safe alternative to the multistage procedure, to look for solutions to practical problems outlined by previous authors, and to check the hospital stay.

Between 1991 and 1995, all patients (61) admitted with left colon obstruction were treated with intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis. Personal development of Dudley's technique is reported. Complications and mortality are pointed out. Later, endoscopy was performed to check the status of all survivors.

Low mortality (2 percent) and major complication rates (3 percent) and short hospital stay (11 days, except for patients with major complications) are reported in our series.

One-stage surgery with intraoperative lavage is a safe procedure. Patients have a better quality of life (no stoma occurred) with an effective cost-savings.

Surgical outcomes in patients presenting with colonic perforation or peritonitis tend to be poor. This study was undertaken to determine outcomes in such patients at a time before multiple re-laparotomies were performed.

Retrospective analysis of computer records of all patients presenting acutely to the University Surgical Unit (Wellington School of Medicine) with colonic perforation or peritonitis over a 15-year period.

Seventy-three patients, 33 males and 40 females were admitted with either perforation or localized peritonitis of colorectal origin. Of these, 78% were managed as emergencies, but six were admitted electively and found incidentally. Consultant surgeons performed surgery slightly more frequently than registrars. Two patients were managed non-operatively. Forty-one per cent received peri-operative blood transfusion and 22% peri-operative total parenteral nutrition. The majority of patients presented with either peritonitis or free perforation in association with diverticular disease. The site of perforation was either ileocolic or sigmoid colonic in the majority of patients. Hartmann's operation was the most commonly performed resection. Respiratory, urinary and wound infections were the most commonly observed postoperative complications. Two patients developed anastomotic leaks (6.3%). The overall persistent intra-abdominal infection rate was 5.5%. Seven patients died following surgery.

Resection of the perforated bowel is mandatory and this should be followed by anastomoses in the case of right-sided lesions and a Hartmann's operation or resection, colostomy and mucous fistula in distally situated lesions.

This study was designed to compare complications and functions following either radical extended right colectomy without colonic decompression or radical segmental left colectomy with intraoperative decompression for obstructed left-sided colonic carcinomas.

One hundred three patients with obstructed left-sided colonic carcinoma undergoing primary resection and anastomoses were studied.

There were 57 males and 46 females with a median age of 65 (range, 24-98) years and who had a median follow-up of 31 (range, 2-59) months. There were no leaks or intra-abdominal sepsis in the extended right colectomy group (44 patients) compared with one anastomosis leak in the segmental left colectomy (59 patients) group. Median hospital stay was 14 days in both groups, with a range of 8 to 36 days in the segmental left colectomy group and 7 to 44 days in those with extended right resection. One month after surgery, the patients who underwent segmental left colectomy had a median bowel movement of 3 (range, 1-6) per 24 hours compared with those with extended right colectomies who had a median of 5 (2-11) bowel movements per 24 hours. Bowel frequency decreased to four or less episodes per 24 hours in all patients in both groups at six months.

There was no significant difference between bowel function or complications between the two groups.

Intra-abdominal infection is generally considered a contraindication to primary colon anastomosis. In order to elucidate the mechanisms by which sepsis affects colonic healing, we studied anastomotic new collagen and protein synthesis and collagen gene expression in a relevant animal model.

Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats (240 to 260 g) underwent sham laparotomy (SHAM, n = 18) or cecal ligation and single puncture (CLP, n = 22). After 24 hours, animals underwent single-layer left colon anastomosis. Animals were sacrificed either 1 or 4 days postanastomosis. Anastomotic segments of colon were excised, minced, and incubated with 4.5 muCi 3H-proline. After 3 hours, tissue 3H-proline incorporation was quantitated as an index of total new protein synthesis. The protein fraction was then digested with purified collagenase enzyme to determine 3H-proline incorporation into collagenase-digestible protein, an index of new collagen synthesis. Total RNA was extracted from anastomotic tissue samples and subjected to Northern blot analysis for type I and type III collagen genes.

Intra-abdominal sepsis resulted in markedly less new collagen synthesis 1 day postanastomosis (9,163 +/- 1,234 versus 3,744 +/- 444 disintegrates per minute 3H-proline/mg of protein, P < 0.0001) and 4 days postanastomosis (8,462 +/- 956 versus 5,708 +/- 802 dpm/mg of protein P < 0.05). Noncollagenous protein synthesis was also impaired in anastomotic tissue from CLP rats on postanastomosis day 1 (37,497 +/- 3,740 versus 18,593 +/- 2,695 dpm/mg of of protein, P < 0.001) and postanastomosis day 4 (28,238 +/- 834 versus 17,784 +/- 1,415 dpm/mg of of protein, P < 0.0001). The expression of type I and type III collagen was altered relative to the normal temporal sequence observed in SHAM animals.

Intra-abdominal infection impairs colonic reparative collagen and protein synthesis. In addition, regulation of type I and type III collagen genes is altered by intra-abdominal sepsis, and the alteration likely contributes to impaired new collagen synthesis and decreased colonic mechanical strength.

This multicentre study is the first prospective randomized trial to compare subtotal colectomy with segmental resection and primary anastomosis following intraoperative irrigation for the management of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. Of the 91 eligible patients recruited by 12 centres, 47 were randomized to subtotal colectomy and 44 to on-table irrigation and segmental colectomy. Hospital mortality and complication rates did not differ significantly, but 4 months after operation increased bowel frequency (three or more bowel movements per day) was significantly more common in the subtotal colectomy group (14 of 35 versus four of 35, chi 2 = 6.06, 1 d.f., P = 0.01). More patients in the subtotal colectomy group reported that they had consulted their general practitioner with bowel problems than did those in the segmental resection group (15 of 37 versus three of 35, chi 2 = 8.17, 1 d.f., P = 0.004). Segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation is the preferred option except when there is caecal perforation or if synchronous neoplasms are present in the colon, when subtotal colectomy is more appropriate.

Staged resection (group T) versus acute resection (group R) for cure was compared in a randomized study of 121 patients presenting with signs of leftsided obstructive colorectal tumours during emergency surgery from 1978 to 1993. Patients with distant spread were excluded. Transverse colostomy was done in 58 and resection without immediate anastomosis in 56. Duration of emergency surgery was shorter, blood-transfusions less and wound infections less frequent in T compared to R, but postoperative mortality was similar (8 patients in each group). The diagnosis of tumour was wrong in 11 patients in T and 6 in R. The proportion of patients surviving the second stage curative resection in T without a permanent colostomy (32/35) was higher than after acute resection (36/50) in spite of 6 patients having anastomotic surgery (Coloshield) at the time of acute resection in R. Days spent in hospital were less in R. Overall recurrence rates and survival rates were similar in T and R. No major advantage besides shorter hospital stay could be demonstrated by acute resection without simultaneous anastomosis compared with the traditional three stage procedure, which on the other hand carried a much smaller risk of a permanent colostomy. The latter should therefore serve as a control in a prospective evaluation of emergency resection with simultaneous anastomosis.

The management of malignant obstruction of the colon distal to the splenic flexure is controversial. The 'traditional' three-stage procedure is marred by frequent failure to complete the planned sequence of operations and a resulting high permanent stoma rate. At each stage the mortality rate (7 per cent) and morbidity rate (30 per cent) are significant. The mortality rate following primary resection with delayed anastomosis (Hartmann's procedure) is 10 per cent. However, many patients experience complications and only 60 per cent have the stoma reversed. Primary anastomosis may be performed after subtotal or segmental colonic resection. The reported mortality rate is about 10 per cent with anastomotic leakage in 4-6 per cent, but cases are often carefully selected. It is difficult to suggest clear guidelines based on existing data. Although there are strong arguments in favour of a single-stage procedure, surgeons must decide whether available resources and local circumstances permit this. The alternative is Hartmann's procedure or referral to a surgeon with an interest in emergency colorectal surgery.

Transcaecal ileal diversion has been used in association with primary resection and anastomosis to defunction an elective distal colonic anastomosis in 10 patients and to allow on-table colonic lavage with subsequent colonic defunction in 11 patients presenting as an emergency with distal colonic obstruction. Post-operative wound sepsis occurred in four patients (19%) with a clinical anastomotic leak in one patient. The median hospital stay was 14 (10-19) days. Transcaecal ileal diversion is simple to perform. It may facilitate primary resection and anastomosis in both the elective and emergency situation without increasing morbidity, mortality or the hospital stay.

A prospective study was made of 92 patients who underwent emergency colorectal surgery during a 1-year period. A dedicated emergency theatre allowed half of the patients to be operated on between 09.00 and 17.00 hours with greater seniority of operating surgeons. The overall mortality rate was 14 per cent and the primary resection rate was 79 per cent. The mortality rate was 12 per cent for right-sided resection with anastomosis and 24 per cent for left-sided resection without anastomosis, including those undergoing Hartmann's procedure which had a 35 per cent mortality rate. Immediate left-sided anastomosis was performed safely in all 14 patients in whom it was attempted. Firms headed by consultants with and without a special interest in colorectal disease made differing use of primary resection and immediate anastomosis (67 versus 41 per cent, P less than 0.05) and Hartmann's (7 versus 25 per cent, P less than 0.05) and non-resectional (15 versus 29 per cent, P not significant) procedures. Retrospective surveys of perioperative deaths examine inadequate management and subsequent mortality rates, but do not reveal the significant morbidity rate that occurs in survivors. This audit revealed significant differences in the management of patients with colorectal emergencies between firms headed by specialist and non-specialist consultants. In order to minimize these differences we believe that recent advances in colorectal practice should be included in the training of all surgeons.

Compared with the prolonged cumulative hospitalization and morbidity that accompany staged resection for the treatment of obstructing or inflammatory disorders of the left colon, our results confirm that resection with intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis is a safe alternative. In the absence of intraoperative lavage, all patients in our series would have required a multistage procedure. Intraoperative lavage with primary anastomosis does not challenge the accepted criteria for safe bowel anastomosis. Rather, it offers another means for meeting those criteria. This alternative should be considered in the management of any patient whose primary indication for colostomy is the lack of adequate mechanical preparation of the colon. Although our experience indicates that intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis can be employed safely in the treatment of inflammatory disorders of the colon, it is not recommended in the presence of fecal peritonitis, a large contiguous pelvic abscess, or systemic sepsis. In these individuals, the additional operating time required for intraoperative lavage and the potential consequences of anastomotic dehiscence pose too great a risk.

In selected individuals requiring emergency colon resection, intraoperative colonic lavage with primary anastomosis represents a safe alternative to staged reconstruction. This procedure achieves excellent mechanical preparation of the colon, facilitates safe anastomosis, and avoids the disadvantages associated with multistaged operations. At our institution, 25 patients requiring urgent segmental resection of the left colon have undergone intraoperative colonic lavage. Primary anastomosis without fecal diversion has been performed in 21 of these patients. Obstruction of the large intestine was the indication for operation in 56 percent of the patients in this series. Ten patients (40 percent) required laparotomy for an acute intra-abdominal inflammatory process. No post-operative deaths have occurred in our series, and no patient has sustained clinically evident anastomotic leakage. A pelvic abscess developed in one patient after sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Three patients required treatment for wound infection. Based on our results, we recommend resection with intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis as the preferred treatment for the majority of patients requiring nonelective segmental left colon resection.

The risk of anastomotic failure in the unprepared colon is generally high. Therefore, Hartmann's operation is frequently employed in emergencies. We present an alternative technique, the exteriorized anastomosis described until now only for cases of perforation. Exteriorized anastomosis was performed in 14 patients. The preoperative diagnosis was occlusive neoplasm, perforated diverticulitis or traumatic performation of the sigmoid colon. Four patients subsequently developed partial anastomotic dehiscence, but without the consequences of intraperitoneal dehiscence. We think that exteriorized anastomosis is a useful alternative in high risk situations.

Although obstructed left-sided colorectal cancer has traditionally been treated by a series of staged operations, there has been recent interest in the one-stage immediate resection technique. The case of a 72 year old woman who required 4 operations for obstructed left-sided colorectal cancer is presented.

In a randomized prospective controlled trial involving 311 patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery, the efficacy and safety of two different single dose and one triple dose regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis, as well as the influence of blood transfusion on postoperative infectious complications, were studied. Postoperative infectious complications occurred in a total of 59 patients (19.0 per cent). There were no major differences between the three treatment groups. Thirty-four patients (10.9 per cent) developed abdominal wound infection, 17 patients (5.5 per cent) intra-abdominal abscess and 16 patients (5.1 per cent) anastomotic leakage. Of 202 patients (65.0 per cent) requiring blood transfusion during hospitalization 57 (28.2 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 23-36 per cent) developed infectious complications, whereas two non-transfused patients (1.8 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 0.2 to 6 per cent; P less than 0.001) developed infectious complications. It is concluded that one single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute and elective colorectal surgery is as protective as a triple dose regimen. The development of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly related to blood transfusion.

Anastomotic breaking strength and collagen metabolism in the colonic wall were studied after resection of a standardized left-colon stenosis in the rat. An increased complication rate was found in the stenosis group compared with the control group (27 percent vs. 2 percent) and the complications arise soon after surgery. The collagen turnover in the anastomotic area, as well as the changes of breaking strength, were equal between the groups in the early healing course, implying that the stenosis group, as an entity, did not show impairment in the studied parameters predisposing for complications. Other factors such as mechanical strain by the increased fecal bulk and increased bacterial load may contribute to occurrence of the anastomotic complications.

Obstructed large bowel carcinoma is a disease of the aged, often with concomitant disease and also advanced malignancy. The immediate mortality rate of operation is high and long-term prognosis is poor in comparison with elective surgery. It is important before operation that the diagnosis be established by sigmoidoscopy and emergency contrast studies. Staged procedures based on considerations of safety have given way to immediate resection. For right-sided colonic obstruction immediate resection and anastomosis is now almost universal and for left-sided tumours primary resection has overtaken staged resection in the UK. An anticipated survival advantage for primary resection has not, however, been confirmed. Obstruction complicated by perforation is an absolute indication for resection. After left-sided resection, making an anastomosis is associated with higher risk of leakage than after an elective operation. In the most adverse circumstances of associated sepsis, Hartmann's operation retains its place but immediate anastomosis is the most frequent option for many. Additional manoeuvres to make this safe include peroperative antegrade colonic irrigation and subtotal colectomy, although segmental resection with anastomosis and without bowel preparation is also practised and may be safe in selected patients. When major resectional surgery is undertaken in aged patients at high risk of mortality, the rule that the operator should be fully trained in elective large bowel surgery is incontrovertible. It is at least equally important that the anaesthetist is experienced and capable of instituting, interpreting and acting upon sophisticated cardiopulmonary monitoring.

In a series of 27 patients who required surgery for distal colonic lesions, primary bowel resection with immediate anastomosis after intraoperative antegrade colonic irrigation was performed. The technique of on-table lavage was similar to that described by Dudley and Radcliffe in 1980; however, some new technical details are introduced to minimize fecal contamination. There were 17 men and 10 women (mean age, 68.5 years). Twenty patients were admitted for obstructing carcinoma of the left colon; 11 underwent immediate surgery, while the remaining 9 underwent delayed surgery after 12 hours of intravenous fluids and nasogastric suction. Of the remaining seven patients, five had perforated sigmoid diverticula and diffuse peritonitis and two had obstructing diverticular disease of the left colon with remarkable bowel distention. One hospital mortality occurred secondary to a ruptured aortic aneurysm. The radiologic anastomotic leakage rate was 14.8 percent. Clinical anastomotic dehiscence was not observed.