Prehabilitation aims to enhance preoperative functional capacity through exercise, nutrition, and psychological programs. Home-based prehabilitation represents an alternative to hospital prehabilitation, with the advantage of not utilising hospital resources. This review aims to evaluate adherence and clinical effectiveness of home-based prehabilitation.

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to October 1, 2024 for randomised controlled trials comparing home-based prehabilitation with standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, and 6-min walking test. We used risk ratios (RR) and mean differences to summarise the results. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 tool.

We included 29 randomised trials for a total of 3508 patients. Median adherence to home-based prehabilitation programs was 82%. Home-based prehabilitation reduced the proportion of patients with postoperative complications (508/1322 [38.4%] vs 578/1335 [43.3%], risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.98, P=0.02, I2=44%, low certainty). After home-based prehabilitation, 6-min walking test performance was better compared with control (MD 28.2 m (95% CI 9.5-46.9; P<0.01, I2=48). Preoperative depression (MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.43; P<0.001, I2=0%), postoperative anxiety (MD -0.50, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.25; P<0.001, I2=0%, low certainty) and length of hospital stays (MD -0.32 days, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.03; P=0.03, I2=45%, low certainty) were lower with home-based prehabilitation.

Home-based prehabilitation reduced the proportion of patients with postoperative complications, but with low certainty of evidence. It also improved preoperative functional capacity, reduced hospital stays, depression and anxiety scores, with good adherence to the intervention.

PROSPERO (CRD42024591208).

Current prehabilitation programs are often limited by poor recruitment and attrition rates. Remote delivery of prehabilitation may reduce barriers to participation and maximize program retention. We aimed to assess the feasibility (uptake, retention, fidelity), preliminary effectiveness, and acceptability of delivering a technology-supported prehabilitation program remotely to oncologic surgical candidates.

This was a one-arm pragmatic feasibility study aiming to follow patients for 4-6 weeks preoperatively and 8 weeks postoperatively. All patients received a home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program, with psychosocial counselling as needed. Those at risk of malnutrition received nutritional counselling and supplements to meet personalized energy and protein targets. Adherence was assessed using an exercise watch and a mobile application for dietary assessment. In addition, we assessed physical effects, with change in 6-min walking distance of 20m defined as clinically meaningful recovery, and post-operative complications. Acceptability was assessed using a convergence mixed-methods approach.

A total of 28 participants were included (median 69, IQR 9.5 years; 12/28, 43 % males). Rate of recruitment was 47 %, retention was 78 %, and attendance was 86-93 %. Participants walked an average of 8168 (SD: 4685) steps per day preoperatively and 6809 (SD: 4819) steps per day postoperatively. They consumed on average 21.6 kcal/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) and 1.1 g protein/kg IBW during the first week of the intervention. Participants demonstrated significant improvements in remote physical tests before surgery (arm strength: +9.7 [5.7, 13.6] repetitions in arm curl, p < 0.001; leg strength: +3.2 [1.4, 4.9] sit-to-stand repetitions in 30 s, p = 0.001; endurance: +19.4 [12.7, 26.1] repetitions in the 2-min step test, p < 0.001). The majority (16/22, 73 %) achieved clinically meaningful recovery at 8 weeks postoperatively. All participants attested to the acceptability of exercising with remote supervision.

A technology-assisted prehabilitation program delivered remotely is feasible and could lead to physical benefits for a surgical cancer population.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and adherence of home-based exercise interventions in people diagnosed with cancer. The primary research question is: Are home-based exercise interventions safe and feasible for people diagnosed with cancer?

A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted in January 2025, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved home-based exercise interventions people diagnosed with cancer. Studies were included if they reported on safety, feasibility, and health-related outcomes. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess study quality and risk of bias. Adverse events were categorized by severity, and feasibility which was determined based on recruitment, withdrawal, and adherence rates.

From 127 eligible studies involving 10,562 participants, the review found that home-based exercise interventions are generally safe, with less than 3.2% of participants experiencing exercise-related adverse events, most of which were minor. Feasibility was supported by an average recruitment rate of 50.1%, which was calculated as the proportion of eligible participants who consented to participate across the included studies. Additionally, the review found a withdrawal rate of 13.7%, and an adherence rate of 76.2%. However, significant variability in these rates were observed across the studies, highlighting the challenges in maintaining participant engagement.

Home-based exercise interventions are feasible and safe for people diagnosed with cancer, with minor adverse events being the most common. However, there is a need for standardized protocols in reporting adverse events and better strategies to improve recruitment and adherence.

These findings support the integration of home-based exercise into standard cancer care, offering a practical and safe option for enhancing the health and well-being of cancer survivors. However, the successful implementation of these programs may require additional support from exercise professionals within primary care or community settings to ensure appropriate guidance and adherence. Personalized exercise programs, developed by qualified exercise professionals such as physiotherapists or clinical exercise physiologists, and improved reporting standards are essential to optimizing these interventions.

Prehabilitation in the context of abdominal wall repair has received increasing interest as a strategy to improve postoperative outcomes by focusing on optimizing preoperative risk factors. The main approach includes nutritional counseling, exercise, and psychological intervention. The aim of this project was to assess whether a multimodal prehabilitation program for patients scheduled to undergo large ventral incisional hernia repair could modify the risk factors and optimize them for surgery. In addition, the impact on postoperative outcomes was evaluated.

This retrospective analysis included patients referred to a multimodal prehabilitation program preceding complex abdominal wall repair for incisional hernia between 2016 and 2020. The program comprised medical optimization, supervised and home-based exercise training, personalized nutrition plans, smoking cessation counseling, and psychological support. Patients were deemed optimized if they met one of the recommended criteria: weight loss ≥ 7% of total body weight, smoking cessation, or Hemoglobin A1c < 7%. Perioperative care adhered to an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway. Primary outcome was the number of patients reaching optimization criteria preoperatively. Secondary outcomes included functional capacity changes from baseline (six-minute walk test), length of stay, and postoperative complications.

Seventy consecutive patients were analyzed, with 57.1% completing the program (prehabilitation group) and 42.9% not (dropout group). Groups were similar in baseline characteristics. In the prehabilitation group, 27.5% were fully optimized, 45% partially optimized, and 82.5% underwent surgery, while 30% partially met criteria and 33.3% underwent surgery in the control group. Patients showed functional improvement (mean + 61 m in 6MWT), with no significant differences in postoperative outcomes.

Prehabilitation positively impacted modifiable risk factors in hernia patients, aiding in their eligibility for complex abdominal wall surgery. Patients participating in the program experienced enhanced functional capacity, indicating the potential benefits of prehabilitation in optimizing surgical outcomes.

Emerging research presents divergent perspectives on the efficacy of prehabilitation for patients scheduled for surgery due to upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, capturing the attention of both the scientific community and surgical professionals. This quantitative comparative analysis seeks to assess the association of prehabilitation to ameliorate postoperative outcomes in individuals with upper GI cancers, thereby providing a comprehensive evaluation of its potential benefits within a surgical context.

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched up to February 2024. Studies reporting the association between prehabilitation, and postoperative complications, readmissions or other outcomes of interest were included. Fixed or random effect models were used, and forest plots were applied to show the results of the quantitative comparative analysis.

A total of 198 studies were initially screened based on titles and abstracts, with 129 studies subsequently excluded. Overall, 69 full-text studies were identified, of which 12 studies were finally included for qualitative analysis in the quantitative comparative analysis after determining whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The pooled results indicated that prehabilitation significantly reduced the overall postoperative complication rates in patients with upper GI cancer undergoing surgical therapy with the pooled OR of 0.59 (95%CI: 0.39-0.88). Moreover, prehabilitation was also shown to be a protective factor of pulmonary complications (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.36-0.80) and ICU readmissions (OR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.06-0.89).

The correlation between prehabilitation and a reduction in overall postoperative complications, pulmonary complications, and ICU readmissions among patients with upper GI cancer is substantiated by significant data. This pivotal finding necessitates further empirical investigation to validate these initial results and ascertain the clinical efficacy of prehabilitation protocols, thereby informing future surgical practice strategies.

There is a gap in knowledge regarding the utility of preoperative exercise (PEx) among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients undergoing surgery and how PEx impacts surgical outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate the mechanism behind PEx among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for GI cancer through a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

This was a single center RCT conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Eligible patients diagnosed with GI cancers with planned abdominal surgery were randomized to receive PEx or a Sedentary (Non-PEx) arm between October 2020 and May 2022. To investigate if PEx could lead to systemic change in circulation, we employed secretomics and metabolomics analyses of patient serum samples before and after exercise to detect inflammatory and tumorigenic responses, with the primary endpoint of investigating the mechanisms through which PEx modulates the inflammatory response in patients undergoing GI cancer surgery.

Between October 2020 and May 2022, 64 patients were enrolled in the study, with 28 randomized to the PEx group and 36 to the non-PEx group. The two cohorts were comparable in terms of age, gender, and comorbidity burden. The median length of stay was 6 days across the entire cohort, with no significant differences between the groups. Similarly, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 15.7%, and the median comprehensive complication index score was 20.9, both of which showed no differences between the PEx and non-PEx groups. Secretomics and metabolomics analyses of patient serum samples revealed a shift towards an anti-inflammatory and anti-tumorigenic phenotype, with significant changes in secretion and metabolic profiles observed in post-PEx serum compared to pre-PEx serum from the same patients.

PEx has the potential to mitigate the pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic state of GI cancer by modulating specific cellular pathways. This study provides evidence into the mechanisms underlying these effects, but additional research is required to explore their applicability in therapeutic development. These findings build upon existing research to support the advancement of exercise-inspired therapeutic strategies in the future.

The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04602026) on 20/10/2020.

Exercise intervention studies have shown benefits for patients with lung cancer undergoing surgery, yet most interventions to date have been resource intensive and have followed a one-size-fits-all approach.

To determine whether a personalized, clinic-aligned perioperative exercise program with remote monitoring and instructions can improve physical function and fatigue among patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer.

The Precision-Exercise-Prescription (PEP) randomized clinical trial is a single-center phase 3 trial. Adult patients with primary lung cancer (stages I-IIIa) or oligometastatic disease to the lung (where all disease could be removed) were assessed for eligibility and randomized to either an exercise intervention or standard care. Patients were enrolled between November 2017 and 2021, and the trial continued during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to December 2023.

The structured exercise program, personalized based on mobility scores, was a home-based exercise intervention prescribed and monitored remotely by a licensed physical therapist. The program started approximately 2 weeks before surgery and continued after surgery. Standard care included use of incentive spirometer and encouragement to exercise without a formal program.

Physical function (6-minute walk test [6MWT]), the Short Physical Performance Battery, and cancer-related fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) were assessed at baseline and 2 months after surgery.

A total of 182 patients (92 receiving exercise intervention, 90 receiving standard care) were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 62.7 (13.8) years, 108 (59%) were female, and 89 (49%) had low mobility scores (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores, 1-3). Physical function in the exercise group increased at 2 months after surgery (mean [SE] 6MWT at baseline, 467.9 [13.0] m; at 2 months, 482.2 [14.1] m), compared with a decrease in the standard-care group (mean [SE] 6MWT at baseline, 481.4 [11.1] m; at 2 months, 471.5 [14.0] m). Mean (SE) between-group changes in 6MWT distance for intent to treat from baseline to 2 months were 22.7 (12.7) m (P = .08), with greater effect sizes among women (mean [SE], 37.8 [17.3] m; P = .03). Similarly, women showed greater improvements in the Short Physical Performance Battery (mean [SE], 0.9 [0.4]; P = .04). Patients in the exercise group maintained stable fatigue scores at 2 months, whereas participants in the standard-care group deteriorated (mean [SD], 3.7 [1.4]; P = .009), with greater effect sizes among individuals who were younger, from rural areas, had overweight or obesity, and had primary lung cancer.

The PEP intervention, a personalized, clinic-aligned, and remotely monitored perioperative exercise program for patients with lung cancer undergoing surgery demonstrated improvements in physical function for women and significant improvements in fatigue scores across all groups.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03306992.

Population ageing and cancer burden are important global public health problems that pose unprecedented threats to health systems worldwide. Frailty is a common health problem among elderly patients with cancer. In recent years, the use of prehabilitation to improve frailty has received widespread attention. Few studies have addressed the specific physiologic effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery.

Frail elderly patients (aged at least 65 years) who underwent elective primary surgery for gastric cancer between September 2022 and October 2023 were included in this single-centre prospective cohort study and were categorized into multimodal prehabilitation or ERAS standard care groups. Prehabilitation, including physical and respiratory training, nutritional support and psychosocial treatment, was provided at least two weeks before gastrectomy. The primary outcome was functional status. Secondary outcomes included changes in indices of lipid metabolism, oxidative stress and chronic inflammation.

Over a 13-month period, 137 participants were assessed for eligibility, and 110 patients (prehabilitation 55, ERAS 55) were analysed. Compared with the baseline, patients in the prehabilitation group exhibited increased physical capacity before the operation (mean 6-min walk test change +28 m; P < 0.001). After prehabilitation intervention, inflammation-related indicators (NLR, PLR, SII and CRP) improved, and proinflammatory cytokine production (IL-5, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 and TNF-α) decreased. After surgery, the increase in IL-6 was reduced in the prehabilitation group (P = 0.036). Moreover, prehabilitation was associated with alleviating oxidative stress as determined by the levels of MDA (P = 0.005).

Multimodal prehabilitation can play a beneficial role in improving functional abilities by reducing chronic inflammation, improving lipid metabolism, and attenuating oxidative stress.

We performed a qualitative study to explore key stakeholders' perspectives about the impact of frailty on ovarian cancer care and evaluate a candidate prehabilitation intervention.

We conducted semi-structured interviews with patient-caregiver dyads and multi-disciplinary clinicians. Patients were ≥ 50 years of age with a new diagnosis of advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian cancer who received cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery) during the past year and met criteria as pre-frail or frail using the FRAIL scale. We used a semi-structured interview guide to elicit participants' views on frailty, nutrition, physical therapy, and a candidate prehabilitation intervention. We used inductive and deductive approaches to code and analyze interviews and identify emergent themes and patterns.

Ten patients and caregivers (five dyads) and 10 providers were interviewed. We identified four themes: (1) frailty screening is essential to prevent over- and under-treatment, but underused; (2) stakeholders preferred a multidisciplinary approach to providing tailored care for frail patients over a candidate prehabilitation intervention; (3) patient, family caregiver, and clinician stakeholders reported multiple barriers to prehabilitation programs, including concerns about selection bias, and (4) frail patients and family members are vulnerable and require more psychosocial support.

We identified significant barriers to prehabilitation interventions for frail patients with ovarian cancer; initiatives to increase frailty screening and provide tailored multi-disciplinary approaches may have a greater impact.

Surgery is the cornerstone treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). However, contraindications for unresectability are not well-documented in the literature.

This study aims to identify contraindications that prevent surgery for primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center.

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated for primary RPS at our center from 1995 to 2021.

Among the 452 patients treated for primary RPS, 92 (20%) were not offered surgery. The reasons for unresectability were categorized as follows: poor general health or severe comorbidities in 39 patients (42%), preoperative detection of distant metastases in 33 patients (36%), and locally advanced disease in 20 patients (22%). Locally advanced disease included vascular involvement in 14 patients (15%) and vertebral invasion in 6 patients (7%). Among the non-operated patients, 66% received chemotherapy, 16% received radiotherapy, and 5% received combined treatments. The median progression-free survival was 7months, and the median overall survival was 18months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 53%.

Contraindications for surgery in patients with primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center are not uncommon. The next step should be to differentiate absolute from relative (i.e., preoperative modifiable factors) contraindications.

Surgery imposes significant physiological and psychological stress, often leading to complications, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stays. Prehabilitation, a proactive strategy to optimize patients' resilience before surgery, has emerged as a transformative approach in perioperative care. Nutritional prehabilitation specifically addresses metabolic dysregulation, muscle loss, and immune suppression caused by surgical stress. This review highlights the critical role of nutritional prehabilitation within a multimodal framework, integrating exercise, psychological support, and emerging technologies. Although some evidence supports the effectiveness of prehabilitation in enhancing functional outcomes and improvements in rates of complications and mortality, its implementation faces challenges such as resources, lack of standardized protocols, and variability across healthcare settings, highlighting the need for greater standardization. Physical training as part of prehabilitation also improves mood, fosters patient engagement, and instills a sense of control over the disease process. These psychosocial benefits, alongside enhanced patient-reported outcomes and qualitative measures, reflect the holistic value of prehabilitation. Emerging technologies, such as wearable devices and telemedicine, offer scalable and personalized solutions for delivering prehabilitation, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future research should prioritize refining protocols, exploring long-term outcomes, and addressing the unique needs of high-risk populations. By emphasizing a proactive approach to perioperative care, this review aims to highlight the potential of nutritional prehabilitation as a foundational component of multimodal strategies designed to optimize surgical resilience, empower patients, and transform surgical recovery into a proactive and patient-centered journey.

To assess sample size calculation reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating prehabilitation interventions in oncological surgery patients.

A systematic literature search was performed in multiple medical databases from inception to April 2023, including MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINHAL, AMED, and PsychINFO.

The inclusion criteria used were RCTs evaluating effectiveness of exercise, nutrition, and/or psychological interventions on postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing oncological surgery.

Two authors (DS and SV) extracted information on the sample size calculation parameters, including type I error (α), power (1-β), mean (or mean difference between randomization arms), and variance (eg, standard deviation) for continuous outcomes, and event rates or event rate difference between randomization arms for dichotomous outcomes. When possible, we recalculated the sample size required using the collected data, given a 10% margin of error.

Of the 59 included publications (58 RCTs), 26 (44%) reported sufficient information to complete sample size recalculation. Of those that provided sufficient information allowing us to recalculate the required sample size, 11 (42%) were within a 10% margin of the reported sample size, whereas 9 (35%) were >10% higher than reported sample size and 6 (23%) were >10% lower than reported sample size.

Over half of the published RCTs in this field exhibit poor sample size calculation reporting. Most RCTs that report sufficient sample size information were underpowered. More stringent reporting requirements are necessary.

The concept of prehabilitation, defined as interventions aimed at enhancing a patient's functional capacity prior to an impending physiological stressor, may contribute to reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality. The study's goal is to verify or refute the feasibility of a prehabilitation programme for two diagnostic patient groups during neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, which is prescribed before the scheduled surgical procedure. This is a single group study design, with all patients enrolled receiving the intervention.

This is an interventional feasibility study of a prehabilitation programme in the form of physical training conducted at home. The training consists of progressively dosed walking and strength exercises for selected muscle groups. Data will be monitored telemetrically and also through telephone contact with participants. Primary outcomes include: the percentage of patients interested in participating in the study out of all patients indicated for neoadjuvant therapy at University Hospital Ostrava during the observed period, the percentage of patients who complete the prehabilitation programme until the date of surgery and individual patient compliance. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness parameters obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing, grip strength measured by a dynamometer, changes in body composition, EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire, and a questionnaire on the subjective perception of the exercise programme. Both primary and secondary outcomes will be compared between study arms (two diagnostic groups). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05646043.

The results of this study can serve as a foundation for larger, multicentre, controlled studies in the future.

Frailty, a syndrome of decreased resilience to physiologic stress, has been associated with increased postoperative length of stay (LOS) for specific procedures. Yet, the literature lacks large-scale analyses examining the relationship between frailty and LOS across surgical procedure.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65+ undergoing inpatient surgery including emergency procedures between 2015 and 2019 using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) data. Frailty, measured by the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), was categorized as non-frail (mFI-5 < 2) or frail (mFI-5 ≥ 2). We modeled LOS, adjusting for demographic variables, comorbidities, and surgical factors, and conducted a subgroup analysis based on emergency surgery status and surgical procedure type.

Among 1,254,809 patients, 29.0 % were frail. A higher proportion of frail patients were Black (10 % vs. 5.5 %), Hispanic (6.1 % vs. 3.8 %), of ASA class IV/V (23.3 % vs. 9.1 %), malnourished (2.7 % vs. 1.9 %), and underwent vascular surgery (16.5 % vs. 8.3 %). They experienced longer median LOS across all surgical procedures, except bariatric surgery. Unadjusted analysis revealed that mFI-5 scores of 4 and 5 were associated with increased median LOS by 3.5 days (95 % CI 3.36-3.64) and 4.64 days (95 % CI 3.96-5.32), respectively, compared to mFI-5 scores of 0. In adjusted analysis, frailty remained a significant risk factor for increased median LOS, with an mFI-5 score of 5 associated with a 3-day longer increase (95 % CI 2.79-3.22) compared to an mFI-5 score of 0. Subgroup analysis showed that each one-point increase in mFI-5 score had the strongest association with increased median LOS in emergency surgery (0.5 days, 95 % CI 0.48-0.52) and lower extremity bypass surgery (0.53 days, 95 % CI 0.47-0.59).

Frailty is an independent risk factor for prolonged postoperative LOS among older surgical patients, even after adjustment for patient and procedure covariates. Other independent risk factors for increased LOS include emergent surgery, malnutrition, and higher ASA class.

Sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis and mortality following injury. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia, as well as to assess its prevalence and impact on health outcomes among trauma patients. We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2023. A total of 27 studies were included, involving 8692 individuals (55.5 % men) with a mean age ranging from 42.2 to 80.5 years. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in trauma patients was 36.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI): 29.1-43.0 %, I2 = 97.8 %], with a 39.3 % prevalence (95 % CI: 31.0-48.5 %, I2 = 96.8 %) in men and a 39.0 % prevalence (95 % CI: 31.4-46.2 %, I2 = 94.4 %) in women. Trauma patients with sarcopenia were more prone to complications [risk ratio (RR): 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.31, I2 = 45.8 %] and less able to discharge independently (RR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.63-0.86, I2 = 33.3 %). The risk of death in trauma patients with sarcopenia was higher than in non-sarcopenic patients [hazard ratio (HR): 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.31-2.04]. Sarcopenia is commonly present in trauma patients and has a negative impact on prognosis. Early assessment and interventions for sarcopenia should be conducted in trauma patients.

With a rapidly aging population and increasing global surgical volumes, managing the elevated risk of perioperative pulmonary complications has become an expanding focus for quality improvement in health care. In this narrative review, we will analyze the evidence-based literature to provide high-quality and actionable management strategies to better detect, stratify risk, optimize, and manage perioperative pulmonary complications in geriatric populations.

Prehabilitation has been increasingly utilized to optimize perioperative outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative outcomes among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were systematically searched up until December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to standard of care in surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary outcome was functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, emergency readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We stratified our findings to determine the impact of uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes.

We included 27 studies with 2532 surgical oncology patients. Overall, patients undergoing prehabilitation demonstrated a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity compared to those without prehabilitation (mean difference in 6MWD 28.32 meters [m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01). Prehabilitation was also associated with significantly lower odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01). There was no difference in emergency readmission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61) or LOS (mean difference -0.42 days, 95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15). Comparing uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation, multimodal prehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity (6MWD 37.35 m versus 13.38 m) and lower odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 versus OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10) CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation improves functional capacity and reduces postoperative complications among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Medical decisions driving the clinical management of octogenarians who require either major or urgent surgery still depend on the patient's age rather than individual functions. This report created the privileged opportunity to illustrate the clinical effectiveness of a comprehensive function-based assessment. This was the case of an 83-year-old gentleman presenting with severe malnutrition and debility due to esophageal cancer. Multidimensional assessments were systematically performed to design the best-tailored therapeutic strategy, including prehabilitation, elective esophagectomy, and emergency laparotomy with ileocolic resection for postoperative hemorrhagic shock due to an occult colonic tumor. This clinical case highlights the need for a systematic and comprehensive assessment of fragile octogenarians, allowing accurate patient evaluation, identification of areas of functional optimization, and establishment of the most appropriate therapeutic decisions.

The Pre-EMPT study aimed to determine if structured exercise could reduce length of stay, post-operative complications and improve fitness and health-related quality of life (HQRL) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and oesophagectomy.

A prospective non-randomised trial compared a standard care pathway (control) to a structured prehabilitation exercise programme (intervention) commenced before NAC and surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Length of hospital stay and post-operative complications were recorded. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPEX), body composition analyses, lymphocyte levels and HRQL questionnaires were performed at multiple time points.

Median length of stay was similar in both groups. There were 6 versus 11 complications observed (intervention vs control p = 0.086). Cardio-pulmonary fitness (VO2peak) declined after NAC, but less in the intervention group (intervention -13.54% vs control -21.40%, p = 0.02). Body composition improved in the intervention group (FMi/FFMi -5.5% intervention, 10.7% control p = 0.043). Performance, cognitive, sleep and emotional function scores improved following NAC in the intervention group. Lymphocyte subsets increased in the intervention group compared to the control group after chemotherapy (p = 0.034). Chemotherapy response was improved in the intervention group (p = 0.022).

A structured exercise programme may mitigate cardiopulmonary deconditioning, reduce sarcopenia and offset lymphopenia, during chemotherapy, in patients undergoing NAC and oesophagectomy.

Prehabilitation is a crucial component of tumor rehabilitation that attempts to improve patients' preoperative health, although its efficacy in treating patients with cancers of the digestive system is still up for debate.

The records from PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Scopus, CNKI and Wan fang database up to November 2024 were systematically searched. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was employed for evaluating the risk of bias in each study, and the PRISMA 2020 checklist provided by the EQUATOR network was utilized.

Through quality analysis, 20 articles were included, involving 1719 patients. Although its effect on severe complications is still unknown, the prehabilitation significantly decreased overall postoperative complications when compared to standard care, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.84). Despite not shortening the postoperative hospital stay (MD: -0.13, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.03), prehabilitation demonstrated notable improvements in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), with preoperative gains (MD: 25.87, 95% CI: 14.49 to 37.25) and sustained benefits at 4 weeks postoperatively (MD: 22.48, 95% CI: 7.85 to 37.12). However, no significant differences in 6MWD were observed at 6 or 8 weeks postoperatively. The average improvement in 6MWD from baseline to preoperative was 28.99 (95% CI: 10.89 to 47.08, P = 0.002), and from 4 weeks postoperative to baseline, it was 25.95 (95% CI: 6.84 to 45.07, P = 0.008), with no significant change at 8 weeks. The acceptance and completion rates of prehabilitation were commendably high at 61% (95% CI: 47-75%) and 90% (95% CI: 87-93%), respectively, alongside a relatively low dropout rate of 10% (95% CI: 7% to13%).

Prehabilitation reduces postoperative complications and improves short-term physical function in digestive surgery patients, with good patient acceptance; however, the long-term effects are unknown due to a lack of follow-up data.

It was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the identification code CRD42022361100.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a widely accepted treatment for esophageal cancer, yet it is associated with a significant risk of surgical adverse events (SAEs), which can compromise patient recovery and long-term survival. Accurate preoperative identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes.

To establish and validate a risk prediction and stratification model for the risk of SAEs in patients with MIE.

This retrospective study included 747 patients who underwent MIE at two centers from January 2019 to February 2024. Patients were separated into a train set (n = 549) and a validation set (n = 198). After screening by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariate logistic regression analyzed clinical and intraoperative variables to identify independent risk factors for SAEs. A risk stratification model was constructed and validated to predict the probability of SAEs.

SAEs occurred in 10.2% of patients in train set and 13.6% in the validation set. Patients with SAE had significantly higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay after surgery. The key independent risk factors identified included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of alcohol consumption, low forced expiratory volume in the first second, and low albumin levels. The stratification model has excellent prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.889 for the training set and an area under the curve of 0.793 for the validation set.

The developed risk stratification model effectively predicts the risk of SAEs in patients undergoing MIE, facilitating targeted preoperative interventions and improving perioperative management.

Gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are more vulnerable to perioperative stress. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is widely used in surgical patients aiming at reducing stress responses. However, whether this approach is safe and feasible for gastric cancer patients received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT remained determined. So, the objective of this study is to investigate the effects of ERAS for this special group of gastric cancer patients.

The data of gastric cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT were collected. Patients were divided into an ERAS group and a conventional group based on whether they received perioperative ERAS management. Propensity score matching was conducted to eliminate bias. Pre- and postoperative inflammatory and nutritional marker levels, postoperative complications, recovery indices and 3-year OS and RFS were observed.

A total of 252 patients were analyzed after 1:1 PSM, including 126 patients in the ERAS group and 126 in the conventional group. The results showed that the implementation of ERAS significantly reduced the levels of novel inflammatory indicators, improve nutritional status and accelerate postoperative recovery. We found that the 3-year OS (72.2 % vs. 66.7 %) and RFS (67.5 % vs. 61.9 %) in the ERAS group showed an improvement trend compared to those in the traditional group, especially for stage III patients, although these differences were not significant.

The perioperative ERAS program is safe and feasible for gastric cancer patients received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy after NACT.

The relationship between physical activity (PA) and nutritional status on the prognosis of cancer survivors remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate the combined effects of PA and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) on prognostic assessment of survival outcomes in US cancer survivors.

2,619 subjects were screened from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 1999 to 2018. The self-reported Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for PA assessment, and the GNRI for nutritional status assessment. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and Cox proportional risk models were used to evaluate the effect of PA combined with GNRI on the prognostic outcomes of death in cancer survivors.

The sufficient PA (≥600 MET min/week) combined with High-GNRI (>98) subgroups significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.90) and cancer-related mortality (HR: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.50) compared to other subgroups. Subgroup analyses indicated that the combination of sufficient PA and High-GNRI was associated with a significantly reduced all-cause and cancer-related mortality among specific groups-including individuals of female, patients with non-obesity-related cancers, and those with higher educational attainment. After excluding participants who died within the first 12 months of follow-up, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the association between PA and GNRI in predicting prognostic outcomes among cancer survivors.

Our study shows that among U.S. cancer survivors, sufficient PA combined with High-GNRI is linked to reduced mortality. These findings emphasize the benefits of PA and nutritional status in improving prognosis and support the need for further studies to develop targeted interventions.

The authors performed a computerized search using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were "chemotherapy AND surgery", "immunotherapy AND surgery", "radiotherapy AND surgery", "nutrition AND surgery", "(oculoplastic OR orbit OR eyelid OR lacrimal OR puncta) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(facial OR facial plastic OR oculoplastic) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND (surgery OR surgical) complications", "wound healing AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "infection AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "(bleeding OR blood loss) AND (cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND wound healing", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND (bleeding OR blood loss)", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND infection".

A total of 89 articles, published from 1993 to 2023 in the English language or with English translations were included. Articles published earlier than 2000 were cited for foundational knowledge. References cited in the identified articles were also used to gather further data for the review.

Patients who are being treated for cancer or are undergoing current treatment for cancer require special considerations. Systemic therapies and radiotherapy impact the physiology of patients and the integrity of tissue in ways that significantly impact surgical interventions. It is imperative for the oculofacial plastic surgeon to have a complete understanding on how a previous or current diagnosis of cancer can influence surgical outcomes.

There is limited evidence depicting ways that behavioral theory and techniques have been incorporated into cancer rehabilitation interventions. Examining their use within cancer rehabilitation interventions may provide insight into the active ingredients that can maximize patient engagement and intervention effectiveness.

This secondary analysis aimed to describe the use of behavior change theory and behavior change techniques (BCTs) in two previously conducted systematic reviews of cancer rehabilitation interventions.

Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) drawn from two systematic reviews examining the effect of cancer rehabilitation interventions on function and disability.

In-person and remotely delivered rehabilitation interventions.

Adult cancer survivors.

Data extraction included: behavior change theory use, functional outcome data, and BCTs using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTTv1). Based on their effects on function, interventions were categorized as "very", "quite" or "non-promising". To assess the relative effectiveness of coded BCTs, a BCT promise ratio was calculated (the ratio of promising to non-promising interventions that included the BCT).

Of 180 eligible RCTs, 25 (14%) reported using a behavior change theory. Fifty-four (58%) of the 93 BCTs were used in least one intervention (range 0-29). Interventions reporting theory use utilized more BCTs (median=7) compared to those with no theory (median=3.5; U=2827.00, P=0.001). The number of BCTs did not differ between the very, quite, and non-promising intervention groups (H(2)=0.24, P=0.85). 20 BCTs were considered promising (promise ratio >2) with goal setting, graded tasks, and social support (unspecified) having the highest promise ratios.

While there was a wide range of BCTs utilized, they were rarely based on theoretically-proposed pathways and the number of BCTs reported was not related to intervention effectiveness.

Clinicians should consider basing new interventions upon a relevant behavior change theory. Intentionally incorporating the BCTs of goal setting, graded tasks, and social support may improve intervention efficacy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has gone from an idea to an indication in locally advanced lung cancer. Several phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy in this setting. Although such progress has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced disease, the unmet needs of stage I and stage II patients without lymph node disease have largely been underrepresented in existing trials. Up-front resection with few patients going on to complete adjuvant therapy remains the norm for most stage I and II patients. Emerging evidence now supports the exploration of supplemental checkpoint blockade in well-selected early-stage, node-negative patients with large tumors and no actionable driver mutations. Although concerns surrounding safety and risk exist, patient selection could be substantially improved using novel biomarker approaches that leverage our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment of lung cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and controversies of perioperative immunotherapy in node-negative lung cancer.

This review synthesised the evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes.

A systematic review was conducted. 10 databases were searched to December 2023. Prospective experimental studies exploring prehabilitation interventions in adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery were included. Prehabilitation was any preoperative intervention to improve physical or psychological outcomes. Included studies required a comparator group or alternative preoperative intervention as well as baseline, presurgical and postoperative assessment points. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (v.2). Data synthesis was narrative (SWiM guidance).

6028 studies were screened, with 25 studies included. Prehabilitation interventions were: inspiratory muscle training (five studies n = 450); exercise (nine studies n = 683); psychological (one study n = 400); and nutritional (ten studies n = 487). High quality studies showed preoperative improvements in impairments directly targeted by the interventions. Generally, these did not translate into functional or postoperative improvements, but multimodal interventions were more promising.

Current evidence supports prehabilitation as safe to preserve or improve preoperative function. Heterogeneity in outcomes and variable study quality means definitive conclusions regarding interventions are not yet possible, limiting implementation. Agreement of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness evaluation is required.

To identify subgroups of patients with oesophageal cancer based on exercise intensity during prehabilitation, and to investigate whether training outcomes varied between subgroups.

Data from a multicentre cohort study were used, involving participants following prehabilitation before oesophagectomy. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using four cluster variables (intensity of aerobic exercise, the Borg score during resistance exercise, intensity of physical activity, and degree of fatigue). Aerobic capacity and muscle strength were estimated before and after prehabilitation.

In 64 participants, three clusters were identified based on exercise intensity. Cluster 1 (n = 23) was characterised by fatigue and physical inactivity, cluster 2 (n = 9) by a low training capacity, despite high physical activity levels, and cluster 3 (n = 32) by a high training capacity. Cluster 1 showed the greatest improvement in aerobic capacity (p = 0.37) and hand grip strength (p = 0.03) during prehabilitation compared with other clusters.

This cluster analysis identified three subgroups with distinct patterns in exercise intensity during prehabilitation. Participants who were physically fit were able to train at high intensity. Fatigued participants trained at lower intensity but showed the greatest improvement. A small group of participants, despite being physically active, had a low training capacity and could be considered frail.

The association between preoperative wearable device step counts and surgical outcomes has not been examined using commercial devices linked to electronic health records (EHRs). This study measured the association between daily preoperative step counts and postoperative complications.

Data were obtained using the All of Us (AOU) Research program, a nationwide initiative to collect EHR and health-related data from the population. Patients who underwent a surgical procedure included in the NSQIP-targeted procedures dataset were included. Patients who did not have available physical activity FitBit data were excluded. Primary outcome was the development of a postoperative complication. All analyses were performed in the AOU researcher workbench.

Of 27,150 patients who underwent a surgical procedure, 475 participants with preoperative wearable data were included: 74.7% were female and 85.2% were White. The average age was 57.2 years. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 12.6%. Patients averaging less than 7,500 daily steps were at increased odds for developing a postoperative complication (odds ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.31). After adjustment for age, sex, race, comorbid disease, BMI, and relative procedure risk, patients with a baseline average steps per day less than 7,500 were at increased odds for postoperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.06).

This study found an increase in overall postoperative complication rate in patients recording lower average preoperative step counts. Patients with a baseline of less than 7,500 steps per day had increased odds of postoperative complications in this cohort. These data support the use of wearable devices for surgical risk stratification and suggest step count may measure preoperative fitness.

Cancer-related fatigue is the most common symptom of subjective and persistent nature in cancer patients, which almost runs through the whole process of disease and treatment and rehabilitation, seriously affects the effect of anti-tumor treatment and reduces the quality of life of patients. Non-pharmacological management is one of the key links to relieve cancer-related fatigue, however, there are many types of non-pharmacological management and the related guidelines do not recommend the optimal nursing program for cancer-related fatigue. In our study, Network Meta-analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of different non-pharmacological therapies in Cancer-related fatigue to make their treatment and care more clinically valuable.

Randomized controlled trials about non-pharmacological therapies for cancer-related fatigue were searched in Chinese and English databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, Chinese Scientific Journal database, Chinese Biomedical Database, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane Library, Sci-Hub, ScienceDirect, and other relevant medical websites including Medlive and DingXiangYuan. The search time was from the establishment of the database to December 2023. The quality of the included Randomized controlled trials was evaluated by two trained researchers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were independently extracted from the included literature and analyzed by reticulated Meta-analysis using Stata 18.0 statistical software.

A total of 49 studies with 24 non-drug management methods, and 3887 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the use of massage therapy to improve cancer-related fatigue had a more significant advantage over conventional nursing measures and other non-pharmacological therapies in cancer patients, followed by infrared laser moxibustion and ginger-isolated moxibustion with traditional Chinese medicine characteristics, while the worst effect was strengthening excise.

The existing evidence shows that massage therapy has the best effect in the intervention of cancer-related fatigue. However, due to the diversity of non-pharmacological therapies and the small number of studies included in each therapy, the coverage of this study is insufficient, and more large-sample, multi-center and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further verification in the future.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to bear high morbidity and mortality. Prehabilitation, using exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial strategies to optimize patients prior to surgical resection, is largely underexplored in this malignancy, especially in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Objectives of this study were (i) to determine feasibility of prehabilitation during treatment in patients with esophageal cancer and (ii) to establish differences between hospital and home-based exercise. Patients were recruited from August 2019 - February 2023 and blindly randomized to either supervised or homebased exercise, receiving identical nutritional and psychosocial support. The main outcome measures were recruitment, retention, and dropout rates. The secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, and quality of life. Forty-four subjects were blindly randomized: 23 to supervised exercise and 21 to home-based exercise (72% recruitment rate). Overall compliance for the supervised group was 72%; home-based group was 77%. Baseline to pre-operative, both groups experienced significant increases in sit-to-stand, arm curls, and amount of weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity. The home-based group experienced an additional considerable decrease in up-and-go test times. Both groups maintained cardiorespiratory fitness and saw substantial increases in some quality-of-life scores. Multimodal prehabilitation is feasible for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In both groups, patient fitness, which is relevant for this patient population given the anticipated decline in functional status during this period, was maintained. This study provides a foundation for future prehabilitation interventions in this patient population.

Studies have demonstrated that prehabilitation in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) improves body composition, physical fitness and quality of life, and can reduce surgical complications. However, it is not offered in all OGC centres. Furthermore, definitions, funding and access to services vary. We conducted a survey of prehabilitation in OGC centres in England and Wales.

OGC centres were identified through the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA). Survey questions were developed, piloted in two institutions and distributed via email in October 2022. Reminder emails were sent over two months until the survey closed in December 2022.

Responses were received from 28 of 36 centres. There was near-universal agreement that prehabilitation should be considered standard of care for patients on curative pathways (27/28; 96%). Most centres (21/28; 75%) offered prehabilitation. The majority of respondents believed that prehabilitation should commence at diagnosis (27/28; 96%) and consist of at least aerobic training and dietitian input. Most (26/28; 93%) believed access to clinical psychologists should be included; however, only 12 (43%) had access to clinical psychologists. Respondents believed prehabilitation improves quality of life (26/28; 93%), fitness (26/28; 93%), smoking cessation (28/28; 100%), surgical complication rates (25/28; 89.3%), likelihood of proceeding to surgery (25/28; 89.3%) and overall survival (20/28; 71.4%).

Despite barriers to funding and a lack of best practice guidelines, most units deliver prehabilitation. Units require higher quality evidence, consensus on the most important aspects of the intervention and core outcome sets to support the delivery of services and facilitate audit to assess the impact of their introduction.

Background/Objectives: Postoperative delirium is a prevalent and serious complication among elderly patients following surgical procedures. Prior research indicates that reduced competence in daily living, as evidenced by limitations in performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL), is directly associated with reduced patient mobility. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of preoperative mobility as a risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium. Methods: To assess preoperative mobility, a comprehensive geriatric evaluation of daily living competence was conducted. This included the Katz Index of Independence in ADL, which assessed basic daily activities over the preceding 14 days, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL). Postoperatively, delirium monitoring was performed twice daily for seven days using validated delirium screening tools, including the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, the Confusion Assessment Method, and the 4ATest. Results: A significant correlation was observed between the incidence of delirium and the IADL scores in all patients, with p < 0.001 for men and p = 0.001 for women. Among emergency patients, the Katz Index scores significantly differed between those who developed delirium and those who did not (p = 0.015). Additionally, a significant correlation was found between the Katz Index and the incidence of delirium in both groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this study emphasize the necessity of preoperative geriatric assessment using tools such as the Katz Index or IADL to identify patients at risk of delirium. The results confirm the importance of enhanced postoperative monitoring for potential delirium. For elective patients, prehabilitation should be considered when reduced daily living competence is identified. For emergency patients, immediate postoperative interventions, including intensive mobilization and orthogeriatric co-management, are recommended.

Home-based, virtually-supported care models may represent the most efficient and scalable approach to delivering prehabilitation services. However, virtual approaches to prehabilitation are understudied. This manuscript describes the protocol for an internal pilot randomised controlled trial of a virtually-delivered, multimodal prehabilitation intervention.

We will conduct a pragmatic, individual patient, internal pilot randomised controlled trial of home-based, virtually supported, multimodal prehabilitation compared with standard perioperative care in adults undergoing elective, inpatient thoracic, abdominal, pelvic and vascular surgery at five Canadian hospitals. Participants will be partially blinded; clinicians and outcome assessors will be fully blinded. The intervention consists of 3-12 weeks of a home-based, multimodal (exercise, nutrition and psychosocial support) prehabilitation programme supported through an online platform. The primary feasibility outcomes and their progression targets are (1) monthly recruitment of>6 participants at each centre, (2) intervention adherence of>75%, (3) retention of>90% of participants at the patient-reported primary outcome point of 30-days after surgery and (4) elicitation of patient, clinician and researcher-identified barriers to our pragmatic trial. A sample size of 144 participants will be adequate to estimate recruitment, adherence and retention rates with acceptable precision. All participants will be followed to either death or up to 1 year. As an internal pilot, if no substantive changes to the trial or intervention design are required, pilot participant outcome data will migrate, unanalysed by allocation, to the future full-scale trial.

Ethical approval has been granted by Clinical Trials Ontario (Project ID: 4479) and our ethics review board (Protocol Approval #20230399-01T). Results will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications, partner organisations and engagement of social and traditional media.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06042491. Protocol, V.1.2, dated 6 June 2024.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical impact of the CALLY index in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy.

Between January 2014 and December 2020, 617 patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at the Osaka City General Hospital were enrolled in this study. The CALLY index was calculated using the following formula: [albumin (g/dL) × lymphocytes (/μl)]/[CRP (mg/dL) × 104]. We compared the predictive value of four biomarkers [CALLY index, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)] for short- and long-term outcomes and focused on the CALLY index to elucidate its clinical value.

Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve for the CALLY index was the highest among the four biomarkers. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates in the low and the high CALLY groups were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis identified the CALLY index as an independent factor for OS and CSS but not NLR or PLR. The mGPS was an independent factor for OS but not for CSS in multivariate analysis. Regarding complications, only the CALLY index was an independent predictor of major complications (≧ Clavien-Dindo grade 3) in multivariate analysis but not others.

The CALLY index may have a clinical value in predicting OS, CSS, and major complications in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Patients requiring a beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) will probably benefit from enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in such groups of patients is considered challenging. The aims of this study were to evaluate ERAS-related outcomes of patients with LARC or LRRC undergoing bTME and to investigate the possibility of designing a tailored ERAS protocol.

This study was divided into four phases. Phase one consisted of a literature study to compare functional recovery and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. In phase two, outcomes on ERAS care elements in bTME were retrospectively evaluated. In phase three, differences in ERAS-related outcomes and compliance of the colorectal ERAS protocol in patients who had undergone bTME were studied. In phase four, multidisciplinary team meetings were held to develop an ERAS protocol for bTME patients.

Seven studies reported on ERAS-related outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. Median length of hospital stay was 9-19 days, median stay in the intensive care unit was 2-4 days and 30-day postoperative major complication rates were 22.6%-61.3%. Seventy-five bTME patients were included for retrospective analysis. In these patients, length of stay was 9.0 days and major postoperative complications were observed in 40.0%. The overall ERAS compliance was 44.4%. Compared with the colorectal ERAS protocol, the largest differences in management were observed in the use of epidural anaesthesia, the postoperative use of urethral catheters, oral intake and mobilization.

Patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC are substantially different from patients treated with the colorectal ERAS protocol, regarding ERAS-related outcomes. A tailored, multimodal ERAS protocol with specific modifications was developed by an expert multidisciplinary team for patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC.

To investigate the impact of chemoradiotherapy on the physical fitness of patients with oesophageal cancer, and the clinical factors influencing it.

A total of 67 participants successfully completed the study, with 18 of them engaging in supervised, in-hospital aerobic training at moderate intensity for a minimum of 20 sessions. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, hand grip strength, body composition assessed via bioelectrical impedance analysis, patient-generated subjective global assessment, albumin, and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were evaluated before chemoradiotherapy and 6-8 weeks after its completion.

Among the participants, cardiopulmonary fitness, hand grip strength, and phase angle of BC-BIA declined during chemoradiotherapy. Before and after chemoradiotherapy, V̇O2peak was 19.6 ± 4.4 and 17.4 ± 3.9 mL/min/kg respectively. The improvement in FOIS during chemoradiotherapy showed a positive correlation with changes in aerobic capacity. Additionally, exercise training was associated with attenuating the decline in aerobic capacity.

Physical fitness deteriorated in patients with oesophageal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. Improvement in dysphagia helps maintain aerobic capacity. Additionally, exercise training has the potential to mitigate the decline. This discovery can serve as a reference for enhancing holistic care for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Prehabilitation, which includes nutritional and exercise therapies, is recommended for patients before surgery to improve physical and cognitive functions. This study aimed to identify the awareness, understanding, and issues among surgeons and anesthesiologists regarding the implementation of prehabilitation.

We conducted a survey on prehabilitation targeting surgeons and anesthesiologists working at a university hospital and two private hospitals. The survey collection period was set for 1 month, commencing on February 5, 2024. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the characteristics of the participants.

A total of 254 surgeons and 49 anesthesiologists from three hospitals participated, with a response rate of 61.7%. Regarding the understanding of prehabilitation, 16.7% of anesthesiologists and only 2% of surgeons had a good grasp of its content. When enquired about the necessity of prehabilitation, 100% of anesthesiologists indicated it as necessary or somewhat necessary, whereas 98.7% of surgeons responded similarly. Several barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation were identified, with the most common reason being the busy schedule of outpatient services.

This study highlights that while both surgeons and anesthesiologists recognize the importance of prehabilitation, significant challenges exist in its practical implementation. This underscores the need for simple explanatory tools for patients, the introduction of remote care options, and simple orders to relevant departments, which are essential and require multidisciplinary collaboration.

The level of nutritional literacy reflects the self-management ability of individuals for a healthy diet and serves as a foundation for effective nutritional interventions. This qualitative study aimed to gain a comprehensive insight into the nutritional literacy levels of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery, obtaining information from both patients and medical staff through interviews.

Based on Nutbeam's health literacy model, 27 participants were selected from December 2023 to February 2024. We used semi-structured interviews and directed content analysis.

Sixteen patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer and 11 medical staff from the Department of Esophageal Cancer completed the interviews. There were five themes, including attitude and cognition, functional nutrition literacy, interactive nutrition literacy, critical nutrition literacy, and ways to improve patients' nutritional literacy.

This study investigated the nutritional literacy levels of patients after esophageal cancer surgery from the perspectives of both patients and medical staff, offering comprehensive insights into the assessment of patients' nutritional literacy and the corresponding strategies for improvement. It emphasizes the hierarchical nature of nutritional literacy among patients after surgery and systematically outlines the different levels of nutritional literacy in this population. The results indicated that the level of nutrient literacy was low and exhibited marked differences. This finding suggests that future studies should be individualized, continuous, and comprehensive, following the Nutbeam's health literacy model, to improve patients' nutritional literacy levels.