Head and neck reconstruction is among the most expensive types of surgery, requiring long operation time and hospital stays, with high complication rates. Enhanced recovery after surgery improves the quality of post-operative recovery. In this study, we evaluated and compared the costs and outcomes in patients who underwent free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery with or without enhanced recovery. This retrospective study utilised an actively maintained prospective database. Patients who underwent head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction between November 2020 and June 2023 were categorised into the enhanced recovery after surgery and control groups. The perioperative outcomes, complication rates and hospitalisation costs were analysed. Overall, 94 patients (47 per group) were included. Compared with the control group, the enhanced recovery after surgery group showed reduced duration of sedation (15.7 h vs 34.7 h, p<0.05), post-operative mechanical ventilation (36.6 h vs 63.7 h, p<0.05), intensive care unit stay (3.9 days vs 5.0 days, p<0.05) and earlier ambulation (7.5 days vs 8.9 days, p<0.05) without increased risks of minor or major complications. The median total costs per patient were $19,353.0 and $17,320.8 in the control and enhanced recovery after surgery groups, respectively. Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery resulted in a 10% reduction ($2167.8/person) in hospitalisation costs, mainly from decreased surgical and medication expenses. The enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is a safe, effective and cost-efficient programme that facilitates post-operative recovery in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction without significantly increasing the risk of complications.

The purpose of this study is to compare short-term outcomes and 1-year incisional hernia rates between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for management of right-sided colonic cancer. The primary outcome was the complication rate assessed by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Secondary outcomes included time to bowel movement, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, early warning scores, and 1-year incisional hernia rate.

This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Patients with right-sided colonic cancer eligible for laparoscopic surgery with primary anastomosis were consecutively included. Patients included in the first period underwent EA, while those in the second underwent IA. Clinical data were collected during the hospital admission up to 30 days postoperatively. Complications were evaluated by the CCI. A routine 1-year CT-scan was used to assess hernias.

One hundred three patients (51 in the EA and 52 in the IA groups) were included. Demographics were similar between the two groups. No significant difference in the CCI-score was found (EA: 17.9 (23.9) vs. IA: 15.0 (17.4), p = 0.85). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group (EA 6.6 days, IA 3.9 days, p = 0.02). The groups had no significant differences regarding other outcomes, including hernia rates (p = 0.12).

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with IA significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without increasing complication rates compared to EA.

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05039762).

Obesity poses significant challenges in colorectal surgery, affecting operative difficulty and postoperative recovery. The choice of minimally invasive approach for this patient population remains a challenge during preoperative planning. This review aims to provide an updated synthesis of studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches for adult patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery.

MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched up to August 2023. Articles were included if they compared laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes in adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Outcomes included overall postoperative morbidity, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time. Inverse variance random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool effect estimates.

After screening 2187 citations, 10 observational studies were included with 3281 patients with obesity undergoing robotic surgery (mean age: 58.1 years, female: 43.9%) and 11 369 patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic surgery (mean age: 58 years, female: 53.2%). Robotic surgery resulted in longer operative times (MD 46.71 min, 95% CI 33.50-59.92, p < 0.01, I2 = 93.79%) with statistically significant reductions in conversions to laparotomy (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.65, p < 0.01, I2 = 67.15%). No significant differences were seen in postoperative morbidity (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.08, p = 0.40, I2 = 36.08%).

These data suggest that robotic colorectal surgery in patients with obesity may reduce the risk for conversion to laparotomy, but at the expense of increased operative times and with no overt benefits in postoperative outcomes. Further high quality randomized controlled trials assessing the utility of robotic surgery in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery are warranted.

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and preliminary effects of a supervised, home-based exercise program in patients recovering from laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. A total of 23 patients were included, with 13 participating in the exercise intervention and 10 receiving standard postoperative care. The exercise group (intervention group) followed a two-month structured program, while the control group received no structured exercise. Feasibility was demonstrated by 98% adherence in the intervention group and no reported adverse events. At T1, the intervention group showed significant improvements in role function, cognitive function, and reduced fatigue compared to the control group. At T2, a significant difference was observed in physical function. Functional capacity, assessed by the Six-Minute Walk Test, was significantly better in the intervention group at T1, T2, and T3, as was physical performance measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at T1, T2, and T3. No significant differences were observed between the groups in anxiety, depression, sleep quality, or body composition parameters. This study highlights the feasibility of a supervised home-based exercise program in the early postoperative phase, demonstrating positive effects on Quality of Life, functional recovery, and fatigue in colorectal cancer patients.

We aimed to assess the impact of the rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks on postoperative pain alleviation and recovery in children undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomies.

Ninety patients got a transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block and were randomly divided into three groups. Each patient had taken 2.5ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (1.25mg/kg). Group 1: 0.3mg/kg of dexamethasone was added to the bupivacaine. Group 2: 1μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was added to the bupivacaine. Group 3: received only bupivacaine. We recorded analgesic usage overall, postoperative pain score, time until initial analgesic use, side effects and satisfaction score.

The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly longer mean time to initial rescue analgesia (13.13 ± 2.81) compared to the control and dexamethasone groups (11.6 ± 2.99, 7.27 ± 2; p < 0.001). Within the first 24 hours following surgery, the dexmedetomidine group consumed considerably less rescue analgesia (490.5 ± 129) than the dexamethasone and control groups (556 ± 210.4, 811.5 ± 333.9; p < 0.0001). With better satisfaction, fewer analgesics were taken, and fewer side effects and lower postoperative pain levels were observed in the dexmedetomidine group.

Dexmedetomidine in combined transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks can enhance postoperative pain relief, decrease analgesic use and hasten postoperative recovery.

Transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary (TEP) tumor resection is performed through the nose via the sphenoid sinus to remove tumors from the pituitary gland. Also, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was adapted to reduce physical and physiological traumatic stress response of surgical patients.

A total of 174 patients who underwent TEP tumor resection in our department from August 2021 to June 2022 were randomly divided into non-ERAS group and ERAS group. The main primary observational indicator was postoperative self-care ability parameters such as early urethral catheters' removal and postoperative food intake. Also, secondary indicators such as postoperative complications, average length of hospital stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared.

The overall self-care ability of the ERAS group was higher than that of the non-ERAS group 24 h after surgery (35 points vs 20 points, p < 0.001). Also, food intake on the first day after surgery was higher than that of the non-ERAS group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the average LOS in the ERAS group was lower than that of the non-ERAS group (4 days vs 7 days, p < 0.01). Additionally, the average hospitalization cost in the ERAS group was lower than that of the non-ERAS group (32, 886 RMB vs 48, 125 RMB, p < 0.001).

ERAS nursing strategy promoted early recovery of self-care, shorten the average LOS, and reduce hospitalization costs without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications.

The mainstay of colorectal cancer care is surgical resection, which carries a significant risk of complications. Efforts to improve outcomes have recently focused on intensive multimodal prehabilitation programs to better prepare patients for surgery, which make the perioperative process even more complex and demanding for patients. Digital applications (eCoaches) seem promising tools to guide patients during their care journey. We developed a comprehensive eCoach to support, guide, and monitor patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery through the perioperative phase of the care pathway.

The primary aim of this study was to determine its feasibility, in terms of recruitment rate, retention rate, and compliance. Also, usability and patient experience were examined.

A single-center cohort study was conducted from April to September 2023 in a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands. All elective colorectal surgery patients were offered an eCoach that provided preoperative coaching of the prehabilitation protocol, guidance by giving timely information, and remote monitoring of postoperative recovery and complications. Recruitment and retention rate, as well as compliance for each part of the care pathway, were determined. Secondary, patient-reported usability measured by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use questionnaire and patient experiences were reported.

The recruitment rate for the eCoach was 74% (49/66). Main reasons for exclusion were digital illiteracy (n=10), not owning a smartphone (n=3), and the expected burden of use being too high (n=2). The retention rate was 80% (37/46). Median preoperative compliance with required actions in the app was 92% (IQR 87-95), and postoperative compliance was 100% (IQR 100-100). Patient-reported usability was good and patient experiences were mostly positive, although several suggestions for improvement were reported.

Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a comprehensive eCoach for guiding and monitoring patients undergoing colorectal surgery encompassing the entire perioperative pathway, including prehabilitation and postdischarge monitoring. Compliance was excellent for all phases of the care pathway and recruitment and retention rates were comparable with rates reported in the literature. The study findings provide valuable insights for the further development of the eCoach and highlight the potential of digital health applications in perioperative support.

To provide a structured macroscopic overview of the characteristics and advances in research related to the Enhancing Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol.

A bibliometric analysis.

Web of Science was selected as the search engine for the bibliometric analysis study, and data up to January 25, 2024 were included in the scan. The analysis was conducted using the "biblioshiny" application available in the Bibliometrics R package.

A total of 769 studies were included in the review between 1991 and 2024. China produced the most publications on the subject, while the United States received the highest number of citations. A total of 213 global collaborations were identified, with the most frequent collaboration being between the United States and Canada (8 collaborations). The author Li K. contributed the most papers and the Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing published the most nursing papers on the topic. "Enhanced recovery" was the most frequently used keyword in the articles. In addition, China led in the number of publications, while the United Kingdom, China, Canada, and Sweden had the highest number of citations of all countries.

This bibliometric study provided comprehensive information on global trends and hotspots in ERAS protocol care research. Developed countries were the most productive in this area of research. It was noted that publications in this study area did not meet the Lodka and Bradford laws.

Background and Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with colon cancer accounting for approximately 60% of all CRC cases. Surgery remains the primary and most effective treatment. Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as a promising approach for colon cancer resection. This retrospective study compares RAS and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LSS) for stage I-III colon cancer resections at a single medical center in East Asia. Methods: Between 1 January 2018, and 29 February 2024, patients undergoing colectomy were classified into right-side and left-side colectomies. Propensity score matching was conducted based on age group, gender, ASA score, and BMI to ensure comparability between groups. After matching, there were 50 RAS and 200 LSS cases for right colectomy (RC), and 129 RAS and 258 LSS cases for left colectomy (LC). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The primary outcomes were recovery milestones, while secondary outcomes included complications and postoperative pain scores. Results: RAS demonstrated faster recovery milestones compared to LSS (hospital stay: 6.5 vs. 10.2 days, p = 0.005 for RC; 5.5 vs. 8.2 days, p < 0.001 for LC). RAS also resulted in lower rates of ileus (14% vs. 26%, p = 0.064 for RC; 6.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.007 for LC) and higher lymph node yields (31.4 vs. 26.8, p = 0.028 for RC; 25.8 vs. 23.9, p = 0.066 for LC). Major complication rates showed no significant difference between RAS and LSS (4.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.746 for RC; 4.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.563 for LC). Patients in the RAS group experienced earlier diuretic phases and reported significantly lower postoperative pain scores (3.0 vs. 4.1, p = 0.011 for RC; 2.9 vs. 4.1, p < 0.001 for LC). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery is associated with faster recovery, lower rates of ileus (LC), higher lymph node yield (RC) and reduced postoperative pain compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer resection.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based care improvement pathways which are perceived to expedite patient recovery following surgery. Their utility in the setting of oesophagectomy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols on recovery following oesophagectomy compared to standard care. A systematic review was performed in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (Version 5.4). Six RCTs including 850 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall complication rate (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.35, Confidence Interval (CI): 0.21, 0.59, P < 0.0001), pulmonary complications (OR: 0.40, CI: 0.24, 0.67, P = 0.0005), post-operative length of stay (LOS) (OR -1.88, CI -2.05, -1.70, P < 0.00001) and time to post-operative flatus (OR: -5.20, CI: -9.46, -0.95, P = 0.02) favoured the ERAS group. There was no difference noted for anastomotic leak (OR: 0.55, CI: 0.24, 1.28, P = 0.17), cardiac complications (OR: 0.86, CI: 0.30, 2.46, P = 0.78), gastrointestinal complications (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.23, 1.17, P = 0.11), wound complications (OR: 0.85, CI: 0.28, 2.58, P = 0.78), mortality (OR: 1.37, CI: 0.26, 7.4, P = 0.71), and 30-day re-admission rate (OR: 1.29, CI: 0.30, 5.47, P = 0.73) between ERAS and standard care groups. ERAS implementation improved post-operative complications, LOS, and time to flatus following oesphagectomy. These results support the robust adoption of ERAS in patients indicated to undergo oesphagectomy.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve perioperative outcomes and expedite recovery across various surgical specialties. While ERAS protocols have shown significant benefits in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries, their impact and effectiveness require further synthesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of ERAS protocols in enhancing recovery and reducing complications in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries. High-quality studies were selected based on adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A systematic review and meta-analysis of six high-quality studies involving 45,678 patients were conducted using databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Data on length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, 30-day readmissions, and mortality were extracted. Statistical analysis employed random-effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgery type, patient age, comorbidities, and follow-up duration. ORs for postoperative complications varied across subgroups (e.g., urgent vs. elective surgeries), with some ranges (e.g., 0.65-1.02) reflecting mixed effects; sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled outcomes. Recovery times ranged from 1 to 3 days for gastrointestinal surgeries and 4 to 9 days for cardiovascular surgeries, demonstrating clinically meaningful variability. ERAS protocols showed greater recovery benefits in urgent surgeries (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.75) and in patients with comorbidities (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.96), likely due to their emphasis on rapid stabilization of perioperative care, including early mobilization and nutritional support. Heterogeneity, assessed through sensitivity analyses, ranged from moderate to substantial across subgroup analyses. ERAS protocols consistently enhance recovery outcomes, minimize complications, and reduce hospital stays in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries, demonstrating their utility in optimizing perioperative care. Future research should explore long-term outcomes and tailored implementation strategies to address patient-specific needs.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has been introduced over the past three decades for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, the effect of this program on long-term survival is poorly studied. We evaluated the effect of ERAS on 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after colorectal cancer surgery, and identified risk factors.

This retrospective study used data from the comparison of oncological outcomes at 3 years after ERAS or conventional care (pre-ERAS), conducted in our department between 2005 and 2017, and published in 2022. A total of 981 patients were included (ERAS, n = 486; pre-ERAS, n = 495).

The 5-year OS and RFS rates were similar in the ERAS and pre-ERAS groups, respectively (63.3% [58.9; 67.4] vs 57.7% [53.2; 61.9]; p = 0.055) and (69.5% [65.2; 73.4] vs 70.9% [66.6; 74.8]; p = 0.365). The 5-year OS result was confirmed by a propensity score analysis (HR 0.98 [0.71; 1.37], p = 0.911). Analysis of 5-year survival by a multivariate Cox model identified age (HR 1.28 [1.15; 1.43]), BMI < 18.5 (HR 1.62 [1.08; 2.45]), smoking (HR 1.68 [1.26; 2.24]), ASA score > 2 (HR 1.56 [1.22; 1.98]), and laparotomy interventions (HR 2.06 [1.61; 2.63]) as risk factors for death. Regarding RFS, multivariate analysis adjusted on the ERAS group identified age as a protective factor with a reduction of 10% in the risk of recurrence (HR 0.90 [0.81-0.99]). In contrast patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a higher risk of recurrence (HR 1.41 [1.07-1.85]).

This study failed to demonstrate any advantage of the ERAS program in improving 5-year OS and RFS after colorectal cancer surgery. Age, undernutrition, smoking, ASA score > 2, and laparotomy interventions are independently associated with early mortality.

An intricate relationship exists, and interactions occur between the gut microbiota and colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent studies have indicated that inflammatory reactions stimulated by Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) lead to the development of CRC. Radical surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy is the primary treatment approach for most CRC patients. This study was designed to evaluate the abundance of Fn as part of the gut microbiota in patients with CRC compared to healthy individuals and to assess the effect of the gut microbiota Fn on patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy and those experiencing CRC relapse. There were 201 participants, comprising 50 healthy controls and 151 CRC patients. Stool samples were collected from three CRC groups (postoperatively, chemotherapy and relapse), and the fourth was the healthy control group. The amount of Fn in each sample was analyzed using quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification-phenol red (QLAMP-PhR), a novel biomolecular method that targets regions encoding the specific Fn FadA gene. Compared with healthy control stool samples, the Fn levels were significantly elevated in all CRC patient groups (P < 0.001), and it was significantly more frequent in the CRC relapse patients (group C) (P < 0.001). In addition, Fn abundance increased significantly in the distal colon compared to the proximal colon (P < 0.001). Both CRC relapse and chemotherapy exert significant reciprocal effects on the gut microbiota Fn of CRC patients. Microbiota-based intervention may be beneficial for patients during postoperative care, especially in CRC relapsing cases. Registration: This study of the clinical trial has been registered in the ISRCTN registry with study registration number ISRCTN53358464. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN53358464.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-024-01279-6.

Although ERAS Program had some advantages in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), its efficacy and safety remained unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the ERAS group and the traditional care (TC) group in LDG.

Multiple databases were retrieved from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2023. The risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the results.

Our meta-analysis contained 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies, which comprised 1468 patients. Regarding efficacy, the ERAS group had significantly shorter postoperative time to first flatus (SMD = -1.29 [95% CI: -1.68, -0.90]), shorter time to first defecation (SMD = -1.26 [95% CI: -1.90, -0.61]), shorter hospital stays (SMD = -0.99 [95% CI: -1.34, -0.63]), and lower hospitalization costs (SMD = -1.17 [95% CI: -1.86, -0.48]) compared to the TC group. Furthermore, in the ERAS group, C-reactive protein levels were lower on postoperative days 1, 3 or 4, and 7; albumin levels were higher on postoperative days 3 or 4 and 7; and interleukin-6 levels were lower on postoperative days 1 and 3. Regarding safety, the overall postoperative complication rate was lower in the ERAS group (RR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.97]), but there was no significant difference in the individual postoperative complication rate. Other indicators were also not statistically significant.

The combination of ERAS Program with laparoscopy surgery was safe and effective for the perioperative management of patients with distal gastric cancer.

Major colorectal surgery is associated with 20 to 40% reduction in physiological and functional capacity and higher level of fatigue 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the effects of a multimodal prehabilitation program in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity. The secondary outcome was to evaluate postoperative complications and length of postoperative hospital stay as well as to determine the costs of implementation and indirect costs.

A single centre, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients of age > 18 years undergoing elective colorectal resection for colonic cancer were eligible. Exclusion criteria were metastatic disease, severe walking impairments, renal failure stage > 2, ASA score > 3, preoperative chemo-radiation therapy. Patients have been randomized either to prehabilitation intervention groups, receiving 4-week trimodal prehabilitation (physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support) or to control receiving no prehabilitation. Both groups followed enhanced recovery programs and received rehabilitation accordingly. The primary outcome for functional capacity was measured by the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) 4 and 8 weeks after surgery; to evaluate post-operative complications the Clavien-Dindo classification was used.

An interim analysis of 71 patients undergoing colorectal surgery was performed, with 35 assigned to interventional arm and 36 to control arm. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The prehabilitation group showed a significant increase in mean 6MWT distance pre-operatively compared to the control group, with an increase of 96 m (523 ± 24.6 vs. 427 ± 25.3, p = 0.01). At 4 and 8 weeks, the prehabilitation group maintained significant improvements, with an increase of 103 m (514 ± 89 vs. 411 ± 115, p = 0.003) and 90 m (531 ± 82 vs. 441 ± 107, p = 0.008), respectively. There were no statistical significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay between the two groups.

The preliminary results of this study indicate that it is feasible to implement a prehabilitation protocol lasting approximately 4 weeks. This protocol appears to yield a significant improvement in the physical performance of patients with colon cancer undergoing elective colorectal resection at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.

This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.

Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).

The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

The effectiveness and safety of preoperative oral carbohydrate (POC) for people with diabetes remain controversial.

We systematically reviewed studies comparing POC to fasting or placebo in elective surgery for diabetic adults, focusing on gastric volume, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and glycemic control.

Fourteen studies (n = 1870 patients) were included. POC did not significantly increase gastric volume or aspiration risk in well-controlled type 2 diabetes. Effects on perioperative glucose control varied. POC improved patient comfort and reduced preoperative hypoglycemia in gestational diabetes. Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in cardiac surgery patients.

POC is safe for well-controlled type 2 diabetics, enhancing comfort and reducing preoperative hypoglycemia without increasing aspiration risk. However, its effects on glucose control and postoperative outcomes vary. Personalized approaches are crucial, particularly for poorly controlled diabetes.

Based on a recent study by Li et al, this editorial examines the significance of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for elderly patients with gastric cancer. Cancer-related mortality, which is overwhelmingly caused by gastric cancer, calls for effective treatment strategies. Despite advances in the field of oncology, conventional postoperative care often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased complications. The aim of ERAS is to expedite recovery, reduce surgical stress, and improve patient satisfaction. The study of Li et al showed that, compared to traditional care, ERAS significantly reduces mortality risk, shortens hospital stays, and decreases postoperative complications. These findings support the widespread implementation of ERAS protocols in surgical practice to enhance patient outcomes and healthcare value.

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following abdominal surgery, often leading to extended hospital stays and a higher risk of post-operative complications, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Alvimopan, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, has been shown to aid in the recovery of normal bowel function after surgery. While its benefits are well-established in open abdominal surgeries, its efficacy in laparoscopic procedures had not been conclusively determined. However, recent clinical trials involving laparoscopic surgeries have since been conducted. This review aims to reassess the efficacy of Alvimopan by incorporating findings from these new studies, potentially providing further insight into its clinical benefits.

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies were included based on the PICO framework, focusing on Alvimopan's impact on postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. Primary outcomes were time to gastrointestinal function recovery (GI-3) and hospital stay duration.

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, with seven focusing on the use of Alvimopan in open abdominal surgeries and three in laparoscopic procedures. Collectively, these studies involved 18,822 patients undergoing various types of abdominal Administration of Alvimopan 6 mg accelerated gastrointestinal function recovery by an average of 14 h (Hazard ratio: 1.62, p = 0.002) and reduced hospital stays by 5.2 h (Hazard ratio: 1.52, p = 0.04) compared to placebo. Similarly, Alvimopan 12 mg reduced GI-3 recovery time by 13.5 h (Hazard ratio: 1.58, p = 0.02) and hospital stay duration by 6.2 h (Hazard ratio: 1.46, p = 0.018).

Alvimopan shows promise in reducing POI and hospital stay durations following abdominal surgeries. The incorporation of the recent studies in laparoscopic abdominal procedures further supports these findings. Integrating Alvimopan into perioperative care protocols may enhance patient outcomes and help lower healthcare costs.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a combination of multimodal pathways to improve surgical outcomes. Recommendations for radical cystectomy have been published by the ERAS society for the cystectomy but a lack of evidence is observed for urological procedures such as nephrectomy (Ne) and radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery protocol implementation for Ne ad RP at our academic institution.

We performed a retrospective, monocentric, comparative analysis, pre and post implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy or nephrectomy (partial or total) for cancer. The primary endpoint was the mean length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included 30-days readmission, postoperative complications, 90 days survival, and oncologic outcome at 6 months.

We included 264 patients between January, 2019, and December, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed separately by type of surgery. The LOS of patients included in the ERP protocol was decreased on average by 1.3 days IC95% [-2.50; -0.08], P<0.001 for nephrectomies and by 2.2 days IC95% [-3.72; -0.62] P<0.001 for prostatectomies, compared to non-ERP patients. There were no more re-admission, death or oncologic recurrence.

In our experience, ERP for oncological nephrectomy and prostatectomy reduced the length of stay, without increasing postoperative complications and readmission.

IV.

Energy restriction (ER) is a nutrition method to reduce the amount of energy intake while maintaining adequate nutrition. In clinical medicine, applications of ER have been implicated in longevity, mortality, metabolic, immune, and psychological health. However, there are limited studies showing the clinical benefit of ER within the immediate surgical setting. A specific, clinically oriented summary of the potential applications of ER is needed to optimize surgery outcomes for patients. The purpose of this article is to examine how ER can be used for perioperative optimization to improve outcomes for the patient and surgeon. It will also explore how these outcomes can feasibly fit in with enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and can be used as a method for nutrition optimization in surgery. Despite evidence of caloric restriction improving outcomes in critically ill surgical patients, there is not enough evidence to conclude that ER, perioperatively across noncritically ill cohorts, improves postoperative morbidity and mortality in elective surgeries. Nevertheless, a contemporary account of how ER techniques may have a significant role in reducing risk factors of adverse surgical outcomes in this cohort, for example, by encouraging preoperative weight loss contributing to decreased operating times, is reviewed.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative management concept, but there is no article to comprehensively review the collaboration and impact of countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keywords on ERAS from a bibliometric perspective. This study assessed the evolution of clustering of knowledge structures and identified hot trends and emerging topics. Articles and reviews related to ERAS were retrieved through subject search from the Web of Science Core Collection. We used the following strategy: "TS = Enhanced recovery after surgery" OR "Enhanced Postsurgical Recovery" OR "Postsurgical Recoveries, Enhanced" OR "Postsurgical Recovery, Enhanced" OR "Recovery, Enhanced Postsurgical" OR "Fast track surgery" OR "improve surgical outcome". Bibliometric analyses were conducted on Excel 365, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrics (R-Tool of R-Studio). Totally 3242 articles and reviews from 1997 to 2022 were included. These publications were mainly from 684 journals in 78 countries, led by the United States and China. Kehlet H published the most papers and had the largest number of co-citations. Analysis of the journals with the most outputs showed that most journals mainly cover Surgery and Oncology. The hottest keyword is "enhanced recovery after surgery". Later appearing topics and keywords indicate that the hotspots and future research trends include ERAS protocols for other types of surgery and improving perioperative status, including "bariatric surgery", "thoracic surgery", and "prehabilitation". This study reviewed the research on ERAS using bibliometric and visualization methods, which can help scholars better understand the dynamic evolution of ERAS and provide directions for future research.

Despite consensus supporting enhanced recovery programs, their full implementation in such a context is difficult due to conventional practices within various groups of professionals. The goal of the EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking (EUPEMEN) project was to bring together the expertise and experience of national clinical professionals who have previously helped deliver major change programs in their countries and to use them to spread enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (ERAS) in Europe. The specific aim of this study is to present and discuss the key points of the proposed recommendations for colorectal surgery.

Five partners from university hospitals in four European countries developed the project as partners. Following a non-systematic review of the literature, the European consensus panel generated a list of recommendations for perioperative care in colorectal surgery. A list of recommendations was formulated and distributed to collaborators at each center to allow modifications or additional statements. These recommendations were then discussed in three consecutive meetings to share uniform ERAS protocols to be disseminated.

The working group developed (1) the EUPEMEN online platform to offer, free of charge, evidence-based standardized perioperative care protocols, learning activities, and assistance to health professionals interested in enhancing the recovery of their patients; (2) the preparation of the EUPEMEN Multimodal Rehabilitation manuals; (3) the training of the trainers to teach future teachers; and (4) the dissemination of the results in five multiplier events, one for each partner, to promote and disseminate the protocols.

The EUPEMEN project allowed the sharing of the expertise of many professionals from four different European countries with the objective of training the new generations in the dissemination of ERAS protocols in daily clinical practice through a new learning system. This project was proposed as an additional training tool for all the enhanced recovery program teams.

The main purpose was to determine the impact on postoperative outcomes of a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) for elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital.

A prospective series of patients (N = 80) undergoing elective colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP protocol in 2018-2020 (ERP group) was compared to patients (N = 80) operated at the same rural hospital in 2013-2015 (pre-ERP group), before the implementation of the program. The exclusion criteria for both groups were: ASA score IV, TNM stage IV, inflammatory bowel disease, emergency surgery, and rectal cancer. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS) which was used as an estimate of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and mortality rates as well as associated factors with both postoperative complications and prolonged hospital LoS.

Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The median adherence to ERP protocol elements was 68 % versus 12 % in the retrospective control group. The median hospital LoS in the ERP-group was significantly lower than in the pre-ERP group (5 vs. 10 days) with no increase in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. The Body Mass Index ≥30 and the traditional peri-operative protocol were the associated factors to postoperative complications, while following a traditional peri-operative protocol was the only factor associated with a prolonged hospital LoS (p < 0.0001).

Although limited hospital resources are perceived as a barrier to ERP implementation, the current experience demonstrates how adopting an ERP program in a rural area is feasible and effective, despite it requires greater effort.

The outcome of patients undergoing major surgery treated with HES for hemodynamic optimization is unclear. This post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical pilot trial investigated the impact of low-molecular balanced HES solutions on the coagulation system, blood loss and transfusion requirements.

The Trial was registered: EudraCT 2008-004175-22 and ethical approval was provided by the ethics committee of Berlin. Patients were randomized into three groups receiving either a 10% HES 130/0.42 solution, a 6% HES 130/0.42 solution or a crystalloid following a goal-directed hemodynamic algorithm. Endpoints were parameters of standard and viscoelastic coagulation laboratory, blood loss and transfusion requirements at baseline, at the end of surgery (EOS) and the first postoperative day (POD 1).

Fifty-two patients were included in the analysis (HES 10% (n = 15), HES 6% (n = 17) and crystalloid (n = 20)). Fibrinogen decreased in all groups at EOS (HES 10% 338 [298;378] to 192 [163;234] mg dl-1, p<0.01, HES 6% 385 [302;442] to 174 [163;224] mg dl-1, p<0.01, crystalloids 408 [325;458] to 313 [248;370] mg dl-1, p = 0.01). MCF FIBTEM was decreased for both HES groups at EOS (HES 10%: 20.5 [16.0;24.8] to 6.5 [5.0;10.8] mm, p = <0.01; HES 6% 27.0 [18.8;35.2] to 7.0 [5.0;19.0] mm, p = <0.01). These changes did not persist on POD 1 for HES 10% (rise to 16.0 [13.0;24.0] mm, p = 0.88). Blood loss was not different in the groups nor transfusion requirements.

Our data suggest a stronger but transient effect of balanced, low-molecular HES on the coagulation system. Despite the decline of the use of artificial colloids in clinical practice, these results may help to inform clinicians who use HES solutions.

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a tool for assessing insulin resistance, is increasingly recognized for its ability to predict cardiovascular and metabolic risks. However, its relationship with trauma and surgical patient prognosis is understudied. This study investigated the correlation between the TyG index and mortality risk in surgical/trauma ICU patients to identify high-risk individuals and improve prognostic strategies.

This study identified patients requiring trauma/surgical ICU admission from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database, and divided them into tertiles based on the TyG index. The outcomes included 28-day mortality and 180-day mortality for short-term and long-term prognosis. The associations between the TyG index and clinical outcomes in patients were elucidated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and RCS models.

A total of 2103 patients were enrolled. The 28-day mortality and 180-day mortality rates reached 18% and 24%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that an elevated TyG index was significantly related to 28-day and 180-day mortality after covariates adjusting. An elevated TyG index was significantly associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.37) and 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.39). RCS models revealed that a progressively increasing risk of mortality was related to an elevated TyG index. According to our subgroup analysis, an elevated TyG index is associated with increased risk of 28-day and 180-day mortality in critically ill patients younger than 60 years old, as well as those with concomitant stroke or cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, in nondiabetic patients, an elevated TyG index is associated with 180-day mortality.

An increasing risk of mortality was related to an elevated TyG index. In critically ill patients younger than 60 years old, as well as those with concomitant stroke or cardiovascular diseases, an elevated TyG index is associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, in non-diabetic patients, an elevated TyG index is associated with adverse long-term prognosis.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have emerged as a promising approach to optimize perioperative care and improve outcomes in various surgical specialties. Despite feasibility studies on ERAS in various surgeries, there remains a paucity of research focusing on gastrointestinal cancer surgeries in the Indian context. The primary objective is to evaluate the compliance rate of the ERAS protocol and secondary objectives include the compliance rate of individual components of the protocol, the complications, the length of hospital stay, and the challenges faced during implementation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgeries in our tertiary care cancer center. In this prospective interventional study (CTRI/2022/04/041657; registered on 05/04/2022), we evaluated 50 patients aged 18 to 70 years undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies and implemented a refined ERAS protocol tailored to our institutional resources and conditions based on standard ERAS society recommendations for gastrointestinal surgeries and specific recommendations for colorectal, pancreatic, and esophageal surgeries.Our study's mean overall compliance rate with the ERAS protocol was 88.54%. We achieved a compliance rate of 91.98%, 81.66%, and 92.00% for pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative components respectively. Fourteen (28%) patients experienced complications during the study. The median length of stay was 6.5 days (5.25-8). Challenges were encountered during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. The study highlighted the feasibility of implementing the ERAS protocol in a cancer institute, but specific challenges need to be addressed for its optimal success in gastrointestinal cancer surgeries.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-01897-y.

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events.

Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide.

To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery.

There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012-April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016-March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49-41 days; P = 0.002).

This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.

For many surgical procedures, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have improved patient outcomes, particularly postoperative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative nausea following orthognathic surgery after the implementation of an ERAS protocol. This retrospective cohort study included patients between 12 and 35 years old who underwent orthognathic surgery at Boston Children's Hospital from April 2018 to December 2022. Patients with syndromes or a hospital stay greater than 48 hours were excluded from the study. The primary predictor was enrollment in our institutional ERAS protocol. The main outcome variable was postoperative nausea. Intraoperative and postoperative covariates were compared between groups using unpaired t tests and chi squared analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression models with 95% confidence intervals were performed to identify predictors for nausea. A P value<0.05 was considered significant. There were 128 patients (68 non-ERAS, 60 ERAS) included in this study (51.6% female, mean age 19.02±3.25 years). The ERAS group received less intraoperative fluid (937.0±462.3 versus 1583.6±847.6 mL, P ≤0.001) and experienced less postoperative nausea (38.3% versus 63.2%, P =0.005). Enhanced recovery after surgery status ( P =0.005) was a predictor for less postoperative nausea, whereas bilateral sagittal split osteotomy ( P =0.045) and length of stay ( P =0.007) were positive predictors for postoperative nausea in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Implementing an ERAS protocol for orthognathic surgery reduces postoperative nausea. Level of Evidence: Level III-therapeutic.

Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) mitigate racial disparities in postoperative length of stay (LOS) for colorectal populations. It is unclear, however, if these effects exist in the bariatric surgery population. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the racial disparities in LOS before and after implementation of bariatric surgery ERP.

A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a single institution. Patients undergoing minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2017 to 2019 (pre-ERP) or 2020-2022 (ERP) were included. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and analysis of variance were used to compare groups, and estimated LOS (eLOS) was assessed via multivariable regression.

Seven hundred sixty four patients were identified, including 363 pre-ERPs and 401 ERPs. Pre-ERP and ERP cohorts were similar in age (median 44.3 years versus 43.8 years, P = 0.80), race (53.4% Black versus 56.4% Black, P = 0.42), and preoperative body mass index (median 48.3 versus 49.4, P = 0.14). Overall median LOS following bariatric surgery decreased from 2 days pre-ERP to 1 day following ERP (P < 0.001). Average LOS for Black and White patients decreased by 0.5 and 0.48 days, respectively. However, overall eLOS remained greater for Black patients compared with White patients despite ERP implementation (eLOS 0.21 days, P = 0.01).

Implementation of a bariatric surgery ERP was associated with decreased LOS for both Black and White patients. However, Black patients did have slightly longer LOS than White patients in both pre-ERP and ERP eras. More work is needed to understand the driving mechanism(s) of these disparities to eliminate them.

We sought to evaluate how implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted surgical outcomes after elective anatomic lung resection.

The effect of implementing the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery thoracic ERAS protocol on postoperative outcomes throughout an entire health care system has not yet been reported.

This was a prospective cohort study within one health care system (January 2019-March, 2023). A thoracic ERAS protocol was implemented on May 1, 2021 for elective anatomic lung resections, and postoperative outcomes were tracked using the electronic health record and Vizient data. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included individual complications, length of stay, opioid use, chest tube duration, and total cost. Patients were grouped into pre-ERAS and post-ERAS cohorts. Bivariable comparisons were performed using independent t -test, χ 2 , or Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders.

There were 1007 patients in the cohort; 450 (44.7%) were in the post-ERAS group. Mean age was 66.2 years; most patients were female (65.1%), white (83.8%), had a body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9 (69.7%), and were ASA class 3 (80.6%). Patients in the postimplementation group had lower risk-adjusted rates of any morbidity, respiratory complication, pneumonia, surgical site infection, arrhythmias, infections, opioid usage, ICU use, and shorter postoperative length of stay (all P <0.05).

Postoperative outcomes were improved after the implementation of an evidence-based thoracic ERAS protocol throughout the health care system. This study validates the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery guidelines and demonstrates that simultaneous multihospital implementation can be feasible and effective.

Good preoperative conditions help patients to counteract surgical injury. Prehabilitation is a multimodal preoperative management strategy, including physical, nutritional, psychological, and other interventions, which can improve the functional reserve of patients and enhance postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study is to show the evolution trend and future directions of research related to the prehabilitation of surgical patients.

The global literature regarding prehabilitation was identified from The Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric methods of the Bibliometrix package of R (version 4.2.1) and VOSviewer were used to analyze publication trends, cooperative networks, study themes, and co-citation relationships in the field.

A total of 638 publications were included and the number of publications increased rapidly since 2016, with an average annual growth rate of 41.0%. "Annals of Surgery", "British Journal of Surgery" and "British Journal of Anesthesia" were the most cited journals. Experts from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands contributed the most in this field, and an initial cooperative network among different countries and clinical teams was formed. Malnutrition, older patients, frailty, and high-risk patients were the hotspots of recent studies. However, among the top 10 cited articles, the clinical effects of prehabilitation were conflicting.

This bibliometric review summarized the most influential publications as well as the publication trends and clarified the progress and future directions of prehabilitation, which could serve as a guide for developing evidence-based practices.

The concept introduced by protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery modifies perioperative traditional care in digestive surgery. The integration of these modern recommendations components during the perioperative period is of great importance to ensure fewer postoperative complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and decreased surgical costs.

To emphasize the most important points of a multimodal perioperative care protocol.

Careful analysis of each recommendation of both ERAS and ACERTO protocols, justifying their inclusion in the multimodal care recommended for digestive surgery patients.

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) such as ERAS and ACERTO protocols are a cornerstone in modern perioperative care. Nutritional therapy is fundamental in digestive surgery, and thus, both preoperative and postoperative nutrition care are key to ensuring fewer postoperative complications and reducing the length of hospital stay. The concept of prehabilitation is another key element in ERPs. The handling of crystalloid fluids in a perfect balance is vital. Fluid overload can delay the recovery of patients and increase postoperative complications. Abbreviation of preoperative fasting for two hours before anesthesia is now accepted by various guidelines of both surgical and anesthesiology societies. Combined with early postoperative refeeding, these prescriptions are not only safe but can also enhance the recovery of patients undergoing digestive procedures.

This position paper from the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery strongly emphasizes that the implementation of ERPs in digestive surgery represents a paradigm shift in perioperative care, transcending traditional practices and embracing an intelligent approach to patient well-being.

Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion.

Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively.

Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2.

The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to reduce surgical stress and ultimately improve patient recovery and outcome. It can require significant resources but with proven benefits. The main goal of this study was to perform a diagnostic assessment of perioperative practice in a local colorectal surgical center.

93 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery from January to December 2022 were analyzed. Preadmission, preoperative, and postoperative data of all patients were collected in a database developed by the researchers, according to ERAS® guidelines. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Chi-square and T-test were performed to identify possible associations between categorical variables and postoperative complications.

Overall analysis showed deficient preoperative patient optimization, especially regarding nutritional counseling and supplementation, smoking and alcohol cessation, anemia treatment (9%), and pre-anesthetic medication (42%). Removal of invasive devices was significantly delayed (removal of urinary catheter average on the fourthday and surgical drain average on the fifth day) in the postoperatively period and oral intake (average onset on the sixth day). Both contribute to hospital length of stay (mean of 13 days) and a significant number of complications.

The results lead us to an individual and multidisciplinary reflection on current practices and outcomes. ERAS® program, already adopted by many centers, could have a positive impact on the immediate postoperative recovery of colorectal patients in Funchal Central Hospital and implementation seems necessary.

Poor preoperative nutritional status has been consistently linked to an increase in postoperative complications and worse surgical outcomes. We updated a review first published in 2012.

To assess the effects of preoperative nutritional therapy compared to usual care in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trial registries on 28 March 2023. We searched reference lists of included studies.

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and receiving preoperative nutritional therapy, including parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition or oral nutrition supplements, compared to usual care. We only included nutritional therapy that contained macronutrients (protein, carbohydrate and fat) and micronutrients, and excluded studies that evaluated single nutrients. We included studies regardless of the nutritional status of participants, that is, well-nourished participants, participants at risk of malnutrition, or mixed populations. We excluded studies in people undergoing pancreatic and liver surgery. Our primary outcomes were non-infectious complications, infectious complications and length of hospital stay. Our secondary outcomes were nutritional aspects, quality of life, change in macronutrient intake, biochemical parameters, 30-day perioperative mortality and adverse effects.

We used standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed risk of bias using the RoB 1 tool and applied the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of evidence.

We included 16 RCTs reporting 19 comparisons (2164 participants). Seven studies were new for this update. Participants' ages ranged from 21 to 79 years, and 62% were men. Three RCTs used parenteral nutrition, two used enteral nutrition, eight used immune-enhancing nutrition and six used standard oral nutrition supplements. All studies included mixed groups of well-nourished and malnourished participants; they used different methods to identify malnutrition and reported this in different ways. Not all the included studies were conducted within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme, which is now current clinical practice in most hospitals undertaking GI surgery. We were concerned about risk of bias in all the studies and 14 studies were at high risk of bias due to lack of blinding. We are uncertain if parenteral nutrition has any effect on the number of participants who had a non-infectious complication (risk ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 1.02; 3 RCTs, 260 participants; very low-certainty evidence); infectious complication (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.80; 3 RCTs, 260 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) 5.49 days, 95% CI 0.02 to 10.96; 2 RCTs, 135 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the enteral nutrition studies reported non-infectious complications as an outcome. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of enteral nutrition on the number of participants with infectious complications after surgery (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.38; 2 RCTs, 126 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD 5.10 days, 95% CI -1.03 to 11.23; 2 RCTs, 126 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Immune-enhancing nutrition compared to controls may result in little to no effect on the number of participants experiencing a non-infectious complication (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.00; 8 RCTs, 1020 participants; low-certainty evidence), infectious complications (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.04; 7 RCTs, 925 participants; low-certainty evidence) or length of hospital stay (MD -1.22 days, 95% CI -2.80 to 0.35; 6 RCTs, 688 participants; low-certainty evidence). Standard oral nutrition supplements may result in little to no effect on number of participants with a non-infectious complication (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20; 5 RCTs, 473 participants; low-certainty evidence) or the length of hospital stay (MD -0.65 days, 95% CI -2.33 to 1.03; 3 RCTs, 299 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of oral nutrition supplements on the number of participants with an infectious complication (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.27; 5 RCTs, 473 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis based on malnourished and weight-losing participants found oral nutrition supplements may result in a slight reduction in infections (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.85; 2 RCTs, 184 participants). Studies reported some secondary outcomes, but not consistently. Complications associated with central venous catheters occurred in RCTs involving parenteral nutrition. Adverse events in the enteral nutrition, immune-enhancing nutrition and standard oral nutrition supplements RCTs included nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal pain.

We were unable to determine if parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, immune-enhancing nutrition or standard oral nutrition supplements have any effect on the clinical outcomes due to very low-certainty evidence. There is some evidence that standard oral nutrition supplements may have no effect on complications. Sensitivity analysis showed standard oral nutrition supplements probably reduced infections in weight-losing or malnourished participants. Further high-quality multicentre research considering the ERAS programme is required and further research in low- and middle-income countries is needed.

Objective  Evaluate the results of the implementation of the Fast Track Protocol (FTP), a medical practice based on scientific evidence, for elective total hip arthroplasty surgery, mainly comparing the National Average Hospital Admission Rate of 7.1 days. Methods  98 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty surgery via the direct anterior approach, anterolateral approach and posterior approach were included in the FTP from December 2018 to March 2020, being followed up preoperatively, intraoperatively and immediately postoperatively. Results  The average length of hospital stay was 2.8 days, being 2.1 days for the direct anterior approach, 3.0 days for the anterolateral access approach and 4.1 days for the posterior access approach. The average surgery time was 90 minutes, 19 (19.39%) of the patients were referred to the ICU in the postoperative period, however, none of them underwent surgery using the direct anterior approach. We had no cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PTE) or neurological injury, 19 (19.39%) patients had postoperative bleeding requiring dressing change, 4 (4.08%) needed blood transfusion, 2 (2.04%) patients had implant instability, 1 (1.02%) patient had a fracture during surgery and 1 (1.02%) patient died of cardiac complications. Conclusion  FTP may be a viable alternative to reduce the length of stay and immediate postoperative complications for elective total hip arthroplasty surgery decreasing the length of stay of patients by 2 to 3 times when compared to the national average of 7.1 days.

The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for primary and secondary adrenal disease, in reducing the length of primary hospital stay and return to daily activities.

This retrospective study was carried out on 61 patients who underwent LA. A total of 32 patients formed the ERAS group. A total of 29 patients received conventional perioperative care and were assigned as the control group. Groups were compared in terms of patient's characteristics (sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, side of tumour, tumour size and co-morbidities), post-operative compliance (anaesthesia time, operative time, post-operative stay, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) score, analgesic assumption and days to return to daily activities) and post-operative complications.

No significant differences in anaesthesia time ( P = 0.4) and operative time ( P = 0.6) were reported. NRS score 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ERAS group ( P < 0.05). The analgesic assumption in post-operative period in the ERAS group was lower ( P < 0.05). ERAS protocol led to a significantly shorter length of post-operative stay ( P < 0.05) and to return to daily activities ( P < 0.05). No differences in peri-operative complications were reported.

ERAS protocols seem safe and feasible, potentially improving perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LA, mainly improving pain control, hospital stay and return to daily activities. Further studies are needed to investigate overall compliance with ERAS protocols and their impact on clinical outcomes.