Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Apr 15, 2023; 14(4): 435-446
Published online Apr 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i4.435
Table 1 General sample characteristics
Variable, n = 80SexDescriptive statistics
Mann-Whitney U test
Valid (n)
Mean
Minimum
Maximum
SD
Pvalue
Age (yr)Female3969.0045.0080.006.270.151516
Male4165.3237.0076.009.56
Weight (kg)Female3977.3654.00108.0012.242.55E-03
Male4188.6663.00150.0016.52
Height (cm)Female39161.38150.00174.005.971.78E-11
Male41175.15164.00190.006.90
BMI (kg/m2)Female3929.6821.9040.204.522.64E-01
Male4128.8421.5044.304.90
HbA1c (%)Female386.425.208.500.794.87E-01
Male406.585.008.800.97
DM1 duration (yr)Female3912.100.0037.008.132.90E-01
Table 2 Reliability results for the patient and practitioner sections of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument-Polish version
Part A of MNSI
Part B of MNSI
n = 80Cronbach alpha, full scale: 0.81790Cronbach alpha, full scale: 0.87095
Corr 1st & 2nd half: 0.745791Corr 1st & 2nd half: 0.972206
Split-half reliability: 0.854388Split-half reliability: 0.985907
Guttman split-half: 0.840785Guttman split-half: 0.985838
Summary for A1Summary for A2Summary for B1Summary for B2
Mean4.2500004.1500006.2125006.175000
Sum340.0000332.0000497.0000494.0000
SD3.4032754.3139463.9255533.860790
Variance11.5822818.6101315.4099714.90570
Cronbach alpha0.64996720.70600830.73370230.7346509
Table 3 Stability of the patient and practitioner sections of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument-Polish version
Part of MNSIMean (SD)
ICC for agreement
ICC for consistency
Test score
Re-test score
ICCagreement
Pvalue
ICCconsistency
Pvalue
A2.125 (1.70)2.075 (2.16)0.7289.05E-150.7259.47E-15
B3.106 (1.96)3.088 (1.93)0.9726.19E-520.9728.53E-52
Table 4 The area under the curve values for Nerve Conduction Study and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Polish version (version A and B) at both time points
Variable
AUC
Pvalue
A10.7490.0003
B10.7960.0000
A20.6170.2296
B20.7700.0001
Table 5 The cut-off points for Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Polish version at the two time points and their sensitivity and specificity, and their positive and negative predictive values based on receiver operating characteristic curves
Variable
True positives, n, %
False positives, n, %
False negatives, n, %
True negatives, n, %
Sensitivity
Specificity
Optimal cut-off point
A128/350/042/52.510/12.50.4001.0003
B157/71.253/3.7513/16.257/8.750.8140.7002
A223/28.751/1.2547/58.759/11.250.3290.9003
B259/73.754/511/13.756/7.50.8430.6002