Published online Apr 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i4.435
Peer-review started: November 8, 2022
First decision: November 27, 2022
Revised: December 11, 2022
Accepted: January 9, 2023
Article in press: January 9, 2023
Published online: April 15, 2023
Processing time: 154 Days and 1.1 Hours
The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) is a collective tool for assessing the peripheral nervous system in patients with diabetes mellitus and is widely used to evaluate patients in many countries.
In Poland, the MNSI has not yet been validated, thus this is a problem when using it in daily practice and for research purposes.
This study aimed to validate both sections (A and B) of the MNSI in Polish (PL) patients with diabetes.
A cross-sectional study using a test (A1, B1) and re-test (A2, B2) formula was performed in 80 patients with diabetes. The gold standard used for neuropathy detection was a nerve conduction study (NCS) which was performed on all participants. Reliability of the MNSI-PL was assessed using the Cronbach’s alpha, Kuder-Richardson formula 20, split-half reliability, the Gottman split-half tests and correlation between first and second half was accessed. Stability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For external validation, we used simple linear correlation, binomial regression, and agreement between two different tools using a Bland-Altman plot analysis.
The scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale: 0.81 for A and 0.87 for B). MNSI-PL scores between test/retest showed high stability (ICC = 0.73 for A and ICC = 0.97 for B). The statistically important correlations between MNSI-PL and NCS were found for B1, B2, and A1 (P < 0.005). The cut-off points of ≥ 3 for section A (sensitivity of 90%-100%; specificity of 33%-40%) and ≥ 2 for section B (sensitivity of 81%-84%; specificity of 60%-70%) were obtained during neuropathy detection.
The MNSI-PL is a reliable and valid instrument in screening for diabetic neuropathy.
PL MNSI is a reliable and accurate screening tool for peripheral neuropathy. We also proposed cutoff points for both scales (for patients and for physicians), and hope that this can also be used by other authors from different countries.