Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2025; 16(5): 103447
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i5.103447
Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis: New hope for patients with type 2 diabetes?
Meng-Qiu Shao, Man-Yin Zhai, Huan-Tian Cui, First School of Clinical Medicine, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China
Jia-Bao Liao, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
Qian-Qian Wan, Department of Medical Affairs, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China
Li-Juan Jiang, Department of Medical Ethics Committee, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China
ORCID number: Jia-Bao Liao (0000-0002-4483-466X); Huan-Tian Cui (0000-0002-0820-5436).
Co-first authors: Meng-Qiu Shao and Jia-Bao Liao.
Co-corresponding authors: Li-Juan Jiang and Huan-Tian Cui.
Author contributions: Shao MQ and Liao JB conducted data searches, organized the information, and drafted the manuscript; Zhai MY and Wan QQ performed information screening and sorting; Jiang LJ and Cui HT provided conceptual inspiration, edited the manuscript, and made critical revisions for intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Huan-Tian Cui, PhD, First School of Clinical Medicine, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, No. 1076 Yuhua Road, Chenggong District, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China. 1762316411@qq.com
Received: November 21, 2024
Revised: February 20, 2025
Accepted: February 28, 2025
Published online: May 15, 2025
Processing time: 156 Days and 23.5 Hours

Abstract

In this article, we comment on an article by Wang et al published in the World Journal of Diabetes. Existing treatments with oral medications can partially mitigate the toxicity of elevated blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, these patients often require lifelong, costly medications, and many struggle with poor compliance. To address the limitations of pharmacological treatments, laparoscopic jejunal-ileal lateral anastomosis has become increasingly common in clinical practice and generally yields favorable outcomes. This procedure stimulates the secretion of larger amounts of glucagon-like peptide-1 by intestinal L cells, which in turn promotes pancreatic islet cell proliferation, reduces insulin resistance, and effectively controls glucose and lipid metabolism disorders. Nonetheless, further research is needed to fully explore its indications, contraindications, the enhancement of patients' quality of life and patients’ satisfaction with the subjective experience of treatment and long-term effects.

Key Words: Type 2 diabetes; Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis; Glucagon-like peptide-1; Glycolipid metabolism; Islet function

Core Tip: Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis may offer new hope for patients with type 2 diabetes. It can stimulate the production of glucagon-like peptide 1 by the terminal L cells of the ileum to control blood sugar and improve the metabolism of patients. Research shows that the procedure showed significant improvements in patients' metabolic indicators such as body mass index, blood pressure, blood glucose, insulin resistance index, and cholesterol levels at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Of course, further investigation is needed to fully explore its indications, contraindications, the enhancement of patients’ quality of life and patients’ satisfaction with the subjective experience of treatment and long-term effects.



TO THE EDITOR

Approximately 537 million adults have diabetes in the world, with the majority diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This number is projected to increase to around 783 million by 2045[1]. T2DM, traditionally defined by chronically elevated blood glucose levels, is now recognized as a complex cardio-renal-metabolic disease driven by chronic positive energy balance[2]. Over time, the disease leads to multiple metabolic and homeostatic disturbances, resulting in persistent disruptions in glucose and lipid metabolism. These metabolic imbalances severely compromise vascular integrity and function, contributing to organ dysfunction and death. T2DM significantly raises the risk of microvascular complications (such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy) and macrovascular complications (including ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease)[3]. These complications impose a substantial socioeconomic burden and negatively impact patients' quality of life[4].

The significance of exploring new treatments for T2DM

The primary goal in diabetes management is to lower blood glucose levels to reduce the risk of microvascular and/or macrovascular complications[5]. Current treatments for T2DM include lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy (e.g., metformin, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, and insulin), obesity management, sleep behavior adjustments, and maintaining mental well-being, all of which can help manage T2DM and its complications[3]. However, long-term effectiveness and patient adherence to these interventions is still significant challenges, especially in low- and middle-income regions[6-8]. Thus, exploring novel treatments for T2DM is crucial.

Continuous exploration of the surgical treatment of T2DM

The bariatric surgery was reported to be an effective treatment for T2DM due to its strong impact on reducing body weight, blood glucose levels, fasting insulin, and HbA1c[9]. Subsequent numerous studies have confirmed bariatric surgery efficacy in improving glucose homeostasis, reducing glucose-lowering medication need, and lowering both T2DM microvascular and macrovascular complications[10].

Traditional metabolic surgeries for T2DM involve Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Biliopancreatic Diversion, Adjustable Gastric Banding, and so on. Evidence shows that surgeries enhance the patient's glycolipid metabolic status[11]. However, these procedures are not devoid of risks, which include gastrointestinal motility disorders, postoperative dumping syndrome, intestinal herniations, Insulinoma, nutritional deficiency, and the potential for residual gastric malignancies[12,13].

In recent times, laparoscopic jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis has surfaced as a promising surgical intervention. It is particularly appropriate for patients who are of normal weight or mildly overweight[14]. This surgical technique significantly lowers blood glucose, postpones the onset of complications, decreases the likelihood of requiring gastrectomy or open surgical approaches, and mitigates the symptoms. As previously mentioned, it shunts the jejunum and ileum. This facilitates the rapid transit of digestive secretions and undigested food components to the terminal ileum and colon. This stimulates GLP-1 secretion by L cells at the terminal ileum, ultimately aiding in blood sugar control and metabolic improvement.

We conducted a comparative analysis of three most commonly used surgical treatments: jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis, RYGB, and SG, evaluating them based on targeting the crowd, effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The findings are summarized in Table 1[14-18].

Table 1 Comparison of three most commonly used surgical treatments.

Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
sleeve gastrectomy
Targeting the crowdIt is mainly targeted at T2DM patients with normal or relatively high BMI and comorbiditiesIt is primarily targeted at T2DM patients with high BMI and comorbiditiesIt is primarily targeted at T2DM patients with high BMI and with or without comorbidities
EffectivenessEffectively alleviates T2DM and related comorbiditiesSignificant weight loss and effective reduction of T2DM and related comorbiditiesThe weight loss outcomes were substantial; however, the improvement in comorbidities was less pronounced compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
SafetyIt may cause long-term nutrient absorption problems due to intestinal reconstruction, but there are few clinical studies and no obvious data supportEarly complications include: Anastomotic leak, hemorrhage obstruction
Venous thrombo-embolic disease. Infections: Late complications include: Internal herniation (most common). Stricture. Micronutrient deficiency. Hyperoxaluria. Gallstone formation. Dumping syndrome. Marginal ulcers. Gastrogastric fistula. Failed weight loss maintenance. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass has a higher mortality rate of about 0.2% than sleeve gastrectomy
The complication rate is low but there may be problems with gastroesophageal reflux
Cost-effectivenessSurgery is shorter and hospital stays less, so initial costs are lower, but costs for long-term nutritional management may increaseAlthough surgery costs are high, medical expenses may be reduced in the long term due to diabetes remissionIn between
Improvement and significance of relevant indexes after jejunal side-to-side anastomosis

T2DM pathophysiological studies indicate that obesity is a significant risk factor for its development. Hepatic metabolic dysfunction, cardiocerebrovascular disease, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia are increasingly recognized in many patients with T2D[19].

This article[14] presents a retrospective analysis involving 78 individuals who have undergone laparoscopic jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis at their medical facility. They aimed to assess the effects of the surgical intervention on various metabolic parameters by measuring preoperative and postoperative levels of glucose, lipids, and purines. They discovered a notable decrease in body mass index, blood pressure and indicators associated with blood glucose metabolism at 3/6 months post-surgery.

No statistically significant differences in pancreatic islet function were observed at 3 months post-surgery compared to preoperative values. However, at 6 months post-surgery, significant improvements were noted. As the function of pancreas improved, there were concurrent enhancements in metabolic indicators, with concurrent reductions in insulin resistance and secretion abnormalities.

The authors evaluated and contrasted the levels of transaminases before and after surgery within their study group. They found no significant differences, which they attributed to the mean BMI of their patients being less than 25 kg/m². They discovered that lateral jejunoileal anastomosis surgery improves blood lipid profiles within 3 months and demonstrates more significant enhancements in lipid profiles and uric acid levels 6 months following the surgical procedure. The authors speculated that these changes were likely related to the elevated secretion of GLP-1, stimulated by the surgical diversion of the ileum, which enhances the production of GLP-1 by L cells[14]. The role of GLP-1 in human metabolism is well-documented in the literature[3,5,19].

Laparoscopic jejunoileal anastomosis promoted the metabolisms of glucose, lipid, and purine, along with other related parameters in T2DM patients. Beyond lowering blood glucose levels, this procedure appears to offer broader benefits, including improved metabolism of lipids and purines, as well as better control of weight and blood pressure. Through the augmentation of endogenous GLP-1, this surgery addresses the underlying mechanisms of insulin resistance and insufficient insulin secretion, potentially reducing the postoperative complications typically seen with traditional weight-loss surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The sample size of this study is relatively small, with only 78 cases included. Each surgery has specific indications and contraindications, and compared to pharmacological treatments, fewer patients may be suitable for this procedure. This study primarily reviews the relevant indicators at 3 and 6 months post-surgery, which limits our ability to assess the long-term effects of the surgery on T2DM complications. Furthermore, the study did not adequately address the enhancement of patients' quality of life and their satisfaction with the subjective experience of treatment. Nonetheless, the study provides a valuable new perspective on the treatment of T2DM. Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis may offer new hope for patients with T2DM. Further in-depth and longer-term retrospective studies are needed to fully evaluate its long-term efficacy and impact.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Zhao J, department of endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, for the answer to the operation and specific benefit mechanism of this surgery. We are thankful to Professor Zhang PY of the Second Clinical College of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine for the guidance of the revised comments.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Chitteti R S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao S

References
1.  Ogurtsova K, Guariguata L, Barengo NC, Ruiz PL, Sacre JW, Karuranga S, Sun H, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ. IDF diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109118.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in RCA: 386]  [Article Influence: 128.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017;389:2239-2251.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1234]  [Cited by in RCA: 1645]  [Article Influence: 205.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
3.  Ahmad E, Lim S, Lamptey R, Webb DR, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2022;400:1803-1820.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 436]  [Article Influence: 145.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Shao H, Yang S, Fonseca V, Stoecker C, Shi L. Estimating Quality of Life Decrements Due to Diabetes Complications in the United States: The Health Utility Index (HUI) Diabetes Complication Equation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37:921-929.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Burns C, Francis N.   Type 2 Diabetes: Etiology, Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment. Metabolic Syndrome. Cham: Switzerland: Springer, 2023.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
6.  Burd C, Gruss S, Albright A, Zina A, Schumacher P, Alley D. Translating Knowledge into Action to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Medicare Expansion of the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention. Milbank Q. 2020;98:172-196.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Walker EA, Gonzalez JS, Tripputi MT, Dagogo-Jack S, Matulik MJ, Montez MG, Tadros S, Edelstein SL; DPP Research Group. Long-term metformin adherence in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Gyawali B, Bloch J, Vaidya A, Kallestrup P. Community-based interventions for prevention of Type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2019;34:1218-1230.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Pories WJ, MacDonald KG Jr, Flickinger EG, Dohm GL, Sinha MK, Barakat HA, May HJ, Khazanie P, Swanson MS, Morgan E. Is type II diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) a surgical disease? Ann Surg. 1992;215:633-42; discussion 643.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 132]  [Cited by in RCA: 139]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kirwan JP, Courcoulas AP, Cummings DE, Goldfine AB, Kashyap SR, Simonson DC, Arterburn DE, Gourash WF, Vernon AH, Jakicic JM, Patti ME, Wolski K, Schauer PR. Diabetes Remission in the Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine Versus Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D). Diabetes Care. 2022;45:1574-1583.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Sandoval DA, Patti ME. Glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: implications for T2DM remission and hypoglycaemia. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19:164-176.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 53]  [Article Influence: 26.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Galvain T, Bosut MP, Jamous N, Ben Mansour N. Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Tunisia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:935-945.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Zhang NJ, Fu YZ, Shan XD, Zhang N, Sun XT, Chu XH, Bi Y, Zhu DL, Feng WH. Are Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and a Body Mass Index of 27.5-32.5 kg/m(2) Suitable for Metabolic Surgery? A One-Year Post-Surgery Study. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12:1429-1444.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Wang JK, Zhang D, Wang JF, Lu WL, Wang JY, Liang SF, Liu R, Jiang JX, Li HT, Yang X. Clinical study on the effect of jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2025;16:99526.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Moradi M, Kabir A, Khalili D, Lakeh MM, Dodaran MS, Pazouki A, Kermansaravi M, Alibeigi P, Moazenzadeh H, Abdolhosseini MR, Eghbali F, Baradaran HR. Type 2 diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): results of the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:260.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Mitchell BG, Collier SA, Gupta N.   Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. 2024 Nov 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, Nguyen NT. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254:410-20; discussion 420.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 529]  [Cited by in RCA: 489]  [Article Influence: 34.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Balasubaramaniam V, Pouwels S. Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Abel ED, Gloyn AL, Evans-Molina C, Joseph JJ, Misra S, Pajvani UB, Simcox J, Susztak K, Drucker DJ. Diabetes mellitus-Progress and opportunities in the evolving epidemic. Cell. 2024;187:3789-3820.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]