Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Apr 15, 2025; 16(4): 103546
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i4.103546
Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis as a promising option for type 2 diabetes
Sang Yeoup Lee, Family Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, South Korea
Sang Yeoup Lee, Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan 50760, South Korea
ORCID number: Sang Yeoup Lee (0000-0002-3585-9910).
Author contributions: Lee SY contributed to data collection, study design, data analysis, and interpretation and wrote, read, and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sang Yeoup Lee, Family Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Geumo-ro 20, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 50612, South Korea. saylee@pnu.edu
Received: November 25, 2024
Revised: January 20, 2025
Accepted: February 7, 2025
Published online: April 15, 2025
Processing time: 98 Days and 5.5 Hours

Abstract

In this editorial, I discuss the article by Wang et al, published in the World Journal of Diabetes, which explores jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis as a novel surgical intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM, often associated with obesity, remains a global health challenge, as sustained remission is difficult to achieve with conventional pharmacological therapy. Jejunoileal anastomosis offers a promising alternative, particularly for patients with normal or relatively high body mass index, and addresses the unique challenges posed by diverse patient populations. This procedure preserves gastric anatomy while simultaneously improving metabolic parameters, such as glycemic control, lipid profiles, and pancreatic β-cell function. Unlike traditional metabolic surgeries that involve permanent anatomical alterations, this approach provides advantages such as reversibility, shorter operative times, and minimal nutritional complications, making it appealing to patients for whom conventional bariatric surgery is unsuitable. Advances in gut hormone physiology and incretin modulation support these findings. This innovative approach represents a potential paradigm shift in T2DM treatment, offering insights into the evolving role of surgical interventions in metabolic regulation. While early findings show promising diabetes remission rates and metabolic improvements at six months post-surgery, further studies with longer follow-up periods and broader patient cohorts are required.

Key Words: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Pancreatic function; Jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis; Remission; Asian population

Core Tip: This editorial examines jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis as a novel surgical approach for type 2 diabetes mellitus. It highlights the role of this surgical approach in modulating glucagon-like peptide-1, improving β-cell function, and preserving gastric anatomy, thereby offering a promising alternative for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a relatively high body mass index.



INTRODUCTION

The global prevalence of diabetes continues to rise, currently affecting over 10% of adults worldwide, with a disproportionately larger number in low- and middle-income countries. Worse still, nearly half of all individuals with diabetes are unaware of their medical condition. The population with diabetes is expected to increase in the coming decades, with estimates indicating that nearly 1 in 8 adults will suffer from the condition by 2045[1]. This growing epidemic poses unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems, particularly in resource-limited developing nations. Asian countries face particularly unique challenges due to the earlier onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in individuals with a lower body mass index (BMI) compared to Western populations, necessitating alternative treatment modalities tailored to these metabolic phenotypes. Although traditional pharmacological approaches remain the mainstay of T2DM management, their limitations, such as the requirement for lifelong medication, adherence issues, inconsistent efficacy, and poor durability, have prompted healthcare providers to explore alternative solutions, leading to a growing interest in surgical interventions.

INNOVATIONS IN METABOLIC SURGERY

Wang et al[2] proposed jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis as a novel alternative to conventional metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), particularly for patients with normal or relatively high BMI. Over the past two decades, MBS has evolved significantly, with diabetes remission rates ranging from 30% to 70% following procedures such as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy. The outcomes of these procedures vary depending on the definition of remission, patient characteristics, surgical method, follow-up duration, and duration of preoperative diabetes[3,4]. However, these traditional procedures involve substantial risks and may be unsuitable for certain patient populations, especially in Asian countries where T2DM often manifests in individuals with a lower BMI[5]. The risks include irreversible anatomical alterations, nutritional deficiencies, and a higher prevalence of complications like the dumping syndrome[3,4,6]. These limitations highlight the need for safer and more adaptable approaches, particularly for populations with unique metabolic profiles.

The current study on the use of jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis sought to bridge this gap in therapeutic management. Unlike RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy, both of which permanently alter gastric anatomy and can lead to significant nutritional challenges[6], jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis preserves the physiological function of the stomach while modifying nutrient flow patterns. This innovative approach stimulates glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion, enhancing glycemic control, promoting satiety, and improving β-cell function while minimizing the risk of nutritional deficiencies and other long-term complications, offering shorter operative times and maintaining the reversibility of the intervention. While weight loss was modest compared to RYGB, glycemic control was notably effective, with diabetes remission rates surpassing expectations[7]. This procedure could be particularly relevant for Asian populations, where traditional MBS may be less appropriate due to different body composition patterns and metabolic phenotypes[8].

METABOLIC MECHANISMS AND IMPROVEMENTS

Recent advances in research on incretin physiology provide an important context for understanding the metabolic benefits observed in this study. The reductions in blood pressure, postprandial blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin levels at three months post-jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis, with further enhancements at six months, are consistent with current research on the role of gut hormones in metabolic regulation[9]. The study also demonstrated improvements in pancreatic function markers, including elevated post-prandial C-peptide, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function levels, suggesting potential β-cell recovery. This is consistent with research indicating that reduction in glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity, a process facilitated by the procedure’s ability to improve ectopic fat deposition in the liver and pancreas, can partially restore β-cell insulin secretion dynamics and systemic insulin sensitivity, even in long-standing diabetes[10,11]. Additionally, reductions in systemic inflammation markers, such as C-reactive protein, may enhance insulin sensitivity and β-cell preservation, underscoring the procedure’s anti-inflammatory effects. Interestingly, the observed improvements in lipid profile, particularly reductions in triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, suggest additional pathways of metabolic regulation. Enhanced bile acid reabsorption and modulation of gut microbiota composition post-surgery may further contribute to these outcomes, supporting broader systemic benefits.

Weight loss, whether achieved through surgical or nonsurgical means, plays a critical role in the remission of T2DM. By reducing ectopic fat deposits in the liver and pancreas, weight loss improves hepatic and pancreatic insulin sensitivity[12,13]. This reduction in glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity facilitates the recovery of pancreatic β-cell function, restoring the insulin secretion dynamics critical for glucose homeostasis[14]. Additionally, the physiological effects of weight loss extend beyond glycemic control, influencing systemic inflammation, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular health[15-17]. The secretion of GLP-1 is enhanced with weight loss, further promoting satiety, improved insulin sensitivity, and β-cell preservation[18].

Beyond glycemic regulation, the observed improvements in lipid profiles and reductions in uric acid levels highlight the broader benefits of jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis for a multisystem disorder such as T2DM. These findings illuminate the complex interplay between glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular health, advancing our understanding of how targeted surgical interventions can address the systemic nature of T2DM[19,20].

LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTION

Despite promising results, the relatively short six-month follow-up period of this study is a limitation, as metabolic improvements may decline over time[3,21,22]. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the durability of metabolic improvements and monitor potential late complications. Moreover, patient selection criteria, particularly the requirement for specific C-peptide thresholds, suggest that only a subset of T2DM patients may benefit optimally from this procedure. This suggests that the broader applicability of jejunoileal anastomosis across diverse populations needs further exploration, as highlighted by the recent consensus guidelines[23,24]. Nevertheless, the incorporation of detailed mechanistic insights into incretin modulation, bile acid signaling, and gut microbiota dynamics in the study underscores the potential of the procedure to influence the broader landscape of metabolic surgery.

While increased GLP-1 secretion likely plays a central role in metabolic improvements[25], earlier studies indicate that bile acid signaling[26] and gut microbiome changes[27] also play key roles in post-surgical metabolic regulation through a complex interplay of mechanisms. These findings underscore the innovative nature of the procedure, which integrates multiple metabolic pathways and highlights the need for advanced research to optimize its application and understand its full therapeutic potential. Future studies should incorporate advanced omics technologies, including metabolomics and microbiome profiling, to uncover these intricate interactions and their contribution to long-term efficacy.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the research on the role of metabolic surgery for T2DM by demonstrating the potential of less invasive techniques to achieve significant metabolic improvements. By delving into multifaceted mechanisms, including gut-pancreas signaling, lipid metabolism, and bile acid pathways, the study highlights a paradigm shift in the surgical management of diabetes. Given the exponentially rising burden of diabetes globally, future research should include large-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-ups to establish the role of this procedure in T2DM management and expand treatment options.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism

Country of origin: South Korea

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Fang C; Sitkin S; Zhao K S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu ZH

References
1.  Hossain MJ, Al-Mamun M, Islam MR. Diabetes mellitus, the fastest growing global public health concern: Early detection should be focused. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7:e2004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Wang JK, Zhang D, Wang JF, Lu WL, Wang JY, Liang SF, Liu R, Jiang JX, Li HT, Yang X. Clinical study on the effect of jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2025;16:99526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Courcoulas AP, Patti ME, Hu B, Arterburn DE, Simonson DC, Gourash WF, Jakicic JM, Vernon AH, Beck GJ, Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Aminian A, Cummings DE, Kirwan JP. Long-Term Outcomes of Medical Management vs Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA. 2024;331:654-664.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Singh P, Adderley NJ, Hazlehurst J, Price M, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K, Bellary S. Prognostic Models for Predicting Remission of Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:2626-2641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Vicks WS, Lo JC, Guo L, Rana JS, Zhang S, Ramalingam ND, Gordon NP. Prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes vary by ethnicity among U.S. Asian adults at healthy weight, overweight, and obesity ranges: an electronic health record study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Albaugh VL, He Y, Münzberg H, Morrison CD, Yu S, Berthoud HR. Regulation of body weight: Lessons learned from bariatric surgery. Mol Metab. 2023;68:101517.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Li J, Xie G, Tian Q, Hu Y, Meng Q, Zhang M. Laparoscopic jejunoileal side-to-side anastomosis for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese patients with a body mass index of 24-32 kg/m(2). J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12:5-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Suleiman M, Marselli L, Cnop M, Eizirik DL, De Luca C, Femia FR, Tesi M, Del Guerra S, Marchetti P. The Role of Beta Cell Recovery in Type 2 Diabetes Remission. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Lytrivi M, Castell AL, Poitout V, Cnop M. Recent Insights Into Mechanisms of β-Cell Lipo- and Glucolipotoxicity in Type 2 Diabetes. J Mol Biol. 2020;432:1514-1534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in RCA: 241]  [Article Influence: 40.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Parhofer KG. Interaction between Glucose and Lipid Metabolism: More than Diabetic Dyslipidemia. Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39:353-362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 203]  [Cited by in RCA: 257]  [Article Influence: 25.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Chen MY, Meng XF, Han YP, Yan JL, Xiao C, Qian LB. Profile of crosstalk between glucose and lipid metabolic disturbance and diabetic cardiomyopathy: Inflammation and oxidative stress. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:983713.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Pang MD, Bastings JJAJ, Op den Kamp-Bruls YMH, Harrold JA, Kjølbaek L, Halford JCG, Adam TCM, Raben A, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Goossens GH, Blaak EE. The effect of weight loss on whole-body and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity and hepatic lipid content and composition: SWEET substudy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023;31:1745-1754.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Taylor R, Al-Mrabeh A, Zhyzhneuskaya S, Peters C, Barnes AC, Aribisala BS, Hollingsworth KG, Mathers JC, Sattar N, Lean MEJ. Remission of Human Type 2 Diabetes Requires Decrease in Liver and Pancreas Fat Content but Is Dependent upon Capacity for β Cell Recovery. Cell Metab. 2018;28:547-556.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 179]  [Cited by in RCA: 261]  [Article Influence: 37.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Janssen JAMJL. Overnutrition, Hyperinsulinemia and Ectopic Fat: It Is Time for A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Ryan DH, Yockey SR. Weight Loss and Improvement in Comorbidity: Differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and Over. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:187-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 386]  [Cited by in RCA: 414]  [Article Influence: 51.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Guglielmi V, Bettini S, Sbraccia P, Busetto L, Pellegrini M, Yumuk V, Colao AM, El Ghoch M, Muscogiuri G. Beyond Weight Loss: Added Benefits Could Guide the Choice of Anti-Obesity Medications. Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12:127-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Kloock S, Ziegler CG, Dischinger U. Obesity and its comorbidities, current treatment options and future perspectives: Challenging bariatric surgery? Pharmacol Ther. 2023;251:108549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Zaïmia N, Obeid J, Varrault A, Sabatier J, Broca C, Gilon P, Costes S, Bertrand G, Ravier MA. GLP-1 and GIP receptors signal through distinct β-arrestin 2-dependent pathways to regulate pancreatic β cell function. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113326.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Moize V, Laferrère B, Shapses S. Nutritional Challenges and Treatment After Bariatric Surgery. Annu Rev Nutr. 2024;44:289-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Sharew B, Kodur N, Corcelles R, Mauer Y. Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Adult Population: What a Primary Care Provider Needs to Know. Mayo Clin Proc. 2024;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Osorio Manyari AA, Armas Alvarez AL, Osorio Manyari JD, Caballero FG, Pouwels S. "Metabolic surgery in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and body mass index less than 30kg/m2: A systematic review". Obes Pillars. 2024;12:100145.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Courcoulas AP, Daigle CR, Arterburn DE. Long term outcomes of metabolic/bariatric surgery in adults. BMJ. 2023;383:e071027.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Ma S, Wang L, Chen J, Zhao Y, Jiang T. The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes remission outcomes in patients with body mass index between 25 kg/m 2 and 32.5 kg/m 2. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:315-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Hulse J, Slay R, Bryant MK, Byrne TK, Pullatt R. Dissemination of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO Guidelines for Bariatric Surgery: What Has Reached Primary Care Providers? Obes Surg. 2024;34:3252-3257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Cornejo-Pareja I, Clemente-Postigo M, Tinahones FJ. Metabolic and Endocrine Consequences of Bariatric Surgery. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:626.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in RCA: 56]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Flynn CR, Albaugh VL, Cai S, Cheung-Flynn J, Williams PE, Brucker RM, Bordenstein SR, Guo Y, Wasserman DH, Abumrad NN. Bile diversion to the distal small intestine has comparable metabolic benefits to bariatric surgery. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7715.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 133]  [Cited by in RCA: 152]  [Article Influence: 15.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Guo Y, Huang ZP, Liu CQ, Qi L, Sheng Y, Zou DJ. Modulation of the gut microbiome: a systematic review of the effect of bariatric surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:43-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in RCA: 128]  [Article Influence: 18.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]