Published online Apr 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i4.793
Peer-review started: December 20, 2023
First decision: January 17, 2024
Revised: January 18, 2024
Accepted: February 27, 2024
Article in press: February 27, 2024
Published online: April 15, 2024
Processing time: 113 Days and 4.6 Hours
This letter to the editor discusses the publication on gut microbiome supplementation as therapy for metabolic syndrome. Gut microbiome dysbiosis disrupts intestinal bacterial homeostasis and is related to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Previous research has found that increasing the abundance of beneficial microbiota in the gut modulates metabolic syndrome by reducing chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. Prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics are often used as supplements to increase the number of beneficial microbes and thus the produc
Core Tip: I am writing to express my appreciation for the enlightening study titled “Gut microbiome supplementation as therapy for metabolic syndrome” recently published in your esteemed journal. The findings presented in this research shed light on the pivotal role of the gut microbiome in modulating metabolic syndrome, emphasizing the potential therapeutic impact of supplementation. The paper delves into the diverse array of supplements, including probiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics, and their distinct effects on the gut microbiome and its association with metabolic syndrome. I believe that this study will further investigations, inspire clinical trials, and foster the development of targeted interventions to enhance metabolic health through the modulation of the gut microbiome. Our research group is also researching the role of the gut microbiota in chronic liver disease. This article will be of great help to our research.
- Citation: Xu YW, Tian J, Song Y, Zhang BC, Wang J. Metabolic syndrome’s new therapy: Supplement the gut microbiome. World J Diabetes 2024; 15(4): 793-796
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v15/i4/793.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i4.793
Dear Editor, we read with great interest the recently published review paper by Mc Anto Antony, entitled “Gut microbiome supplementation as therapy for metabolic syndrome”, in the World Journal of Diabetes[1]. The gut microbiota may have a significant role in controlling the host’s health. Even though gut microbes have been studied for several decades, the investigation into the purposes of those microorganisms has attracted significant interest outside of the realm of traditional diseases associated with infection. This systematic review of recent evidence from some mice and human model experiments concluded that microbiome supplementation improves people’s gut microbiomes that suffer from metabolic syndrome. They produce beneficial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including butyrate, acetate, and propionate which can improve insulin sensitivity and the patient’s body weight[2]. Acetate, butyrate, and propionate are formed because of the intestinal microflora’s fermentative action on fibre from the diet. The microbiota in the gut transforms the primary bile acids into bile acids, which may further increase the synthesis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and enhance insulin sensitivity[3].
We agree with that opinion in this review. Previous studies similarly reported that microbiome supplementation increases the gut microbes’ abundance of benefits and reduces the prevalence of dangerous bacteria in people with metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Endotoxemia and chronic inflammation can result from type 2 diabetes mellitus weakening the barrier between the intestines and allowing gram-negative microbes to get into the circulatory system[4]. Gut microbiome supplements, for example, probiotics, synbiotics, or postbiotics, affect the gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome by increasing the abundance of beneficial microbiota; therefore, these supplements could reduce insulin resistance and chronic inflammation to modify the metabolic syndrome[3].
Prebiotics provide a multitude of health effects, one of which is immunological regulation via the creation of more immune globulin and interleukins (IL) and a decrease in inflammatory IL[5]. Additionally, the SCFAs may lower gut pH, which will stop harmful bacteria from growing. These elements can enhance insulin sensitivity, enhance the condition of the gut, as well as decrease the generation of cytokines that are associated with inflammation[6]. Among probiotics, the two most associated bacteria are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. It has been discovered that probiotics affect the expression of genes and proteins linked to inflammation[7]. Among the beneficial bacteria crucial in preserving this barrier in the intestine are Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Facecalibacterium prausnitzii is linked to decreased inflammation and creates SCFA butyrate. Bifidobacteria enhance insulin sensitivity, enhance gut health, and reduce the generation of cytokines associated with inflammation[8]. From previous research, we found that probiotics, synbiotics, or postbiotics are three substances that can lead to the production of SCFAs, in the gastrointestinal tract improve health and promote intestinal barrier integrity.
Three SCFAs possess an impact on energy homeostasis and metabolic processes, and they may positively influence the functioning of muscle in the skeleton, the tissue of the liver, and fatty tissue. These SCFAs not only are of importance in gut health and as signaling molecules but also might directly affect metabolism[9]. SCFAs in the gut, maybe they can improve the health of the gastrointestinal tract, and then they also can protect against inflammation and most importantly promote intestinal barrier integrity.
SCFAs are produced in the distal intestine during the fermentation of indigestible meals. In the caecum, ileum, and colon, the ratio of acetate to propionate to butyrate is around 3:1:1[10]. Since the liver and colon are normally where butyrate and propionate are processed, they primarily impact the functioning of the local gastrointestinal tract and liver[11]. such as GPR41 and GPR43 were G-protein-coupled receptors, in the distal gut are bound by SCFAs, influencing satiety and glucose homeostasis, and producing the gut hormones peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)[12]. High concentrations of acetate and low levels of propionate and butyrate enter the bloodstream and can have an immediate impact on the function and metabolism of substrates in the muscles, liver, and peripheral fat tissue. Acetate and butyrate might influence skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in an adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent manner, this could promote the uptake of glucose (via the glucose transporter type 4; GLUT4) and the subsequent retention of glycogen (perhaps through a process that involves GPR41/GPR43)[13]. Through elevated systemic levels of gut-derived PYY and GLP-1, SCFAs may also indirectly influence muscle insulin susceptibility and the breakdown of glucose. This could impact the muscle’s response to insulin and absorption of glucose, improving tissue insulin tolerance and glucose management[14].
Some proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may be affected by SCFAs in epithelial cells, and they are also promoted by enhancing nuclear factor kappa-B activation in Toll-like receptors ligand responses[15]. SCFAs can also inhibit the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, in neutrophils[16]. SCFAs regulate dendritic cell activities, which in turn control the immunological response by influencing T-cell interaction as well as cytokine secretion.
Butyrate and propionate inhibit the activation of bone marrow-derived stem cells by suppressing the LPS-induced expression of the costimulatory molecule CD40 and the secretion of IL-6 and IL-12p40[16]. They can inhibit proinflammatory mediators, including nitric oxide (NO), IL-6, and IL-12, but they do not affect the production of TNF-α or monocyte chemotactic protein 1. Growing evidence points to SCFAs’ regulatory role in both adaptive and innate immune cells, among other immune system cell types.
The potential role of increasing SCFAs as a metabolic tool to prevent insulin resistance and associated cardiometabolic risk factors is increasing. It is still unknown how these findings may affect human metabolism and clinical relevance because most of the data come from in vitro and animal research. This may be important for future research. Ingesting complex carbs stimulates the microbiota to produce SCFAs, a helpful strategy to stop glucose metabolism and potentially delay the onset of insulin resistance. Long-term well-controlled human intervention studies are needed to clarify the role of SCFAs in the control of body weight and insulin sensitivity and to define the mechanism of action of SCFAs in organisms. Supplementing with gut microbiota can help treat the metabolic syndrome.
When probiotics are supplemented, side effects may be caused. Probiotics are not released in the stomach but play a role in the intestine. When excessive probiotics are supplemented, it will cause intestinal dysfunction. In addition, in some patients with severely damaged intestinal barrier, bacteria easily break through the intestinal barrier into the blood, causing infection. However, randomised, large-scale, high-quality research and clinical trials should be developed to evaluate the use of SCFAs to alter the gut microbiome and affect different metabolic illnesses. The side effects of bacteria also need to be considered, which will be another focus of research. Moreover, additional beneficial strains with effects on the gut microbiome need to be identified for the treatment of other diseases.
According to this review, gut-healthy bacteria enhance insulin sensitivity and reduce the release of cytokines associated with inflammation. Therefore, in our research centre, we consider that SCFAs may affect the composition of the gut microbiome and its functions can affect chronic liver disease most likely by regulating innate and adaptive cells; however, further investigation is needed.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Endocrinology and metabolism
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Rai S, India S-Editor: Li L L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yuan YY
1. | Antony MA, Chowdhury A, Edem D, Raj R, Nain P, Joglekar M, Verma V, Kant R. Gut microbiome supplementation as therapy for metabolic syndrome. World J Diabetes. 2023;14:1502-1513. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Kant R, Chandra L, Verma V, Nain P, Bello D, Patel S, Ala S, Chandra R, Antony MA. Gut microbiota interactions with anti-diabetic medications and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Methodol. 2022;12:246-257. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Massey W, Brown JM. The Gut Microbial Endocrine Organ in Type 2 Diabetes. Endocrinology. 2021;162. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Zhao Y, Wang Z. Gut microbiome and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020;35:207-218. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Megur A, Daliri EB, Baltriukienė D, Burokas A. Prebiotics as a Tool for the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes: Classification and Ability to Modulate the Gut Microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Gurry T. Synbiotic approaches to human health and well-being. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:1070-1073. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Suez J, Zmora N, Segal E, Elinav E. The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics. Nat Med. 2019;25:716-729. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 405] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 690] [Article Influence: 138.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Maioli TU, Borras-Nogues E, Torres L, Barbosa SC, Martins VD, Langella P, Azevedo VA, Chatel JM. Possible Benefits of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii for Obesity-Associated Gut Disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:740636. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60] [Article Influence: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Canfora EE, Jocken JW, Blaak EE. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:577-591. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1162] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1363] [Article Influence: 151.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Fernandes J, Su W, Rahat-Rozenbloom S, Wolever TM, Comelli EM. Adiposity, gut microbiota and faecal short chain fatty acids are linked in adult humans. Nutr Diabetes. 2014;4:e121. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 444] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 423] [Article Influence: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CP, Macfarlane GT. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987;28:1221-1227. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1896] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2074] [Article Influence: 56.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Chambers ES, Viardot A, Psichas A, Morrison DJ, Murphy KG, Zac-Varghese SE, MacDougall K, Preston T, Tedford C, Finlayson GS, Blundell JE, Bell JD, Thomas EL, Mt-Isa S, Ashby D, Gibson GR, Kolida S, Dhillo WS, Bloom SR, Morley W, Clegg S, Frost G. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut. 2015;64:1744-1754. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 940] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 866] [Article Influence: 96.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Yamashita H, Maruta H, Jozuka M, Kimura R, Iwabuchi H, Yamato M, Saito T, Fujisawa K, Takahashi Y, Kimoto M, Hiemori M, Tsuji H. Effects of acetate on lipid metabolism in muscles and adipose tissues of type 2 diabetic Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73:570-576. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 76] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93] [Article Influence: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Lin MY, de Zoete MR, van Putten JP, Strijbis K. Redirection of Epithelial Immune Responses by Short-Chain Fatty Acids through Inhibition of Histone Deacetylases. Front Immunol. 2015;6:554. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91] [Article Influence: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Sato FT, Sampaio SC, Curi R. Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22:849-855. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 378] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 466] [Article Influence: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Nastasi C, Candela M, Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Hansen M, Krejsgaard T, Biagi E, Andersen MH, Brigidi P, Ødum N, Litman T, Woetmann A. The effect of short-chain fatty acids on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16148. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 188] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 262] [Article Influence: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |