Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Jun 25, 2015; 6(6): 782-791
Published online Jun 25, 2015. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.782
Published online Jun 25, 2015. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.782
Gestational diabetes mellitus: An update on the current international diagnostic criteria
Mukesh M Agarwal, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
Author contributions: Agarwal MM did the literature search, chose the relevant studies and wrote the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest: The author has no conflict of interest to report.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Mukesh M Agarwal, MD, FCAP, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, UAE University, P.O. Box 17666, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. magarwal7@gmail.com
Telephone: +971-3-7672000 Fax: +971-3-7671966
Received: January 27, 2015
Peer-review started: January 28, 2015
First decision: April 10, 2015
Revised: April 20, 2015
Accepted: May 16, 2015
Article in press: May 18, 2015
Published online: June 25, 2015
Processing time: 144 Days and 4.5 Hours
Peer-review started: January 28, 2015
First decision: April 10, 2015
Revised: April 20, 2015
Accepted: May 16, 2015
Article in press: May 18, 2015
Published online: June 25, 2015
Processing time: 144 Days and 4.5 Hours
Core Tip
Core tip: Globally, the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is idiosyncratic. This disarray is independent of whether a country is affluent (e.g., Denmark) or relatively poor (e.g., Bangladesh). The reason is that not just the international but also the national medical and obstetric organizations in a country advise a multitude of approaches to GDM. This confuses the primary providers of obstetric care, who need one clear, evidence-based, global recommendation. Despite all the differences, in the near future, the light at the end of the tunnel for providing such a universal global GDM guideline is bright.