This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of insulin autoantibody (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA), and insulinoma-associated antigen-2 antibody (IA-2A) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) children based on the presence of predisposing HLA-II alleles. Additionally, to assess the sequence homology between autoantigens of islet cells and selected proteins derived from gut bacteria in terms of their binding capacities to HLA risk alleles, HLA-DRB1/DQB1 alleles were determined by PCR-SSOP in 111 T1D children (probands) along with 222 parents and 133 siblings. Autoantibodies were measured by ELISA, and in silico analysis was run as follows: protein extraction, homology and epitope prediction, peptide alignment, and HLA-peptide docking. Higher significant frequencies of DRB1*03:01, DQB1*02:01, and DQB1*03:02 alleles and DRB1*03:01 ~ DQB1*02:01 haplotype and lower frequencies of DRB1*11:01, DRB1*14:01, and DQB1*03:01 alleles were found in probands compared to parents and siblings. DRB1*11:01 ~ DQB1*03:01, DRB1*14:01 ~ DQB1*05:03, and DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:02 haplotypes were significantly less frequent in the probands compared to parents. Out of 111 probands, 21 were seronegative, 90 tested positive for one autoantibody, and 15 showed the concurrent presence of three autoantibodies. Logistic regression analysis revealed that DRB1*04 ~ DQB1*03:02 haplotype was associated with the induction of GADA and IA-2A, while DRB1*11:01 ~ DQB1*03:01 was associated with seronegativity. Epitopes derived from GAD and gut bacteria showed strong binding capacities to HLA risk alleles. Due to the sequence similarities between gut bacteria-derived proteins and islet cell autoantigens and their potential for binding to HLA risk alleles, dysbiosis of gut microbiota can be considered another risk factor for the development of T1D, especially in genetically susceptible individuals.

The 3 Screen ICA ELISA is a novel assay capable of simultaneously measuring autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 (IA-2A), and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A), making it a valuable tool for screening type 1 diabetes. Despite its advantages, it cannot specify which individual autoantibodies are positive or negative. This study aimed to estimate individual positive autoantibodies based on the 3 Screen ICA titer. Six hundred seventeen patients with type 1 diabetes, simultaneously measured for 3 Screen ICA and three individual autoantibodies, were divided into five groups based on their 3 Screen ICA titer. The sensitivities and contribution rates of the individual autoantibodies were then examined. The study had a cross-sectional design. Sixty-nine percent (424 of 617) of patients with type 1 diabetes had 3 Screen ICA titers exceeding the 99th percentile cut-off level (20 index). The prevalence of GADA ranged from 80% to 100% in patients with a 3 Screen ICA over 30 index and 97% of patients with a 3 Screen ICA ≥300 index. Furthermore, the prevalence of all individual autoantibodies being positive was 0% for ≤80 index and as high as 92% for ≥300 index. Significant associations were observed in specific titer groups: the 20-29.9 index group when all the individual autoantibodies were negative, the 30-79.9 index group when positive for GADA alone or IA-2A alone, the 30-299.9 index group when positive for ZnT8A alone, the 80-299.9 index group when positive for both IA-2A and ZnT8A, the 300-499.9 index group when positive for both GADA and ZnT8A, and the ≥300 index group when positive for all individual autoantibodies. These results suggest that the 3 Screen ICA titer may be helpful in estimating individual positive autoantibodies.

Patients afflicted by type 1 diabetes (T1D) exhibit polyautoimmunity (PolyA). However, the frequency and distribution of PolyA in T1D is still unknown.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the prevalence of latent and overt PolyA in individuals with T1D.

Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search across medical databases identified studies on latent and overt PolyA in T1D. Two researchers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed study quality. A random effects model was utilized to calculate the pooled prevalence, along with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI), for latent PolyA and overt PolyA. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to study the effect of study designs, age, sex, and duration of disease on pooled prevalence.

A total of 158 articles, encompassing a diverse composition of study designs were scrutinized. The analysis included 270,890 individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of T1D. The gender was evenly distributed (50.30 % male). Notably, our analysis unveiled an overt PolyA prevalence rate of 8.50 % (95 % CI, 6.77 to 10.62), with North America having the highest rates (14.50 %, 95 % CI, 7.58 to 24.89). This PolyA profile was further characterized by a substantial incidence of concurrent autoimmune thyroid disease (7.44 %, 95 % CI, 5.65 to 9.74). Moreover, we identified a notable prevalence of latent PolyA in the T1D population, quantified at 14.45 % (95 % CI, 11.17 to 18.49) being most frequent in Asia (23.29 %, 95 % CI, 16.29 to 32.15) and Oceania (21.53 %, 95 % CI, 16.48 to 27.62). Remarkably, this latent PolyA phenomenon primarily featured an array of autoantibodies, including rheumatoid factor, followed by Ro52, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, and thyroglobulin antibodies. Duration of the disease was associated with a highest frequency of latent (β: 0.0456, P-value: 0.0140) and overt PolyA (β: 0.0373, P-value: 0.0152). No difference in the pooled prevalence by study design was observed.

This meta-analysis constitutes a substantial advancement in the realm of early detection of PolyA in the context of T1D. Individuals with T1D should regularly undergo assessments to identify potential concurrent autoimmune diseases, especially as they age.

In recent years, the emergence of multiplex technology that can simultaneously measure multiple anti-islet autoantibodies has become particularly valuable for the staging and early diagnosis of immune-mediated type 1 diabetes (T1D). While it has been established that 20%-30% of T1D patients suffer from autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), there is limited available data regarding the presence of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients. Among commercially available anti-islet autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibodies (GADAs) are often the first marker measured in general clinical practice.

To investigate the frequency of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients.

Our study involved four hundred ninety-five AITD patients, categorized into three distinct groups: AITD with T1D (n = 18), AITD with phenotypic type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 81), and AITD without diabetes (n = 396), and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to determine the frequencies of 3 Screen Islet Cell Autoantibody (3 Screen ICA), GADA, insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2As), and zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8As) within these groups.

The frequency of 3 Screen ICA in AITD patients with T1D, T2D, and those without diabetes were 88.9%, 6.2%, and 5.1%, respectively, with no significant difference seen between the latter two groups. Notably, the frequency of 3 Screen ICA was 11.1% higher in AITD patients with T1D, 1.3% higher in AITD patients with T2D, and 1.1% higher in AITD patients without diabetes compared to GADA, respectively. Furthermore, 12.5%, 20.0%, and 20.0% of the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients were negative for GADA. Additionally, 1.3% of the AITD patients who tested negative for 3 Screen ICA in both the AITD with T2D and non-diabetic AITD groups were found to be positive for individual autoantibodies. Among the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients, there was a significantly higher proportion of individuals with multiple autoantibodies in AITD patients with T1D compared to those without diabetes (37.5% vs 5.0%, P < 0.05). However, this proportion was similar to that in AITD patients with T2D (20.0%). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers between AITD patients with T1D and those without diabetes (436.8 ± 66.4 vs 308.1 ± 66.4 index). Additionally, no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers was observed between Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis in any of the groups.

Our findings reveal that some AITD patients without diabetes exhibit 3 Screen ICA titers comparable to those in AITD patients with T1D. Thus, 3 Screen ICA outperforms GADA in identifying latent anti-islet autoantibody-positive individuals among AITD patients.

The practice of endocrinology in South Asia poses many challenges but simultaneously offers unique opportunities. The population in this region is predisposed to diabetes and cardiovascular disease at a much lower body mass index compared to Caucasians. Dietary deficiencies, higher prevalence of infection and distinct environmental and genetic factors further complicate the presentation of endocrine disorders. Over the past few decades, important breakthroughs have been made to confront these challenges. Collaboration among the endocrine fraternity of the South Asian countries will help to consolidate these gains and pave the way forward for a healthier region.