The impact of physical activity on the incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains less well studied. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and the risk of developing IPF.

We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study within the UK Biobank involving 502,476 participants. Participants were categorized as meeting or not meeting the 2017 UK Physical Activity Guidelines (150 min of moderate activity or 75 min of vigorous activity per week). The cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) for IPF were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were performed to identify potential causal links between physical activity and IPF risk.

Over a median of 12.2 y follow-up, we identified 1,639 incident IPF cases and 395,172 controls. Individuals who met the physical activity guidelines had a significantly lower risk of IPF than those who did not meet the guidelines (adjusted HR = 0.843, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.765-0.930).The cumulative incidence of IPF was lower in the meeting guideline group than in the nonmeeting guideline group (Log-rank P = 0.0019). Two-sample MR analysis revealed that a 1-standard deviation increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was linked to a reduced IPF risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95 % CIs = 0.04 to 0.81, P = 0.026). Moreover, an increase in the number of days per week of moderate physical activity was genetically correlated with decreased IPF risk (OR = 0.32, 95 % CIs = 0.15-0.70, P = 0.003).

Higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity are causally associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing IPF.

Despite the high prevalence of sleep disturbances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the relationship between physical activity in daily life (PADL) and sleep in this population remains unclear.

Investigate the impact of sleep on different domains of PADL in IPF and characterize their PADL profile.

Sixty-seven participants (thirty-three with IPF and thirty-four healthy subjects [control group]) were included. The subjects underwent assessments of pulmonary function, exercise capacity, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, PADL, sleep, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life. PADL and sleep measures were assessed using an activity monitor (Actigraph®, wGT3x-BT). Associations between sleep and PADL were done using correlation and regression models.

In the IPF, sleep duration at night associated significantly with step counts, sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (-0.82 ≤ R ≤ 0.43; p < .05 for all). Lung function and sleep partially explained PADL variables (0.19 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.65, p < .05 for all). Compared to controls, the IPF subjects presented lower step counts, less time spent in MVPA, standing position, and more time spent in lying position (p < .05, for all).

Sleep duration is associated with PADL in IPF. The PADL profile of patients is worse than in control subjects.

Several observational studies have found that physical inactivity and sedentary time are associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) risk. However, the causality between them still requires further investigation. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the causal effect of physical activity (PA) and sedentary time on the risk of IPF via two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

Multiple genome-wide association study (GWAS) data involving individuals of European ancestry were analyzed. The datasets encompassed published UK Biobank data (91,105-377,234 participants) and IPF data (2018 cases and 373,064 controls) from FinnGen Biobank. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was the primary approach for our analysis. Sensitivity analyses were implemented with Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis.

Genetically predicted self-reported PA was associated with lower IPF risk [OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.82; P = 0.02]. No causal effects of accelerometry-based PA or sedentary time on the risk of IPF were observed.

Our findings supported a protective relationship between self-reported PA and the risk for IPF. The results suggested that enhancing PA may be an effective preventive strategy for IPF.

Lifestyle is an important contributor of age-related chronic disease, but the association between lifestyle and the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains unknown. The extent to which genetic susceptibility modifies the effects of lifestyle on IPF also remains unclear.

Is there a joint effect or interaction of lifestyle and genetic susceptibility on the risk of developing IPF?

This study included 407,615 participants from the UK Biobank study. A lifestyle score and a polygenic risk score were constructed separately for each participant. Participants were then classified into three lifestyle categories and three genetic risk categories based on the corresponding score. Cox models were fitted to assess the association of lifestyle and genetic risk with the risk of incident IPF.

With favorable lifestyle as the reference group, intermediate lifestyle (hazard ratio, 1.384; 95% CI, 1.218-1.574) and unfavorable lifestyle (hazard ratio, 2.271; 95% CI, 1.852-2.785) were significantly associated with an increased risk of IPF. For the combined effect of lifestyle and polygenic risk score, participants with unfavorable lifestyle and high genetic risk had the highest risk of IPF (hazard ratio, 7.796; 95% CI, 5.482-11.086) compared with those with favorable lifestyle and low genetic risk. Moreover, approximately 32.7% (95% CI, 11.3-54.1) of IPF risk could be attributed to the interaction of an unfavorable lifestyle and high genetic risk.

Exposure to unfavorable lifestyle significantly increased the risk of IPF, particularly in those with high genetic risk.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a systemic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia associated with inflammation and oxidative stress, and the lung may be a target organ of diabetic microvascular damage. Several studies have indicated a positive association between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and diabetes with controversial findings.

Primary outcomes were to compare the prevalence of DM among individuals with IPF to non-IPF controls, and the prevalence of IPF among individuals with DM to non-DM controls.

Data sources include PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Studies contained sufficient data to calculate the prevalence of DM among individuals with and without IPF, or the prevalence of IPF among individuals with and without DM. Two investigators independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was the summary effect measure.

Eighteen studies including 26 410 623 individuals met the eligibility criteria, of whom 16 recruited people with IPF and 2 recruited people with DM. The OR of DM in IPF patients was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.30-1.84; P < .001) compared to that in non-IPF controls. However, compared with that in non-DM patients, the risk of IPF in DM patients was not found to be significantly reduced (OR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.64-1.25; P = .497).

This meta-analysis suggests that people with IPF have 1.54 times increased odds of diabetes compared to non-IPF controls, while whether patients with DM have an increased risk of IPF is still controversial. Further large, prospective cohort studies investigating the prevalence of IPF in diabetic patients are warranted.

Background: Sedentary behaviour (SB) can delay hospitalised older adults' recovery from acute illness and injuries. Currently, there is no synthesis of evidence on SB among hospitalised older people. This scoping review aimed to identify and map existing literature on key aspects of SB among hospitalised older adults, including the prevalence, measurement and intervention strategies for SB and sedentary behaviour bouts (SBBs) as well as healthcare professionals, patients and carers' perspectives on interventions. Methods and analysis: Several electronic databases were searched between January 2001 and September 2020. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework was used to conduct this scoping review. Results: Out of 1824 articles, 21 were included comprising 16 observational studies, 3 randomised controlled trials, 1 comparative study, and 1 phase-1 dose-response study. The sample size ranged from 13 to 393, with all 1435 participants community-dwelling before hospitalisation. Only two studies focused on measuring SB and SBBs as a primary outcome, with others (n = 19) reporting SB and SBB as a sub-set of physical activity (PA). Older adults spent an average of 86.5%/day (20.8 h) sedentary. Most studies (n = 15 out of 21) measured SB and SBB using objective tools. Conclusion: Hospitalised older people spent most of their waking hours sedentary. Studies explicitly focused on SB and SBB are lacking, and the perspectives of patients, carers and healthcare professionals are not clarified. Future hospital-based studies should focus on interventions to reduce SB and SBB, and the perspectives of healthcare professionals, patients and carers' taken into account.