The aim of reconstruction after lower extremity amputation is to provide adequate soft tissue coverage that is compatible with prosthetics to optimize functional status. We present two cases where the anterior compartment myocutaneous free flap used in a "spare parts" fashion was valuable in preserving the length of residual limbs for patients needing simultaneous below-knee amputation (BKA) and contralateral transmetatarsal amputation (TMA). The first case involved a 48-year-old woman undergoing TMA and BKA to address bilateral lower extremity necrosis secondary to septic shock. The anterior compartment muscles were taken en bloc as a myocutaneous free flap measuring ~4 × 12 cm based on the anterior tibial artery. A standard BKA was completed with a posterior flap, and the flap was used to cover exposed metatarsals on the opposite limb. After 4 years, she had no complications or additional surgeries and was able to ambulate independently. The second case involved a 55-year-old woman undergoing BKA and TMA for bilateral lower extremity gangrene. Again, the anterior compartment muscles were taken as a myocutaneous free flap measuring ~5 × 15 cm to cover the resulting TMA defect. This patient underwent debulking at 2 and 10 weeks postoperatively, after which she had no complications at 1 year of follow-up and returned to independent ambulation. This technique provided effective soft tissue coverage and successfully preserved limb length without additional donor site morbidity. As a myocutaneous free flap, the anterior compartment muscles may effectively preserve the length of residual limbs in patients undergoing BKA and TMA, allowing for improved functional outcomes and quality of life.

Traumatic amputation of the lower limb is a significant life-changing event. It is associated with substantial functional disability.

To assess the serial improvement in functional mobility outcomes after the rehabilitation provided to traumatic unilateral lower limb amputee (TULLA) over 6 months of follow-up.

It is a prospective observational cohort study including 106 TULLA performed in a tertiary care trauma center in North India from January 2021 to December 2021. Patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery in the focused amputee clinic, where functional mobility care was provided by physical rehabilitation and prosthesis application and patients were evaluated using the Locomotors Capabilities Index (LCI-5) and L-Test of functional mobility.

There was a significant improvement in LCI-5 and L-Test from discharge to follow-up. The mean overall LCI-5 scores were 14.68 ± 6.56, 28.29 ± 9.04 and 42.77 ± 8.94 at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. The mean L-test for overall individuals with limb loss (N = 100) at discharge, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months were 178.41 ± 49.62, 126.98 ± 37.76, 98.39 ± 30.09 and 72.82 ± 21.03 respectively. Further, a subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in LCI-5 and L-test in individuals with above-knee and below-knee limb loss with prostheses compared to those without prostheses.

Our multidisciplinary approach helps to improve functional mobility outcomes among TULLA. Focused amputee clinics are the need of the hour to achieve successful functional mobility following amputation.

Limb amputation can impose severe burdens on the individual and society. Regardless of the underlying cause of amputation, pain management is challenging and may impact patients' recovery and quality of life. Individuals undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) face significant perioperative risk. Therefore, anesthesiologists must meticulously customize their anesthetic approach. Regional anesthesia (RA) provides numerous physiological advantages over general anesthesia (GA) and is essential for pain management in orthopedic surgeries, standing as an excellent anesthesia method for high-risk patients and being fundamental in multimodal analgesia. This narrative review is an attempt to enhance understanding of different pain phenomena following limb amputation and to provide a critical synthesis of the existing evidence concerning the efficacy and impact of RA on morbidity, mortality, and pain management following MLEA, aiming to shed light on areas that have not received enough attention within these aspects and subsequently serve as a guide for future research. Despite the persistent controversy regarding the comparative mortality rates associated with RA versus alternative anesthetic methods for MLEA, several studies praise their efficacy in pain management and in mitigating adverse perioperative outcomes. Given that much of this data originates from retrospective studies, randomized multicenter prospective trials remain essential to validate their actual efficacy. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of RA on healthcare costs and resources related to MLEA is necessary to determine its correlation with cost reduction, decreased hospital stays, improved resource allocation, and increased patient satisfaction.

Patients who undergo major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) have the highest postoperative mortality among orthopedic patient groups. The comorbidity profile for MLEA patients is often extensive and associated with elevated postoperative mortality. This study primarily aimed to investigate the increased short- and long-term mortality following first and subsequent major lower extremity amputation. Secondarily, to examine the mediation role of post-amputation complications.

With data from the Danish National Patient Registry, 11,695 first-time MLEAs in patients aged ≥50 years were identified between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, along with 58,466 unamputated persons matched 1:5 by year of birth, sex, and region of residence. Mediators were identified through diagnosis codes (ICD-10) present in 6 months following MLEA.

The increased mortality following MLEA was highest in the month following MLEA, hazard ratio (HR) 38.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 30.5-48.9) in women and HR 55.7 (CI 44.3-70.2) in men compared to a matched unamputated cohort. Subsequent amputation resulted in an increased mortality the month after a subsequent amputation (overall HR 3.2 (CI 2.8-3.7) in women and HR 3.2 (CI 2.8-3.6) in men) and almost normalized after the first year. The proportion of the mortality risk that potentially could be reduced by preventing sepsis was 16% (CI 11.7-20.3) for women and 17% (CI 13.4-20.4) for men. For pneumonia, it was 10.5% (CI 7.1-13.9) in women and 14.9% (11.6-18.2) in men.

We observed an increased mortality in the month following MLEA, which remained elevated for years compared to the matched unamputated cohort. A subsequent amputation results in increased mortality in the following year, but declined and normalized after the first year. Sepsis and pneumonia arising after the amputation appeared to be important factors that contributed to the increased postoperative mortality.

BEST-CLI established the superiority of single-segment great saphenous vein (ssGSV) conduits for revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI); however, the generalizability of these data is unknown. Thus, we aimed to validate the long-term results of open surgical bypass (BPG) vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTA/S) using the BEST-CLI inclusion and randomization criteria.

All patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI at our institution from 2005 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To approximate BEST-CLI, one-to-one propensity score matching was used. Cohort 1 included BPG with ssGSV vs PTA/S; Cohort 2 included BPG without ssGSV vs PTA/S. Primary outcomes included wound healing, major amputation, major reintervention, major amputation/death (amputation/death), and major adverse limb events (MALE) or death (MALE/death) and were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests.

Of 1946 limbs undergoing a first-time intervention for CLTI between 2005 and 2022, 765 underwent BPG and 1181 underwent PTA/S. After matching, 862 fit Cohort 1 (431 BPG and 431 PTA/S), and 274 fit Cohort 2 (137 BPG and 137 PTA/S). Both cohorts exhibited a median follow-up of 2.7 years. In Cohort 1, major reintervention and MALE/death were both noted to be significantly lower following ssGSV BPG, as compared with PTA/S (at 7 years: 11% vs 24%; P = .001 and 72% vs 78%; P = .03, respectively). These findings correlated with a 53% and 28% reduction in the aforementioned adjusted events (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.74 and hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.98, respectively). These significant differences in major reintervention and MALE/death were not noted in Cohort 2 (at 7 years: 25% vs 24%; P = .92 and 82% vs 80%; P = .31, respectively). Further, neither cohort demonstrated significant differences in complete wound healing (at 6 months, Cohort 1: 47% vs 40%; P = .32; Cohort 2: 40% vs 38%; P = .12), major amputation (at 7 years: Cohort 1: 15% vs 15%; P = .89; Cohort 2: 35% vs 25%; P = .86), or amputation/death (at 7 years, Cohort 1: 70% vs 66%; P = .99; Cohort 2: 78% vs 76%; P = .45).

Patients undergoing revascularization using ssGSV demonstrate significantly lower rates of major reintervention and MALE/death compared with those undergoing endovascular interventions for CLTI. However, similar outcomes are not seen among patients undergoing revascularization without a suitable ssGSV. These findings correlate with those demonstrated in BEST-CLI, suggesting generalizability.

Amputation confers disabilities upon patients and is associated with substantial cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) between individuals with amputation and the general population.

A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed using the Nationwide Health Insurance Service database for the period between 2010 and 2018. A total of 24,925 individuals with amputation were included with a ratio of 1:3 age- and sex-matched controls. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate the risk of ESKD among amputees.

During a mean follow-up period of 4.3 years, there were 40 incident ESKD cases (0.4 per 1000 person-years) among individuals with amputation. Individuals with amputation showed a higher risk of ESKD (adjusted HR [aHR] of 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.20-2.54) compared with matched controls. The risk was further increased in those with mild disability (aHR of 1.41, 95% CI of 0.51-3.87) and severe disability (aHR of 8.22, 95% CI of 2.99-22.61). When considering the levels of amputation, the association was apparently more prominent in proximal than distal amputation, in particular for proximal upper limb amputation (aHR of 17.90, 95% CI of 4.37-73.40).

Individuals with amputation were at a significantly greater risk of ESKD than the general population, particularly subjects with severe disability and proximal amputation. Our data suggest that amputations should be added to the list of risk factors for the development of chronic kidney disease.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) occurs frequently in patients undergoing dialysis, but early intervention for PAD may not be fully implemented. We evaluated the effects of financially incentivising dialysis facilities that provided early detection and management of PAD on outcomes of PAD care.

This retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 18-74 years who received maintenance haemodialysis between April 2016 and March 2021 from the JMDC Claims Database. The (time-dependent) exposure was claim for incentives for early detection and management of PAD. The outcomes were PAD screening tests (process indicator) and infections, revascularisation procedures, and amputations in the lower extremities (outcome indicators). We used Poisson regression models with generalised estimation equations for the number of screening tests and Cox proportional hazards models for the first incidence of the outcome indicator.

Overall, 5850 patients on haemodialysis were identified: 5183 and 667 with and without claims for the incentive, respectively; the numbers of screening tests were 9070 and 776, respectively (adjusted ratio of the frequency, 1.89 [95% confidence interval 1.70-2.10]). Among patients with and without claims for the incentive, infections occurred in 479 and 109 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [0.80-1.23]), revascularisations were performed in 192 and 29 (adjusted HR, 1.11 [0.75-1.66]), and amputations were conducted in 72 and 9 patients, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.35 [0.66-2.75]).

The financial incentive for early detection and management of PAD was associated with a higher frequency of PAD screening tests, but not with improved outcome indicators.

End-stage renal disease is an independent risk factor for the development of peripheral arterial disease, with considerably worse outcomes in patients with concomitant diseases. It is important to realize the widespread, yet frequently asymptomatic, nature of peripheral arterial disease in patients with end-stage renal disease due to the presence of other comorbidities that decrease activity levels and sensation to allow for early recognition and timely medical management to try and mitigate otherwise poor outcomes. Despite their high risk, properly selected patients derive benefit from revascularization; both open and endovascular approaches provide similar outcomes in terms of overall survival, amputation-free survival, and limb salvage, with perhaps a slight preference toward open repair. This narrative review of the literature evaluates the epidemiology, pathophysiology, outcomes, and management strategies that provide the best possible outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial disease and end-stage renal disease.

Intra-operative blood loss is a significant complication of major lower limb amputation (MLLA). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effect of tourniquet use on patients undergoing amputation.

Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 2024.

Inclusion criteria were any study design assessing MLLA with and without tourniquet use. Primary outcomes were peri-operative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Secondary outcomes were operative duration, surgical site infection, stump revision, and mortality. Articles were screened and data extracted independently by two reviewers, then pooled using random effects meta-analysis, and presented with their GRADE certainty. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and Cochrane RoB 2 tools.

Seven studies (one randomised controlled trial [RCT] and six cohort studies) were included, totalling 1 018 limbs (412 tourniquet, 606 non-tourniquet). Intra-operative blood loss was lower with tourniquet use (mean difference [MD] -192.09 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] -291.67 - -92.52; p < .001); however, there was no significant difference in total blood loss measured over the first three to four post-operative days (MD -254.66 mL; 95% CI -568.12 - 58.80; p = .11). Post-operative haemoglobin drop was lower for tourniquet patients (MD -0.55 g/dL; 95% CI -0.80 - -0.31; p < .001). The odds ratio (OR) for requiring blood transfusion was 0.65 (95% CI 0.38 - 1.11; p = .11) for tourniquet vs. non-tourniquet patients, with no significant difference in the number of units transfused per patient (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.72 - 0.03; p = .070). Operation duration was shorter with tourniquet use (MD -8.69 minutes, 95% CI -15.95 - -1.42; p = .020). There was no significant difference in rates of surgical site infection (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 - 1.90; p = .82), stump revision (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.43 - 1.16; p = .17), or death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49 - 1.30; p = .36). GRADE certainty was low or very low for all outcomes.

Tourniquet use may be associated with reduced post-operative haemoglobin drop and operative duration, without negative consequences on stump infection, revision, and mortality. However, most data are observational. Further RCTs are needed to generate higher quality evidence.

This study addresses the challenges faced by diabetic patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot, particularly focusing on the implications for wound healing and early mortality. The wounds at the amputation stump may necessitate multiple surgical interventions. The aim is to identify prognostic factors associated with these outcomes, shedding light on the complexities surrounding the postamputation phase. A prospective study was conducted on 39 diabetic patients who underwent lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot between 2021 and 2022. Comprehensive preoperative data, encompassing parameters such as blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, hemoglobin A1c, albumin, protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, body mass index, smoking habits, dialysis, revascularization, duration of surgery, and the use of tourniquet during the procedure were meticulously recorded. Additionally, cognitive performance and depression status were assessed preoperatively using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. A follow-up period of 3 months postsurgery allowed for the comparison of patients who developed infections at the amputation stump with those who did not, as well as the distinction between patients who survived and those who succumbed to mortality. The study revealed that the use of a tourniquet during surgery significantly increased the risk of infection (p = .027), and higher BDI scores were associated with increased risks of both infection (AUC = 0.814) and mortality (AUC = 0.769), with cut-off scores of 24.0 and 23.5 predicting these outcomes with high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Additionally, lower MMSE scores were associated with increased short-term postoperative mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in parameters such as complete blood count, ESR, CRP, procalcitonin, HbA1c, albumin, total protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, BMI, smoking, dialysis, revascularization, and surgery duration. This investigation highlights the significance of considering tourniquet usage during amputation, preoperative depression status, and cognitive function in patients who undergo amputation due to diabetic foot. The use of a tourniquet during surgery is a significant risk factor for infection, and elevated BDI scores are strong predictors of both infection and mortality in patients undergoing amputations. The findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary neuropsychiatric evaluation preoperatively to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Limb-loss is a significant medical event with lifelong consequences, impacting various aspects of a patient's well-being. Care for these often-complex patients involves providers from many different specialties working toward a set of patient-centered goals. This article aims to highlight the important role of physiatrists in directing the interdisciplinary care for these patients. Through evidence-based concepts, the authors aim to lay a roadmap for comprehensive, longitudinal management of these patients from pre-amputation assessment through lifelong care.

 Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) can reduce neuroma formation and phantom limb pain (PLP) after lower extremity (LE) amputation. These techniques have not been studied in safety-net hospitals. This study aims to examine the surgical complication rates after TMR and/or RPNI at an academic safety-net hospital in an urban setting.

 This was a retrospective review of patients older than 18 years who had prior above-knee guillotine amputation (AKA) or below-knee guillotine amputation (BKA) and underwent stump formalization with TMR and/or RPNI from 2020 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, and operative and postoperative characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was any surgical complication, defined as infection, dehiscence, hematoma, neuroma, or reoperation. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with surgical complications and PLP.

 Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 years, and 75% were males. Indications for amputation included diabetic foot infection (71.9%), necrotizing soft tissue infection (25.0%), and malignancy (3.1%). BKA was the most common indication for formalization (93.8%). Most patients (56.3%) had formalization with TMR and RPNI, 34.4% patients had TMR only, and 9.4% had RPNI alone. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46.9%, with infection being the most common (31.3%). The median follow-up time was 107.5 days. There was no significant difference in demographics, medical history, or operative characteristics between patients who did and did not have surgical complications. However, there was a trend toward higher rates of PLP in patients who had a postoperative wound infection (p = 0.06).

 Overall complication rates after LE formalization with TMR and/or RPNI at our academic safety-net hospital were consistent with reported literature. Given the benefits, including reduced chronic pain and lower health care costs, we advocate for the wider adoption of these techniques at other safety-net hospitals.

Background and Objectives: Diabetic foot sepsis (DFS) accounts for approximately 60% of hospital admissions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Individuals with DM are at risk of severe COVID-19. This study investigated factors associated with major amputation and mortality in patients admitted with DFS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Demographic information, COVID-19 and HIV status, clinical findings, laboratory results, treatment and outcome from records of patients with diabetic foot sepsis, were collected and analysed. Supervised machine learning algorithms were used to compare their ability to predict mortality due to diabetic foot sepsis. Results: Overall, 114 records were found and 57.9% (66/114) were of male patients. The mean age of the patients was 55.7 (14) years and 47.4% (54/114) and 36% (41/114) tested positive for COVID-19 and HIV, respectively. The median c-reactive protein was 168 mg/dl, urea 7.8 mmol/L and creatinine 92 µmol/L. The mean potassium level was 4.8 ± 0.9 mmol, and glycosylated haemoglobin 11.2 ± 3%. The main outcomes included major amputation in 69.3% (79/114) and mortality of 37.7% (43/114) died. AI. The levels of potassium, urea, creatinine and HbA1c were significantly higher in the deceased. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in the rate of major amputation and mortality in patients with DFS. The in-hospital mortality was higher in patients above 60 years of age who tested positive for COVID-19. The Random Forest algorithm of ML can be highly effective in predicting major amputation and death in patients with DFS.

To generalize the research status, hotspots, and development trends of amputation-related research.

The data from 1999 to 2021 were collected from the Web of Science core collection database, and analyzed through bibliometrics software (CiteSpace and VOSviewer) for the dual-map overlay of journals, top 25 references with the strongest citation bursts, top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts, and timeline of keywords.

A total of 8,588 literature studies were involved in this study. The United States ranks the first in terms of H-index, total number of publications, and total citations. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, and University of Washington are the major contributors to amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International , Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , and Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development are the main publication channels for articles related to amputation. Geertzen JHB, Czerniecki J, and Dijkstra PU are major contributors to amputation. In addition, research on limb salvage treatment and surgical methods for amputation will become a hotspot in the future.

The total number of publications for amputation has generally increased from 1999 to 2021. Our study is beneficial for scientists to specify the research hotspot and development direction of amputation.

Objective: Despite advances in medicine, 30% of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) require major lower limb amputation (MLLA). The long-term outcome of this cohort is poorly described. Methods: In all, 154 patients undergoing MLLA for CLTI during 2018-2020 were analyzed for short-term and long-term outcomes and prosthesis use. Results: In total, 106 below-knee amputations and 48 above-knee amputations were followed up for a mean duration of 50 months (37-78). The mean age of the cohort was 63 years. The majority were male (60%) with multiple comorbidities, including diabetes (83.8%), hypertension (49.4%), ischemic heart disease (20%), and smoking (32.5%). An equal proportion underwent MLLA as primary (45%) or secondary (55%). 30-day mortality was 6%. The mean length of in-hospital stay was 18 days (3-56). Overall survival rates at 1st, 2nd, and 4th year were 73%, 64%, and 35%, respectively. On a multivariate regression analysis, a higher level of amputation had a significant impact on mortality (p = 0.015). 54% of amputees had a prosthetic limb. However, the primary use of prosthesis was for cosmesis, with only 12% mobile independently. Conclusions: MLLA for CLTI is associated with poor early and long-term survival. Prosthesis use and mobility are extremely poor in the Sri Lankan context.

Despite the development of microscopic reconstructive techniques for lower limb salvage, major limb amputation is still required for critical, unsalvageable lower leg wounds, with steadily increasing estimates of major limb amputations. In this study, the authors highlight a surgical technique for below-knee (BK) amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel, and evaluate its safety and effectiveness compared with the conventional method of using surgical blades.

A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Republic of Korea, on patients who underwent BK amputation between October 2012 and January 2021. Patients were assigned to two groups: amputation using classical methods, such as surgical blades and electrocautery (group A); and amputation using an ultrasonic scalpel (group B). Numerous perioperative factors, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications and recovery time were examined. The present study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

A total of 41 patients (16 in group A and 25 in group B) were included in this study. Operation time was significantly shorter in group B (p=0.001) and intraoperative blood loss was lower (p=0.011). Wound healing time did not vary between groups.

In this study, the use of an ultrasonic scalpel for lower limb amputation was effective in reducing operation time and blood loss, which may be helpful in improving outcomes for patients with comorbidities.

The 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a risk-stratification tool utilized to predict complications and mortality following major lower extremity (LE) amputation. However, its prognostic value for long-term mortality is unknown. The study aim was to assess whether a high mFI-5 score relates to long-term mortality following major LE amputation for chronic wounds. Patients ≥60 years who underwent major LE amputation from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, amputation type, and postoperative complications was collected and mFI-5 was calculated. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and differences were assessed with Log-Rank test. A total of 172 patients were identified. Mean age was 70.7 ± 8.0 years. Median time to ambulation was 3.7 months (IQR 4.0). By final follow-up of 17.5 ± 15.9 months, ambulatory rate was 51.7% (n = 89), overall mortality 36.0% (n = 62), 1-year mortality 14.0% (n = 24), and 3-year mortality 27.9% (n = 48). Patients with an mFI-5 of ≥4 (26.7%, n = 46) compared with patients with mFI-5 <4 (73.3%, n = 126) had a higher rate of prolonged postoperative LOS (34.8% vs 19.8%, p = .042), overall mortality (52.2% vs 30.2%, p = .008), 1-year mortality (23.9% vs 10.3%, p = .023), and 3-year mortality (45.7% vs 21.4%, p = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated mFI-5 was an independent predictor of 3-year mortality (OR 2.35, p = .043). At a threshold ≥4, the mFI-5 demonstrated utility in predicting long-term mortality. The value of this prognostic indicator is in its preoperative application of assessing risk of mortality, which should be utilized in conjunction with other measures.

Lower extremity trauma can have a devastating effect on the quality of the life of patients. To avoid limb amputation and its associated social stigma, many patients spend years undergoing multiple costly procedures, with prolonged hospital stays, all the while hoping for an elusive limb salvage. People with lower limb amputation experience higher energy requirements for walking, reduced aerobic capacity, and slower walking speeds, when compared with people with normal limbs. A below-knee amputation (BKA) is functionally superior to an above-knee amputation.

Between 2012 and 2023, five patients underwent BKAs with a nonislanded foot fillet flap reconstruction of the BKA stump. Four of these patients had undergone previous multiple procedures in attempts at limb salvage. While two patients had sustained recent trauma, three were operated on electively.

All the BKA stumps healed without any complications. Only one patient complained of phantom limb pain. One patient will require the reconstruction of a lateral knee collateral ligament.

This case series demonstrates the versatility of the pedicled foot fillet flap in addressing the different complications of lower extremity injury that may result in an unusable limb. The utility of this technique is especially valuable in low-resource settings where the built environment may be unfriendly to nonbipedal ambulation, and an urgent need for a return to economic productivity. Because prostheses are fairly accessible in Kenya, return to ambulation and economic productivity are anticipated following a BKA.

Thirty-day mortality is higher after urgent major lower extremity amputations compared to elective lower extremity amputations. This study aims to identify factors associated with urgent amputations and to examine their impact on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality.

Patients undergoing major lower limb amputation from 2013 to 2020 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Urgent amputation was defined as occurring within 72 hr of admission. Associations with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes including postoperative complication, inpatient death, and long-term survival were compared using univariable tests and multivariable logistic regression. Long-term survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Of the 12,874 patients included, 4,850 (37.7%) had urgent and 8,024 (62.3%) had elective amputations. Non-White patients required urgent amputation more often than White patients (39.8% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.03). A higher proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients presented urgently (Medicaid: 13.0% vs. 11.0%; self-pay: 3.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001). Patients requiring urgent amputation were less often taking aspirin (55.6% vs. 60.1%, P < 0.001) or statin (62.2% vs. 67.2%, P < 0.001), had fewer prior revascularization procedures (41.0% vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001), and were of higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4-5 (50.9% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001). Urgent amputations were more commonly for uncontrolled infection (48.1% vs. 29.4%, P < 0.001) or acute limb ischemia (14.3% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were higher after urgent amputations (34.7% vs. 16.6%, P < 0.001), including need for return to operating room (23.8% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001) and need for higher revision (15.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). Inpatient mortality was higher after urgent amputation (8.9% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed non-White race, self-pay, homelessness, current smoking, ASA class 4-5, and amputations for uncontrolled infection or acute limb ischemia were associated with urgent status, whereas living in a nursing home or prior revascularization were protective. Furthermore, urgent amputation was associated with an increased odds of postoperative complication or death (odds ratio 1.86 [1.69-2.04], P < 0.001) as well as long-term mortality (odds ratio: 1.24 [1.13-1.35], P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis corroborated that elective status was associated with improvement of long-term survival.

Patients requiring urgent amputations are more often non-White, uninsured, and less frequently had prior revascularization procedures, revealing disparities in access to care. Urgency was associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, as well as increased long-term mortality. Efforts should be directed toward reducing these disparities to improve outcomes following amputation.

Severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts greater mortality after major lower-extremity amputation (LEA), but it remains poorly understood whether patients with earlier stages of CKD share similar risk.

We assessed long-term postoperative outcomes for patients with CKD in a retrospective chart review of 565 patients who underwent atraumatic major LEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. We stratified patients by renal function and compared outcomes including survival.

Preoperative CKD diagnosis was related to many patient characteristics, co-occurred with many comorbidities, and was associated with less follow-up and survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression analyses showed significantly worse 5-year survival for major LEA patients with mild, moderate, or severe CKD compared to major LEA patients with no history of CKD at the time of amputation (P < 0.001). Severe CKD independently predicted worse mortality at 1-year (odds ratio [OR] 2.91; P = 0.003) and 5-years (OR 3.08; P < 0.001). Moderate CKD independently predicted worse 5-year mortality (OR 2.66; P = 0.029).

This study demonstrates that moderate and severe CKD predict greater long-term mortality following major LEA when controlling for numerous potential confounders. This finding raises questions about the underlying mechanism if causal and highlights an opportunity to improve outcomes with earlier recognition and optimization CKD preoperatively.

The aim of this study was to investigate the illness trajectories of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after revascularization and estimate the independent risks of major amputation and death (from any cause) and their interaction.

Data from Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care were used to identify patients (≥50 years of age) who underwent lower limb revascularization for PAD in England from April 2013 to March 2020. A Markov illness-death model was developed to describe patterns of survival after the initial lower limb revascularization, if and when patients experienced major amputation, and survival after amputation. The model was also used to investigate the association between patient characteristics and these illness trajectories. We also analyzed the relative contribution of deaths after amputation to overall mortality and how the risk of mortality after amputation was related to the time from the index revascularization to amputation.

The study analyzed 94 690 patients undergoing lower limb revascularization for PAD from 2013 to 2020. The majority were men (65.6%), and the median age was 72 years (interquartile range, 64-79). One-third (34.8%) of patients had nonelective revascularization, whereas others had elective procedures. For nonelective patients, the amputation rate was 15.2% (95% CI, 14.4-16.0) and 19.9% (19.0-20.8) at 1 and 5 years after revascularization, respectively. For elective patients, the corresponding amputation rate was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.4-3.1) and 5.3% (4.9-5.8). Overall, the risk of major amputation was higher among patients who were younger, had tissue loss, diabetes, greater frailty, nonelective revascularization, and more distal procedures. The mortality rate at 5 years after revascularization was 64.3% (95% CI, 63.2-65.5) for nonelective patients and 33.0% (32.0-34.1) for elective patients. After major amputation, patients were at an increased risk of mortality if they underwent major amputation within 6 months after the index revascularization.

The illness-death model provides an integrated framework to understand patient outcomes after lower limb revascularization for PAD. Although mortality increased with age, the study highlights patients <60 years of age were at increased risk of major amputation, particularly after nonelective revascularization.

Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure.

We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model.

A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1 year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90 days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1 year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups.

While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.

Decision-making regarding level of lower extremity amputation is sometimes challenging. Selecting an appropriate anatomic level for major amputation requires consideration of tradeoffs between postoperative function and risk of wound complications that may require additional operations, including debridement and/or conversion to above-knee amputation (AKA). We evaluated the utility of common, non-invasive diagnostic tests used in clinical practice to predict the need for reoperations among patients undergoing primary, elective, below knee-amputations (BKAs) by vascular surgeons.

Patients undergoing elective BKA over a 5-year period were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records were reviewed to characterize demographics, pre-amputation testing transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2), and ankle-brachial index (ABI). The need for ipsilateral post-BKA reoperation (including BKA revision and/or conversion to AKA) regardless of indication was the primary outcome. Associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cutpoints for TcPO2 values associated with amputation reoperation were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

We identified 175 BKAs, of which 46 (26.3%) required ipsilateral reoperation (18.9% BKA revisions and 14.3% conversions to AKA). The mean age was 63.3 ± 14.8 years. Most patients were male (65.1%) and White (72.0%). Mean pre-amputation calf TcPO2 was 40.0 ± 20.5 mmHg, and mean ABI was 0.64 ± 0.45. In univariable models, post-BKA reoperation was associated with calf TcPO2 (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99; P = .013) but not ABI (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.19-1.46; P = .217). Univariable associations with reoperation were also identified for age (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.990; P = .003) and diabetes (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87; P = .019). No associations with amputation revision were identified for gender, race, end-stage renal disease, or preoperative antibiotics. Calf TcPO2 remained associated with post-BKA reoperation in a multivariable model (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .022) adjusted for age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .222) and diabetes (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01; P = .559). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested a TcPO2 ≥38 mmHg as an appropriate cut-point for assessing risk for BKA revision (area under the curve = 0.682; negative predictive value, 0.91).

Reoperation after BKA is common, and reoperation risk was associated with pre-amputation TcPO2. For patients undergoing elective BKA, higher risk of reoperation should be discussed with patients with an ipsilateral TcPO2 <38 mmHg.

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of two simplified tests, a point-of-care nerve conduction device (DPNCheck™) and a coefficient of variation of R-R intervals (CVR-R), as an alternative to traditional nerve conduction studies for the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in patients with diabetes.

Inpatients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (n = 167) were enrolled. The study population consisted of 101 men, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8 years. DPN severity was assessed using traditional nerve conduction studies, and differentiated based on Baba's classification (BC). To examine the explanatory potential of variables in DPNCheck™ and CVR-R regarding the severity of DPN according to BC, a multiple regression analysis was carried out, followed by a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Based on BC, 61 participants (36.5% of the total) were categorized as having DPN severity of stage 2 or more. The multiple regression analysis yielded a predictive formula with high predictive power for DPN diagnosis (estimated severity of DPN in BC = 2.258 - 0.026 × nerve conduction velocity [m/s] - 0.594 × ln[sensory nerve action potential amplitude (μV)] + 0.528In[age(years)] - 0.178 × ln[CVR-R], r = 0.657). The area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.880. Using the optimal cutoff value for DPN with severer than stage 2, the predictive formula showed good diagnostic efficacy: sensitivity of 83.6%, specificity of 79.2%, positive predictive value of 51.7% and negative predictive value of 76.1%.

These findings suggest that DPN diagnosis using DPNCheck™ and CVR-R could improve diagnostic efficiency and accessibility for DPN assessment in patients with diabetes.

Amputation confers disabilities upon patients and is linked to substantial morbidity and death attributed to heart disease. While some studies have focused on traumatic amputees in veterans, few studies have focused on traumatic amputees within the general population. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the risk of heart disease in patients with traumatic amputation with disability within the general population using a large-scale nationwide population-based cohort.

We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance System. A total of 22 950 participants with amputation were selected with 1:3 age, sex-matched controls between 2010 and 2018. We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate the risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation among amputees. Participants with amputation had a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.14-1.47]), heart failure (aHR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.17-1.38]), and atrial fibrillation (aHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33]). The risks of myocardial infarction and heart failure were further increased by the presence of disability (aHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.04-1.95]; and aHR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.13-1.67], respectively).

We demonstrate an increased risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation among individuals with amputation, and the risk further increased in those with disabilities. Clinicians should pay attention to the increased risk for heart disease in patients with amputation.

The primary aim of this study was to assess the role of internal iliac patency in predicting outcomes of above-knee amputation (AKA) stump healing. The secondary objectives were to assess the accuracy of Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection (WIfI) classification system in predicting AKA stump healing and its association with delayed mortality.

This is a retrospective study performed in a vascular surgery unit in a tertiary hospital on patients who underwent AKAs over 1 year, from July 2021 until June 2022. Patient demographic data, WIfI scoring, outcome of AKAs, and patency of profunda femoris and internal iliac artery (IIA) were collected. To minimize confounding, a single vascular surgeon performed all computed tomography imaging reviews and arterial measurements. Approval for this study was obtained from the National Research Registry, NMRR ID-23-01865-KQ4 (investigator initiated research).

Ninety patients underwent AKA over 1 year, from July 2021 until June 2022. Occluded IIA in the presence of patent profunda femoris did not affect the wound healing of the AKA stump. There was significant association between WIfI scoring and mortality. Patients with a WIfI scoring of 3 to 4 were observed to have a higher mortality rate compared with patients with normal healing: 47 (72.0%) vs. 4 (80.0%); P = 0.021.

In this study, the IIA patency shows no statistically significant effect on AKA stump healing; however, the small number of patients is a drawback of the study. This study also demonstrates that the WIfI score can be a prognostic factor for mortality in patients undergoing AKA.

Diabetic foot (DMF) complications are common and are increasing in incidence. Risk factors related to wound complications are yet to be established after trans-tibial amputation under the diagnosis of DMF infection.

To analyze the prognosis and risk factors related to wound complications after transtibial amputation in patients with diabetes.

This retrospective cohort study included seventy-two patients with DMF complications who underwent transtibial amputation between April 2014 and March 2023. The groups were categorized based on the occurrence of wound complications, and we compared demographic data between the complication group and the non-complication group to analyze risk factors. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.

The average follow-up period was 36.2 months. Among the 72 cases, 31 (43.1%) had wound complications. Of these, 12 cases (16.7%) received further treatment, such as debridement, soft tissue stump revision, and re-amputation at the proximal level. In a group that required further management due to wound complications after transtibial amputation, the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was 9.32, while the other group that did not require any treatment had a 7.54 HbA1c level. The prevalence of a history of kidney transplantation with wound complications after transtibial amputation surgery in DMF patients was significantly greater than in cases without wound complications (P = 0.02). Other factors did not show significant differences.

Approximately 43.1% of the patients with transtibial amputation surgery experienced wound complications, and 16.7% required additional surgical treatment. High HbA1c levels and kidney transplant history are risk factors for postoperative wound complications.

Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a common surgical procedure for addressing severe forefoot pathologies, such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot infections. Variability in research methodologies and findings within the existing literature has hindered a comprehensive understanding of healing rates and complications following TMA. This meta-analysis and systematic review aims to consolidate available evidence, synthesising data from multiple studies to assess healing rates and complications associated with closed TMA procedures. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles published from January 1st, 1988, to June 1st, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting healing rates in non-traumatic transmetatarsal amputation patients with more than 10 participants, excluding open TMAs. Two independent reviewers selected relevant studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extracted from eligible studies included patient demographics, healing rates, complications, and study quality. Among 22 studies encompassing 1569 transmetatarsal amputations, the pooled healing rate was 67.3%. Major amputation rates ranged from 0% to 55.6%, with a random-effects pooled rate of 23.9%. Revision rates varied from 0% to 36.4%, resulting in a pooled rate of 14.8%. 30-day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%, with a fixed-effects pooled rate of 2.6%. Post-operative infection rates ranged from 3.0% to 30.7%, yielding a random-effects pooled rate of 16.7%. Dehiscence rates ranged from 1.7% to 60.0%, resulting in a random-effects pooled rate of 28.8%. Future studies should aim for standardised reporting and assess the physiological and treatment factors influencing healing and complications.

Staged surgery with open guillotine amputation (OGA) prior to a definitive major lower extremity amputation (LEA) has been shown to be effective for sepsis control and improving wound healing. Studies have evaluated postoperative complications including infection, return to the operating room for re-amputation, and amputation failure following OGA. However, the role of timing to close OGA for predictive outcomes remains poorly understood. We aim to assess outcomes of major LEA related to the time of OGA closure.

Data from patients who underwent major LEA from 2015 to 2021 was collected retrospectively. The study included all patients undergoing below-, through-, or above-knee amputations. Next, patients who had OGA prior to a definitive amputation were selected. Patients who died before amputation closure were excluded. Post-amputation outcomes such as surgical site infection (SSI), postoperative sepsis, postoperative ambulation, hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality were reviewed. The study cohort was stratified by demographics and comorbidities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the time of closure (TOC) cut-off value. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Of 688 patients who underwent major LEA, 322 underwent staged amputation with OGA before the formalization procedure and were included. The TOC ranged from 1-47 days with a median of 4 days (interquartile range (IQR) from 3 to 7). The optimal TOC point of 8 days (ranging from 2 - 42 days) in obese patients (199/322) for predicting mortality showed the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.709) with 64.71% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity. Patients who are obese and grouped in TOC less than 8 days had no 30-day mortality, significantly lower 1-year mortality, better survival, and a lower rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) complication. There was no significant difference in LOS, postoperative SSI, sepsis, and ambulation between the two subgroups of obese patients. Multivariable analysis showed that gender, CKD, and postoperative ambulation independently predict overall mortality in obese patients.

TOC cutoff in obese patients showed statistically significant results in predicting mortality. Our findings indicated better survival in obese patients with a lower TOC (less than 8 days). This emphasizes the importance of earlier closure of OGA in obese patients.

Our aim was to compare transfemoral amputation (TFA) to knee disarticulation (KD) as a reamputation level after failed transtibial amputation (TTA) in patients with peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes.

We studied 152 patients undergoing reamputation, 86 TFA and 66 KD, after a failed TTA. The primary outcome was reamputation and reoperation, and secondary outcomes were prosthetic fitting and mortality. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcome.

The reamputation rate was 36% after KD and 15% after TFA ( p = 0.004). The multivariable analysis showed that TFA was associated with a significantly reduced risk of reamputation, odds ratio (OR) = 0.31 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.1-0.7). The overall reoperation rate was 38% after KD and 22% after TFA ( p = 0.03). This reduction of risk for TFA was not significant in the multivariable analysis, OR = 0.49 (95% CI, 0.2-1.0). Prosthetic limb fitting was possible in 30% after KD and 19% after TFA ( p = 0.1). Previous amputation in the contralateral leg was the only factor associated with reduced ability for prosthetic fitting in the multivariable analysis, OR = 0.15 (95% CI, 0.03-0.7). Mortality at 30 d was 17% and 53% at 1 year. No independent factors affected 30-d mortality in the multivariable analysis.

In this study, we found a significantly lower risk of reamputation after TFA compared with KD after a failed TTA. We consider TFA to be the reamputation level of choice, especially when there is a need of reducing risk of further reamputations.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a clinical syndrome defined by peripheral arterial disease (PAD) combined with rest pain, gangrene, or leg ulceration for longer than two weeks resulting in lower extremity amputation. In recent years, low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) has been implemented for PAD treatment. However, it has not been possible to ensure insurance coverage for patients with lower LDL levels than 140 mg/dL under cholesterol-lowering drugs. Rheocarna is a novel adsorption-type blood purification device for the treatment of CLTI by adsorbing LDL and fibrinogen (Fib) that is not constrained by hypercholesterolemia and is not amenable to or nonresponsive to revascularization surgery. The only requirements for use are that the blood flow rate increases up to 200 mL/min gradually.

To evaluate the applicability of this treatment procedure, we compared the removal rates of Fib and LDL following Rheocarna therapy using various blood treatment volumes (6, 10.5, and 19.5 L).

Fib and LDL removal rates were about 20% and 15%-25% per treatment, with no significant differences between treatment volumes. Following treatment with Rheocarna, blood pressure tends to decrease at first, which later increases, and the higher the treatment volume, the longer the time of low blood pressure tended to be.

Although no significant difference was found in the removal rate of Fib and LDL in response to increase volume to 6 L or beyond in this study, the 6 L volume is considered effective enough for the removal of Fib and LDL.

Up to 25% of people with diabetes develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) during their lifetime, which precedes approximately 85% of nontraumatic lower limb amputations. Diabetic limb salvage has been at the forefront of recent research, as major amputation is associated with 5-year mortality rates of 52%-80%. We sought to determine if ambulatory status before DFU diagnosis is predictive of amputations and outcomes within 1 year, as no studies have directly examined this relationship.

A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with DFUs from January 2011 to December 2021 was performed. Patients aged 18 years or more with type II diabetes were included. Ambulatory status was defined as the primary form of mobility reported by the patient before development of DFU, and was categorized as independent ambulation, ambulatory with assisting device (AWAD), or nonambulatory (NA). Statistical analyses included χ2, multinomial, and multivariable logistic regressions.

After review, 506 patients were included. NA (OR = 5.10; P = 0.002) and AWAD status (OR = 2.77; P = 0.01) before DFU development were predictive of major (below or above-knee) amputation during hospitalization, emergency department visits within 30-days (NA: OR = 4.19; P = 0.01, AWAD: OR = 3.09; P = 0.02), and mortality within one-year (NA: OR = 4.19; P = 0.01, AWAD: OR = 3.09; P = 0.02). AWAD status was also associated with increased risk of hospital readmission (OR = 2.89; P < 0.001) within 30-days and any amputation (OR = 1.73; P = 0.01) within 1 year.

In patients with DFUs, NA and AWAD status were predictive of major amputation during hospitalization and are associated with poorer 1-year outcomes, including mortality. Ambulatory status assessment may be used to inform DFU treatment approaches.

Since the only and the milestone FDA approval of becaplermin gel (RegranexTM, 0.01% human recombinant PDGF-BB) as a (diabetic) wound healing therapeutic more than 25 years ago, no new therapeutic (excluding physical therapies, devices, dressings, anti-microbial agents, or other preventive treatments) for any type of wound healing has advanced to clinical applications. During the same period of time, the FDA has approved additional 250 new drugs for various human tumors, which were famously described as "wounds that do not heal". Two similar pathological conditions have experienced such a dramatic difference in therapeutics. More surprisingly, few in the wound healing community seem to be alarmed by this mysterious deficit. As it is often said, "damaging is far easier than re-building". In contrast to the primary duty of a cancer drug to damage a single molecule of the signaling network, a wound healing drug must be able to re-build the multi-level damages in the wound. No known single molecule alone is capable of repairing multi-cell-type and multi-pathway damages all at once. We argue that the previous single molecule-based strategy for developing wound healing therapeutics is profoundly flawed in theory. The future success of effective wound healing therapeutics requires a fundamental change in the paradigm.

The optimal management of major stump complications (operative infection or dehiscence) following below-knee-amputation (BKA) is unknown. We evaluated a novel operative strategy to aggressively treat major stump complications hypothesizing it would improve our rate of BKA salvage.

Retrospective review of patients requiring operative intervention for BKA stump complications between 2015 and 2021. A novel strategy employing staged operative debridement for source control, negative pressure wound therapy, and reformalization was compared to standard care (less structured operative source control or above knee amputation).

32 patients were studied, 29 of which were male (90.6%) with an average age of 56.1 ± 9.6 y. 30 (93.8%) had diabetes and 11 (34.4%) peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The novel strategy was used in 13 patients and 19 had standard care. Novel strategy patients had higher BKA salvage rates, 100% vs 73.7% (P = .064), and postoperative ambulatory status, 84.6% vs 57.9% (P = .141). Importantly, none of the patients undergoing the novel therapy had PAD, while all progressing to above-knee amputation (AKA) did. To better assess the efficacy of the novel technique, patients progressing to AKA were excluded. Patients undergoing novel therapy who had their BKA level salvaged (n = 13) were compared to usual care (n = 14). The novel therapy's time to prosthetic referral was 72.8 ± 53.7 days vs 247 ± 121.6 days (P < .001), but they did undergo more operations (4.3 ± 2.0 vs 1.9 ± 1.1, P < .001).

Utilization of a novel operative strategy for BKA stump complications is effective in salvaging BKAs, particularly for patients without PAD.

Major amputations are classically associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the increasing prevalence of risk factors for amputation, namely, diabetes and peripheral arterial disease, we sought to identify the major indications for lower limb amputation in an Australian cohort. A secondary aim was to assess the outcomes, namely, mortality, of amputees over the previous decade.

This study assessed all patients undergoing major lower limb amputations between 2012 and 2020. Variables analysed included comorbidities, indication for amputation, in-hospital complications and mortality, duration of hospital stay, and out-patient mortality.

317 amputations were performed on 269 patients. 55% of amputations were below knee, 45% above knee, with one through-knee amputation. Indications included ischaemia (55.2%), infection (30.6%), malignancy (6.9%), trauma (4.4%), and chronic pain or instability (2.5%). In-patient mortality rate was 7.6%, with mortality rates of 21.5% at one year, and 70.1% at 10 years. Post-operative complications occurred in 43% of amputations. Rural, regional, and remote (RRR) patients did not suffer disproportionately from major amputations, however, were more likely to require amputations for ischaemia. Patients undergoing amputation for infective causes demonstrated lower mid-term mortality rates compared to those undergoing amputations for ischaemia (56.1 vs 60.4% at 5 years, p = 0.007).

Major amputations continue to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, both in the short and long term. Patients undergoing amputations for ischaemic causes demonstrate poorer outcomes than their infective counterparts, with outcomes being even worse in RRR populations. Prevention of amputations via intense management of comorbidities would benefit both patients and the healthcare system.

 Combined revascularization and free flap reconstruction is one treatment method for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with complex wounds. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the characteristics of this combined procedure and to assess postoperative outcomes.

 A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science for studies between January 2000 and February 2022. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative outcome was conducted.

 Fifteen articles encompassing 1,176 patients with 1,194 free flaps were ultimately included in the qualitative and quantitative assessment. Our meta-analysis showed the following complication rates for short-term postoperative outcomes: 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-53%; I 2 = 74%) for reoperation, 13% (95% CI, 2-24%; I 2 = 0%) for vascular thrombosis, 9% (95% CI, 0-17%; I 2 = 0%) for total flap failure, 8% (95% CI, 0-17%; I 2 = 0%) for partial flap failure, 4% (95% CI, 0-10%; I 2 = 0%) for amputation, and 3% (95% CI, 0-9%; I 2 = 0%) for 30-day mortality. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year limb salvage rates were 86% (95% CI, 78-92%), 81% (95% CI, 68-88%), and 71% (95% CI, 53-83%), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 93% (95% CI, 90-96%), 92% (95% CI, 77-97%), and 75% (95% CI, 50-88%), respectively.

 Combined revascularization and free flap reconstruction for CLTI with complex wounds was clearly effective for the long-term outcomes. However, this combined procedure should be considered on the assumption that the reoperation rate is high and that flap-related complications rate may be higher than lower extremity reconstruction of other etiologies.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are debilitating to the patient and costly for the healthcare system. We set up the Diabetic Rapid Evaluation and lower limb Amputation Management (DREAM) clinic with the aim of providing early directed specialist care to patients with DFUs. With early management, we hope to treat DFUs in its early stages, reducing the need for and associated morbidity of major and minor lower limb amputations.

We evaluated the outcomes of the fast-access DREAM clinic with multi-disciplinary evaluation for patients with DFUs. Outcomes include time from the point of referral to DREAM clinic evaluation, amputation rates and wound healing rates.

Patients presenting with DFU to the DREAM clinic were enrolled. A podiatrist made the first assessment, followed by immediate specialist consultation with Endocrinologists, Vascular surgeons or Orthopaedic surgeons as required.

Data on baseline demographics and DFU characteristics were collected. Outcomes evaluated were wound healing at 12 weeks, wound salvage rates, time to DREAM clinic access and time to specialist referral.

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, with 57.3% males, and mean age of 63 ± 13.0 years. Majority of ulcers were classified as neuropathic (41.3%) and located at the digits (40%). At 12-weeks follow-up, 1 had undergone major amputation, 9 minor amputations and 4 surgical debridements. The median time to DREAM clinic evaluation from first presentation was 3 days (IQR 7). Eleven (16.2%) required >1 specialist consult. Twenty (29.4%) were hospitalised for treatment. Twelve underwent revascularisation within 4 days (IQR 3.5). Twenty-four patients (35.3%) continued podiatry follow-up, having 28 DFUs in which 20 (71.4%) healed within 12 weeks.

The fast-access multidisciplinary DREAM clinic shows promising outcomes with lower major amputation rates and exemplary DFU healing outcomes.

Elderly patients with critical limb ischemia are an especially frail and vulnerable group of patients. There is little literature investigating outcomes and resource utilization in nonagenarians undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA). This study aims to elucidate the outcomes of this unique set of patients for whom amputation may often be considered a "palliative" intervention.

Analyzing over 16,000 records from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database, we collected demographic, operative, and postoperative data on all patients who underwent an MLEA. We performed univariate analysis comparing nonagenarians to younger patients examining both short-term and long-term outcomes. Multimodel inference was used to analyze the effect of age on clinically meaningful outcomes: mortality and long-term living disposition.

With 392 nonagenarians and 16,349 patients under the age of 90, we found nonagenarians were less comorbid and less likely to have a prior bypass or amputation. Despite experiencing lower rates of reoperation and individual postoperative complications, nonagenarians suffered higher long-term mortality (46% vs. 22%, P < 0.0005) and were more likely to be living in a facility at follow-up (34% vs. 15%, P < 0.0005). Incorporating important demographic and clinical factors, multimodel inference demonstrated that, the nonagenarian age group was a critical predictor of nonhome living status (Akaike Importance weight 0.99).

Although nonagenarians were less comorbid than their younger counterparts and suffered fewer perioperative complications, MLEA leads to a poorer outcome with significant mortality and a higher likelihood of residing in a facility at long-term follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of frank goals of care discussions in nonagenarians considering major amputation.

Severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts greater mortality after major lower extremity amputation (MLEA), but it remains poorly understood whether this finding extends to patients with earlier stages of CKD. We assessed outcomes for patients with CKD in a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent MLEA at a large tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. We stratified 398 patients by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and conducted Chi-Square and survival analysis. Preoperative CKD diagnosis was associated with many comorbidities, less 1-year follow-up, and greater 1- and 5-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed worse 5-year survival for patients with any stage of CKD (62%) compared to patients without CKD (81%; P < .001). Greater 5-year mortality was independently predicted by moderate CKD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.37, P = .02) as well as severe CKD (HR 2.09, P = .005). These findings demonstrate the importance of identifying and treating CKD early preoperatively.

The influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on mortality following lower extremity amputation (LEA) remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the influence of DM on long-term mortality (LTM) and short-term mortality (STM) after amputation.

The Medline, the Cochrane library, and Embase databases were searched. The primary and secondary outcomes were LTM and STM following amputation. One-year and 30-day all-cause mortality after amputation were considered as LTM and STM, respectively. A random-effects model was utilized to pool results. To evaluate the stability of results, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Twenty-three cohort studies with a total of 58,219 patients were included, among which 31,750 (54.5%) patients had DM. The mean score of included studies evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was 7.65, indicating moderate to high quality. The pooled results showed no significant difference in 1-year LTM (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI 0.86-1.07) after amputation. However, 3-year (RR, 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.47) and 5-year (RR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.07-1.31) LTMs of DM patients were obviously higher than that of NDM (non-diabetes mellitus) patients. The STM of the DM group was significantly lower than the NDM group (RR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.64-0.98).

The current study revealed that DM patients had an obvious lower STM following LEA, but the risk of DM on LTM after amputation was gradually increased with time. More attention should be paid to the long-term survival of DM patients after LEA.

Through-knee amputation (TKA) carries potential biomechanical advantages over above knee amputation (AKA) in patients unsuitable for a below-knee amputation. However, concerns regarding prosthetic fit, cosmesis and wound healing have tempered enthusiasm for the operation. Furthermore, there are many described surgical techniques for performing a TKA. This frustrates attempts to compare past and future comparative data, limiting the opportunity to identify which procedure is associated with the best patient centered outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to identify all the recognized operative TKA techniques described in the literature and to develop a clear descriptive system to support future research in this area.

A systematic review was performed, searching the OVID, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases, according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Papers of any design were included if they described an operative technique for a TKA. Key operative descriptions were captured and used to design a classification system for surgical techniques.

A total of 906 papers were identified, of which 28 are included. The most important distinctions in operative technique were the level of division of the femur (disarticulation without bone division, transcondylar amputation, with or without shaving of the medial, lateral, and posterior condyles and supracondylar amputation), management of the patella (kept whole, partially preserved, completely removed), use of a muscular gastrocnaemius flap, and skin incisions. A 4-component classification system was developed to be able to describe TKA operative techniques. A suggested shorthand nomenclature uses the first letter of each component (FPMS; Femur, Patella, Muscular flap, Skin incision), followed by a number, to describe the operation. Patient outcomes were poorly reported, and therefore outcomes for different types of TKA are not addressed in this review.

A novel descriptive system for describing different techniques for performing a TKA has been developed. This classification system will help in reporting, comparing, and interpreting past and future studies of patients undergoing TKA.

Lower limb amputation (LLA) is a major surgical procedure with a significant impact on quality of life and mortality rates as well. Previous studies have shown that mortality rates following LLA can range from 9-17% within 30 days in the UK. This study systematically evaluates and reviews the published literature on life expectancy, mortality, and survival rates following lower extremity amputation (LEA). We have conducted a comprehensive search on Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases resulting in 87 full-text articles. After a thorough review, only 45 (52.9%) articles met the minimum inclusion criteria for the study. Our analysis indicated 30-day mortality rates following LEA ranged from 7.1% to 51.4%, with an average mortality rate of 16.45% (SD 14.35) per study. Furthermore, 30-day mortality rates following below-knee amputation (BKA) and above-knee amputation (AKA) were found to be between 6.2% to 51.4%, X= 17.16% ± 19.46 SD and 12.7 to 21.7%, X= 16.15% ± 4.17 SD, respectively. Our review provides a comprehensive insight into the life expectancy, mortality, and survival rates following LEA. These findings highlight the importance of considering various factors, including patient age, presence of comorbidities such as diabetes, heart failure, and renal failure, and lifestyle factors such as smoking, in determining prognosis following LLA. Further research is necessary to determine strategies for improving outcomes and reducing mortality in this patient population.

Among patients facing lower extremity amputation due to dysvascular disease, the mortality risk is very high. Given this, as well as the importance of a patient-centered approach to medical care, informing patients about their possible risk of dying may be important during preoperative shared decision-making. The goal of this investigation was to gain an understanding of patient and provider experiences discussing mortality within the context of amputation within the Veterans Health Administration.

Semistructured interviews were performed with Veterans with peripheral arterial disease and/or diabetes, vascular and podiatric surgeons, and physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians. Interviews were analyzed using team-based content analysis to identify themes related to amputation-level decisions.

We interviewed 22 patients and 21 surgeons and physicians and identified 3 themes related to conversations around mortality: (1) both patients and providers report that mortality conversations are not common prior to amputation; (2) while most providers find value in mortality conversations, some express concerns around engaging in these discussions with patients; and (3) some patients perceive mortality conversations as unnecessary, but many are open to engaging in the conversation.

Providers may benefit from introducing the topic with patients, including providing the context for why mortality conversations may be valuable, with the understanding that patients can always decline to participate should they not be interested or comfortable discussing this issue.

Lower extremity amputations are often associated with limited postoperative functionality and postoperative complications. Removable rigid dressings (RRDs) have been used following below-knee amputation (BKA) to improve limb maturation, decrease postoperative complications, reduce time to prosthesis casting, and limit conversion rates to above-knee amputation (AKA). We hypothesized that usage of RRD following BKA will correlate with decreased prescription narcotics required at discharge and improved ambulatory status at follow-up.

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent BKA performed by the vascular surgery service at a large, acute care hospital between July 2016 and July 2021. Data collected included age, sex, body mass index, conversion to AKA, narcotic prescriptions at discharge, and ambulatory status at follow-up.

Between July 2016 and 2021, rate of conversion to AKA was significantly lower in patients who received an RRD (9.3%), as opposed to those who did not (41.5%) (P = 0.0002). Narcotic prescriptions at discharge, compared following conversion to morphine equivalents, were also significantly lower in the rigid dressing group compared to patients who did not receive the dressing (50.5 vs. 108.9 morphine eq/24 h, P = 0.0019). Furthermore, use of rigid dressing significantly improved ambulatory status at follow-up to 75.9% in RRD patients compared to 29.3% in patients with conventional dressing (P < 0.0001). This statistical significance persisted after all patients who were converted to AKA were removed from analysis (79.6% vs. 39.3% ambulatory, P = 0.000363). Multivariate analysis revealed that ambulatory status at follow-up was only associated with age more than 80 years (P = 0.042) and use of postoperative RRD (P = 0.001).

These findings support the utility of an RRD following BKA to reduce conversion to AKA, reduce narcotic dosages required at discharge, and improve ambulatory status at follow-up.