Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2017; 9(4): 166-175
Published online Apr 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i4.166
Published online Apr 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i4.166
Table 1 Univariate prognostic analysis in pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer
Clinicopaghological factors | Classification | Number | Univariate analysis (5-yr RFS) | Univariate analysis (P value) | 5-yr OS | P value |
Age | Young | 74 | 77.40% | 0.0082 | 82.30% | 0.0024 |
Elderly | 98 | 56.90% | 58.10% | |||
Sex | Male | 120 | 62.50% | 0.018 | 63.50% | 0.0054 |
Female | 52 | 81.90% | 83.10% | |||
Tumor location | Upper | 54 | 59.60% | 0.12 | 81.10% | 0.027 |
Middle | 74 | 68.40% | 76.10% | |||
Lower | 44 | 80.50% | 59.20% | |||
Method | Total | 100 | 67.40% | 0.51 | 69.00% | 0.18 |
Distal | 72 | 70.00% | 76.00% | |||
Lymphadenectomy | D1 | 10 | 68.60% | 0.95 | 56.00% | 0.53 |
D1+ | 16 | 64.30% | 79.60% | |||
D2 | 146 | 69.00% | 72.20% | |||
Laparoscopic | Yes | 25 | 77.30% | 0.16 | 77.30% | 0.2 |
No | 147 | 67.00% | 70.90% | |||
Splenectomy | Yes | 51 | 61.50% | 0.2 | 65.80% | 0.31 |
No | 121 | 71.50% | 74.50% | |||
Transfusion | Yes | 23 | 63.90% | 0.58 | 68.00% | 0.37 |
No | 149 | 69.30% | 72.70% | |||
13th JGCA pT | T2 | 65 | 80.30% | 0.019 | 83.00% | 0.021 |
T3 | 105 | 61.90% | 65.80% | |||
T4 | 2 | 50.00% | 50.00% | |||
13th JGCA pN | N0 | 24 | 90.50% | 0.0043 | 89.40% | 0.022 |
N1 | 82 | 74.00% | 77.30% | |||
N2 | 66 | 54.30% | 59.10% | |||
13th JGCA pStage | II | 57 | 92.10% | < 0.0001 | 86.80% | < 0.0001 |
IIIA | 79 | 63.90% | 76.00% | |||
IIIB | 36 | 43.00% | 42.80% | |||
Lauren histology | Intestinal | 60 | 63.60% | 0.23 | 68.30% | 0.27 |
Diffuse | 112 | 71.30% | 74.20% | |||
INF | Alpha | 13 | 76.90% | 0.83 | 84.60% | 0.53 |
Beta | 75 | 69.90% | 77.50% | |||
Gamma | 84 | 66.40% | 67.50% | |||
Lymphatic invasion | ly0 | 9 | 100.00% | 0.2 | 100.00% | |
ly1 | 45 | 74.80% | 77.10% | 0.19 | ||
ly2 | 62 | 63.70% | 71.20% | |||
ly3 | 56 | 63.90% | 63.60% | |||
Vascular invasion | v0 | 16 | 87.10% | 0.055 | 85.60% | 0.043 |
v1 | 55 | 69.90% | 65.20% | |||
v2 | 55 | 72.80% | 83.50% | |||
v3 | 46 | 55.70% | 62.70% | |||
Macroscopic feature | High risk | 18 | 35.70% | 0.0003 | 34.00% | < 0.0001 |
Average risk | 154 | 72.60% | 76.60% |
Table 2 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model in pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer
Clinicopaghological factors | Classification | Number | Multivariate analysis for PFS (Hazard ratio) | Multivariate analysis for OS (95%CI) | P value | Hazard ratio | 95%CI | P value |
Age | Young | 74 | Reference | 0.029 | Reference | 0.008 | ||
Elderly | 98 | 1.83 | 1.07-3.20 | 2.35 | 1.25-4.58 | |||
Sex | Male | 120 | Reference | 1.06-4.34 | 0.031 | Reference | 0.87-4.91 | 0.11 |
Female | 52 | 2.05 | 1.93 | |||||
Tumor location | Upper | 54 | 2.84 | 1.24-7.19 | 0.013 | |||
Middle | 74 | 1.73 | 0.70-4.66 | 0.24 | ||||
Lower | 44 | Reference | ||||||
13th JGCA pStage | II | 57 | Reference | Reference | ||||
IIIA | 79 | 6.17 | 2.42-20.83 | < 0.0001 | 2.25 | 0.93-6.27 | 0.08 | |
IIIB | 36 | 8.48 | 3.11-29.70 | < 0.0001 | 4.81 | 1.79-14.72 | 0.002 | |
Vascular invasion | v0 | 16 | Reference | |||||
v1 | 55 | 1.46 | 0.38-9.55 | 0.62 | ||||
v2 | 55 | 0.71 | 0.17-4.80 | 0.68 | ||||
v3 | 46 | 1.34 | 0.33-9.01 | 0.71 | ||||
Macroscopic feature | High risk | 18 | 2.29 | 1.06-4.63 | 0.036 | 2.74 | 1.17-6.15 | 0.021 |
Average risk | 154 | Reference | Reference |
Table 3 Relations of high risk macroscopic features to prognsotic factors in pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer
Clinicopaghological factors | Classification | Number | High risk gastric cancer n = 18 | Average risk gastric cancer n = 154 | P value |
Age | Young | 74 | 8 | 66 | 0.26 |
Elderly | 98 | 10 | 88 | ||
Sex | Male | 120 | 13 | 107 | 0.81 |
Female | 52 | 5 | 47 | ||
Lymphadenectomy | D1 | 26 | 4 | 22 | 0.37 |
D2 | 146 | 14 | 132 | ||
Tumor location | Upper | 54 | 3 | 51 | 0.32 |
Middle | 74 | 9 | 65 | ||
Lower | 44 | 6 | 38 | ||
13th JGCA pT | T2 | 65 | 1 | 64 | 0.0025 |
T3 | 105 | 17 | 88 | ||
T4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
13th JGCA pN | N0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 0.11 |
N1 | 82 | 5 | 77 | ||
N2 | 66 | 11 | 55 | ||
13th JGCA pStage | II | 57 | 3 | 54 | 0.0004 |
IIIA | 79 | 4 | 76 | ||
IIIB | 36 | 11 | 25 | ||
7th UICC pT | T2 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.02 |
T3 | 36 | 1 | 35 | ||
T4a | 105 | 17 | 88 | ||
T4b | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
7th UICC pN | N0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 0.08 |
N1 | 45 | 1 | 44 | ||
N2 | 40 | 4 | 36 | ||
N3 | 63 | 11 | 52 | ||
7th UICC pStage | IIA | 13 | 0 | 13 | < 0.0001 |
IIB | 37 | 2 | 35 | ||
IIIA | 46 | 2 | 44 | ||
IIIB | 38 | 3 | 35 | ||
IIIC | 38 | 11 | 27 | ||
Vascular invasion | v0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0.94 |
v1 | 55 | 6 | 49 | ||
v2 | 55 | 6 | 49 | ||
v3 | 46 | 5 | 41 |
Table 4 Initial recurrent sites and RTKs expression in high risk gastric cancer with relapse
Case | Age | Sex | 13th JGCA pT | 13th JGCA pN | 13th JGCA pStage | Macroscopic features | EGFR | HER2 | HER3 | IGF1R | EphA2 | Initial recurrences |
1 | 74 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | #16 LN |
2 | 62 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 2+ | 0+ | 1+ | 2+ | 0+ | #20 LN |
3 | 79 | F | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 0+ | 1+ | #13 LN |
4 | 68 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 3+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 0+ | #16,13 |
5 | 68 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 3+ | 0+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | #13 LN |
6 | 45 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 2+ | 3+ | 2+ | 0+ | 2+ | #13 LN |
7 | 69 | M | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Giant type III | 3+ | 3+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | liver |
8 | 71 | M | 3 | 1 | IIIA | Type IV | 2+ | 0+ | 1+ | 1+ | 0+ | #13 LN |
9 | 69 | F | 3 | 1 | IIIA | Type IV | 2+ | 0+ | 2+ | 1+ | 0+ | Peritoneum |
10 | 69 | M | 3 | 1 | IIIA | Type IV | 1+ | 2+ | 0+ | 1+ | 1+ | Peritoneum |
11 | 59 | F | 3 | 2 | IIIB | Type IV | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 0+ | Peritoneum |
- Citation: Yamashita K, Ema A, Hosoda K, Mieno H, Moriya H, Katada N, Watanabe M. Macroscopic appearance of Type IV and giant Type III is a high risk for a poor prognosis in pathological stage II/III advanced gastric cancer with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9(4): 166-175
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v9/i4/166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i4.166