Lee JM, Lee HS, Hyun JJ, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Seo YS, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Um SH, Kim CD. Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in patients with pancreatic cancer administered gemcitabine and erlotinib. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(7): 555-562 [PMID: 27559435 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i7.555]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hong Sik Lee, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Inchon-ro 73, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, South Korea. hslee60@korea.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Allergy
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2016; 8(7): 555-562 Published online Jul 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i7.555
Table 1 Patient demographics and laboratory findings
Characteristic
No. of patients, n
82
Age, mean ± SD, yr
63.5 ± 10.7
Male, n (%)
49 (60)
Laboratory findings
WBC count, mean ± SD
6259 ± 2667
Platelet count, mean ± SD, × 1000
225 ± 94
Neutrophil count, mean ± SD
4175 ± 2139
Lymphocyte count, mean ± SD
1462 ± 729
CRP, mean ± SD, mg/dL
12.5 ± 23.8
Albumin, mean ± SD, g/dL
3.5 ± 0.6
CA19-9, median, IU/mL
503.8
CEA, median, ng/mL
2.8
ECOG performance status score, n (%)
0
22 (27)
1
48 (58)
2
12 (15)
Inflammatory markers
NLR, median, range
3.1 (1-48)
PLR, median, range
141 (44-921)
CRP/albumin ratio, median, range
0.5 (0-37.7)
Staging
Locally advanced, n (%)
14 (17)
Metastatic, n (%)
68 (83)
Table 2 Univariate analysis of the clinical parameters for the prediction of progression-free survival
Parameter
n
Univariate analysis
HR (95%CI)
P value
Sex
Woman
33
1
Man
49
1.37 (0.82-2.3)
0.232
Age (yr)
< 65
41
1
≥ 65
41
0.85 (0.52-1.41)
0.536
Staging
Locally advanced
14
1
Metastatic
68
1.39 (0.68-2.82)
0.367
ECOG performance status score
0-1
70
1
2
12
1.49 (0.77-2.87)
0.234
CA19-9 (IU/mL)
< 1000
48
1
≥ 1000
34
1.33 (0.81-2.21)
0.264
CEA (ng/mL)
< 5
46
1
≥ 5
29
1.24 (0.72-2.13)
0.441
NLR
≤ 5
62
1
> 5
20
1.80 (1.04-3.19)
0.049
PLR
≤ 150
46
1
> 150
36
1.22 (0.73-2.02)
0.448
CRP/albumin ratio
≤ 0.5
42
1
> 0.5
40
1.72 (1.07-2.80)
0.047
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinical parameters for the prediction of overall survival
Parameter
n
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Sex
Woman
33
1
Man
49
1.26 (0.73-2.17)
0.418
Age (yr)
≥ 65
41
1
< 65
41
1.27 (0.75-2.17)
0.379
Staging
Locally advanced
14
1
1
Metastatic
68
2.87 (1.20-6.83)
0.017
2.10 (0.85-5.18)
0.108
ECOG performance status score
0-1
70
1
1
2
12
2.96 (1.49-5.89)
0.002
2.94 (1.42-6.08)
0.004
CA19-9 (IU/mL)
< 1000
48
1
≥ 1000
34
1.45 (0.79-2.66)
0.224
CEA (ng/mL)
< 5
46
1
≥ 5
29
1.67 (0.90-3.10)
0.107
NLR
≤ 5
62
1
1
> 5
20
2.61 (1.29-5.27)
0.008
2.76 (1.33-5.75)
0.007
PLR
≤ 150
46
1
> 150
36
1.43 (0.79-2.60)
0.24
CRP/albumin
≤ 0.5
42
1
1
> 0.5
40
2.13 (1.19-3.81)
0.011
1.60 (0.84-3.04)
0.151
Table 4 Mean times to disease progression and death according to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio
Variable
NLR ≤ 5
NLR > 5
P value
CRP/albumin ratio ≤ 0.5
CRP/albumin ratio > 0.5
P value
Time until disease progression, mean ± SD), mo
3.0 ± 1.7
1.9 ± 1.2
0.016
3.0 ± 1.8
2.3 ± 1.4
0.08
Time until death, mean ± SD, mo
9.3 ± 5.9
4.7 ± 3.5
0.014
10.0 ± 5.4
6.0 ± 5.5
0.01
Citation: Lee JM, Lee HS, Hyun JJ, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Seo YS, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Um SH, Kim CD. Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in patients with pancreatic cancer administered gemcitabine and erlotinib. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(7): 555-562