Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2015; 7(7): 55-70
Published online Jul 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.55
Published online Jul 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.55
Patients selection(inclusion criteria) | Surgical technique | Postoperative outcome | Oncological outcome | |||
ISR | T1-3 tumors within 30-35 mm from the anal verge | Abdominal phase: high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels | Morbidity: | 8%-64% | Local recurrence | 2.6%-9.5% |
Lymphnode metastases | 2.40% | |||||
Perineal phase: dissection on the anatomical plane between the IAS and the EAS | Mortality | 0%-1.7% | Distant metastases | 9.3%-14.1% | ||
CRM (-) | 80.4%-96% | |||||
5-yr overall survival | 76.4%-86.3% | |||||
APPEAR | Was developed to treat patients with malignant or benign disease, needing APR or completion protectomy, if treated with conventional surgery | Abdominal phase, same as TME in LAR | Morbidity: | 15.4%-60% | Distal resection margin | Median: 20 mm |
Mostly used in rectal cancer 2-5 cm from anal verge | Perineal phase involves a convex crescentic incision in the perineum, between vagina/scrotum and anus, the dissection continues upwards to the plane made from abdominal phase. The rectum is freed laterally and posteriorly from the perineal aspect and the specimen delivered through the perineum | Mortality | 0% | CRM | Median: 5 mm | |
Local recurrence | 0% | |||||
TEM TAMIS | (1) Are indicated for: mobile/nonfixed tumors, less than 3 cm in size, occupying less than 1/3 of the circumference of the bowel, not extending beyond the submucosa well to moderately differ-rentiated with low-risk histopatho-logical features | Adenomas located within the intraperitoneal portion of the rectum: careful muco-sectomy, avoiding entry into the peritoneum | TEM Morbidity | 6%-31% | Without neo-adjuvant CRT | |
7.4%-19% | ||||||
Extraperitoneally located adenomas: full thickness resection | TAMIS Morbidity | Occasionally | T1sm1: Local recurrence | < 5% | ||
All invasive carcinomas: full thickness resection | TEM Mortality | Occasionally | T1sm2-3: Local recurrence | 20% | ||
(2) As a palliation in patients with advanced rectal cancer who either refuse radical excision or they are poor surgical candidates | Circumferential adenomas in the lower and middle rectum: complete full thickness resection, followed by an end-to-end anastomosis | TAMIS Mortality | After neo-adjuvant CRT | |||
(3) Furthermore, TAMIS is used for the repair of rectoure-theral fistulae, distal rectal mobilization, extraction of rectal foreign bodies, and for transanal TME | T2N0: | |||||
Local recurrence | 5.7% | |||||
Distant recurrence | 2.8% | |||||
Combined recurrence | 9% | |||||
After neo-adjuvant CRT | ||||||
T2-3N0 (ypT0): | ||||||
Local recurrence | 0% | |||||
Systematic recurrence | 4% | |||||
T2-3N0 (ypT1): | ||||||
Local recurrence | 2% | |||||
Systematic recurrence | 7% | |||||
T2-3N0 (ypT2): | ||||||
Local recurrence | 7% | |||||
Systematic recurrence | 7% | |||||
T2-3N0 (ypT3): | ||||||
Local recurrence | 21% | |||||
Systematic recurrence | 12% | |||||
TaTME | Was developed to overcome technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic TME, mainly related to narrow pelvis, visceral obesity or large tumor diameter | Abdominal phase involves high ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels and mobiliazation of left colon and splenic flexure | Morbidity | 22.7%-26% | Distal resection margin | Median: 10 mm |
Perineal phase: | Mortality | 0 | CRM | Median: 2 mm | ||
for tumours ≤ 3 cm from anal verge, ISR and after, transanal access platform insertion, and CO2 insufflation. Dissection starts from the presacral plane, the mesorectum is mobilized and the posterior dissection proceeded cephalic in the avascular presacral plane in accordance to TME principles. The dissection continues until peritoneal reflection is visualized and divided to achieve sigmoid colon mobilization. The specimen is extracted transanaly | CRM (-) | 92.7%-96.7% | ||||
“Intact” mesorectum | 84% | |||||
“Nearly complete” mesorectum | 16% | |||||
R0 resections achieved | 94.6% | |||||
No of retrieved lymphnodes | ≥ 12 |
- Citation: Dimitriou N, Michail O, Moris D, Griniatsos J. Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7(7): 55-70
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v7/i7/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.55