Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2015; 7(12): 401-410
Published online Dec 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i12.401
Table 1 Summary of completed phase III trials of targeted agents in the treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
Author/trialLine oftreatmentTargetAgentTreatmentORR (%)PFS (mo)OS (mo)
Lordick et al[22] (2013)/ EXPANDFirstEGFRCetuximabCisplatin/capecitabine ± cetuximab30 vs 29 P = 0.774.4 vs 5.6 P = 0.329.4 vs 10.7 P = 0.95
Waddell et al[23] (2013)/REAL-3FirstEGFRPanitumumabEOX ± panitumumab46 vs 42 P = 0.426.0 vs 7.4 P = 0.0688.8 vs 11.3 P = 0.013
Bang et al[32] (2010)/ ToGAFirstHER2TrastuzumabCisplatin/capecitabine or 5-FU ± trastuzumab47 vs 35 P = 0.00176.7 vs 5.5 P = 0.000213.8 vs 11.1 P = 0.0046
Hecht et al[34] (2013)/ LoGICFirstEGFR/HER2LapatinibCAPOX ± lapatinib53 vs 40 P = NA6.0 vs 5.4 P = 0.112.2 vs 10.5 P = 0.35
Ohtsu et al[37] (2011)/ AVAGASTFirstVEGF-ABevacizumabCisplatin/capecitabine ± bevacizumab46 vs 37.4 P = 0.036.7 vs 5.3 P = 0.03712.1 vs 10.1 P = 0.1002
Shen et al[39] (2015)/ AVATARFirstVEGF-ABevacizumabCisplatin/capecitabine ± bevacizumab40.7 vs 33.7 P = 0.3486.3 vs 6.0 P = 0.4711.4 vs 10.5 P = 0.55
Bang et al[35] (2014)/TyTANSecondEGFR/HER2LapatinibPaclitaxel ± lapatinib27 vs 9 P < 0.0015.4 vs 4.4 P = 0.1311.0 vs 8.9 P = 0.1044
Fuchs et al[41] (2014)/ REGARDSecondVEGFR-2RamucirumabBSC + ramucirumab or placebo3.4 vs 2.6 P = 0.762.1 vs 1.3 P < 0.00015.2 vs 3.8 P = 0.0473
Wilke et al[43] (2014)/ RAINBOWSecondVEGFR-2RamucirumabPaclitaxel + ramucirumab or placebo28 vs 16 P = 0.00014.4 vs 2.9 P < 0.00019.6 vs 7.4 P = 0.017
Ohtsu et al[52] (2013)/ GRANITE-1Second or thirdmTOREverolimusEverolimus or placebo4.5 vs 2.1 P = NA1.7 vs 1.4 P < 0.0015.4 vs 4.3 P = 0.124