Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2015; 7(11): 317-327
Published online Nov 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i11.317
Published online Nov 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i11.317
Table 1 MET protein expressions on immunohistochemistry and clinical outcomes in gastric cancer
n | Definition of overexpression | % | Relation to clinicopathological factors | Relation to survival | Ref. | |
Usual IHC | 495 | 2+/3+, > 10% | 22 | Intestinal type, recurrence | Worse3 | [14] |
170 | Cytoplasmic, 2+/3+ | 13 | ND | ND | [38] | |
121 | ≥ 5% | 66 | N, stage | Worse | [20] | |
114 | > 30% | 74 | NA | Worse3 | [30] | |
98 | Intensity and extensity scoring system | 59 | N, M | Worse | [25] | |
50 | 78 | NA | NA | [28] | ||
38 | 2+/3+, ≥ 25% | 63 | Intestinal type | ND | [22] | |
941 | ≥ 50% | 50 | NA | NA | [24] | |
1212 | Any staining | 98 | Liver metastasis | ND | [29] | |
TMA | 438 | Membranous, 2+/3+, > 10% | 24 | T, N, M, stage, intestinal type | Worse | [12] |
436 | Intensity and extensity scoring system | 44 | T, N, M, diffuse type | Worse34 | [13] | |
215 | Cytoplasmic, > 10% | 69 | NA | NA | [27] | |
212 | 2+/3+ | 12 | ND | Worse3 | [32] | |
182 | Intensity and extensity scoring system | 66 | N, intestinal type, differentiated type | Worse | [19] | |
163 | Cytoplasmic 2+/3+ ≥ 10%, and positive > 75% | 4 | ND | Worse3 | [31] | |
124 | Cytoplasmic, 3+ | 71 | T, stage, intestinal type | ND | [23] | |
114 | Intensity and extensity scoring system | 82 | N, stage | Worse | [26] | |
35 | 43 | ND | Likely worse | [18] |
Table 2 MET mRNA expressions and clinical outcomes in gastric cancer
n | Overexpression | Relation to clinicopathological factors | Relation to survival | Ref. | ||
Cut-off value | % | |||||
Tumor | 100 | Value determined by nonparametric receiver operating characteristics | 11 | M | Worse | [34] |
100 | ND | 24 | ND | ND | [43] | |
45 | N, stage, differentiated type | ND | [35] | |||
43 | Value of mean + 2 SD in noncancerous tissue | 70 | NA | ND | [36] | |
15 | Intestinal type | ND | [22] | |||
Serum | 52 | Detected | 62 | T, N, M, stage, recurrence, v | Worse | [37] |
Table 3 MET gene alterations and clinical outcomes in gastric cancer
n | Definition ofpositive expression | % | Relation toclinicopatho-logical factors | Relation to survival | Ref. | |
FISH | 4601 | GA | 2.2 | Stage | Worse | [39] |
196 | GA | 6.1 | ND | Worse | [32] | |
170 | GA or HP | 15 (GA7.1 HP7.6) | ND | ND | [38] | |
SISH | 381 | GA or HP | 19 (GA3.4, HP16) | Intestinal (HP), M (GA), stage (GA) | Worse2 (GA) | [12] |
RT-PCR | 472 | > 4 copies | 21 | NA | Worse2 | [33] |
266 | > 4 copies | 1.5 | NA | NA | [40] | |
216 | ≥ 5 copies | 10 | Unknown | Worse2 | [41] | |
128 | ≥ 4 copies | 30 | T, stage | Worse2 | [42] | |
45 | ≥ 7 copies | 7 | ND | Worse | [18] | |
SNP array | 193 | GA | 4 | ND | ND | [44] |
100 | GA | 3 | ND | ND | [43] | |
Polymorphism analysis | 34 (tumor) | Any alterations | 59 | T, N, M | ND | [47] |
34 (serum) | Any alterations | 41 | N, M | ND | [47] |
Table 4 Development of MET-targeting agents for gastric cancer
Type | Agent | Other targets | Phase | Line | Combined therapy | Results or status | Ref. |
MET selective | Tivantinib (ARQ197) | None | II | 2nd/3rd | None | No CR/PR | [72] |
non-ATP competitive TKI | Median PFS 1.4 mo | ||||||
MET-selective | AMG 337 | None | II | Any | None | Ongoing | [74] |
ATP-competitive TKI | I | 2nd/3rd | None | 1 CR and 4 PR in 10 patients with MET -amplified tumor | [73] | ||
Multitargeted | Foretinib | VEGFR2, RON, AXL, TIE2 | II | 1st (95%) | Docetaxel, Cisplatin | No CR/PR | [75] |
ATP-competitive TKI | (GSK1363089) | Median OS 7.4 | |||||
Crizotinib | ALK | I | Tumor shrinkage in 2 patients with PFS 3.5 and 3.7 mo | [39] | |||
(PF-2341066) | |||||||
MET mAb | Onartuzumab (MetMab ) | None | III | 1st | mFOLFOX | Ongoing | [77] |
HGF mAb | Rilotumumab | None | III | 1st | ECX | Suspended | [79] |
(AMG 102) | None | III | 1st | CX | Suspended | [80] | |
None | II | 1st | ECX | Median PFS 4.2 mo | [78] | ||
Median OS 5.6 mo |
- Citation: Inokuchi M, Otsuki S, Fujimori Y, Sato Y, Nakagawa M, Kojima K. Clinical significance of MET in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7(11): 317-327
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v7/i11/317.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v7.i11.317