Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2014; 6(8): 263-274
Published online Aug 15, 2014. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i8.263
Table 1 Important randomized trials for preoperative chemoradiation n (%)
Ref.nHistologyTreatmentR0pCROp mortalityMS3 YSLocoregional failure
Nygaard et al[10], 1992SqS37%-5 (3.4)Approximately 0.6 yrApproximately 9%-
CB → S41%6 (4.0)Approximately 0.7 yrApproximately 2%
R → S40%4 (2.7)Approximately 0.9 yrApproximately 20%
CB + R → S55% (Gp 4 vs 1, P = 0.08)8 (5.4)Approximately 0.7 yrApproximately 18%
Walsh et al[11], 1996113ACF + R → S-25%5 (10.4)1632%-
S-0%2 (3.7)11 mo6%-
P = 0.01P = 0.01
Bosset et al[12], 1997282SqC + R → S-26%17 (12.3)18.6 mo36%-
S-0%5 (3.6)18.6 mo34%-
See text
Urba et al[13], 200110075% ACFV + R → S90%28%1 (2.1)16.9 mo30%19%
25% SqS90%0%2 (4)17.6 mo NS16%42%
P = 0.02
Burmeister et al[14], 200525637% SqCF + R → S80%16%5 (4.8)22.2 mo35%15%
62% AS59%0%6 (5.5)19.3 mo30%19%
1% mixed/otherSee text
Tepper et al[15], 20085625% SqCF + R → S-33%0 (0)4.5 yr39%13%
75% AS0%1 (3.8)1.8 yr16%15%
P = 0.0025 YS
Cao et al[9], 2009366SqCFM → S87%1.7%0%Approximately 42 moApproximately 69%-
R → S98%15%0%Approximately 42 mo69%
CFM + R → S98%22%0%Approximately 60 mo74%
S73%0%0%Approximately 42 mo53%
P = 0.013
van Hagen et al[16], 201236623% SqJT + R → S92%29%6 (4)49.4 mo58%-
T1-375% AS69%0%8 (4)24 mo44%
N0-12% otherP = 0.03
M0
Table 2 Pros and cons of pre-operative therapy for esophageal cancer
Pre-op therapyProsIntact vascular supply allowing for potential improved oxygenation for radiotherapy
Smaller radiotherapy volume
Potential tumor downstaging
Sterilization of tumor bed in preparation for surgery
Improve resectability
ConsTreatment decision based on clinical stage, may over-treat patients
Narrow window for surgical resection post CRT, may increase surgical complications with pre-op CRT
Dysphagia and issue of nutrition support due to tumor and treatment
Table 3 Pros and cons of post-operative therapy for esophageal cancer
Post-op therapyProsTreatment decision based on true pathologic stage, avoid CRT in patient who may not require it
Accurate assessment of disease extent to allow delineation of disease involvement
Immediate relief of dysphagia due to tumor
ConsDifficulty to delineate RT target volume
Large RT therapy volume and difficulty in RT planning
Potential decrease in oxygenation to tumor bed due to postoperative tissue alteration in vascular supply
Inability to assess RT or chemo tumor response
May preclude the use of postoperative CRT for those patients with reduced functional status postoperatively
Table 4 Randomized trials for definitive chemoradiation therapy
Ref.nHistologyTreatmentMS2 yr OSLocoregional failure
Herskovic et al[50], 199212188% SqCF + R 50 Gy12.5 m38%43%
12% AR 64 Gy8.9 m10%64%
P < 0.001local recurrence + persistent primary
Minsky et al[44], 200221886% SqCF + R 50.4 Gy18 m40%52%
14% ACF + R 64.8 Gy13 m31% (NS)56%
Table 5 Complications of radiotherapy to esophagus and their management
Acute complications
Skin erythema: 0.5% hydrocortisone, flamazine cream
Hair loss: no treatment
Mucositis, odynophagia, loss of appetite, fatigue, generalized weakness, dysphagia, dehydration, malnutrition, intestinal obstruction: intravenous hydration, xylocaine viscus, feeding tube
Pneumonitis: prednisone, oxygen
Spinal cord L'hermitte sign: no treatment
Larynx hoarseness: prednisone
Fistula/erosion of great vessels, esophageal perforation: consult thoracic surgeons
Chronic complications
Fibrosis/hyperpigmentation of skin: no treatment
Lung fibrosis: oxygen
Esophageal stricture: begins at 3-4 mo. Incidence: 50 Gy 0.8%, 60 Gy 0.6%; 60 Gy + chemo 12%. Treat by dilatation and/or stent
Peptic ulcer: proton pump inhibitor
Chronic enteritis: anti-diarrhoeal, aminosalicylates, pentoxifylline and tocopherol, cholestyramine, antibiotics, corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen
Spinal cord myelopathy: hyperbaric oxygen, anticoagulation