Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 108205
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108205
Table 1 Clinical baseline characteristics of 112 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, n (%)
Characteristics
All patients, n = 112
G1-G3 ALC nadir, n = 80
G4 ALC nadir, n = 32
P value
Gender0.041
    Male83 (74.1)55 (68.8) 28 (87.5)
    Female29 (25.9)25 (31.3) 4 (12.5)
Age, years0.064
    ≤ 6758 (51.8)37 (46.3) 21 (65.6)
    > 6754 (48.2)43 (53.8) 11 (34.4)
BMI0.501
    < 24 kg/m268 (60.7)47 (58.8) 21 (65.6)
    ≥ 2444 (39.3)33 (41.3) 11 (34.4)
Tumor length (cm)0.509
    ≤ 551 (45.5)38 (47.5) 13 (40.6)
    > 561 (54.5)42 (52.5) 19 (59.4)
T stage0.509
    T1 + T251 (45.5)38 (47.5) 12 (37.5)
    T3 + T461 (54.5)42 (52.5) 20 (62.5)
N stage0.017
    N017 (15.2)14 (17.5) 3 (9.4)
    N167 (59.8)52 (65.0) 15 (46.9)
    N228 (25.0)14 (17.5) 14 (43.8)
Clinical stage0.003
    I + II73 (65.2)59 (73.8) 14 (43.8)
    III39 (34.8)21 (26.3) 18 (56.3)
RT dose0.336
    ≤ 60 Gy62 (55.4)42 (52.5) 20 (62.5)
    > 60 Gy50 (44.6)38 (47.5) 12 (37.5)
Treatment regimen 0.244
    RT alone41 (36.6)33 (41.3) 8 (25.0)
    Sequential CRT27 (24.1)17 (21.3) 10 (31.3)
    Concurrent CRT44 (39.3)30 (37.5) 14 (43.8)
RT technique0.321
    ENI41 (36.6)27 (33.8) 14 (43.8)
    IFI71 (63.4)53 (66.3) 18 (56.3)
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of factors affecting clinical outcomes
Characteristics
OS
PFS
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis

m-OS (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
m-PFS (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Gender0.8100.907
    Male23.2 (14.8-31.7)18.2 (10.4-26.0)
    Female23.4 (20.0-26.8)16.8 (11.9-21.7)
Age0.9470.764
    ≤ 67 years23.2 (12.1-34.4)13.4 (6.4-20.4)
    > 67 years23.1 (16.1-30.2)18.6 (12.8-24.5)
BMI0.6490.742
    < 24 kg/m223.1 (17.0-29.2)15.8 (9.4-22.2)
    ≥ 2423.2 (15.7-30.7)17.3 (11.0-23.6)
Tumor length0.0021.88 (1.14-3.12) 0.0140.0121.08 (0.13-8.76) 0.942
    ≤ 5 cm42.1 (27.3-56.8)25.0 (1.0-49.1)
    > 5 cm17.0 (7.7-26.2)11.9 (9.0-14.8)
T stage0.0021.88 (1.14-3.12) 0.0140.0121.62 (0.19-13.84) 0.66
    T1-T242.1 (27.3-56.8)25.0 (1.0-49.1)
    T3-T417.0 (7.7-26.2)11.9 (9.0-14.8)
N stage0.0000.55 (0.34-1.00) 0.0510.0000.38 (0.15-1.01) 0.053
    N0--
    N124.4 (19.1-29.7)17.3 (10.9-23.7)
    N212.3 (10.4-14.3)6.6 (4.6-8.7)
TNM stage0.0000.44 (0.19-1.03) 0.0580.0002.24 (1.35-3.71) 0.002
    I + II32.4 (18.7-46.0)25.0 (1.2-48.9)
    III11.8 (7.5-16.0)6.6 (5.6-7.6)
RT dose0.1100.540
    ≤ 60 Gy22.8 (15.8-29.8)13.4 (8.4-18.4)
    > 60 Gy29.3 (12.5-46.0)18.6 (14.1-23.1)
Treatment regimen0.0421.59 (0.88-2.86) 0.0930.0331.83 (0.19-1.03) 0.058
    RT alone22.4 (17.5-27.3)14.2 (7.3-21.0)
    Sequential CRT14.0 (9.7-18.2)9.9 (0.8-19.0)
    Concurrent CRT38.4 (16.5-60.4)-
RT technique0.0280.77 (0.44-1.36) 0.3640.0012.34 (1.32-4.14) 0.004
    ENI42.1 (25.1-59.0)-
    IFI22.4 (16.5-28.3)12.7 (9.7-15.7)
ALC nadir0.0131.98 (1.20-3.28) 0.0080.0061.87 (1.09-3.20) 0.023
    G1-G326.3 (19.8-32.7)20.2 (13.3-27.0)
    G411.5 (6.5-16.6)6.8 (5.5-8.1)
ALC nadir time0.0411.23 (0.73-2.06) 0.4430.360
    1-4 week16.7 (6.8-26.5)14.2 (6.8-21.5)
    5-6 week29.9 (14.5-45.2)17.3 (8.3-26.3)
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables associated with grade 4 lymphocytopenia
Characteristics
Univariate
Multivariate
OR
P value
OR
P value
Gender (male vs female)3.1820.0484.9280.045
Age (≤ 67 years vs > 67 years)0.4510.067
BMI (< 24 vs ≥ 24 kg/m2)0.7460.502
Tumor length (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm)1.3220.510
T stage (1+2 vs 3+4)1.3220.510
N stage (0 vs 1 vs 2)2.5490.0110.6830.176
TNM stage (I+II vs III)3.6120.0036.7540.003
Treatment regimen
RT alone vs SCRT vs CCRT
1.3510.219
RT technique ENI vs IFI0.6550.322
Dosimetric parameters of OARs
Heart V5 (≤ 93% vs > 93%) 3.4580.0060.5180.228
Heart V10 (≤ 86% vs > 86%) 3.8330.00312.8080.046
Aorta V5 (≤ 85% vs > 85%) 2.8290.0191.0540.955
Aorta V30 (≤ 78% vs > 78%) 2.3740.0441.2880.713
Thoracic vertebrae Dmean (≤ 32 Gy vs > 32 Gy) 4.2590.0010.4700.339
Thoracic vertebrae V5 (≤ 69% vs > 69%) 3.3000.0070.8030.822
Thoracic vertebrae V10 (≤ 67% vs > 67%) 3.1330.0101.9380.462
Lung Dmean (≤ 13 Gy vs >13 Gy) 2.7190.0220.8730.092
Lung V5 (≤ 58% vs > 58%) 3.3000.0075.3240.048
Lung V10 (≤ 42% vs > 42%) 3.6400.0040.6460.187
Lung V20 (≤ 25% vs > 25%) 2.8640.0167.6310.031
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of subgroups associated with grade 4 lymphocytopenia
Characteristics
RT alone
Sequential CRT
Concurrent CRT
Univariate P
Multivariate P
Univariate P
Multivariate P
Univariate P
Multivariate P
Gender (male vs female) 0.9520.0970.092
Age (≤ 67 years vs > 67 years) 0.8160.5900.226
BMI (< 24 vs ≥ 24 kg/m2) 0.2920.3840.541
Tumor length (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm) 0.8000.0810.679
T stage (1+2 vs 3+4) 0.8000.0810.976
N stage (0 vs 1 vs 2) 0.3580.1460.355
TNM stage (I+II vs III) 0.0990.2120.050
RT technique ENI vs IFI0.9640.6560.533
Dosimetric parameters of OARs
Heart V5 (≤ 93% vs > 93%) 0.0370.0510.0130.0390.0150.048
Heart V10 (≤ 86% vs > 86%) 0.0580.0370.0010.5090.0260.033
Aorta V5 (≤ 85% vs > 85%) 0.8170.1600.0320.926
Aorta V30 (≤ 78% vs > 78%) 0.3800.3840.195
Thoracic vertebrae Dmean (≤ 32 Gy vs > 32 Gy) 0.1290.0930.0320.612
Thoracic vertebrae V5 (≤ 69% vs > 69%) 0.3800.4010.0180.485
Thoracic vertebrae V10 (≤ 67% vs > 67%) 0.3800.4010.0180.895
Lung Dmean (≤ 13 Gy vs > 13 Gy) 0.0220.4830.1600.276
Lung V5 (≤ 58% vs > 58%) 0.0190.0390. 0160.0450.0130.043
Lung V10 (≤ 42% vs > 42%) 0.0120.0530.0260.0840.0160.135
Lung V20 (≤ 25% vs > 25%) 0.0290.0640.0390.0540.0330.012
Table 5 Comparison of different grades of lymphocytopenia with different CoTNM-Heart V10, CoTNM-Lung V5, and CoTNM- Lung V20 score values

No.
G1-G3 80 (%)
G4 32 (%)
χ2
P value
CoTNM-heartV1016.6970.000
    0 score4037 (46.3) 3 (9.4)
    1 score5033 (41.3) 17 (53.1)
    2 score2210 (12.5) 12 (27.5)
CoTNM-lungV510.9970.004
    0 score4035 (43.8) 5 (15.6)
    1 score3324 (30.0) 9 (28.1)
    2 score3921 (26.3) 18 (56.3)
CoTNM-lungV2016.9230.000
    0 score4235 (43.8) 7 (21.9)
    1 score4837 (46.3) 11 (34.4)
    2 score228 (10.0) 14 (43.8)
Table 6 Effect of CoTNM-heart V10, CoTNM-Lung V5, and CoTNM-lung V20 on overall survival and progression-free survival
Characteristics
N
Median OS
OS (%)
χ2
P value
Median PFS
PFS (%)
χ2
P value
1 year
2 years
3 years
1 year
2 years
3 years
CoTNM- heartV105.4460.0665.4180.067
    0 score4026.387.552.544.420.270.046.643.7
    1 score5024.868.054.042.517.361.740.537.8
    2 score2211.850.031.826.56.636.431.220.8
CoTNM-lungV517.4990.00017.4400.000
    0 score40-82.562.554.620.275.048.545.9
    1 score3329.984.857.644.9-72.553.249.1
    2 score3911.848.728.221.26.633.322.215.2
CoTNM-lungV2014.0680.00111.1220.004
    0 score4228.585.757.149.017.669.047.645.0
    1 score4824.472.952.140.820.264.343.939.1
    2 score227.740.927.321.85.831.821.214.1