Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 103337
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.103337
Table 1 Phase II/III trials of first-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer published previously
Clinical trial identifier
Year
Patients
Clinical phase
Tumor stage
Treatment regimen
Median OS (months)
Median PFS (months)
Ref.
JCOG1407 UMIN0000231432022126Phase IILAPCmFOLFIRINOX/gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel23.0 vs 21.311.2 vs 9.4[48]
PREOPANC Eudra CT 2012-003181-402022246Phase IIIrPCGemcitabine + surgery15.7 vs 14.3NA[49]
NAPOLI 3 NCT040832352023770Phase IIImPDACNALIRIFOX vs nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine11.1 vs 9.27.4 vs 5.6[53]
PRODIG-4 ACCO TD-112022406Phase IIIPDACGemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX9.4 vs 7.5Failure[61]
MPACT NCT008446492013861Phase IIImPDACNab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine + gemcitabine8.5 vs 6.75.5 vs 3.7[57]
NEONAX NCT020475132023127Phase IIrPADCGemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel15.7 vs 14.311.5 vs 5.9[62]
NAPOLI 320242581Phase IIImPCNALIRIFOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel + FOLFIRINOX11.1 vs 10.4 vs 11.77.4 vs 5.7 vs 7.3[63]
PRODIGE 65 NCT039436672024211Phase IIImPDACGemcitabine and paclitaxel vs gemcitabine (GEMPAX)6.4 vs 5.93.1 vs 2.0[64]
Table 2 Summary of second-line therapies for pancreatic cancer and the results of phase III clinical trials
Clinical trial identifier
Year
Patients
Study phase
Tumor stage
Treatment regimen
Median OS (months)
Median PFS (months)
Ref.
NAPOLI-1 NCT014945062016417Phase IIImPDACNanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid6.1 vs 4.2NA[66]
MPACT2021378Phase IIImPDACLiposomal irinotecan + fluorouracil/leucovorin vs FOLFIRINOX9.8 vs 6.63.7 vs 4.6[68]
PANCREOX NCT011218482016108Phase IIILAPCNanoliposomal irinotecan + fluorouracil and folinic acid6.1 vs 9.93.1 vs 2.9[69]
MPACT201557mPDACNab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine8.85.1[71]
NCT050745892022298Phase IIImPDACLiposomal formulation of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid, or placebo plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid7.39 vs 4.994.21 vs 1.48[73]
NCT01834235202378Phase IIIAPDACGemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel6.6 vs 5.02.7 vs 3.4[74]
NAPOLI-12024115Phase IIIAPDACNanoliposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin8.4 vs 7.93.6 vs 3.4[75]
NAPOLI-12023296Phase IIIAPDACNanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin6 vs 1212.4 vs NA[76]
Table 3 Previous phase II/III clinical trials of third-line therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer
Clinical trial identifier
Year
Patients
Study phase
Tumor stage
Treatment regimes
Median OS (months)
Median FPS (months)
Ref.
NAPOLI-1201986RetrospectivemPDACNanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin9.43.5[77]
NAPOLI-1NCT014945062020417Phase IIImPDACNanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin5.8 vs 4.32.8 vs 1.4[78]
NR202329Phase II/IIILA-mPCNanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin10.27 vs 9.332.90 vs 3.60[80]
Table 4 Challenges and opportunities for recent targeted therapy options that have been approved and recommended by the Food and Drug Administration for treating pancreatic cancer
Targeted pathway
Frequency of mutation
Clinical phase
Targeted therapies approved by the FDA
KRAS [G12D, G12V, G12R, G12C, G13 (D, C, S, R)]95%Phase I-IISotorasib (AMG 510), adagrasib (MRTX849)
BRAF (V600E)13.7%Phase I-IIIDabrafenib, trametinib
NTRK fusion0.3%Phase IILarotrectinib, entrectinib
NRG-1 fusion0.5%Phase I-IIAfatinib, zenocutuzumab
BRCA1/2/PALB23%Phase I-IIIOlaparib, cisplatin, niraparib
MSI-H/dMMR4.7%Phase I-IIPembrolizumab
FGFR243%-69%Phase IIPemigatinib
MEK/ERK1%Phase IITrametinib
RET fusion1%Phase IISelpercatinib, pralsetinib (BLU-667)