Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 104253
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.104253
Table 1 The clinical characteristics of the 156 patients with cholangiocarcinoma and 98 controls
Clinicopathological data
n
SHOX2 positive
SEPT9 positive
HOXA9 positive
RASSF1A positive
Comprehensive methylation Positive
CTC counts/5 mL
Tumor location
    iCCA3324.24%24.24%42.42%27.27%57.58%10
    pCCA8321.69%27.71%56.63%27.71%66.27%12
    dCCA4027.5%32.5%50%35%67.5%14
    iCCA vs dCCA0.7950.6040.6380.6140.4670.342
Gender
    Male8722.99%34.48%47.13%32.18%68.97%13
    Female6924.64%20.29%57.97%26.09%59.42%10
    Male vs female0.8510.7020.1990.4810.240.760
Age at diagnosis
    ≤ 60 years9121.98%26.37%41.76%26.37%59.34%11
    > 60 years6526.15%30.77%66.15%33.85%72.31%14
    Median age (years)57
    Mean age (years)59
    ≤ 60 years vs > 60 years0.5710.5910.1950.3740.1260.276
Tumor stage
    I-II119.09%9.09%18.18%9.09%36.36%3
    III-IV14524.83%29.66%54.48%31.03%66.21%13
    I-II vs III-IV0.2370.1440.0200.1760.0460.001
Lymphatic invasion
    L010525.71%27.62%48.57%32.38%62.86%4
    L15119.61%29.41%58.82%23.53%68.63%16
    L0 vs L10.4000.8150.3310.2550.4790.001
Follow-up
    Follow up available43
    Median follow-up months14
    Mean follow-up months17
    Range (months)0-58
    Deceased23
    Censored20
Healthy donors
    Male423/4222331
    Female281/2811110
    ≤ 60 years51110110
    > 60 years19222221
Benign bile duct patients
    Male212/2111110
    Female7000110
    ≤ 60 years23201220
    > 60 years5111110
Table 2 Performance of biomarkers and their combinations for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma
Biomarker or combination
Positive test, CCA No.
Negative test, CCA No.
Sensitivity (%)
Early-stage CCA (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
SEPTIN94431129528.219.0996.9454.72
HOXA9813759551.9218.1896.9469.29
SHOX23721199623.729.0997.9652.36
RASSF1A4621109629.499.0997.9655.91
CA1998012478651.289.0987.7665.35
SEPTIN9 + HOXA9813759551.9218.1896.9469.29
SEP + HOXA9 + SHO883689556.4127.2796.9472.05
SEP + HOXA9 + SHO + RASS1016559264.7436.3693.8875.98
Sep + HOXA9 + SHO + RASS + CA19910712498668.5945.4587.7675.98
Table 3 Results of univariate and multivariate survival analyses (Cox proportional hazard models)
VariablesNumber of patients
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Tumor location(iCCA vs dCCA)331.246 (0.495-3.138)0.624
Gender(male vs female)431.536 (0.673-3.861)0.284
Age at diagnosis(≤ 60 vs > 60 years)431.527 (0.673-3.467)0.273
Tumor stage(I-II vs III-IV)433.13 (1.06-9.242)0.0392.871 (1.056-7.653)0.03
Lymphatic invasion(V0 vs V1)382.902 (1.069-7.874)0.0373.425 (1.081-8.523)0.035
CA199≤ 41 U/mL vs > 41 U/mL)432.41 (1.079-5.384)0.028
SHOX2 methylation(SHOX2- vs SHOX2+)431.713 (0.623-4.713)0.210
SEPT9 methylation(SEPT9- vs SEPT9+)431.757 (0.698-4.422)0.166
HOXA9 methylation(HOXA9- vs HOXA9+)431.718 (0.743-3.975)0.200
RASSF1A methylation(RASSF1A- vs RASSF1A+)432.684 (1.0-7.557)0.013
CTC count > 10/5 mL(> 10/5 mL vs ≤ 10/5 mL)433.542 (1.354-9.266)0.0273.24 (1.465-7.562)0.021