Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 103455
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.103455
Table 1 Patient characteristics, mean ± SD
Characteristic
Variables
n
%
Age (year)62.4 ± 8.5
≤ 659562.1
> 655837.9
SexMale12682.4
Female2717.6
Maximal tumor size (mm)44.2 ± 15.5
≤ 40 mm8656.2
> 40 mm6743.8
Esophageal invasion length (mm)13.4 ± 13.8
< 20 mm10166.0
≥ 20 mm5234.0
Siewert classificationI117.2
II14292.8
Nishi classificationE = G53.3
GE7448.4
EG74.6
Not applicable6743.8
This classificationE2214.4
Eg3120.3
Ge10065.4
Surgical approachesTransthoracic approach2717.6
Transabdominal hiatal approach12682.4
Extent of surgical resectionSubtotal esophagectomy with partial gastrectomy2717.6
Proximal gastrectomy with partial esophagectomy3422.2
Total gastrectomy with partial esophagectomy9260.1
Histologic typeAdenocarcinoma14594.8
Mixed adenocarcinoma85.2
Histological gradeWell-moderately differentiated7247.1
Moderately-poorly differentiated8052.3
Lauren typeIntestinal type5636.6
Diffuse type4428.8
Mixed type5133.3
Preoperative chemotherapyNo10468.0
Yes4932.0
Vessel invasionNo12883.7
Yes2516.3
Perineural invasionNo7347.7
Yes8052.3
Pathological depth of tumor invasionT1-24831.4
T3-410568.6
Lymph node metastasisN07347.7
N1-38052.3
Distant metastasispM014796.1
pM163.9
TNM-GC staging systemIA2415.7
IB1610.5
IIA85.2
IIB3321.6
IIIA3019.6
IIIB2818.3
IIIC85.2
IV63.9
TNM-EC staging systemIA53.3
IB1711.1
IC1610.5
IIA10.7
IIB42.6
IIIA53.3
IIIB4932.0
IIIC/IVA5032.7
IVB63.9
Table 2 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, mean ± SD
Characteristic
Variables
Type E
Type Eg
Type Ge
P value
Age (year)61.5 ± 11.761.0 ± 9.763.0 ± 7.20.417
≤ 65132062
> 65911380.922
SexMale1826820.969
Female4518
Tumor size (mm)53.0 ± 18.258.7 ± 12.637.9 ± 11.20.000a
≤ 40 mm74750.000a
> 40 mm152725
Esophageal invasion length (mm) 35.9 ± 13.023.9 ± 6.05.1 ± 5.40.000a
< 20 mm101000.000a
≥ 20 mm21310
Surgical approachesTransthoracic approach19800.000a
Transabdominal hiatal approach323100
Extent of surgical resectionSubtotal esophagectomy with partial gastrectomy19800.000a
Proximal gastrectomy with partial esophagectomy3526
Total gastrectomy with partial esophagectomy01874
Histologic typeAdenocarcinoma1830970.013a
Mixed adenocarcinoma413
Histological gradeWell-moderately differentiated98550.016a
Moderately-poorly differentiated122345
Lauren typeIntestinal type76430.150
Diffuse type71324
Mixed type71232
Preoperative chemotherapyNo2019650.042a
Yes21235
Vessel invasionNo1824860.512
Yes4714
Perineural invasionNo1014490.908
Yes121751
Pathological depth of tumor invasionT1-264380.028a
T3-4162762
Lymph node metastasisN097570.003a
N1-3132443
Distant metastasisM02129970.679
M1123
I-II118620.002a
III-IV112338
TNM-GC staging systemI-II118620.002a
III-IV112338
TNM-EC staging systemI-II24270.003a
III-IV202763
Table 3 Number of patients with positive nodes
Variable
Variable
Type E
Type Eg
Type Ge
P value
Overall13/2224/3143/1000.003a
The rate of lymph node metastasis≤ 15%211270.010a
> 15%111316
Pathological depth of tumor invasionT1-24340.141
T3-492139
Pathological depth of tumor invasionT10/10/11/230.956
T24/51/33/150.051
T32/32/40.659
T49/1621/2437/580.058
Location of lymph nodeNo. 1619190.017a
No. 209180.018a
No. 3215260.010a
No. 41690.443
No. 50540.134
No. 60120.735
No. 71220270.047a
No. 80240.527
No. 91490.541
No. 100010.647
No. 110480.249
No. 202100.038a
No. 211000.074
Table 4 Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of overall survival
Variable
Hazard ratio
95% confidence interval
P value
This study classification
Type E1.00.002
Type Eg0.7740.366-1.6400.504
Type Ge0.3310.167-0.6560.002
Age
< 65 years1.0
≥ 65 years1.1100.647-1.9040.705
Sex
Male1.0
Female0.8500.416-1.7380.657
Tumor size
≤ 40 mm1.0
> 40 mm2.2351.307-3.8230.003
Esophageal invasion length
< 20 mm1.0
≥ 20 mm2.4311.355-4.3620.003
Histologic type
Adenocarcinoma1.0
Mixed adenocarcinoma2.7751.102-6.9880.030
Histological grade
Well-moderately differentiated1.0
Moderately-poorly differentiated1.7070.993-2.9360.053
Lauren type
Intestinal type1.00.207
Diffuse type1.7760.922-3.4180.086
Mixed type1.5380.798-2.9641.198
Preoperative chemotherapy
No1.0
Yes1.4840.865-2.5470.152
Vessel invasion
No1.0
Yes3.6882.069-6.5730.000
Perineural invasion
No1.0
Yes2.5231.420-4.4840.002
Pathological depth of tumor invasion
T1-21.0
T3-46.1592.452-15.4710.000
Lymph node metastasis
L01.0
L15.8212.928-11.5700.000
Distant metastasis
M01.0
M12.9311.053-8.1590.040
Table 5 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of overall survival
Variable
Hazard ratio
95% confidence interval
P value
This study classification
Type E1.00.004
Type Eg0.4510.207-0.9840.045
Type Ge0.3000.147-0.6090.001
Vessel invasion
V01.0
V12.5451.399-4.6310.002
Perineural invasion
P01.0
P11.1290.599-2.1270.709
Pathological depth of tumor invasion
T1-21.0
T3-42.9451.095-7.9220.032
Lymph node metastasis
L01.0
L13.6431.728-7.6780.001
Table 6 Comprehensive comparison of staging systems for gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction patients
ProjectLikelihood ratio χ2 price
Linear trend χ2 price
The log-likelihood estimate
Gastric cancer TNM staging system
Esophageal cancer TNM staging system
Gastric cancer TNM staging system
Esophageal cancer TNM staging system
Gastric cancer TNM staging system
Esophageal cancer TNM staging system
Type E10.8966.6153.3275.17837.01837.300
Type Eg17.03218.76011.9239.89955.62462.748
Type Ge13.5147.5752.8731.196181.106186.322