Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2025; 17(3): 101076
Published online Mar 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i3.101076
Published online Mar 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i3.101076
Table 1 Characteristics of enterocutaneous fistula patients compared between uncured and cured groups, n (%)
Category | Uncured group (n = 36) | Cured group (n = 55) | χ2 | P value |
Age (years) | 54.64 ± 17.90 | 56.55 ± 14.56 | 0.557 | 0.579 |
Gender | 2.552 | 0.110 | ||
Male | 28 (77.78) | 34 (61.82) | ||
Female | 8 (22.22) | 21 (38.18) | ||
BMI (kg/m²) | 20.57 ± 3.76 | 21.86 ± 3.72 | 1.610 | 0.111 |
Albumin level (g/L) | 33.95 ± 5.68 | 35.12 ± 5.59 | 0.967 | 0.336 |
Primary disease | 0.044 | |||
Abdominal wall mass | 1 (2.78) | 2 (3.64) | ||
Abdominal external hernia | 1 (2.78) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Abdominal trauma | 2 (5.56) | 7 (12.73) | ||
Gastroduodenal disease | 3 (8.33) | 8 (14.55) | ||
Intestinal disease | 9 (25.00) | 4 (7.27) | ||
Appendix disease | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.82) | ||
Colorectum disease | 10 (27.78) | 25 (45.45) | ||
Hepatobiliary/pancreatic disease | 4 (11.11) | 6 (10.91) | ||
Acute abdominal disease | 2 (5.56) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Vascular disease | 1 (2.78) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Urological disease | 1 (2.78) | 2 (3.64) | ||
Gynecological disease | 2 (5.56) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Fistula reason | 0.055 | |||
Surgery | 33 (91.67) | 52 (94.55) | ||
Trauma | 0 (0.00) | 3 (5.45) | ||
Inflammatory bowel disease | 2 (5.56) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Radio-/chemotherapy | 1 (2.78) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Fistula location | 0.006 | |||
Esophagus/stomach | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.82) | ||
Duodenum | 2 (5.56) | 11 (20.00) | ||
Bile bowel/pancreatic bowel | 1 (2.78) | 1 (1.82) | ||
Anastomosis fistula | ||||
Intestinal fistula | 20 (55.56) | 14 (25.45) | ||
Colorectum fistula | 13 (36.11) | 21 (38.18) | ||
Complex fistula | 0 (0.00) | 7 (12.73) | ||
Fistula number | 7.354 | 0.007 | ||
Single fistula | 20 (55.56) | 45 (81.82) | ||
Multiple fistula | 16 (44.44) | 10 (18.18) | ||
Fistula nature | 0.277 | |||
Tubular fistula | 33 (91.67) | 48 (87.27) | ||
Labral fistula | 2 (5.56) | 7 (12.73) | ||
Internal fistula | 1 (2.78) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Infection status | 0.617 | 0.432 | ||
None | 14 (28.89) | 17 (30.91) | ||
Yes | 22 (61.11) | 38 (69.09) | ||
Diagnostic methods | 0.249 | |||
Drainage fluid observation | 16 (44.44) | 31 (56.36) | ||
Abdominal wound observation | 12 (33.33) | 13 (23.64) | ||
DFO + AWO | 6 (16.67) | 11 (20.00) | ||
Imaging diagnosis | 2 (5.56) | 0 (0.000 | ||
Nutrition feeding | 1.043 | 0.307 | ||
None | 1 (2.78) | 6 (10.91) | ||
Yes | 35 (97.22) | 49 (89.09) | ||
Somatostatin | 0.009 | 0.925 | ||
None | 20 (55.56) | 30 (54.55) | ||
Yes | 16 (44.44) | 25 (45.45) | ||
Growth hormone | 3.376 | 0.066 | ||
None | 25 (69.44) | 47 (85.45) | ||
Yes | 11 (30.56) | 8 (14.55) | ||
Fibrin glue | 12.194 | < 0.001 | ||
None | 29 (80.56) | 24 (43.64) | ||
Yes | 7 (19.44) | 31 (56.36) |
Table 2 Univariate regression analysis of factors associated with fistula cure
b | Sb | χ2 | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
Constant | 0.199 | 0.319 | 0.389 | 0.533 | |
Fistula number (multiple) | -1.309 | 0.526 | 6.179 | 0.270 (0.096, 0.758) | 0.013 |
Fibrin glue application | 1.697 | 0.523 | 10.528 | 5.459 (1.958, 15.219) | 0.001 |
Table 3 Interaction analysis between fistula number and fibrin glue application
Category | b | Sb | χ2 | OR (95%CI) | P value |
Constant | 0.223 | 0.335 | 0.443 | 1.250 | 0.506 |
Fistula number (multiple) | -1.402 | 0.663 | 4.472 | 0.246 (0.067, 0.903) | 0.034 |
Fibrin glue application | 1.609 | 0.634 | 6.436 | 5.000 (1.142, 17.338) | 0.011 |
Fistula number + fibrin glue application | 0.262 | 1.109 | 0.056 | 1.300 (0.148, 11.422) | 0.813 |
Table 4 Comparison of predictive effects among different models
Constant | Fistula number | Fibrin glue application | ||
z | P value | z | P value | |
Fistula number + fibrin glue application | -2.242 | 0.025 | -2.517 | 0.012 |
Table 5 Evaluation of efficacy combined with fistula number, fibrin glue and therapeutic prediction
Category | Therapeutic prediction of fistula number and fibrin glue application | |
Uncured (n = 53) | Cured (n = 38) | |
Outcome of conservative treatment | ||
Uncured (n = 36) | 29 | 7 |
Cured (n = 55) | 24 | 31 |
Sensitivity | 56.36 | |
Specificity | 80.56 | |
Positive predictive value | 81.58 | |
Negative predictive value | 54.72 | |
Youden index | 36.92 | |
AUC | 0.747 (0.644, 0.850) |
- Citation: Zhuang ZN, Zhao R, Li YX. Retrospective analysis of factors influencing the self-healing of patients with enterocutaneous fistulas receiving conservative treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(3): 101076
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i3/101076.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i3.101076