Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2025; 17(2): 101780
Published online Feb 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.101780
Published online Feb 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.101780
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with traditional serrated adenomas, n = 193
Variables | n (%) |
Patient-related factors | |
Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 63.2 ± 13.8 (18.0-89.0) |
Sex | |
Male | 93 (48.2) |
Female | 100 (51.8) |
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD (range) | 23.9 ± 3.4 (17.4-37.7) |
Obesity | |
Underweight (< 18.5) | 6 (3.1) |
Normal (18.5 ≤ n < 23.0) | 76 (39.4) |
Overweight (23.0 ≤ n < 25.0) | 45 (23.3) |
Obesity (≥ 25.0) | 66 (34.2) |
Alcohol | |
None | 89 (46.1) |
Quit | 51 (26.4) |
Current | 53 (27.5) |
Smoking | |
None | 134 (69.4) |
Quit | 34 (17.6) |
Current | 25 (13.0) |
Hypertension | 81 (42.0) |
Diabetes mellitus | 40 (20.7) |
Dyslipidemia | 31 (16.1) |
Anti-platelet agent (n = 49, 25.4%) | |
Aspirin | 32 (16.6) |
Warfarin/NOAC | 5 (2.6) |
Dual anti-platelet agent | 12 (6.2) |
History of colorectal cancer | 27 (14.0) |
Symptom | |
None | 168 (87.0) |
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 24 (12.4) |
Obstruction | 1 (0.5) |
Lesion-related factors | |
Size (mm), mean ± SD (range) | 18.1 ± 13.5 (3.0-70.0) |
Diminutive (1-5 mm) | 16 (8.3) |
Small (6-9 mm) | 46 (23.8) |
Large (> 10 mm) | 131 (67.9) |
Location | |
Cecum | 3 (1.6) |
Ascending colon | 27 (14) |
Transverse colon | 20 (10.4) |
Descending colon | 9 (4.7) |
Sigmoid colon | 60 (31.1) |
Rectum | 74 (38.3) |
Color | |
White | 82 (42.5) |
Red | 111 (57.5) |
Morphology (Paris classification) | |
0-Ip, 0-Isp | 85 (44.1) |
0-Is | 67 (34.7) |
0-IIa | 34 (17.6) |
0-IIa + IIc | 7 (3.6) |
Border | |
Distinct | 164 (85.0) |
Irregular | 29 (15.0) |
Mucosal surface | |
Smooth | 89 (46.1) |
Lobular | 104 (53.9) |
Dysplasia (n = 71, 36.8%) | |
LGD | 51 (26.4) |
HGD | 14 (7.3) |
ADC | 6 (3.1) |
Associated lesion (n = 104, 53.9%) | |
Hyperplastic polyp | 17 (8.8) |
Sessile serrated lesion | 2 (1.0) |
Traditional serrated adenoma | 10 (5.2) |
Conventional adenoma with LGD | 62 (32.1) |
Conventional adenoma with HGD/ADC | 13 (6.7) |
Procedure-related factors | |
Removal methods | |
Cold biopsy | 1 (0.5) |
Cold snare EMR | 6 (3.1) |
Conventional EMR | 121 (62.7) |
ESD | 52 (26.9) |
Operation | 11 (5.7) |
Observation | 2 (1.0) |
Post-procedural complications (n = 93, 48.2%) | |
Bleeding | 92 (47.7) |
Perforation | 1 (0.8) |
Treatment methods of complications | |
APC | 18 (9.3) |
Coagrasper | 35 (18.1) |
Hemoclipping | 40 (20.7) |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics between traditional serrated adenomas without and with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, n (%)
Variables | TSAOs (n = 122) | TSADs (n = 71) | P value |
Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 61.1 ± 14.5 (18.0-84.0) | 66.7 ± 11.8 (36.0-85.1) | 0.072 |
Sex | 0.234 | ||
Male | 63 (51.6) | 30 (42.3) | |
Female | 59 (48.4) | 41 (57.7) | |
BMI (n = 499), mean ± SD (range) | 24.1 ± 3.7 (17.4-37.7) | 23.7 ± 2.9 (17.7-30.6) | 0.128 |
Obesity | 0.726 | ||
Underweight (< 18.5) | 3 (2.5) | 3 (4.2) | |
Normal (18.5-23.0) | 46 (37.7) | 30 (42.3) | |
Overweight (23.0-25.0) | 31 (25.4) | 14 (19.7) | |
Obesity (≥ 25.0) | 42 (34.4) | 24 (33.8) | |
Alcohol | 0.177 | ||
None | 52 (42.6) | 37 (52.1) | |
Quit | 31 (25.4) | 20 (28.2) | |
Current | 39 (32.0) | 14 (19.7) | |
Smoking | 0.681 | ||
None | 82 (67.2) | 52 (73.2) | |
Quit | 23 (18.9) | 11 (15.5) | |
Current | 17 (13.9) | 8 (11.3) | |
Hypertension | 45 (36.9) | 36 (50.7) | 0.061 |
Diabetes mellitus | 29 (23.8) | 11 (15.5) | 0.171 |
Dyslipidemia | 21 (17.2) | 10 (14.1) | 0.568 |
Anti-platelet agent (n = 49) | 0.521 | ||
Aspirin | 23 (18.9) | 9 (12.7) | |
Warfarin/NOAC | 3 (2.5) | 2 (2.8) | |
Dual anti-platelet agent | 9 (7.4) | 3 (4.2) | |
History of colorectal cancer | 16 (13.1) | 11 (15.5) | 0.671 |
Symptom | 0.051 | ||
None | 111 (91.0) | 57 (80.3) | |
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 10 (8.2) | 14 (19.7) | |
Obstruction | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
Lesion-related factors | |||
Size (mm), mean ± SD (range) | 12.7 ± 8.0 (3.0-55.0) | 27.3 ± 15.9 (5.0-70.0) | 0.003 |
Diminutive (1-5 mm) | 16 (13.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
Small (6-9 mm) | 31 (25.4) | 15 (21.1) | |
Large (> 10 mm) | 75 (61.5) | 56 (78.9) | |
Location | 0.177 | ||
Cecum | 1 (0.8) | 2 (2.8) | |
Ascending colon | 13 (10.7) | 14 (19.7) | |
Transverse colon | 12 (9.8) | 8 (11.3) | |
Descending colon | 8 (6.6) | 1 (1.4) | |
Sigmoid colon | 42 (34.4) | 18 (25.4) | |
Rectum | 46 (37.7) | 28 (39.4) | |
Color | 0.001 | ||
White | 63 (51.6) | 19 (26.8) | |
Red | 59 (48.4) | 52 (73.2) | |
Morphology (Paris classification) | 0.005 | ||
0-Ip, 0-Isp | 53 (43.4) | 32 (45.1) | |
0-Is | 35 (28.7) | 32 (45.1) | |
0-IIa | 30 (24.6) | 4 (5.6) | |
0-IIa + IIc | 4 (3.3) | 3 (4.2) | |
Border | < 0.001 | ||
Distinct | 114 (93.4) | 50 (70.4) | |
Irregular | 8 (6.6) | 21 (29.6) | |
Mucosal surface | 0.058 | ||
Smooth | 62 (50.8) | 27 (38.0) | |
Lobular | 60 (49.2) | 44 (62.0) | |
Associated lesion (n = 104, 53.9%) | |||
Non-neoplastic lesions (n = 17, 8.8%) | 5 (4.2) | 12 (16.2) | < 0.001 |
Hyperplastic polyp | 5 (4.2) | 12 (16.2) | |
Neoplastic lesions (n = 87, 45.1%) | 48 (40.3) | 39 (52.7) | < 0.001 |
Sessile serrated lesion | 1 (0.8) | 1 (1.4) | |
Traditional serrated adenoma | 3 (2.5) | 7 (9.5) | |
Conventional adenoma with LGD | 37 (31.1) | 25 (33.8) | |
Conventional adenoma with HGD/ADC | 7 (5.9) | 6 (8.1) | |
Procedure-related factors | |||
Removal methods | < 0.001 | ||
Cold biopsy | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
Cold EMR | 6 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
Conventional EMR | 97 (79.5) | 24 (44.4) | |
ESD | 13 (10.7) | 22 (40.7) | |
Operation | 3 (2.5) | 8 (14.8) | |
Observation | 2 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | |
Post-procedural complications (n = 93, 48.2%) | < 0.001 | ||
Bleeding | 44 (36.1) | 48 (67.6) | |
Perforation | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
Treatment method of complication | < 0.001 | ||
APC | 15 (12.3) | 3 (4.2) | |
Coagrasper | 17 (13.9) | 18 (25.4) | |
Hemoclipping | 13 (10.7) | 27 (38.0) |
Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with traditional serrated adenomas with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma
Variables | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | P value |
Sex | |||
Male | 0.685 | 0.380-1.236 | 0.209 |
Female | 1.0 | ||
Obesity | |||
Normal (18.5-23.0) | 1.0 | ||
Underweight (< 18.5) | 1.533 | 0.290-8.105 | 0.615 |
Overweight (23.0-25.0) | 0.692 | 0.317-1.512 | 0.356 |
Obesity (≥ 25.0) | 0.876 | 0.444-1.730 | 0.703 |
Symptom | |||
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 2.726 | 1.140-6.521 | 0.024 |
Color | |||
White | 1.0 | ||
Red | 3.209 | 1.735-5.934 | < 0.001 |
Morphology (Paris classification) | |||
0-Ip, 0-Isp | 1.0 | ||
0-Is | 1.514 | 0.791-2.900 | 0.211 |
0-IIa | 0.221 | 0.071-0.685 | 0.009 |
0-IIa + IIc | 1.242 | 0.261-5.911 | 0.785 |
Border | |||
Distinct | 1.0 | ||
Irregular | 5.985 | 2.484-14.423 | < 0.001 |
Mucosal surface | |||
Smooth | 1.0 | ||
Lobular | 1.684 | 0.928-3.057 | 0.087 |
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with traditional serrated adenoma with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma
Variables | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | P value |
Symptom | |||
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 2.828 | 1.022-7.824 | 0.045 |
Color | |||
White | 1.0 | ||
Red | 1.889 | 0.896-3.981 | 0.095 |
Morphology (Paris classification) | |||
0-Ip, 0-Isp | 1.0 | ||
0-Is | 1.121 | 0.528-2.380 | 0.766 |
0-IIa | 0.497 | 0.150-1.647 | 0.253 |
0-IIa + IIc | 1.176 | 0.213-6.489 | 0.852 |
Border | |||
Distinct | 1.0 | ||
Irregular | 7.314 | 2.508-21.333 | < 0.001 |
Mucosal surface | |||
Smooth | 1.0 | ||
Lobular | 2.424 | 1.147-5.125 | 0.020 |
- Citation: Kim KH, Myung E, Oh HH, Im CM, Seo YE, Kim JS, Lim CJ, You GR, Cho SB, Lee WS, Noh MG, Lee KH, Joo YE. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal traditional serrated adenomas with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma in a Korean population. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(2): 101780
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i2/101780.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.101780