Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2024; 16(9): 3839-3850
Published online Sep 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i9.3839
Table 1 Discrepancy analysis of patient study metrics between the training and validation cohorts
VariablesTotal (n = 550)Group
Z/χ2P value
Training set (n = 385)
Validation set (n = 165)
Age53 (47, 59)53 (47, 59)53 (48, 58)Z = -0.420.68
WBC (109/L)4.09 (2.98, 5.70)4.06 (2.97, 5.65)4.21 (3.00, 5.76)Z = -0.710.48
RBC (1012/L)4.43 (3.83, 4.94)4.46 (3.84, 4.96)4.36 (3.83, 4.91)Z = -0.430.67
HB (g/L)141.00 (121.00, 156.00)142.00 (121.00, 157.00)137.00 (121.00, 155.00)Z = -1.000.32
PLT (109/L)88.00 (55.00, 138.00)85.00 (55.00, 136.00)92.00 (56.00, 142.00)Z = -0.880.38
AFP (ng/mL)7.42 (2.96, 110.14)7.44 (2.95, 88.46)7.27 (3.07, 167.59)Z = -0.210.84
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)32.55 (20.48, 1555.89)33.85 (20.89, 1839.88)28.64 (19.52, 1157.19)Z = -0.850.39
CEA (ng/mL)2.22 (1.42, 3.40)2.21 (1.35, 3.36)2.35 (1.54, 3.44)Z = -1.280.20
CA199 (ng/mL)19.70 (10.43, 38.10)19.75 (10.60, 38.92)18.60 (9.37, 34.30)Z = -0.880.38
CA125 (ng/mL)25.41 (13.18, 123.00)23.91 (12.77, 103.25)27.90 (14.70, 148.90)Z = -1.240.22
Sex, n (%)χ² = 0.910.34
    Male406 (74.22)288 (75.39)118 (71.52)
    Female141 (25.78)94 (24.61)47 (28.48)
Table 2 Univariate analysis of study parameters in the hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis groups, n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 385)
Group
Z/χ2
P value
Cirrhosis (n = 195)
HCC (n = 190)
Age53.00 (47.00, 59.00)51.00 (44.00, 56.00)55.00 (49.00, 60.00)Z = -4.66< 0.001
WBC (109/L)4.06 (2.97, 5.65)3.50 (2.52, 4.54)4.65 (3.69, 6.40)Z = -6.87< 0.001
RBC (1012/L)4.46 (3.84, 4.96)4.13 (3.54, 4.79)4.70 (4.11, 5.07)Z = -5.18< 0.001
HB (g/L)142.00 (121.00, 157.00)134.00 (113.00, 151.75)149.00 (129.75, 160.00)Z = -4.76< 0.001
PLT (109/L)85.00 (55.00, 136.00)64.50 (48.25, 100.00)122.00 (70.50, 168.25)Z = -7.95< 0.001
AFP (ng/mL)7.44 (2.95, 88.46)3.79 (2.34, 9.32)49.16 (5.84, 1220.00)Z = -9.35< 0.001
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)33.85 (20.89, 1839.88)22.59 (16.30, 32.28)854.40 (37.98, 14001.70)Z = -11.58< 0.001
CEA (ng/mL)2.21 (1.35, 3.36)2.08 (1.28, 3.39)2.27 (1.42, 3.36)Z = -1.410.16
CA199 (ng/mL)19.75 (10.60, 38.92)18.07 (9.85, 34.82)21.25 (12.70, 43.17)Z = -1.580.115
CA125 (ng/mL)23.91 (12.77, 103.25)33.51 (14.52, 143.25)19.70 (12.24, 55.62)Z = -3.050.002
Sex, n (%)χ² = 9.900.002
    Male288 (75.39)130 (68.42)158 (82.29)
    Female94 (24.61)60 (31.58)34 (17.71)
Table 3 Performance of modeling indicators and prediction models in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Variables
AUC (95%CI)
Cut-off
Accuracy (%)
Se (%)
Sp (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
F1 Score
Age0.638 (0.582, 0.693)53.5062.5759.9065.2663.5461.690.62
WBC (109/L)0.703 (0.651, 0.755)4.1067.5465.6369.4768.4866.670.67
RBC (1012/L)0.653 (0.598, 0.708)4.2263.0970.8355.2661.5465.220.66
PLT (109/L)0.735 (0.685, 0.785)109.0068.3255.7381.0574.8364.440.64
AFP (ng/mL)0.776 (0.729, 0.823)19.0573.3059.9086.8482.1468.180.69
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)0.842 (0.802, 0.882)90.9179.3269.7988.9586.4574.450.77
LR-training set0.850 (0.812, 0.888)0.4778.0163.0293.1690.3071.370.74
LR-validation set0.827 (0.764, 0.890)0.4774.5565.0684.1580.6070.410.79
SVM-training set0.860 (0.822, 0.898)0.5480.1071.3588.9586.7175.450.72
SVM-validation set0.803 (0.735, 0.871)0.5472.7368.6776.8375.0070.790.77
RF-training set0.969 (0.955, 0.984)0.5292.1588.0296.3296.0288.830.78
RF-validation set0.858 (0.800, 0.917)0.5280.0075.9084.1582.8977.530.72
LASSO-training set0.845 (0.806, 0.884)0.1878.8069.2788.4285.8174.010.72
LASSO-validation set0.831 (0.769, 0.893)0.1872.7368.6776.8375.0070.790.81
ASAP-training set0.866 (0.829, 0.903)0.9382.2073.9690.5388.7577.480.92
ASAP-validation set0.813 (0.747, 0.879)0.9373.9461.4586.5982.2668.930.70