Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2024; 16(9): 3832-3838
Published online Sep 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i9.3832
Table 1 Comparison of serum UL16-binding protein 2 and DR-70 levels among the colorectal cancer, benign, and control groups, mean ± SD
Group
ULBP2 (ng/L)
DR-70 (μg/mL)
CRC (n = 60)84.28 ± 13.52a1.28 ± 0.41a
Benign (n = 50)68.04 ± 8.890.48 ± 0.15
Control (n = 50)66.93 ± 9.150.46 ± 0.14
F value44.392161.273
P value< 0.001< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of serum UL16-binding protein 2 and DR-70 levels among patients with different prognostic outcomes, mean ± SD
Group
ULBP2 (ng/L)
DR-70 (μg/mL)
Good prognosis (n = 43)76.91 ± 15.281.10 ± 0.36
Poor prognosis (n = 17)95.67 ± 17.051.49 ± 0.45
t value4.1473.518
P value0.0010.001
Table 3 Diagnostic values of different indicators for early-stage colorectal cancer
Index
AUC
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Youden's index
SE
95%CI
ULBP20.74384.0065.000.4900.04720.651-0.821
DR-700.72590.0053.330.4330.04770.632-0.806
ULBP2 combined with DR-700.95292.0086.670.7670.01780.894-0.984
Table 4 Diagnostic values of different indicators for poor prognosis of colorectal cancer
Index
AUC
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Youden's index
SE
95%CI
ULBP20.73176.5076.700.5320.08070.600–0.837
DR-700.74864.7181.400.4950.07820.619–0.851
ULBP2 combined with DR-700.88582.3588.370.6480.04850.776–0.953