Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2024; 16(8): 3559-3584
Published online Aug 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i8.3559
Table 1 Relationship between CASC19 and clinicopathologic characteristics
Patient-related
factors
CASC19
χ2
P value
Low (n = 36)
High (n = 36)
Gender0.2500.617
Male2523
Female1113
Age (years)2.7240.099
    < 601522
    ≥ 602114
Tumor sizes14.629< 0.001
    < 5 cm2913
    ≥ 5 cm723
Differentiation grade1.7870.181
    Poor2429
    Well127
Tumor location5.0770.079
    Upper33
    Middle918
    Lower2415
N stage19.505< 0.001
    N0224
    N1-N31432
T stage9.0000.003
    T1-T2186
    T3-T41830
Table 2 Risk factors for prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Variable
Univariate analysis, HR (95%CI)
P value
Multivariate analysis, HR (95%CI)
P value
CASC195.986 (2.854-12.555)< 0.0012.478 (1.071-5.736)0.034
Gender1.056 (0.544-2.048)0.872
Age1.407 (0.756-2.619)0.282
Differentiation grade0.965 (0.471-1.976)0.922
Tumor size9.438 (4.397-20.257)< 0.0012.969 (1.189-7.415)0.02
Tumor location 0.736 (0.466-1.164)0.19
TNM (I, II/III)10.293 (3.642-29.089)< 0.0014.122 (1.243-13.672)0.021
Table 3 Relationship between the HMGA2 and clinicopathologic characteristics
Patient-related
factors
HMGA2
χ2
P value
Low (n = 22)
High (n = 22)
Gender0.1090.741
    Male1615
    Female67
Age (years)1.4670.226
    < 601014
    ≥ 60128
Tumor sizes0.9100.340
    < 5 cm1613
    ≥ 5 cm69
Differentiation grade3.5360.060
    Poor1117
    Well115
N stage9.8210.002
    N0133
    N1-N3919
T stage4.9560.026
    T1-T2114
    T3-T41118