Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2024; 16(8): 3481-3495
Published online Aug 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i8.3481
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients with Ad-hepatocellular carcinoma who received camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy therapy
VariablesUnmatched
PSM (1:1)
TRIPLET alone group (n = 122)
TRIPLET-MWA group (n = 95)
P value
TRIPLET alone group (n = 82)
TRIPLET-MWA group (n = 82)
P value
Age, year0.9301.000
    ≤ 65112 (91.80)86 (90.53)76 (92.68)77 (93.90)
    > 6510 (8.20)9 (9.47)6 (7.32)5 (6.10)1.000
Gender0.505
    Female12 (9.84)13 (13.68)8 (9.76)9 (10.98)1.000
    Male110 (90.16)82 (86.32)74 (90.24)73 (89.02)
ECOG0.9001.000
    0122 (100.00)94 (98.95)82 (100.00)81 (98.78)
    10 (0.00)1 (1.05)0 (0.00)1 (1.22)
Comorbidity1.0000.677
    Absence110 (90.16)86 (90.53)75 (91.46)74 (90.24)
    Presence12 (9.84)9 (9.47)7 (8.54)8 (9.76)
HBV0.4071.000
    Absence6 (4.92)2 (2.11)4 (4.88)2 (2.44)
    Presence116 (94.26)93 (95.79)78 (95.12)80 (97.56)
Ascites0.011a1.000
    Absence93 (76.23)87 (91.58)75 (91.46)75 (91.46)
    Presence29 (22.95)8 (8.42)7 (8.54)7 (8.54)
ALBI grade0.041a0.867
    167 (54.92)66 (69.47)55 (67.07)57 (69.51)
    2-355 (45.08)29 (30.53)27 (32.93)25 (30.49)
HCC number0.2770.219
    1-354 (44.26)50 (52.63)50 (70.42)42 (59.15)
    > 368 (55.74)45 (47.37)21 (29.58)29 (40.85)
HCC diameter, cm0.6670.155
    < 57 (5.74)6 (6.32)7 (8.54)4 (4.88)
    5-1051 (41.80)34 (35.79)41 (50.00)32 (39.02)
    > 1064 (52.46)55 (57.89)34 (41.46)46 (56.10)
AFP, ng/mL0.6050.428
    ≤ 40046 (37.70)40 (42.11)31 (37.80)37 (45.12)
    > 40076 (62.30)55 (57.89)51 (62.20)45 (54.88)
Vascular invasion0.0770.346
    Absence18 (14.75)24 (25.26)15 (18.29)21 (25.61)
    Presence104 (85.25)71 (74.74)67 (81.71)61 (74.39)
Metastasis0.7500.158
    Absence68 (55.74)50 (52.63)50 (60.98)40 (48.78)
    Presence54 (44.26)45 (47.37)32 (39.02)42 (51.22)
AST ‎(U/L)‎, median, IQR67 (31, 105)77 (32, 112)0.85485 (28, 128)77 (35, 127)0.872
ALT ‎(U/L)‎‎, median, IQR54 (22, 89)59 (22, 89)0.74658 (22, 89)59 (25, 109)0.929
TBIL (μmol/L), mean ± SD17.823.20.42218.619.00.710
ALB (g/L), mean ± SD37.0 ± 5.137.6 ± 4.20.56437.2 ± 5337.0 ± 4.20.567
INR, mean ± SD1.1 ± 0.121.12 ± 0.100.9011.10 ± 0.141.11 ± 0.100.892
PT (s), mean ± SD12.4 ± 0.312.3 ± 0.60.94012.4 ± 0.812.4 ± 0.61.000
PLT (× 109)‎, median, IQR208(59, 245)256 (67, 312)0.358230 (55, 270)256 (78, 304)0.660
Table 2 Microwave ablation parameters after camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Parameters
MWA (n = 95)
Ablation of residual tumor activity63 (66.3)
Ablation of recurrent tumor32 (33.7)
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)
    ≤ 558 (61.1)
    > 537 (38.2)
No. of tumor
    Single74 (77.9)
    Multiple21 (22.1)
Extrahepatic metastasis before MWA65 (68.4)
Ablation of tumor type number
    173 (76.8)
    219 (20)
    > 23 (3.2)
Ablation of liver tumor92 (96.8)
Ablation of lung tumor13 (13.7)
Ablation of adrenal gland tumor3 (3.2)
Ablation of breast tumor1 (1.1)
Hepatic tumors
    Ablative duration (minute)26
    Ablative power (W)55.8 ± 6
    Ablative sessions2
    Ablative points4
Lung tumors
    Ablative duration (minute)14
    Ablative power (W)50.2 ± 3.4
    Ablative sessions1
    Ablative points2
Adrenal gland tumors
    Ablative duration (minute)20
    Ablative power (W)45.6 ± 4.2
    Ablative sessions1
    Ablative points1
Breast tumors
    Ablative duration (minute)16
    Ablative power (W)50
    Ablative sessions1
    Ablative points2
The response to HAIC
    CR8 (8.4)
    PR78 (82.1)
    SD9 (9.5)
Complete ablation of hepatic tumors57 (60)
Complete ablation of all tumors34 (35.8)
Recurrence after MWA57 (60)
Combination of radiotherapy8 (8.4)
Table 3 Theraputic effectiveness comparison between camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy group and camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy-microwave ablation group
Variables
TRIPLET group (n = 122)
TRIPLET-MWA group (n = 95)
P value
TRIPLET group (n = 82)
TRIPLET-MWA group (n = 82)
P value
Hepatic response
Tumor response to the first TRIPLET0.0620.120
    Non-OR90 (73.77)54 (60.67)58 (70.73)45 (57.69)
    OR32 (26.23)35 (39.33)24 (29.27)33 (42.31)
The optimal tumor response< 0.0010.007
    Non-OR38 (31.15)9 (9.47)21 (25.61)7 (8.54)
    OR84 (68.85)86 (90.53)61 (74.39)75 (91.46)0.006
Overall response0.001
    Non-OR46 (37.70)15 (15.79)28 (34.15)12 (14.63)
    OR76 (62.30)80 (84.21)54 (65.85)70 (85.37)
HAIC sessions14 (2, 6)4 (2, 6)1.0004 (2, 6)4 (2, 6)1.000
Interval between TRIPLET and MWA, day140 (32, 53)36 (32, 48)
Table 4 Complications comparison related to camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy or camrelizumab plus apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy-microwave ablation
Complications
TRIPLET alone group (n = 122)
TRIPLET-MWA group (n = 95)
P value
Major complications6 (4.9)5 (5.3)1.000
Peritoneal effusion1 (0.8)-
Liver abscess3 (2.5)1 (1.1)
Biliary fistula1 (0.8)-
Biloma-2 (2.0)
Hydropneumothorax requiring drainage--
Massive ascites1 (0.8)1 (1.1)
Seeding-1 (1.1)
Minor complications36 (29.5)22 (23.2)0.755
Liver dysfunction18 (14.8)12 (12.6)
Fever18 (14.8)10 (10.5)
Abdominal nonspecific pain3 (2.4)1 (1.1)
Bile duct dilatation1 (0.8)2 (2.0)
Hemorrhage5 (4.0)3 (3.2)
Mild pleural effusion10 (8.1)-
Mild ascites6 (4.8)3 (3.2)
Jaundice4 (3.2)3 (3.2)
Other7 (5.7)4 (4.0)