Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2024; 16(6): 2350-2361
Published online Jun 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2350
Table 1 Summary of univariate and multivariable analysis of overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma
VariablesUnivariate analysis
Multivariable analysis

HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HMGB3[32]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 5 vs > 5 cm1.863 (1.300-2.671)< 0.0011.400 (0.964-2.034)0.077
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV3.870 (2.373-6.309)< 0.0012.471 (1.350-4.525)0.003
HMGB3 expression: High vs low3.658 (2.208-6.061)< 0.0013.042 (1.809-5.115)< 0.001
Ang-2[39]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 2 vs > 2 cm1.704 (0.994-2.921)0.0521.120 (0.622-2.015)0.706
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV1.690 (1.283-2.228)< 0.0011.531 (1.041-2.252)0.030
Ang-2 expression: High vs low3.080 (1.742-5.466)< 0.0013.144 (1.738-5.689)< 0.001
Wnt3a[56,57]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 2 vs > 2 cm2.056 (1.056-4.089)0.0302.018 (1.058-3.912)0.031
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV0.686 (0.328-1.436)0.318NANA
Wnt3a expression: High vs low5.656 (2.682-11.926)< 0.0013.651 (1.973-6.757)< 0.001
GPC-3[73]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 3 vs > 3 cm2.011 (1.498-3.869)0.034NANA
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV1.961 (1.443-2.486)< 0.001NANA
GPC-3 expression: High vs low12.697 (3.097-52.050)< 0.00014.259 (2.030-8.934)< 0.001
GP73[78,79]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 2 vs > 2 cm0.990 (0.506-1.938)0.978NANA
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV0.231 (0.121-0.440)< 0.0010.221 (0.114-0.426)< 0.001
GP73 expression: High vs low1.008 (1.002-1.014)0.0050.477 (0.272-0.837)0.010
sCLU[92,95]
Tumor diameter: ≤ 5 vs > 5 cm1.758 (0.987-2.968)0.036NANA
TNM stage: I/II vs III/IV 3.056 (1.756-5.321)< 0.0011.474 (0.589-3.690)0.407
sCLU expression: High vs low2.030 (0.987-4.175)0.004NANA