Zhou XC, Ke FY, Dhamija G, Chen H, Wang Q. Study on sex differences and potential clinical value of three-dimensional computerized tomography pelvimetry in rectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(3): 773-786 [PMID: 38577473 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.773]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Qiang Wang, MD, Attending Doctor, Department of Radiology, The Dingli Clinical Institute of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou Central Hospital), No. 252 Baili East Road, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China. franklin1216@sina.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 773-786 Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.773
Table 1 Pelvic measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name
Definition
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet (AB)
Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet (PQ)
Maximum distance between the left and right iliopectineal line
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis (CD)
Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet (CE)
Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx
Interischial spine diameter (LM)
Shortest distance between the ischial spines
Interischial tuberosity diameter (NO)
Shortest distance between the ischial tuberosities
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis (AC)
Distance between the superior and inferior borders of the pubic symphysis
Sacrococcygeal distance (BE)
Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the tip of the coccyx
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum (BD)
Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction
Sacrococcygeal angle (α)
The angle between the extended lines of the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet
Sacropubic angle (β)
Angle between the extended lines of the anteroposterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis
Sacrococcygeal curvature height (FI)
Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the sacrococcygeal distance
Sacral curvature height (FH)
Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacral curve to the superior-inferior diameter of sacrum
Superior pubococcygeal diameter (AE)
Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance (FG)
Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the superior-inferior diameter of pubic symphysis or its extended line
Table 2 Soft tissue measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name
Definition
Rectal area (a)
Area of the rectum at the level of the ischial spine
Mesorectal fat area (b)
Area of the mesorectal fat at the level of the ischial spine
Visceral fat area (c)
Area of visceral fat at the level of the umbilicus
Subcutaneous fat area (d)
Area of subcutaneous fat at the level of the umbilicus
Waist circumference (e)
Circumference of the waist at the level of the umbilicus
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter (RS)
It refers to the distance measured from the line connecting the umbilicus to the spinous process at the level of the umbilicus, between the abdominal wall section and the lumbar section
Transverse abdominal diameter (TU)
It refers to the distance measured from the level of the umbilicus to the horizontal line at the anterior edge of the lumbar vertebrae
Table 3 Normality test analysis of each variable
Variable name
W value
P value
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet
0.9905098
0.1642
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet
0.9914321
0.2294
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis
0.9758847
0.0009
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet
0.9716010
0.0002
Interischial spine diameter
0.9840155
0.0146
Interischial tuberosity diameter
0.9848102
0.0195
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis
0.9878909
0.0617
Sacrococcygeal distance
0.9947691
0.6552
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum
0.9883327
0.0729
Sacrococcygeal angle
0.9931951
0.4174
Sacropubic angle
0.9720830
0.0003
Sacrococcygeal curvature height
0.8480501
0.0000
Sacral curvature height
0.9947091
0.6454
Superior pubococcygeal diameter
0.9918030
0.2615
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance
0.9114720
0.0000
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance
0.9723249
0.0003
Visceral fat area
0.9564061
0.0000
Subcutaneous fat area
0.9635344
0.0000
Waist circumference
0.9939451
0.5244
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter
0.9863249
0.0343
Transverse abdominal diameter
0.9939991
0.5327
Rectal area
0.9221744
0.0000
Mesorectal fat area
0.9777443
0.0016
Table 4 Clinical and pathological characteristics data of 218 patients in the laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer
Range
mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3)
No. of cases (percentage), n (%)
Age (yr)
32-89
66 (59, 74)
Sex
Male
139 (63.76)
Female
79 (36.24)
BMI (kg/m2)
14.42-31.25
22.57 ± 3.17
ASA grading
I
22 (10.09)
II
185 (84.86)
III
11 (5.05)
History of previous abdominal surgery
19 (8.72)
Neoadjuvant therapy
8 (3.67)
pTNM/ypTNM staging
0
9 (4.13)
I
53 (24.31)
II
63 (28.9)
III
93 (42.66)
Table 5 mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3) of 16 pelvic parameters and 7 soft tissue parameters measured by 218 computerized tomography scans and comparison between sexes
Variable name
Total cases (n = 218), mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3)
Citation: Zhou XC, Ke FY, Dhamija G, Chen H, Wang Q. Study on sex differences and potential clinical value of three-dimensional computerized tomography pelvimetry in rectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(3): 773-786