Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 659-669
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.659
Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of the study cohort
Characteristics
PDAC (n = 93)
Non-PDAC (n = 64)
Control (n = 88)
Men, n (%)59 (63.4)35 (54.7)38 (43.2)
Women, n (%)34 (36.6)29 (45.3)50 (56.8)
Age (yr)64 (54.74)54 (40.68)57 (43, 71)
CEA, n (%)93 (100)64 (100)82 (93.18)
CA19-9, n (%)93 (100)64 (100)69 (78.41)
CA125, n (%)93 (100)63 (98.44)42 (47.73)
CA242, n (%)93 (100)63 (98.33)0 (0.00)
CA724, n (%)93 (100)63 (98.44)0 (0.00)
AFP, n (%)93 (100)64 (100)82 (93.18)
Stage I, n (%)29 (31.18)--
Stage II, n (%)22 (23.66)--
Stage III, n (%)4 (4.30)--
Stage IV, n (%)16 (17.20)--
Unknown, n (%)22 (23.66)--
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of N-glycans, tumor markers in distinguishing patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Biomarker
AUC
Cut-off
Sensitivity
Specificity
N-glycan0.860.2884.90%73.00%
CA19-90.753755.91%95.49%
CEA0.725.022.58%100.00%
CA1250.763532.26%98.10%
CA2420.673030.11%98.41%
CA7240.566.920.43%87.30%
Table 3 Sensitivity of the Glyco-model in detecting patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of different stages
Subgroup
Sensitivity
Overall84.95% (79/93)
Stage I89.66% (26/29)
Stage II77.27% (17/22)
Stage III & IV90.00% (18/20)
Unknown81.82% (18/22)
Table 4 Sensitivity of the N-glycan model in non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma individuals
Subgroup
Specificity
Overall73.03% (111/152)
Healthy79.55% (70/88)
SPN83.33% (10/12)
PNET50.00% (5/10)
SCN91.67% (11/12)
IPMN50.00% (13/26)
MCN50.00% (2/4)
Table 5 The positivity rate of Glyco-model among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor markers-negative
Tumor marker negative
Glyco-model positivity rate
CEA ≤ 5 (72)87.50% (63/72)
CA19-9 ≤ 37 (41)82.93% (34/41)
CA125 ≤ 35 (63)88.89% (56/63)
CA242 ≤ 30 (65)83.08% (54/65)
CA724 ≤ 6.9 (74)86.49% (64/74)