Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 614-629
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.614
Table 1 Pancreatic cyst fluid analysis based on endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration
TypeSCNMCNIPMNSPTPPseudocyst
ViscosityLowHighHighNALow
MucinLowHighHighNALow
Amylase< 250 U/L< 250 U/LHighLowHigh
CytologyNegative or Glyogen containing cuboid cellsMucin containing column cellsPapillary clusters of mucin column cells, atypiaBranching papillae cuboid or cylindric cells, high cellularity, myxoid stromaDirty material, macrophages, inflammatory cell
NGSVHL; chr3 LOHCEAKRAS; GNAS; TP53; PTEN; CEACTNNB1NA
Table 2 Markers for diagnosing solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas on immunohistochemistry analysis
MarkersPositive rateMechanisms/implications
β-catenin[26,65]Almost 100% (nuclear)Activating the Wnt-signaling pathway
CD200[73]100% (focal)Marker of stem cell status
CD10[65,66,74]100%Marker of SPTP; expressed in immature lymphocyte
CD56[66]100% Marker of SPTP
AMACR[75]96.2% Marker of SPTP
LEF1[18]94.7% Regulating the Wnt-signaling pathway
TFE3[76]94.7% Activating and regulating the Wnt-signaling pathway
CD99[77]78.4% (paranuclear dot-like)Differentiating from PNET
E-cadherin[65,78]0% Differentiating from PNET
CgA[26]0%Differentiating from PNET
Trypsin[26,79]0% Differentiating from ACC
BCL10[26,79]0%Differentiating from ACC
Ki-67[31,80]Mostly 1-2%Predicting prognosis
Table 3 Differential diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas
DiseaseFemaleAge (yr)MarkerClinicopathological features
SPTP90%20-40β-cateninWell-circumscribed; < 3 cm: Mainly solid; > 3 cm: Solid-cystic; myxoid stroma enveloping fibrovascular cores; discohesive epithelioid cells
Non-functional PNET50%50-60CgASolid: Obviously enhanced with capsule ring-like enhancement; solid-cystic: Mural nodule, uneven wall; high rate of G2 and G3
ACC< 50%60AFPEnhanced solid with large mass having hypodense areas; heterogeneous enhancement; full of large polygonal cells with background necrosis, zymogen-rich and granular cytoplasm, cherry-red nucleoli
SCN75%55-70NAHoneycomb appearance, central scar; stellate scar in the center of the cyst cavity; clear serous fluid
MCN> 95%40-60NAMucin secretion; disconnection from pancreatic duct; ovarian-like stroma; intracellular mucin
IPMN50%60-80NACommunication with pancreatic duct; absence of ovarian-like stroma; mucin
Pseudocyst≤ 25%AnyNAHistory of pancreatitis or pancreatic trauma; high amylase in pancreatic juice
PBLNA< 10AFPHypodense mass; central mass; squamous nest; well-defined margin; heterogeneous; enhanced; circumscribed, plump spindly cell whorls with squamous morules
Table 4 Reported parenchyma-preserving pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas
Ref.
Country
F/M
Median/mean age (year)
Surgery type
Median/mean follow-up (month, range)
R/M
Li et al[100]China129/3732.5 (10-68)11 EN, 22 CP49 (24-102)2
Wang et al[103]China84/1731.7 (10-65)31 EN46.1 (12-101)0
Tjaden et al[101]Germany44/829 (8-71)4 EN, 5 CP54 (2-230)2
Cho et al[102]Korea56/1014.5 ± 5.815 EN, 4 CP24.9 (10-76)1
Gao et al[99]China49/1331.76 ± 10.1915 EN, 47 CP31 (3-69)0
Chen et al[104]China8/244.6 (32-57)10 CP22.9 (3-48)0
Guo et al[11]China71/1631.3 ± 13.16 EN, 4 CP46 (13-97)0
Wang et al[13]China85/1231.6 ± 13.9215 EN, 20 CP, 2 DPPHR54 (7-121)0
Table 5 Current models to predict the risk of recurrence of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

Tumor size
Ki-67 index
LVI (extratumoral)
Classification
Fudan Prognostic Index[8]≤ 10 cm< 3%-Low risk
> 10 cm< 3%-Intermediate risk
Any3-20%-
Any> 20%-High risk
PUMCH risk model[9]≤ 9 cm≤ 1%NegativeLow risk
> 9 cmAnyAnyHigh risk
Any> 1%Any
AnyAnyPositive