Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2024; 16(1): 79-89
Published online Jan 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.79
Table 1 Comparison of general data
Group
Propofol (n = 40)
Sevoflurane (n = 40)
χ2/t
P value
Sex0.050.823
Female1920
Male2120
BMI (kg/m2)22.85 ± 2.1022.94 ± 2.120.2340.816
Age (yr)47.33 ± 5.2047.82 ± 5.110.5210.604
Body mass (kg)64.98 ± 5.2165.01 ± 5.230.0310.975
ASA classes0.0510.822
Class Ⅰ2223
Class Ⅱ1817
Cancer type2.0660.559
Adenocarcinoma2322
Undifferentiated carcinoma1211
Mucinous carcinoma55
Other02
Metastasis0.1550.926
Bone metastasis54
Liver metastasis44
Table 2 Comparison of Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment scores
Group
T0
T4
t
P value
Propofol (n = 40)111.98 ± 7.5390.30 ± 5.2515.304< 0.001
Sevoflurane (n = 40)112.03 ± 6.48102.32 ± 5.217.756< 0.001
t0.03811.711
P value0.97< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores
Group
SAS
SDS
T0
T4
T0
T4
Propofol (n = 40)42.29 ± 3.0251.83 ± 4.49b44.26 ± 3.5053.83 ± 4.42
Sevoflurane (n = 40)42.31 ± 3.8648.19 ± 4.90b44.12 ± 3.6750.13 ± 4.74
t0.3595.1980.6393.956
P value0.721< 0.0010.525< 0.001