Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2023; 15(7): 1262-1270
Published online Jul 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1262
Table 1 Baseline information
Indicators
Control group (n = 30)
Research group (n = 32)
χ2/t
P value
Age (years old)61.03 ± 6.9161.44 ± 10.610.1790.859
Gender (male/female)17/1319/130.0470.829
Clinical staging (II/III)18/1216/160.6250.429
Tumor diameter (cm)5.68 ± 1.295.80 ± 1.500.3370.738
History of alcoholism (with/without)11/198/240.9920.319
History of smoking (with/without)8/227/250.1940.660
Family medical history (yes/no)5/259/231.1630.281
Table 2 Short-term efficacy of two groups of esophageal carcinoma patients, n (%)
Indicators
Control group (n = 30)
Research group (n = 32)
χ2
P value
Complete response6 (20.00)7 (21.88)--
Partial response12 (40.00)13 (40.63)--
Stable disease7 (23.33)8 (25.00)--
Progressive disease5 (16.67)4 (12.50)--
Overall response rate18 (60.00)20 (62.50)0.0410.840
Disease control rate25 (83.33)28 (87.50)0.2170.642
Table 3 Incidence of drug toxicities in two groups of esophageal carcinoma patients, n (%)
Indicators
Control group (n = 30)
Research group (n = 32)
χ2
P value
Myelosuppression
I-II13 (43.33)6 (18.75)4.4030.036
III-IV6 (20.00)2 (6.25)2.6050.107
Gastrointestinal reactions
I-II15 (50.00)8 (25.00)4.1470.042
III-IV7 (23.33)3 (9.38)2.2300.135
Radiation esophagitis
I-II14 (46.67)13 (40.63)0.2300.632
III-IV7 (23.33)6 (18.75)0.1960.658