Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2023; 15(1): 143-154
Published online Jan 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.143
Table 1 Comparison of clinical general data between the observation and control groups
Clinical general data
Observation group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
t/χ2 value
P value
Gender, n (%)0.0500.823
Male22 (55.00)21 (52.50)
Female18 (45.00)19 (47.50)
Age (yr)62.21 ± 7.7861.10 ± 8.430.6120.542
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.40 ± 2.0522.16 ± 1.950.5360.593
KPS score (points)72.21 ± 5.5471.19 ± 5.800.8040.424
TNM stage, n (%)0.2380.626
IIIb27 (67.50)29 (72.50)
IV13 (32.50)11 (27.50)
Table 2 Comparison of short-term efficacy between two groups, n (%)
Group
Cases
CR
PR
SD
PD
Z value
P value
Observation group402 (5.00)21 (52.50)12 (30.00)5 (12.50)-2.7990.005
Control group400 (0.00)13 (32.50)12 (30.00)15 (37.50)
Table 3 Comparison of clinical data of effective and ineffective patients in observation group
Clinical data
Chemotherapy effective (n = 23)
Chemotherapy ineffective (n = 17)
t/χ2 value
P value
Gender, n (%)0.0510.822
Male13 (56.62)9 (52.94)
Female10 (43.48)8 (47.06)
Age (yr)60.60 ± 5.5665.12 ± 5.71-3.587 0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.14 ± 2.0322.75 ± 2.12-1.314 0.193
KPS score (points)75.54 ± 4.3267.70 ± 3.838.589 0.000
TNM stages, n (%)5.6310.018
IIIb19 (82.61)8 (47.06)
IV4 (17.39)9 (52.94)
Table 4 Comparison of tumor markers before and after treatment in two groups
Index
Observation group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
t value
P value
CA199 (mg/L)
Before treatment110.43 ± 21.32108.28 ± 19.820.467 0.642
1 wk after treatment71.22 ± 17.28a88.01 ± 13.34a-4.864 0.000
1 mo after treatment44.49 ± 15.52a,d69.32 ± 12.10a,d-7.980 0.000
CEA (ng/L)
Before treatment46.69 ± 7.8047.05 ± 8.00-0.204 0.839
1 wk after treatment32.21 ± 6.65a40.40 ± 7.71a-5.087 0.000
1 mo after treatment11.38 ± 3.03a,d28.83 ± 6.62a,d-15.159 0.000
NSE (mg/L)
Before treatment22.23 ± 3.5422.40 ± 3.70-0.210 0.834
1 wk after treatment17.39 ± 3.11a19.40 ± 2.83a-3.023 0.003
1 mo after treatment12.23 ± 2.29a,d17.73 ± 2.69a,d-9.847 0.000
EGFR (mg/L)
Before treatment22.43 ± 5.5422.15 ± 4.480.249 0.804
1 wk after treatment16.67 ± 2.11a19.22 ± 2.17a-5.328 0.000
1 mo after treatment6.60 ± 1.92a,d11.11 ± 2.01a,d-10.262 0.000
Table 5 Comparison of SF-36 scale scores before and after treatment in two groups
Index
Observation group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
t value
P value
Physiological function
Before treatment52.34 ± 6.8954.11 ± 7.04-1.136 0.259
3 mo after treatment65.12 ± 8.14a60.32 ± 8.04a2.653 0.010
Role-physical
Before treatment60.43 ± 7.9259.90 ± 8.040.297 0.767
3 mo after treatment64.54 ± 8.09a63.93 ± 7.90a0.341 0.734
Bodily pain
Before treatment31.88 ± 7.7832.01 ± 8.09-0.073 0.942
3 mo after treatment38.00 ± 8.12a38.70 ± 9.17a-0.361 0.719
General health
Before treatment58.56 ± 9.1557.74 ± 9.030.403 0.688
3 mo after treatment66.43 ± 7.12a65.80 ± 9.22a0.342 0.733
Energy
Before treatment40.32 ± 7.2238.75 ± 8.110.914 0.363
3 mo after treatment54.76 ± 6.70a47.21 ± 7.14a4.877 0.000
Social function
Before treatment51.21 ± 6.9851.33 ± 7.54-0.074 0.941
3 mo after treatment61.89 ± 6.45a60.40 ± 7.16a0.978 0.331
Emotional function
Before treatment31.65 ± 7.2131.44 ± 8.010.123 0.902
3 mo after treatment47.58 ± 7.22a39.03 ± 8.12a4.977 0.000
Mental health
Before treatment40.34 ± 6.3139.45 ± 7.080.594 0.555
3 mo after treatment66.16 ± 8.11a50.91 ± 9.03a7.947 0.000
Table 6 Comparison of adverse event between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
III-IV grade leukopenia
III-IV grade nausea and vomiting
III-IV grade diarrhea
III-IV grade mouth ulcer
III-IV grade abnormal liver and kidney function
III-IV grade thrombocytopenia
Observation group408 (20.00)11 (27.50)13 (32.50)9 (22.50)15 (38.50)10 (25.00)
Control group405 (12.50)7 (17.50)4 (10.00)8 (20.00)12 (30.00)3 (7.50)
t/χ2 value0.8271.1476.0500.0750.5034.501
P value0.3630.2840.0140.7850.4780.034