Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2023; 15(1): 143-154
Published online Jan 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.143
Published online Jan 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.143
Table 1 Comparison of clinical general data between the observation and control groups
Clinical general data | Observation group (n = 40) | Control group (n = 40) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Gender, n (%) | 0.050 | 0.823 | ||
Male | 22 (55.00) | 21 (52.50) | ||
Female | 18 (45.00) | 19 (47.50) | ||
Age (yr) | 62.21 ± 7.78 | 61.10 ± 8.43 | 0.612 | 0.542 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.40 ± 2.05 | 22.16 ± 1.95 | 0.536 | 0.593 |
KPS score (points) | 72.21 ± 5.54 | 71.19 ± 5.80 | 0.804 | 0.424 |
TNM stage, n (%) | 0.238 | 0.626 | ||
IIIb | 27 (67.50) | 29 (72.50) | ||
IV | 13 (32.50) | 11 (27.50) |
Table 2 Comparison of short-term efficacy between two groups, n (%)
Group | Cases | CR | PR | SD | PD | Z value | P value |
Observation group | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 21 (52.50) | 12 (30.00) | 5 (12.50) | -2.799 | 0.005 |
Control group | 40 | 0 (0.00) | 13 (32.50) | 12 (30.00) | 15 (37.50) |
Table 3 Comparison of clinical data of effective and ineffective patients in observation group
Clinical data | Chemotherapy effective (n = 23) | Chemotherapy ineffective (n = 17) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Gender, n (%) | 0.051 | 0.822 | ||
Male | 13 (56.62) | 9 (52.94) | ||
Female | 10 (43.48) | 8 (47.06) | ||
Age (yr) | 60.60 ± 5.56 | 65.12 ± 5.71 | -3.587 | 0.001 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.14 ± 2.03 | 22.75 ± 2.12 | -1.314 | 0.193 |
KPS score (points) | 75.54 ± 4.32 | 67.70 ± 3.83 | 8.589 | 0.000 |
TNM stages, n (%) | 5.631 | 0.018 | ||
IIIb | 19 (82.61) | 8 (47.06) | ||
IV | 4 (17.39) | 9 (52.94) |
Table 4 Comparison of tumor markers before and after treatment in two groups
Index | Observation group (n = 40) | Control group (n = 40) | t value | P value |
CA199 (mg/L) | ||||
Before treatment | 110.43 ± 21.32 | 108.28 ± 19.82 | 0.467 | 0.642 |
1 wk after treatment | 71.22 ± 17.28a | 88.01 ± 13.34a | -4.864 | 0.000 |
1 mo after treatment | 44.49 ± 15.52a,d | 69.32 ± 12.10a,d | -7.980 | 0.000 |
CEA (ng/L) | ||||
Before treatment | 46.69 ± 7.80 | 47.05 ± 8.00 | -0.204 | 0.839 |
1 wk after treatment | 32.21 ± 6.65a | 40.40 ± 7.71a | -5.087 | 0.000 |
1 mo after treatment | 11.38 ± 3.03a,d | 28.83 ± 6.62a,d | -15.159 | 0.000 |
NSE (mg/L) | ||||
Before treatment | 22.23 ± 3.54 | 22.40 ± 3.70 | -0.210 | 0.834 |
1 wk after treatment | 17.39 ± 3.11a | 19.40 ± 2.83a | -3.023 | 0.003 |
1 mo after treatment | 12.23 ± 2.29a,d | 17.73 ± 2.69a,d | -9.847 | 0.000 |
EGFR (mg/L) | ||||
Before treatment | 22.43 ± 5.54 | 22.15 ± 4.48 | 0.249 | 0.804 |
1 wk after treatment | 16.67 ± 2.11a | 19.22 ± 2.17a | -5.328 | 0.000 |
1 mo after treatment | 6.60 ± 1.92a,d | 11.11 ± 2.01a,d | -10.262 | 0.000 |
Table 5 Comparison of SF-36 scale scores before and after treatment in two groups
Index | Observation group (n = 40) | Control group (n = 40) | t value | P value |
Physiological function | ||||
Before treatment | 52.34 ± 6.89 | 54.11 ± 7.04 | -1.136 | 0.259 |
3 mo after treatment | 65.12 ± 8.14a | 60.32 ± 8.04a | 2.653 | 0.010 |
Role-physical | ||||
Before treatment | 60.43 ± 7.92 | 59.90 ± 8.04 | 0.297 | 0.767 |
3 mo after treatment | 64.54 ± 8.09a | 63.93 ± 7.90a | 0.341 | 0.734 |
Bodily pain | ||||
Before treatment | 31.88 ± 7.78 | 32.01 ± 8.09 | -0.073 | 0.942 |
3 mo after treatment | 38.00 ± 8.12a | 38.70 ± 9.17a | -0.361 | 0.719 |
General health | ||||
Before treatment | 58.56 ± 9.15 | 57.74 ± 9.03 | 0.403 | 0.688 |
3 mo after treatment | 66.43 ± 7.12a | 65.80 ± 9.22a | 0.342 | 0.733 |
Energy | ||||
Before treatment | 40.32 ± 7.22 | 38.75 ± 8.11 | 0.914 | 0.363 |
3 mo after treatment | 54.76 ± 6.70a | 47.21 ± 7.14a | 4.877 | 0.000 |
Social function | ||||
Before treatment | 51.21 ± 6.98 | 51.33 ± 7.54 | -0.074 | 0.941 |
3 mo after treatment | 61.89 ± 6.45a | 60.40 ± 7.16a | 0.978 | 0.331 |
Emotional function | ||||
Before treatment | 31.65 ± 7.21 | 31.44 ± 8.01 | 0.123 | 0.902 |
3 mo after treatment | 47.58 ± 7.22a | 39.03 ± 8.12a | 4.977 | 0.000 |
Mental health | ||||
Before treatment | 40.34 ± 6.31 | 39.45 ± 7.08 | 0.594 | 0.555 |
3 mo after treatment | 66.16 ± 8.11a | 50.91 ± 9.03a | 7.947 | 0.000 |
Table 6 Comparison of adverse event between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | III-IV grade leukopenia | III-IV grade nausea and vomiting | III-IV grade diarrhea | III-IV grade mouth ulcer | III-IV grade abnormal liver and kidney function | III-IV grade thrombocytopenia |
Observation group | 40 | 8 (20.00) | 11 (27.50) | 13 (32.50) | 9 (22.50) | 15 (38.50) | 10 (25.00) |
Control group | 40 | 5 (12.50) | 7 (17.50) | 4 (10.00) | 8 (20.00) | 12 (30.00) | 3 (7.50) |
t/χ2 value | 0.827 | 1.147 | 6.050 | 0.075 | 0.503 | 4.501 | |
P value | 0.363 | 0.284 | 0.014 | 0.785 | 0.478 | 0.034 |
- Citation: Wang JP, Du JL, Li YY. Short-term efficacy and influencing factors of conventional chemotherapy combined with irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15(1): 143-154
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v15/i1/143.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.143