Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2022; 14(8): 1562-1573
Published online Aug 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1562
Published online Aug 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1562
Table 1 Clinical characteristic of individuals in our study
Group | n | Ratio of gender (Male/female) | mean age |
CRP | 62 | 1.3:1 | 58.3 |
CRC | 101 | 1.1:1 | 59.7 |
HC | 83 | 1:1 | 51.1 |
Table 2 List of standards of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight
Substance | Average mass (M + H)+ | Resolution | StDeV |
Angiotensin II | 1047.18 | 360 | 10 |
Angiotensin I | 1297.48 | 365 | 10 |
Substance P | 1348.64 | 380 | 17 |
Bombesin | 1620.86 | 420 | 23 |
ACTH clip 1-17 | 2094.42 | 475 | 22 |
ACTH clip 18-39 | 2466.68 | 540 | 17 |
Somatostatin 28 | 3149.57 | 580 | 25 |
Ubiquitin | 4283.45 | 800 | 40 |
Insulin | 5734.56 | 580 | 25 |
Cytochrome c | 6181.05 | 560 | 85 |
Ubiquitin | 8565.89 | 345 | 25 |
Table 3 Comparison of serum protein profiles between colorectal cancer group and healthy control group
Mass (m/z) | DAve | PTTA | PWKW | PAD | Ave1 | Ave2 |
4210.57 | 536.3 | 0.00000308 | 0.00000149 | 0.066 | 700.27 | 1236.57 |
2932.56 | 22.98 | 0.00000635 | < 0.000001 | 0.00721 | 28.61 | 51.6 |
2022.34 | 282.69 | 0.0000161 | < 0.000001 | < 0.000001 | 309.73 | 27.04 |
3192.08 | 26.53 | 0.0000333 | 0.0000105 | 0.000326 | 30.96 | 57.49 |
3883.65 | 31.52 | 0.000476 | 0.000129 | 0.00122 | 46.6 | 78.12 |
877.4 | 3.23 | 0.000645 | 0.000129 | 0.000683 | 5.93 | 9.16 |
1866.09 | 62.56 | 0.000826 | 0.000407 | < 0.000001 | 83.77 | 21.21 |
2899.72 | 13.03 | 0.000997 | 0.000189 | < 0.000001 | 38.31 | 25.28 |
7772.42 | 338.93 | 0.00141 | 0.00147 | 0.0503 | 594.88 | 933.81 |
3158.36 | 53.74 | 0.00284 | 0.000264 | < 0.000001 | 62.18 | 115.92 |
2272.09 | 20.34 | 0.00284 | 0.0000451 | < 0.000001 | 22.18 | 42.51 |
4645.79 | 22.93 | 0.00432 | 0.00483 | 0.231 | 57.18 | 80.11 |
4092.12 | 22.14 | 0.00577 | 0.0321 | 0.324 | 113.17 | 135.31 |
1778.9 | 7.03 | 0.00739 | 0.00672 | < 0.000001 | 18.66 | 11.64 |
4268.05 | 27.62 | 0.00795 | 0.000333 | < 0.000001 | 69.05 | 96.67 |
2952.92 | 27.19 | 0.0104 | 0.0265 | 0.232 | 70.78 | 97.97 |
3262.98 | 50 | 0.0116 | 0.00564 | < 0.000001 | 69.12 | 119.11 |
1897.01 | 14.98 | 0.0183 | 0.0122 | < 0.000001 | 41.59 | 26.61 |
2660.37 | 35.86 | 0.0197 | 0.0367 | 0.286 | 115.58 | 151.44 |
Table 4 Area under curve values of 19 differential protein profile and carcinoembryonic antigen
DPP | m/z | AUC |
P1 | 877.4 | 0.714 |
P2 | 1778.9 | 0.595 |
P3 | 1866.09 | 0.687 |
P4 | 1897.01 | 0.640 |
P5 | 2022.34 | 0.843 |
P6 | 2272.09 | 0.705 |
P7 | 2899.72 | 0.746 |
P8 | 2932.56 | 0.783 |
P9 | 2952.92 | 0.589 |
P10 | 3158.36 | 0.759 |
P11 | 3192.08 | 0.811 |
P12 | 3262.98 | 0.751 |
P13 | 3883.65 | 0.642 |
P14 | 4092.12 | 0.655 |
P15 | 4210.57 | 0.805 |
P16 | 4268.05 | 0.744 |
P17 | 4645.79 | 0.617 |
P18 | 7772.42 | 0.714 |
P19 | 2660.37 | 0.666 |
Table 5 Comparison of serum protein profiles between colorectal cancer group and colorectal polys group
Mass | DAve | PTTA | PWKW | PAD | Ave1 | Ave2 |
861.19 | 33.51 | 0.000077 | 0.00000468 | < 0.000001 | 36.09 | 69.6 |
4475.16 | 87.57 | 0.000186 | 0.00000468 | 0.00000185 | 96.92 | 184.49 |
2863.23 | 37.14 | 0.000332 | 0.00073 | < 0.000001 | 88.71 | 51.57 |
845.16 | 4.89 | 0.000376 | 0.0000351 | 0.00000115 | 7.69 | 12.59 |
4210.83 | 278.83 | 0.000672 | 0.00073 | 0.135 | 702.87 | 981.7 |
2022.52 | 251.03 | 0.000672 | 0.0167 | < 0.000001 | 353.51 | 102.48 |
866.41 | 9.71 | 0.00209 | 0.000277 | < 0.000001 | 15.5 | 25.21 |
2899.88 | 12.32 | 0.00232 | 0.0000748 | < 0.000001 | 38.41 | 26.09 |
1072.04 | 5.17 | 0.0032 | 0.000277 | < 0.000001 | 8.66 | 13.83 |
2106.07 | 12.84 | 0.00374 | 0.0000351 | < 0.000001 | 35.74 | 48.59 |
4645.62 | 24.65 | 0.00634 | 0.00872 | 0.0751 | 65.03 | 89.68 |
2953.55 | 28.69 | 0.0112 | 0.0167 | 0.114 | 77.95 | 106.64 |
2661.25 | 41.77 | 0.0134 | 0.0137 | 0.0322 | 121.96 | 163.73 |
877.3 | 6.11 | 0.0278 | 0.0000078 | < 0.000001 | 5.81 | 11.92 |
Table 6 Coordinate values and total contribution values of seven peaks in principal component analysis
m/z | 1866.45 | 1945.58 | 2022.52 | 2082.82 | 4210.83 | 5906.31 | 7767.55 |
Loading 1 | -0.05 | -0.35 | -0.2 | -0.225 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 0.25 |
Loading 2 | 0.17 | -0.4 | 0.81 | -0.17 | -0.22 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
Loading 3 | -0.015 | 0.14 | -0.1 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.36 | -0.9 |
TC | 5.45 | 25.93 | 24.36 | 15.52 | 20.08 | 44.84 | 23.07 |
Table 7 The level comparison between classification tree diagnostic model validation and carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9
Index | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Classification tree | 81.8 | 66.7 |
CEA | 55.6 | 91.3 |
CA-199 | 65.4 | 65.2 |
- Citation: Wang HJ, Xie YB, Zhang PJ, Jiang T. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum-based proteomics for colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(8): 1562-1573
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i8/1562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1562