Zhan TC, Zhang DK, Gu J, Li M. Surgical complications after different therapeutic approaches for locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(5): 393-403 [PMID: 31139309 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i5.393]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ming Li, MD, Professor, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Colorectal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, China. limingmd@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2019; 11(5): 393-403 Published online May 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i5.393
Table 1 Definition of postoperative surgical complications (during admission and 30 d thereafter)
Definition
Anastomotic leakage
Any gas or feces collection around the anastomosis after low anterior resection in the drainage tubes; clinical suspicion confirmed by surgery
Perineal wound complications
Perineal wound dehiscence and wound necrosis after abdominoperineal resection resulting from infection
Ileus
Absence of bowel sounds or defecation after 5 d following surgery
Bleeding
Gastrointestinal or abdominal hemorrhage, decrease in hemoglobin level directly after surgery treated conservatively with blood transfusion or by reintervention
Intra-abdominal abscess
Any intra-abdominal fluid collection unrelated to the anastomosis or perineal wound
Table 2 Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications
Grade
Definition
I
Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiologic interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are drugs including antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics and diuretics, and electrolytes and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside.
II
Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included.
III
Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention
Table 4 Postoperative complications (events during admission and 30 d thereafter)
Complications
Treatment group
No. of patients
Total
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3a
Grade 3b
Grade 4a
Grade 4b
Grade 5
P value
Anastomotic leakage (LAR)
1
236
16
10
6
0.411
2
151
9
3
6
3
507
23
16
7
Perineal wound complications (APR)
1
110
13
9
3
1
< 0.001
2
108
29
14
13
2
3
85
8
4
3
1
Ileus
1
346
11
2
5
4
0.069
2
259
14
13
1
3
592
14
2
12
Bleeding
1
346
10
1
8
1
0.485
2
259
10
2
7
3
592
14
2
10
2
Intra-abdominal abscess
1
346
12
2
5
4
1
0.932
2
259
10
5
2
3
3
592
20
3
8
6
3
Abdominal wound complications
1
346
10
7
2
1
0.474
2
259
10
6
4
3
592
14
11
2
1
Urological complications
1
346
17
10
4
3
0.154
2
259
16
5
8
3
3
592
20
12
6
2
Intestinal necrosis
1
346
2
2
0.689
2
259
3
2
1
3
592
4
4
Gastrointestinal perforation
1
346
0
1.000
2
259
0
3
592
0
Intravenous line infection
1
346
8
8
0.641
2
259
8
8
3
592
12
12
Stoma complications
1
269
11
4
7
0.702
2
228
14
3
11
3
119
5
2
3
General complications
1
346
36
21
15
0.520
2
259
34
17
17
3
592
54
28
25
1
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of anastomotic leakage
Characteristics
Anastomotic leakage
χ2
OR
95%CI of Exp(B)
P value
Age
1.748
1.542
0.812–2.928
0.186
Sex
1.081
1.410
0.738–2.695
0.299
Distance from anal verge
0.508
1.276
0.653–2.496
0.476
Pathological T stage
13.089
2.620
1.555–4.415
< 0.001
Pathological N stage
1.402
0.768
0.496–1.189
0.236
Preoperative radiotherapy
14.029
0.001
Long course CRT/surgery directly
10.931
3.624
1.689–7.775
0.001
short course RT/surgery directly
9.614
5.150
1.828–14.515
0.002
diverting stoma
15.804
6.211
2.525–15.385
< 0.001
Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of perineal wound complications
Characteristics
Perineal wound complications
χ2
OR
95%CI of Exp(B)
P value
Age
1.576
1.508
0.794–2.865
0.209
Sex
1.542
1.513
0.787–2.907
0.214
Distance from anal verge
1.045
1.779
0.590–5.376
0.307
Pathological T stage
0.391
1.121
0.784–1.602
0.532
Pathological N stage
0.791
1.227
0.782–1.927
0.374
Preoperative radiotherapy
16.757
<0.001
long course CRT/surgery directly
1.166
1.692
0.651–4.394
0.280
short course RT/surgery directly
13.184
5.565
2.203–14.057
<0.001
Citation: Zhan TC, Zhang DK, Gu J, Li M. Surgical complications after different therapeutic approaches for locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(5): 393-403