Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2019; 11(4): 335-347
Published online Apr 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i4.335
Published online Apr 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i4.335
Table 1 Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers
Clinical / pathological features | n |
Gender | |
Male | 718 |
Female | 477 |
Age (yr) | |
≤ 60 | 578 |
> 60 | 617 |
Tumor grade | |
G1 | 42 |
G2 | 857 |
G3 | 296 |
Tumor stage | |
pT1 | 32 |
pT2 | 175 |
pT3 | 937 |
pT4 | 51 |
Nodal status | |
pN0 | 593 |
pN1 | 296 |
pN2 | 306 |
Tumor type | |
Tubular carcinoma | 1089 |
Mucinous carcinoma | 106 |
Localization | |
Ascending colon | 273 |
Transverse colon | 32 |
Descending colon | 56 |
Sigmoid | 289 |
Rectum | 545 |
Total number | 1195 |
Table 2 Distribution of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 staining in 1195 colorectal adenocarcinomas
Staining pattern | Number of cases | Positive rate |
IHC 3+ | 31 | 2.6% |
IHC 2+ | 105 | 8.8% |
IHC 1+ | 475 | 39.7% |
IHC 0 | 584 | 48.9% |
Table 3 Concordance between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression by Immunohistochemical staining and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization
IHC score | HER2 gene amplification (FISH) | % HER2 gene amplification | |
Positive | Negative | ||
1+ (n = 10) | 0 | 10 | 0% |
2+ (n = 102) | 12 | 90 | 11.8% |
3+ (n = 29) | 24 | 5 | 82.8% |
Table 4 Association of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene status with clinicopathological features n (%)
Clinicopathological features | HER2 status | P-value | |
HER2 negative | HER2 positive | ||
Gender | 0.441 | ||
Male | 616 (96.2) | 24 (3.8) | |
Female | 406 (97.1) | 12 (2.9) | |
Age (yr) | 0.272 | ||
≤ 60 | 501 (96.0) | 21 (4.0) | |
> 60 | 521 (97.2) | 15 (2.8) | |
Tumor grade | 0.784 | ||
1 | 39 (97.5) | 1 (2.5) | |
2 | 773 (96.7) | 26 (3.3) | |
3 | 210 (95.9) | 9 (4.1) | |
Histology | 0.762 | ||
Tubular | 937 (96.5) | 34 (3.5) | |
Mucinous/other types | 85 (97.7) | 2 (2.3) | |
Tumor site | 0.819 | ||
Colon | 548 (96.5) | 20 (3.5) | |
Rectal | 474 (96.7) | 16 (3.3) | |
Left-sided colon | 203 (88.3) | 27 (37.0) | 0.514 |
Right-sided colon | 292 (86.4) | 46 (63.0) | |
Depth of invasion | |||
T1 | 31 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.039 |
T2 | 165 (98.8) | 2 (1.2) | |
T3 | 815 (96.3) | 31 (3.7) | |
T4 | 11 (78.6) | 3 (21.4) | |
T1-2 | 196 (99.0) | 2 (1.0) | 0.001 |
T3-4 | 826 (96.0) | 34 (4.0) | |
Lymph node metastasis | |||
N0 | 541 (96.3) | 21 (3.7) | 0.260 |
N1 | 261 (98.1) | 5 (1.9) | |
N2 | 220 (95.7) | 10 (4.3) | |
No | 541 (96.3) | 21 (3.7) | 0.524 |
Yes | 481 (97.0) | 15 (3.0) | |
Distant metastasis | 0.028 | ||
No | 940 (96.9) | 30 (3.1) | |
Yes | 81 (92.0) | 7 (8.0) | |
Tumor stage | |||
(1)I-II | 192 (98.5) | 2 (1.0) | 0.012 |
III | 749 (96.5) | 27 (3.5) | |
IV | 81 (92.0) | 7 (8.0) | |
(3)I-II | 192 (99.0) | 2 (1.0) | 0.044 |
III-IV | 830 (96.1) | 34 (3.9) |
Table 5 Overall survival based on clinicopathological features
Clinicopathological features | Patients | Events | Median survival (95%CI), mo | P-value |
Gender | 0.707 | |||
Male | 640 | 144 | NA | |
Female | 418 | 100 | NA | |
Age (yr) | ||||
≤ 60 | 522 | 116 | NA | 0.591 |
> 60 | 536 | 128 | NA | |
≤ 65 | 661 | 138 | NA | 0.027 |
> 65 | 397 | 106 | NA | |
Tumor site | 0.457 | |||
Colon | 568 | 133 | NA | |
Rectal | 490 | 111 | NA | |
Tumor grade | 0.000 | |||
1-2 | 839 | 176 | NA | |
3 | 219 | 68 | NA | |
Histology | 0.000 | |||
Tubular | 971 | 205 | NA | |
Mucinous/ Other types | 87 | 39 | 54.90 | |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.000 | |||
No | 562 | 61 | NA | |
Yes | 496 | 183 | NA | |
Tumor stage | 0.000 | |||
I-II | 198 | 13 | NA | |
III-IV | 860 | 231 | NA | |
HER2 protein overexpression by IHC | ||||
IHC (-) | 935 | 221 | NA | 0.220 |
IHC (+) | 123 | 23 | NA | |
HER2 gene amplification by FISH | ||||
Positive | 1022 | 234 | NA | 0.458 |
Negative | 36 | 10 | NA |
- Citation: Wang XY, Zheng ZX, Sun Y, Bai YH, Shi YF, Zhou LX, Yao YF, Wu AW, Cao DF. Significance of HER2 protein expression and HER2 gene amplification in colorectal adenocarcinomas. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(4): 335-347
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i4/335.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i4.335