Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2019; 11(11): 1054-1064
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1054
Published online Nov 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1054
Table 1 Patient characteristics
L-EFTR | S-EFTR | E-EFTR | P value | ||
Female, n (%) | 27 (75) | 8 (29.6) | 8 (29.6) | 11 (40.7) | 0.554 |
Age (yr) | 55.8 ± 10.20 | 57.7 ± 8.53 | 5.35 ± 8.91 | 57.2 ± 12.83 | 0.535 |
Tumor size (mm) | 9.0 ± 3.98 | 6.5 ± 1.96 | 12.6 ± 4.42 | 9.6 ± 3.45 | 0.505 |
Table 2 Operation time, cost, and en-bloc resection and complication rates
L-EFTR | S-EFTR | E-EFTR | P value | |
Total operation duration (min) | 27.2 ± 26.28 | 14.0 ± 8.19 | 33.0 ± 21.99 | 0.148 |
Operation duration of tumor resection (min) | 18.4 ± 26.31 | 4.7 ± 3.39 | 23.6 ± 13.74 | 0.085 |
Operation duration of defect closure (min) | 8.8 ± 4.39 | 9.3 ± 5.07 | 9.4 ± 9.10 | 0.965 |
Total procedure cost (CNY) | 5970.7 ± 3465.27 | 5852.0 ± 6438.25 | 15837.5 ± 7212.96 | < 0.001 |
Cost of tumor resection (CNY) | 3952.2 ± 1866.49 | 525.0 ± 0 | 5253.5 ± 2200.48 | < 0.001 |
Cost of defect closure (CNY) | 2018.8 ± 3232.47 | 5237.0 ± 6438.25 | 10584.0 ± 5857.06 | 0.001 |
En-bloc resection rate, % | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Complication rate, % | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 Cost comparison for the whole procedure
Total procedure cost | |||||
β | Standard error | Standardization coefficient | 95%CI | P value | |
L-EFTR vs S-EFTR | 7220.69 | 2138.94 | 0.766 | (2743.83, 11697.54) | 0.003 |
L-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -8556.61 | 2124.56 | -0.593 | (-12962.67, -4150.55) | 0.001 |
S-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -14876.08 | 2282.57 | -0.896 | (-19714.91, -10037.26) | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Cost comparison for tumor resection
Cost of tumor resection | |||||
β | Standard error | Standardization coefficient | 95%CI | P value | |
L-EFTR vs S-EFTR | 3653.83 | 913.13 | 0.809 | (1742.63, 5565.02) | 0.001 |
L-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -1277.22 | 905.56 | -0.310 | (-3155.24, 600.79) | 0.172 |
S-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -4777.27 | 820.07 | -0.835 | (-6515.75, -3038.80) | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Cost comparison for defect closure
Cost of defect closure | |||||
β | Standard error | Standardization coefficient | 95%CI | P value | |
L-EFTR vs S-EFTR | 3567.39 | 2099.27 | 0.364 | (-826.43, 7961.20) | 0.106 |
L-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -7278.81 | 1843.43 | -0.591 | (-11101.85, -3455.76) | 0.001 |
S-EFTR vs E-EFTR | -10098.81 | 1835.18 | -0.785 | (-13989.22, -6208.40) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Ge N, Hu JL, Yang F, Yang F, Sun SY. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating small tumors originating from the muscularis propria in the gastric fundus: An improvement in technique over 15 years. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11(11): 1054-1064
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v11/i11/1054.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1054