Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2018; 10(8): 211-220
Published online Aug 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i8.211
Published online Aug 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i8.211
Table 1 Studies for pancreatic cancer
n | Age | No. of hepatic metastases | Median size of liver metastases | Chemotherapy | Mortality rate | |
Hackert et al[39], 2017 | 85 | 60 | 96% had 3 lesions 3 had > 3 lesions | 31% had 1-2 cm 43% had < 1 cm | 74% received Adjuvant gemcitabine or 5 FU | 2.90% |
Crippa et al[34], 2016 | 11 | 65 (35-80) | 10% had 1 28% had 1-5 61% had > 5 | NA | Neoadjuvant gemcitabine (14%), 30% gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel while 66% had FOLFIRINOX, PEFG, PEXG or PDXG | 0 |
Tachezy et al[38], 2016 | 69 | 65 (31-83) | 2 (1-11) | NA | Neoadjuvant gemcitabine in 4% or FOLFIRINOX in 14%. Adjuvant in 80%, 80% got gemcitabine and 7% FOLFIRINOX | 1% |
Zanini et al[35], 2015 | 15 | 55 (52-64) | 2 (1-3) 60% had 1 lesion | 2.2 cm (1.8-2.5) | Adjuvant gemcitabine | 0 |
Klein et al[33], 2012 | 22 | 57.5 (31-78) | NA | NA | Adjuvant gemcitabine | 0 |
Dünschede et al[40], 2010 | 9 | 55 (39-72) | 3 (1-5) | 3.5 (1-9) | 0 | |
Gleisner et al[37], 2007 | 17 | 64.7 ± 11.4 | 1 (1-1) | 0.6 (0.3-1.2) | 6 received 5FU or gemcitabine | 9.10% |
Shrikhande et al[36], 1996 | 11 | 65 (60-74) | 2 (1-3) | NA | Adjuvant Gemcitabine or 5FU or radiation | 0 |
Table 2 Results by outcome for pancreatic cancer
N | Median OS(mo) | 95%CI | N | Median OS (mo) | 95%CI | P-value | |
Resection | No resection | ||||||
Positive studies | |||||||
Hackert et al[39] | 85 | 12.3 | NA | ||||
Tachezy et al[38] | 69 | 14 | 10.8-18.2 | 69 | 7.5 | 4.9–10.2 | < 0.001 |
Crippa et al[34] | 11 | 39 | 116 | 11 | < 0.0001 | ||
Klein et al[33] | 22 | 16.6 | NA | ||||
Yamada et al[75] | 11 | 10.1 | 28 | 6.8 | NS | ||
Shrikhande et al[36] | 11 | 11.4 | 7.8-16.5 | 118 | 5.9 | 5.4-7.6 | 0.04 |
Negative studies | |||||||
Zanini et al[35] | 15 | 9.1 | 8.6-9.7 | NA | |||
Dünschede et al[40] | 9 | 8 (4-16) | 5 | 11 (10-12) | |||
Gleisner et al[37] | 22 | 5.9 | 66 | 5.6 | 0.46 | ||
Takada et al[42] | 11 | 6 (2-10) | 33 | 3 (2-9) |
Table 3 Studies for biliary tract cancer
N | Age (yr) | No. and size of hepatic metastases | Treatment | Median OS (mo) | Mortality Rate | Survival rate % | |
Kurosaki et al[47], 2011 | Distal bile duct (n = 7) Ampullary cancer (n = 6) | 65 ± 10 | Median no = 2 (1-3) Median size 3 cm (1.8-6 cm) | Adjuvant cisplatin + 5 FU or gemcitabine or S1 (n = 10) | Bile duct = 14 Ampullary = 20 | - | 5-yr = 44.9% |
Bresadola et al[49], 2011 | Gall bladder (n = 5) Papilla of Vater (n = 3) Biliary tract (n = 1) | 56 (46-64) | - | - | Gall bladder = 5 (1-12) Papilla of Vater = 7 (5-71) Biliary tract = 17 | 3% | |
de Jong et al[48], 2010 | Ampullary (n = 10) Duodenal (n = 5) Biliary (n = 5) Pancreas (n = 20) | 63.0 ± 10.6 | Median no 1(1-5) and median size 0.7 (0.2-5.9) | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (pancreatic n = 4 ampullary n = 2 duodenal n = 1) Adjuvant chemotherapy n = 22 (55%) Gemcitabine (n = 14) 5-fluruoracil (n = 4), cyclophosphamide (n = 2) Combination irinotecan (n = 3) | Intestinal type = 23 Pancreatobiliary = 13 | 5% | 3-yr survival Intestinal tumours = 33% Pancreatobiliary tumours = 8% |
Wakai et al[45], 2008 | Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; adeno- carcinoma (n = 2) Gall bladder; adeno-squamous (n = 1) | 63 (35-79) | - | - | Bile duct = 8 and 15 gall Bladder = 9 | 21% | 5 yr = Extra hepatic 12% Gall bladder 9% |
Gleisner et al[37], 2007 | Ampullary (n = 1) Duodenal (n = 2) Distal bile duct (n = 2) Histology Adenocarcinoma | 65(53–82) | Median no = 1 and median size 0.6 cm (0.3-1.2) | FOLFIRI given to duodenal cancer | 9.9 | 9.10% | 3 yr = 6.7% |
Adam et al[13], 2006 | Ampullary (n = 15) Pancreatic (n = 41) Gallbladder (n = 23) Biliary (n = 5) | 53 (10-87) | - | - | Ampullary = 38 | - | 5 yr Ampullary = 46% The entire cohort = 27% |
Fuji et al[46], 1999 | Bile duct (n = 2) (adenocarcinoma) Ampulla of vater (n = 2) Duodenal cancer (n = 3) | 58 (36-67) | Median no = 1 | - | 20 | - | 3 yr = 28% |
Table 4 Results by outcome for biliary tract cancer
N | Median OS (mo) | 95%CI | N | Median OS (mo) | 95%CI | |
Resection | No resection or palliative surgery | |||||
Positive studies | ||||||
Fujii et al[46] | 7 | 20 | NA | |||
Kurosaki et al[47] | 13 | 28-60 | 9 | 6-12 | ||
Niguma et al[50] | 10 | 17.2 | 12 | 4.4 | ||
de Jong et al[48] | 8 | 17-19 | 7 | 7 | < 0.01 | |
Adam et al[13] | 15 | 38 | NA | |||
Negative studies | ||||||
Gleisner et al[37] | 5 | 9.9 | 6 | 0.43 | ||
Wakai et al[45] | 3 | 9 | NA | |||
Bresadola et al[49] | 7 | 15 | NA |
- Citation: Lee RC, Kanhere H, Trochsler M, Broadbridge V, Maddern G, Price TJ. Pancreatic, periampullary and biliary cancer with liver metastases: Should we consider resection in selected cases? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10(8): 211-220
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v10/i8/211.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i8.211