Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2025; 17(2): 101780
Published online Feb 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.101780
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal traditional serrated adenomas with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma in a Korean population
Ki-Hyun Kim, Eun Myung, Hyung Hoon Oh, Chan-Muk Im, Young-Eun Seo, Je-Seong Kim, Chae-June Lim, Ga-Ram You, Sung-Bum Cho, Wan-Sik Lee, Young-Eun Joo, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun-eup 58128, South Korea
Myung-Giun Noh, Kyung-Hwa Lee, Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun-eup 58128, South Korea
ORCID number: Ki-Hyun Kim (0009-0007-8558-0540); Eun Myung (0009-0006-4845-0926); Hyung Hoon Oh (0000-0002-3323-495X); Young-Eun Joo (0000-0003-0422-2439).
Co-first authors: Ki-Hyun Kim and Eun Myung.
Author contributions: Kim KH and Myung E wrote the main text, they contributed equally as co-first author; Kim KH, Myung E, and Joo YE generated the idea and performed the computations; Oh HH, Im CM, Seo YE, Kim JS, Lim CJ, and You GR collected and analyzed the data; Oh HH, Im CM, and Kim KH collected the endoscopic images; Noh MG and Lee KH collected the pathological images; Cho SB, Lee WS, and Joo YE reviewed the analyzed statistical results; Joo YE supervised all processes; and all authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Supported by The First Research in Lifetime Grant from Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, No. HCRI23005.
Institutional review board statement: The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (No. CNUHH-2024-181).
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the first or corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Young-Eun Joo, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, No. 264 Seoyang Road, Hwasun-eup 58128, South Korea. yejoo@chonnam.ac.kr
Received: September 26, 2024
Revised: October 28, 2024
Accepted: November 29, 2024
Published online: February 15, 2025
Processing time: 114 Days and 4.2 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is a rare and precancerous lesion of colorectal cancer. The clinical and endoscopic differentiations between TSAs without dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (TSAOs) and TSAs with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (TSADs) remain unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics of colorectal TSAs and compare the characteristics of TSAOs with those of TSADs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 193 patients who underwent endoscopic resection and received a pathologic diagnosis of TSA. We reviewed the medical, endoscopic, and histopathologic records of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of TSAs between January 2010 and December 2023.

RESULTS

TSAs were more frequently located in the rectosigmoid colon. Most TSAs had 0-Ip, 0-Isp, or 0-Is morphologies. The TSAD lesions were larger than TSAO lesions. TSAD lesions more commonly had a red color and an irregular border than TSAO lesions. TSAOs were usually treated using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, whereas TSADs were treated using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and surgery. Post-polypectomy bleeding was more common with TSADs than with TSAOs. Univariate analysis showed that gastrointestinal bleeding, red color, 0-IIa, irregular border, and lobular mucosal surface were significantly associated with TSADs. Multivariate analysis showed that gastrointestinal bleeding, an irregular border, and a lobular mucosal surface were significantly associated with TSADs.

CONCLUSION

TSAs with gastrointestinal bleeding, an irregular border, and a lobular mucosal surface are associated with an increased risk of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.

Key Words: Traditional serrated adenoma; Dysplasia; Carcinoma; Endoscopic features; Gastrointestinal bleeding

Core Tip: Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is recognized as a precancerous lesion. However, the endoscopic features associated with the presence or absence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma have not yet been clearly defined. In our study, we analyzed the medical records of 193 patients diagnosed with TSAs following endoscopic resection at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. In our study, TSAs with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma was associated with gastrointestinal bleeding, an irregular border, and a lobular mucosal surface. These findings are expected to serve as important factors in determining the treatment strategy for the lesions.



INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the world[1]. CRC develops from the accumulation of multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations in the normal colorectal epithelium. Approximately 70% of sporadic CRCs develop via the adenoma-carcinoma sequence pathway, which leads to the transformation of the normal colorectal epithelium to conventional adenomatous polyps, low-grade to high-grade dysplasia, and finally carcinoma[2,3]. Recent reports suggest that colorectal serrated lesions with characteristic sawtooth-like in-folding of the epithelial crypts lead to the development of CRC via the serrated neoplasia pathway that progresses by methylating tumor suppressor genes. The serrated neoplasia pathway has increasingly been recognized as an important alternative pathway accounting for up to 30% of sporadic CRC[4-8]. Colorectal serrated lesions were classified into the following 4 categories in 2019 by the World Health Organization: Hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and unclassified serrated adenomas. HPs account for approximately 75% of all diagnosed serrated lesions but rarely progress to cancer. SSLs represent the second most diagnosed serrated lesions with a prevalence of 5%-10% in the general population. Of all serrated lesions, TSAs have a prevalence is < 1% in the general population undergoing screening colonoscopy. SSLs and TSAs are the precursor epithelial polyps that can develop into CRC[4-8]. Therefore, endoscopists should be aware of the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of SSLs and TSAs to ensure early detection, appropriate resection, and an optimal surveillance interval. In particular, if the precancerous lesion is accompanied by dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, complete resection should be performed to prevent recurrence and progression to cancer.

According to previously published studies, TSAs, similar to HPs, commonly occur in the left colon. TSAs are larger than SSLs and have a polypoid appearance, unlike SSLs. TSAs primarily affect patients aged > 50 years and prevalence does not differ by sex. Histologically, TSAs show elongated, narrow penicillate nuclei with dispersed chromatin and eosinophilic cytoplasm, ectopic crypt foci, and typical slit-like clefted serrations[9-13]. However, because of their rarity, the clinical and endoscopic features of TSAs have not yet been fully elucidated. In particular, comparison of clinical and endoscopic characteristics of TSAs without dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (TSAOs) and TSAs with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (TSADs) is important for the development of future treatment options to prevent recurrence and progression of TSAs. Therefore, this study focused on assessing the clinical and endoscopic features of TSAs and compare the features between TSAOs with TSADs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and population

This retrospective study assessed consecutive patients with endoscopically resected lesions pathologically diagnosed as TSAO and TSAD at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea, between January 2010 and December 2023. A total of 193 TSA lesions were retrospectively analyzed for various clinicopathological characteristics by reviewing medical, endoscopic, and histopathologic records of enrolled patients. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (IRB No. CNUHH-2024-181).

Endoscopic examination and histologic analysis of TSAs

The patients were inspected with video colonoscopes (Olympus CF-240I, CF-H260, or CF-HQ290; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Three professional gastrointestinal endoscopists reviewed the endoscopic findings related to TSAs and assessed conventional white-light colonoscopy visuals. The endoscopic features were analyzed based on criteria validated by Mizuguchi et al[13], which included color assessments (white or red) (Figure 1A), border definitions (distinct or irregular) (Figure 1B), and mucosal surface characteristics (smooth or lobular) (Figure 1C). According to the Paris classification, superficial lesion morphology can be classified into three main categories: (1) Protruding (0-I); (2) Non-protruding and non-excavated (0-II); and (3) Excavated (0-III). Type 0-I lesions include sub-classifications of pedunculated (0-I), sessile (0-Is), or mixed (0-Isp) forms, while type 0-II lesions are categorized as slightly elevated (0-IIa), flat (0-IIb), or depressed (0-IIc). The histological analysis of TSAOs and TSADs was conducted separately by two gastrointestinal pathologists at our institution, following the 2019 World Health Organization criteria for features like villous and occasionally filiform architecture, eosinophilic cytoplasm, penicillate nuclei, ectopic crypts, undulant serration, and any clear demarcation with conventional adenoma-like regions. TSAs were categorized based on dysplastic changes as without dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma (Figure 2). In cases where histologic interpretations differed, the pathologists engaged in further discussions to reach an agreement.

Figure 1
Figure 1 White-light colonoscopy images of traditional serrated adenomas in a representative case. A: Color - white or red; B: Border - distinct or irregular; C: Surface - smooth or lobular.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Histopathologic features observed with hematoxylin and eosin staining of the resected specimens of traditional serrated adenomas. A: Traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) without dysplasia shows a saw-tooth appearance of the crypts with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and a basal/central elongated nucleus [hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, × 100]; B: TSA with low-grade dysplasia (HE staining, × 50); C: TSA with high-grade dysplasia (HE staining, × 100); D: TSA with adenocarcinoma (HE staining, × 50).
Statistical analysis

The clinical and endoscopic features of TSAOs and TSADs were analyzed through the χ² test, Student’s t-test, or analysis of variance, as appropriate. The data were summarized using proportions for categorical variables and mean values accompanied by SD for continuous variables. Furthermore, a binary logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the risk factors associated with TSADs. All statistical evaluations were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). A P value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS
Baseline characteristics of TSA patients

The baseline characteristics of TSA patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of enrolled patients was 63.2 ± 13.8 years (range: 18.0-89.0 years). The study patients group included 93 male (48.2%) and 100 female (51.8%). The mean body mass index was 23.9 ± 3.4 kg/m2 (range: 17.4-37.7 kg/m2). A history of alcohol consumption and smoking was noted in 104 (53.9%) and 59 (30.6%) patients, respectively. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were noted in 81 (42.0%), 40 (20.7%), and 31 (16.1%) patients, respectively. A total of 49 (25.4%) patients received anti-thrombotic medications, including aspirin, warfarin, or new oral anticoagulants. Of the total, 25 patients (12.9%) showed gastrointestinal symptoms including bleeding and obstruction. The mean size of TSAs was 18.1 ± 13.5 mm (range: 3.0-70.0 mm). Of the 193 detected TSA lesions, 134 lesions (69.4%) were localized in the rectosigmoid colon. The most common location was the rectum (74, 38.3%), followed by the sigmoid colon (60, 31.1%), ascending colon (27, 14.0%), transverse colon (20, 10.4%), descending colon (9, 4.7%), and cecum (3, 1.6%). The lesions were most commonly white (82, 42.5%) and red (111, 57.5%). Based on the Paris classification (32), the numbers of patients categorized as 0-Ip and 0-Isp, 0-Is, 0-IIa, and 0-IIa + IIc were 85 (44.1%), 67 (34.7%), 34 (17.6%), and 7 (3.6%), respectively. With regard to endoscopic features, 164 (85.0%) had a distinct border, whereas 29 (15.0%) had an irregular border, and 89 (46.1%) had a mucosal surface, whereas 104 (53.9%) had a lobular mucosal surface. According to histologic examination, 122 (63.2%) lesions were TSAOs, and 71 (36.8%) lesions were TSADs [low-grade dysplasia, 51 (26.4%); high-grade dysplasia, 14 (7.3%); adenocarcinoma, 6 (3.1%)]. With regard to the prevalence of synchronous colorectal neoplasms in patients with TSA, 62 (32.1%) had conventional adenoma with low-grade dysplasia, 17 (8.8%) had HP, 13 (6.7%) had conventional adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 2 (1.0%) had SSLs. TSAs were resected using polypectomy such as cold biopsy (1, 0.5%), cold endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (6, 3.1%), conventional EMR (121, 62.7%), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (52, 26.9%), or surgery (11, 5.7%). The post-procedure bleeding rate was 47.7% (92/193) and the perforation rate was 0.5% (1/193) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with traditional serrated adenomas, n = 193.
Variables
n (%)
Patient-related factors
    Age (years), mean ± SD (range)63.2 ± 13.8 (18.0-89.0)
Sex
    Male93 (48.2)
    Female100 (51.8)
    BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD (range)23.9 ± 3.4 (17.4-37.7)
Obesity
    Underweight (< 18.5)6 (3.1)
    Normal (18.5 ≤ n < 23.0)76 (39.4)
    Overweight (23.0 ≤ n < 25.0)45 (23.3)
    Obesity (≥ 25.0)66 (34.2)
Alcohol
    None89 (46.1)
    Quit51 (26.4)
    Current53 (27.5)
Smoking
    None134 (69.4)
    Quit34 (17.6)
    Current25 (13.0)
Hypertension81 (42.0)
Diabetes mellitus40 (20.7)
Dyslipidemia31 (16.1)
Anti-platelet agent (n = 49, 25.4%)
    Aspirin32 (16.6)
    Warfarin/NOAC5 (2.6)
    Dual anti-platelet agent12 (6.2)
    History of colorectal cancer27 (14.0)
Symptom
    None168 (87.0)
    Gastrointestinal bleeding24 (12.4)
    Obstruction1 (0.5)
Lesion-related factors
    Size (mm), mean ± SD (range)18.1 ± 13.5 (3.0-70.0)
    Diminutive (1-5 mm)16 (8.3)
    Small (6-9 mm)46 (23.8)
    Large (> 10 mm)131 (67.9)
Location
    Cecum3 (1.6)
    Ascending colon27 (14)
    Transverse colon20 (10.4)
    Descending colon9 (4.7)
    Sigmoid colon60 (31.1)
    Rectum74 (38.3)
Color
    White82 (42.5)
    Red111 (57.5)
Morphology (Paris classification)
    0-Ip, 0-Isp85 (44.1)
    0-Is67 (34.7)
    0-IIa34 (17.6)
    0-IIa + IIc7 (3.6)
Border
    Distinct164 (85.0)
    Irregular29 (15.0)
Mucosal surface
    Smooth89 (46.1)
    Lobular104 (53.9)
Dysplasia (n = 71, 36.8%)
    LGD51 (26.4)
    HGD14 (7.3)
    ADC6 (3.1)
Associated lesion (n = 104, 53.9%)
    Hyperplastic polyp17 (8.8)
    Sessile serrated lesion2 (1.0)
    Traditional serrated adenoma10 (5.2)
    Conventional adenoma with LGD62 (32.1)
    Conventional adenoma with HGD/ADC13 (6.7)
Procedure-related factors
Removal methods
    Cold biopsy1 (0.5)
    Cold snare EMR6 (3.1)
    Conventional EMR121 (62.7)
    ESD52 (26.9)
    Operation11 (5.7)
    Observation2 (1.0)
Post-procedural complications (n = 93, 48.2%)
    Bleeding92 (47.7)
    Perforation1 (0.8)
Treatment methods of complications
    APC18 (9.3)
    Coagrasper35 (18.1)
    Hemoclipping40 (20.7)
Comparison of clinical characteristics of TSAOs and TSADs

The cohort of TSAs consisted of 122 TSAOs and 71 TSADs. Regarding patient-related factors, no statistically significant differences were observed between the TSAO and TSAD groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, prevalence of obesity, alcohol, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, use of anti-thrombotic, gastrointestinal symptoms, and history of CRC. With regard to lesion-related factors, the mean tumor size was significantly higher in TSADs than in TSAOs (P = 0.003). The 0-Is lesions occurred more frequently in the TSAD group, whereas 0-IIa lesions occurred more frequently in the TSAO group (P = 0.005). Analysis of endoscopic features showed that a red lesion, an irregular border, and a lobular mucosal surface were more commonly associated with TSADs than with TSAOs (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Non-neoplastic lesions such as HPs and neoplastic lesions such as SSL, TSA, and conventional adenomas with low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma were more commonly detected in the TSAD group than in the TSAO group (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in location, morphology, and mucosal surface between the TSAO and TSAD groups. With regard to procedural factors, conventional EMR, ESD, and surgery were more commonly performed in the TSAD group, whereas conventional EMR was more frequently performed in the TSAO group (P < 0.001). Additionally, post-procedural bleeding was more frequently reported in TSADs compared to TSAOs (P < 0.001), and hemoclipping for hemostasis was performed more often in the TSAD group (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics between traditional serrated adenomas without and with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, n (%).
Variables
TSAOs (n = 122)
TSADs (n = 71)
P value
Age (years), mean ± SD (range)61.1 ± 14.5 (18.0-84.0)66.7 ± 11.8 (36.0-85.1)0.072
Sex0.234
    Male63 (51.6)30 (42.3)
    Female59 (48.4)41 (57.7)
BMI (n = 499), mean ± SD (range)24.1 ± 3.7 (17.4-37.7)23.7 ± 2.9 (17.7-30.6)0.128
Obesity0.726
    Underweight (< 18.5)3 (2.5)3 (4.2)
    Normal (18.5-23.0)46 (37.7)30 (42.3)
    Overweight (23.0-25.0)31 (25.4)14 (19.7)
    Obesity (≥ 25.0)42 (34.4)24 (33.8)
Alcohol0.177
    None52 (42.6)37 (52.1)
    Quit31 (25.4)20 (28.2)
    Current39 (32.0)14 (19.7)
Smoking0.681
    None82 (67.2)52 (73.2)
    Quit23 (18.9)11 (15.5)
    Current17 (13.9)8 (11.3)
    Hypertension45 (36.9)36 (50.7)0.061
    Diabetes mellitus29 (23.8)11 (15.5)0.171
    Dyslipidemia21 (17.2)10 (14.1)0.568
Anti-platelet agent (n = 49)0.521
    Aspirin23 (18.9)9 (12.7)
    Warfarin/NOAC3 (2.5)2 (2.8)
    Dual anti-platelet agent9 (7.4)3 (4.2)
History of colorectal cancer16 (13.1)11 (15.5)0.671
Symptom0.051
    None111 (91.0)57 (80.3)
    Gastrointestinal bleeding10 (8.2)14 (19.7)
    Obstruction1 (0.8)0 (0.0)
Lesion-related factors
    Size (mm), mean ± SD (range)12.7 ± 8.0 (3.0-55.0)27.3 ± 15.9 (5.0-70.0)0.003
    Diminutive (1-5 mm)16 (13.1)0 (0.0)
    Small (6-9 mm)31 (25.4)15 (21.1)
    Large (> 10 mm)75 (61.5)56 (78.9)
Location0.177
    Cecum1 (0.8)2 (2.8)
    Ascending colon13 (10.7)14 (19.7)
    Transverse colon12 (9.8)8 (11.3)
    Descending colon8 (6.6)1 (1.4)
    Sigmoid colon42 (34.4)18 (25.4)
    Rectum46 (37.7)28 (39.4)
Color0.001
    White63 (51.6)19 (26.8)
    Red59 (48.4)52 (73.2)
Morphology (Paris classification)0.005
    0-Ip, 0-Isp53 (43.4)32 (45.1)
    0-Is35 (28.7)32 (45.1)
    0-IIa30 (24.6)4 (5.6)
    0-IIa + IIc4 (3.3)3 (4.2)
Border< 0.001
    Distinct114 (93.4)50 (70.4)
    Irregular8 (6.6)21 (29.6)
Mucosal surface0.058
    Smooth62 (50.8)27 (38.0)
    Lobular60 (49.2)44 (62.0)
Associated lesion (n = 104, 53.9%)
    Non-neoplastic lesions (n = 17, 8.8%)5 (4.2)12 (16.2)< 0.001
    Hyperplastic polyp5 (4.2)12 (16.2)
    Neoplastic lesions (n = 87, 45.1%)48 (40.3)39 (52.7)< 0.001
    Sessile serrated lesion1 (0.8)1 (1.4)
    Traditional serrated adenoma3 (2.5)7 (9.5)
    Conventional adenoma with LGD37 (31.1)25 (33.8)
    Conventional adenoma with HGD/ADC7 (5.9)6 (8.1)
Procedure-related factors
Removal methods< 0.001
    Cold biopsy1 (0.8)0 (0.0)
    Cold EMR6 (4.9)0 (0.0)
    Conventional EMR97 (79.5)24 (44.4)
    ESD13 (10.7)22 (40.7)
    Operation3 (2.5)8 (14.8)
    Observation2 (1.6)0 (0.0)
Post-procedural complications (n = 93, 48.2%)< 0.001
    Bleeding44 (36.1)48 (67.6)
    Perforation1 (0.8)0 (0.0)
Treatment method of complication< 0.001
    APC15 (12.3)3 (4.2)
    Coagrasper17 (13.9)18 (25.4)
    Hemoclipping13 (10.7)27 (38.0)
Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with TSADs

The univariate analysis results examining risk factors related to TSADs are summarized in Table 3. For patient-related factors, no significant associations were identified between dysplasia risk and variables such as gender or obesity. The proportion of patients experiencing gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in the TSAD group than in the TSAO group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.726; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.140-6.521; P = 0.024]. With regard to lesion-related factors, a red-colored lesion was positively associated with the risk of dysplasia (OR = 9.182; 95%CI: 4.062-20.759; P < 0.001) compared to a white-colored border. Based on the Paris classification of endoscopic morphology, there was a higher risk of dysplasia with the 0-IIa morphology (OR = 0.221; 95%CI: 0.071-0.685; P = 0.009) than with the 0-Ip and 0-Isp morphologies. The analysis of endoscopic features showed that an irregular border was positively associated with the risk of dysplasia (OR = 5.985; 95%CI: 2.484-14.423; P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with traditional serrated adenomas with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.
Variables
Odds ratio
95% confidence interval
P value
Sex
    Male0.6850.380-1.2360.209
    Female1.0
Obesity
    Normal (18.5-23.0)1.0
    Underweight (< 18.5)1.5330.290-8.1050.615
    Overweight (23.0-25.0)0.6920.317-1.5120.356
    Obesity (≥ 25.0)0.8760.444-1.7300.703
Symptom
    Gastrointestinal bleeding2.7261.140-6.5210.024
Color
    White1.0
    Red3.2091.735-5.934< 0.001
Morphology (Paris classification)
    0-Ip, 0-Isp1.0
    0-Is1.5140.791-2.9000.211
    0-IIa0.2210.071-0.6850.009
    0-IIa + IIc1.2420.261-5.9110.785
Border
    Distinct1.0
    Irregular5.9852.484-14.423< 0.001
Mucosal surface
    Smooth1.0
    Lobular1.6840.928-3.0570.087
Multivariate analysis of TSADs risk factors

The results of the multivariate analysis identifying risk factors associated with TSADs are summarized in Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that TSADs with gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 2.726; 95%CI: 1.022-7.824; P = 0.045), an irregular border (OR = 8.238; 95%CI: 2.606-26.040; P < 0.001), and lobular mucosal surface (OR = 2.529; 95%CI: 1.140-5.611; P = 0.022) are significantly associated with the risk of dysplasia (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with traditional serrated adenoma with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.
Variables
Odds ratio
95% confidence interval
P value
Symptom
    Gastrointestinal bleeding2.8281.022-7.8240.045
Color
    White1.0
    Red1.8890.896-3.9810.095
Morphology (Paris classification)
    0-Ip, 0-Isp1.0
    0-Is1.1210.528-2.3800.766
    0-IIa0.4970.150-1.6470.253
    0-IIa + IIc1.1760.213-6.4890.852
Border
    Distinct1.0
    Irregular7.3142.508-21.333< 0.001
Mucosal surface
    Smooth1.0
    Lobular2.4241.147-5.1250.020
DISCUSSION

TSAs are uncommon, serrated lesions that have a potential for malignant transformation[4-8]. However, owing to their rarity, research concerning the clinical and endoscopic features of TSAs and their association with the risk of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma is lacking. Therefore, we focused on the clinical and endoscopic characteristics based on the presence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in TSAs. TSAs commonly occur in patients aged > 50 years and have no significant predilection for either sex. TSAs are more commonly located in the distal colon. Endoscopically, they often present reddish, pedunculated or sessile lesions with pinecone-like or branch coral-shape and are usually > 5 mm in size[11-15]. In our study, the mean age of the enrolled patients was 63.2 years, and no significant differences were observed between sexes. Of the total, 74.1% of TSAs were localized in the rectosigmoid and descending colon, 57.5% had a red color, and 78.7% had pedunculated or sessile morphologies (0-Ip, 0-Isp, and 0-Is). The mean size of TSAs was 18.1 mm. Our observations for the location and morphology of TSAs are in line with those of other and our previous studies[16-20].

Previous studies have reported a cumulative CRC incidence of 1.34% in patients with TSA, which is similar to that in patients with conventional advanced adenoma, and 65.1% of patients with TSA were diagnosed with high-risk neoplasia at follow-up surveillance colonoscopy[17]. In TSAs, both conventional adenoma-like dysplasia and serrated dysplasia can be observed[19-22]. TSAs are hypothesized to acquire increasing degrees of cytological atypia before the development of CRC[10,23-25]. Therefore, endoscopists should be aware of the unique features of TSA, a precancerous lesion, to ensure their early detection and appropriate resection and an optimal surveillance interval. The differentiation between TSAOs and TSADs is clinically important. This distinction also has a significant effect on the choice of procedural methods for achieving complete removal of the lesions.

In our study, the mean tumor size was significantly higher in the TSAD than in the TSAO group. The analysis of endoscopic features showed that red color and an irregular border were more commonly found in the TSAD group than in the TSAO group. Lesions classified 0-Is were more frequently found in the TSAD group, whereas 0-IIa lesions were more frequently found in the TSAO group. Non-neoplastic and neoplastic precursor lesions were more commonly detected in the TSAD group than in the TSAO group. Previously, TSAs were larger in those with conventional epithelial dysplasia compared with those without. However, the gross morphology of TSAs did not differ according to the status of conventional epithelial dysplasia. Furthermore, contrary to our results, the frequency of synchronous precursor lesions was higher among TSAs with conventional epithelial dysplasia than in those without[11]. These differences in results could be attributed to the smaller sample size and the unavoidable selection bias in our study.

Although our results are inconsistent with those of previous studies, our study shows that the prevalence of neoplastic lesions is higher among TSADs than in TSAOs. Previous studies have associated the presence of SSLs with the presence of synchronous colorectal neoplastic lesions[26-28]. Furthermore, advanced adenomas featuring high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma were observed to be more prevalent in SSLs with dysplasia compared to those without dysplasia[28]. Furthermore, a previous study showed a statistically significant higher risk of synchronous advanced neoplasms detected colonoscopically with TSAs than without[12]. Therefore, patients with TSAs, such as patients with SSLs, need meticulous endoscopic observation to detect synchronous neoplastic lesions.

In our study, ESD was more frequently performed in TSADs, whereas EMR was more frequently performed in TSAOs. Because TSADs were larger and more commonly had irregular borders than TSAOs in our study, use of ESD was more likely for complete endoscopic resection. Post-procedural bleeding occurred more frequently in TSADs than in TSAOs, which could be attributed to neoangiogenesis that occurs during the transition to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma[28,29]. However, it is anticipated that various factors such as size and treatment methods may be associated with post-procedural bleeding, so further research is needed. On univariate analysis, gastrointestinal bleeding, red color, 0-IIa type morphology, and an irregular border were significantly associated with TSAD development. Lobular mucosal surface showed a weak positive association with TSADs although the association was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, gastrointestinal bleeding, irregular border, and lobular mucosal surface were significantly associated with TSADs.

Previous studies on TSA are available. However, most of these studies are a part of broader analyses of serrated lesions, which primarily focus on SSLs due to their higher prevalence. Furthermore, research specifically limited to TSAs tends to emphasize immunohistochemical analysis rather than endoscopic features. These analytical aspects are not readily predictable or applicable by endoscopists during endoscopic procedures. Our study is valuable as it highlights the endoscopic characteristics based on the presence or absence of dysplasia in TSAs, which I believe provides direct assistance in determining and planning endoscopic treatment strategies. Our study has some limitations. First, this study is a retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary hospital in Korea. Second, the TSAO and TSAD groups had heterogeneous patient populations, which resulted in selection biases. Owing to these limitations, our findings may not be generalizable to the overall patient population. In future, large prospective, multicenter studies are needed to further validate of our findings.

CONCLUSION

TSAs exhibiting gastrointestinal bleeding, irregular borders, and lobular mucosal surfaces are associated with an increasing risk of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Consequently, these characteristics may serve as useful indicators for complete en bloc resection in immediate decision-making for the resection of TSAs.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country of origin: South Korea

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Tsuji Y S-Editor: Wei YF L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang YL

References
1.  Yu J, Feng Q, Kim JH, Zhu Y. Combined Effect of Healthy Lifestyle Factors and Risks of Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, and Colorectal Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:827019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Yu L, Zhang MM, Hou JG. Molecular and cellular pathways in colorectal cancer: apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation as key players. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022;57:1279-1290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Cao Y, Wang X. Effects of molecular markers on the treatment decision and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12:1191-1196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Mezzapesa M, Losurdo G, Celiberto F, Rizzi S, d'Amati A, Piscitelli D, Ierardi E, Di Leo A. Serrated Colorectal Lesions: An Up-to-Date Review from Histological Pattern to Molecular Pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:4461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Monreal-Robles R, Jáquez-Quintana JO, Benavides-Salgado DE, González-González JA. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum: a concise review. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2021;86:276-286.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Bell PD, Anderson JC, Srivastava A. The Frontiers of Serrated Polyps. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46:e64-e70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sacco M, De Palma FDE, Guadagno E, Giglio MC, Peltrini R, Marra E, Manfreda A, Amendola A, Cassese G, Dinuzzi VP, Pegoraro F, Tropeano FP, Luglio G, De Palma GD. Serrated lesions of the colon and rectum: Emergent epidemiological data and molecular pathways. Open Med (Wars). 2020;15:1087-1095.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bateman AC. The spectrum of serrated colorectal lesions-new entities and unanswered questions. Histopathology. 2021;78:780-790.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Chetty R. Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA): morphological questions, queries and quandaries. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69:6-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Bettington ML, Chetty R. Traditional serrated adenoma: an update. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:933-938.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Kim MJ, Lee EJ, Suh JP, Chun SM, Jang SJ, Kim DS, Lee DH, Lee SH, Youk EG. Traditional serrated adenoma of the colorectum: clinicopathologic implications and endoscopic findings of the precursor lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:898-911.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Duh E, Sowa P, Roberts MB, Karnes W. Traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) and the company they keep: TSA presence predicts advanced neoplasm states. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:1351-1354.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Mizuguchi Y, Tanaka Y, Cho H, Sekiguchi M, Takamaru H, Yamada M, Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Hashimoto T, Sekine S, Saito Y. Endoscopic features of isolated and traditional serrated adenoma-associated superficially serrated adenomas of the colorectum. Dig Endosc. 2022;34:153-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Kim J, Lee JY, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Koo JE, Lee HJ, Choe J, Byeon JS. Risk factors of traditional serrated adenoma and clinicopathologic characteristics of synchronous conventional adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:636-646.e9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lee SK, Chang HJ, Kim TI, Kim WH, Park CK, Chang DK, Park DI, Sohn JH, Byeon JS, Yang SK, Kim JO, Lee SH, Jin SY, Park CH, Baek IH, Eun CS, Han DS, Park SJ, Chang HK, Jeen YT, Kim HS, Park DH, Shin SJ, Chang MS. Clinicopathologic findings of colorectal traditional and sessile serrated adenomas in Korea: a multicenter study. Digestion. 2008;77:178-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Anderson JC, Srivastava A. Traditional serrated adenomas: what the endoscopist should know. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:647-650.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Trivedi M, Godil S, Demb J, Earles A, Bustamante R, Patterson OV, Gawron AJ, Kaltenbach T, Mahata S, Liu L, Gupta S. Baseline Characteristics and Longitudinal Outcomes of Traditional Serrated Adenomas: A Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:1637-1645.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Sekine S, Yamashita S, Yamada M, Hashimoto T, Ogawa R, Yoshida H, Taniguchi H, Kojima M, Ushijima T, Saito Y. Clinicopathological and molecular correlations in traditional serrated adenoma. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:418-427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Tanaka Y, Eizuka M, Uesugi N, Kawasaki K, Yamano H, Suzuki H, Matsumoto T, Sugai T. Traditional serrated adenoma has two distinct genetic pathways for molecular tumorigenesis with potential neoplastic progression. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55:846-857.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Gui H, Husson MA, Mannan R. Correlations of morphology and molecular alterations in traditional serrated adenoma. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2020;11:78-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  McCarthy AJ, Serra S, Chetty R. Traditional serrated adenoma: an overview of pathology and emphasis on molecular pathogenesis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2019;6:e000317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Kalimuthu SN, Chelliah A, Chetty R. From traditional serrated adenoma to tubulovillous adenoma and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;8:805-809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37:570-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 559]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 609]  [Article Influence: 30.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Snover DC. Update on the serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 439]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 466]  [Article Influence: 31.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Kim JH, Kang GH. Evolving pathologic concepts of serrated lesions of the colorectum. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54:276-289.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  IJspeert JE, de Wit K, van der Vlugt M, Bastiaansen BA, Fockens P, Dekker E. Prevalence, distribution and risk of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps at a center with a high adenoma detection rate and experienced pathologists. Endoscopy. 2016;48:740-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Shiu SI, Kashida H, Komeda Y. The prevalence of sessile serrated lesion in the colorectum and its relationship to synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33:1495-1504.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kim KH, Kim KO, Jung Y, Lee J, Kim SW, Kim JH, Kim TJ, Cho YS, Joo YE. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma in a Korean population: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3946.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Raica M, Cimpean AM, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1924-1934.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 127]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]