Review Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2022; 14(3): 587-606
Published online Mar 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i3.587
Gut and liver involvement in pediatric hematolymphoid malignancies
Umeshreddy V Devarapalli, Moinak S Sarma, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
Gopinathan Mathiyazhagan, Department of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
ORCID number: Umeshreddy V Devarapalli (0000-0003-0224-4474); Moinak S Sarma (0000-0003-2015-4069); Gopinathan Mathiyazhagan (0000-0002-1643-2129).
Author contributions: Devarapalli UV, Sarma MS and Mathiyazhagan G contributed to the literature review; Devarapalli UV and Mathiyazhagan G contributed to the primary drafting; Sarma MS reviewed concept and design, intellectual inputs, and final drafting.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Moinak S Sarma, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India. moinaksen@yahoo.com
Received: September 3, 2021
Peer-review started: September 3, 2021
First decision: October 3, 2021
Revised: October 22, 2021
Accepted: February 27, 2022
Article in press: February 27, 2022
Published online: March 15, 2022

Abstract

Hematolymphoid malignancies are common neoplasms in childhood. The involvement of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver, biliary system, pancreas, and peritoneum are closely interlinked and commonly encountered. In leukemias, lymphomas, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), the manifestations result from infiltration, compression, overwhelmed immune system, and chemotherapy-induced drug toxicities. In acute leukemias, major manifestations are infiltrative hepatitis, drug induced gastritis, neutropenic typhlitis and chemotherapy related pancreatitis. Chronic leukemias are rare. Additional presentation in lymphomas is cholestasis due to infiltration or biliary obstruction by lymph nodal masses. Presence of ascites needs a thorough workup for the underlying pathophysiology that may modify the therapy and affect the outcome. Uncommon hematolymphoid malignancies are primary hepatic, hepatosplenic, and GI lymphomas which have strict definitions. In advanced diseases with extensive spread, it may be impossible to distinguish these diseases from the primary site of origin. LCH produces biliary strictures that mimic as sclerosing cholangitis. Liver infiltration is associated with poor liver recovery even after chemotherapy. The heterogeneity of gut and liver manifestations in hematolymphoid malignancies has a clinical impact on their management. Though chemotherapy is the mainstay of therapy in all hematolymphoid malignancies, debulking surgery and radiotherapy have an adjuvant role in specific clinical scenarios. Rare situations presenting as liver failure or end-stage liver disease require liver transplantation. At their initial presentation to a primary care physician, given the ambiguity in clinical manifestations and the prognostic difference with time-bound management, it is vital to recognize them early for optimal outcomes. Pooled data from robust registries across the world is required for better understanding of these complications.

Key Words: Leukemia, Lymphoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary

Core Tip: Pediatric hematolymphoid malignancies commonly are leukemias, lymphomas, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Their gut and liver involvement are seldom discussed due to a lack of literature in children. Manifestations result from infiltration, compression, overwhelmed immune system, and chemotherapy-induced drug toxicities. In this review, we will discuss the diverse abdominal manifestations and challenges from a pediatric gastroenterologist’s perspective.



INTRODUCTION

Hematolymphoid malignancies in children are characterized by uncontrolled clonal proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells with resultant infiltration of bone marrow and involvement of lymphoreticular system including lymph nodes, Waldeyer’s ring, thymus, liver, spleen and gut. Their diverse complications are seen mainly in the abdomen which is often challenging for a pediatric gastroenterologist (Table 1). The liver is a part of the reticuloendothelial system and is hence invariably involved. Hematologic malignancies disseminate to infiltrate vital organs such as the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and pancreas. Nodal compressions and drug toxicities can often involve the pancreatobiliary system. Rarely the peritoneum is also infiltrated and complicates the clinical scenario. As the systemic complaints overwhelm the clinical picture, the abdominal manifestations are undermined and under-reported leading to a lack of robust data in children. This review collates the majority of the available literature and sheds light on their diverse abdominal manifestations which range from asymptomatic involvement to life-threatening conditions. This review is limited to the discussion of the important hematolymphoid malignancies such as leukemias, lymphomas, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Discussion on detailed chemotherapeutic management and various opportunistic infectious complications of hematolymphoid malignancies affecting the abdomen are beyond the scope of this manuscript.

Table 1 Overview of gut and liver manifestations of hematolymphoid malignancies in children.

Overview of gut and liver manifestations
InfiltrationIntussusception; Adynamic ileus; Mucosal ulceration; Hemorrhage; Perforation; Protein-losing enteropathy; Jaundice (biliary wall infiltration); Hepatosplenomegaly; Acute liver failure; Vanishing bile duct syndrome; Portal hypertension; Ascites (peritoneal seeding, peritoneal lymphomatosis); Splenic infarction, rupture
ImmunodeficiencyNecrotizing enterocolitis (typhlitis); Appendicitis; Wound infections; Perirectal abscess; Sepsis; Opportunistic infections; Esophageal and hepatic candidiasis; Herpes infections; Cytomegalovirus infections; Pseudomembranous colitis; Protozoal infections; Invasive fungemia; Hepatitis B and C reactivation
Drug toxicityMucositis; Gastritis and gastroparesis; Ileus; Pseudoobstruction; Bowel necrosis; Pancreatitis; Hepatotoxicity
Compression Gastric outlet obstruction; Biliary obstruction; Secondary Budd-Chiari syndrome; Chylous Ascites
Miscellaneous:Gastrointestinal haemorrhage (thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis)
Rationale of the review

The gut and liver involvement in hematolymphoid malignancies frequently manifests with features that overlap with chronic infections and inflammatory conditions. The review may help readers in tackling the common clinical dilemmas and give a clear outline of various abdominal complications encountered in hematolymphoid malignancies. This may in turn improvise interdisciplinary referrals between a hematologist and pediatric gastroenterologist during the management for better outcomes.

LEUKEMIAS IN CHILDREN

The acute leukemias of childhood collectively represent about 32% of malignancies in children younger than 15 years of age[1]. Of all the leukemias in childhood, 97% are due to acute leukemias constituting lymphoid (76%), myeloid (20%), or undifferentiated lineage (1%) variants. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) constitute the remaining 3%[2]. Infiltration of lymphoreticular organs, mainly the spleen, liver, and lymph nodes is a characteristic feature of acute leukemias[3].

Acute lymphoid leukemia

Liver involvement: The most common hepatic involvement at initial presentation is asymptomatic hepatomegaly, reported in up to 68% of acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) pediatric patients. At the initial diagnosis, 34%-61% of children have enlargement of the liver or spleen (palpable organomegaly approximately > 4 cm below the costal margin)[1]. Abnormal liver biochemistry is seen in two settings of ALL: At initial diagnosis and/or during the treatment course. It is speculated that in ALL, there is a direct portal and sinusoidal infiltration by leukemic cells. The rise in liver transaminases is a consequence of hepatocellular necrosis due to leukemic infiltrates[4]. In a study by Segal et al[4], elevated liver transaminases were overall found in 34% of patients at presentation. Hepatosplenomegaly on physical examination was noted in 34% with hepatitis vs 56% of patients without hepatitis (P = 0.014). Additionally, 3.4% had conjugated hyperbilirubinemia along with abnormal liver enzymes. There were no significant differences in the overall outcome among those who had normal vs elevated transaminases. Hence it was inferred that hepatitis at the time of diagnosis of ALL does not significantly affect the outcome or the induction chemotherapy success. Liver biopsy is not routinely advocated in ALL patients presenting with hepatitis. Due to concomitant bone marrow depression, these children carry a higher risk for bleeding complications as compared to patients having non-malignant liver disease[5]. The usual resolution of hepatitis with treatment suggests that liver biopsies should be reserved in patients with abnormal liver biochemistry who are either refractory to induction chemotherapy or have persistent hepatitis despite normal viral studies and abdominal imaging. The indications and timing of the liver biopsy should be individualized on a case-to-case basis and performed only if necessary. Liver failure as the presentation has been rarely reported in ALL[5]. This entity is commonly associated with T-cell ALL and has an overall poor prognosis despite the initiation of chemotherapy or liver transplantation. Anecdotal reports suggest short-term success after liver transplantation[6]. Rarely ischemia may be seen in hypovolemic conditions secondary to sepsis or volume loss. Occult chronic hepatitis B or C may reactivate during chemotherapy. Acute and chronic infection of hepatitis B or C may occur due to unscreened blood product transfusion. In countries with a high seroprevalence of cyto-megalo-virus (CMV), hepatic reactivations are often noted during the induction or maintenance phase of chemotherapy with steroids as they impair cellular immunity against CMV. Other systemic viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infections may ensue due to an overall immunocompromised state.

Implications of chemotherapy on the liver: It is observed that the use of steroids during pre-phase induction chemotherapy normalizes the abnormal liver biochemistry in ALL patients presenting with hepatitis without features of fulminant liver failure. This allows full induction chemotherapy to be delivered under the routine protocol. In those with significant liver dysfunction, current ALL induction protocols suggest a dose reduction in chemotherapy agents or withholding a dose[4]. On chemotherapy, any rise in liver enzymes merits a thorough workup. They usually reflect liver injury secondary to chemotherapeutic agents such as methotrexate, L-asparaginase, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), daunorubicin, and vincristine. Persistent elevation of liver enzymes particularly occurring after 6-MP exposure necessitates evaluation for thiopurine methyltransferase activity. Those with abnormally low levels should not be given 6-MP and require either dose modification or replacement with other chemotherapeutic agents[7]. High dose methotrexate (> 500 mg/m2), anthracyclines and L-asparaginase can cause liver cell failure in a predisposed patient with underlying liver disease. Genetic polymorphisms of various enzymes are involved in the drug metabolism during the therapy of ALL[8-10].

GI involvement: Pathogenesis of GI involvement is multifactorial. Various hypotheses include leukemic infiltration of gut mucosa, mucosal injury by chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., methotrexate), gut neuropathy (e.g., vincristine), and cancer cachexia. In the latter, there is a reduced anti-oxidant pool to support epithelial regeneration leading to the disrupted mucosal surface, intestinal edema and engorged vessels. These pathophysiologic alterations along with neutropenia and immune dysregulation make the gut more vulnerable to bacterial intramural invasion[11,12]. In a study of 273 children with ALL, GI symptoms at initial presentation were abdominal pain (19.5%), abdominal distension (18.5%), vomiting (14.9%) and bleeding (7.9%)[13]. In a retrospective analysis of 129 children with ALL who underwent upper GI endoscopy before chemotherapy, overall 82% had features suggestive of GI inflammation. Lesions in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenal bulb were 8.5%, 78%, 39.5% respectively. Concomitant Helicobacter pylori infection was also found to be an uncommon cause of gastritis in leukemic children as compared to adults[14]. Leukemic infiltrates in the GI tract initially remain clinically silent. Necrotizing enteropathy or typhlitis may occur in terminal stages[2]. Typhlitis is more common with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) than ALL (cumulative risk of 28.5% vs 7.4% respectively)[12]. Typhlitis is diagnosed by the presence of a clinical triad of abdominal pain, fever, and neutropenia or imaging signs (thickened bowel wall)[12]. Gram-negative rods, gram-positive cocci, enterococci, fungi, and viruses have been implicated as causes[11]. Fungal infections can play an important role in necrotizing enteropathy. A systematic review of published case studies found significantly lower mortality rate in patients receiving antifungal agents for the treatment of necrotizing enteropathy[15]. In such situations, it may not be often possible to distinguish from other differential diagnoses such as pseudomembranous colitis, appendicitis, or ischemic colitis. Frank or localized intestinal perforation can culminate rapidly. Abdominal plain X-rays may show a dilated atonic cecum and ascending colon filled with liquid or gas, signs of intramural gas, and small bowel dilatation. However, X-rays have limited value due to their poor sensitivity and specificity[16]. On contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), bowel wall thickening is significantly more prominent in Clostridiodes difficile (C. difficile) colitis (mean wall thickness, 12 mm; range, 8-20 mm) than in neutropenic enterocolitis (mean wall thickness, 7 mm; range, 4-15 mm; P < 0.01)[17]. Inflammatory mass, pericolonic inflammation, and pneumatosis intestinalis may be rarely seen[11]. A barium enema is contraindicated due to its potential in causing colonic perforation and septicemia. Colonoscopy is best avoided unless biopsies are required to differentiate the condition from C. difficile colitis[18]. Medical therapy is the mainstay of management. Though most children with typhlitis respond to broad-spectrum antibiotics along with the anaerobic cover, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, intensive fluid replacement, and bowel rest, there is still a risk of mortality in 20%[12]. Initial empiric coverage for antifungal agents is not routinely recommended but they can be considered if the initial therapy does not show optimal response in 72 h[11]. Indications for surgery include bowel perforation, uncontrolled massive GI bleeding, abscess or appendicitis which occurs in 0.5%-1.5% of patients[11,19].

Implications of the chemotherapy on the GI tract: On a background of an already inflamed gastric mucosa, steroids and anthracyclines can predispose to further gastritis. In addition, vincristine used during the induction phase can lead to neuropathy of the GI tract causing gastroparesis, paralytic ileus and colonic atony. Changes in the gut microbial flora, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and post-chemotherapy pro-inflammatory state cumulatively predispose the GI tract to be the source of febrile neutropenia in children with leukemia[20].

Pancreatic involvement: Pancreatitis has been rarely reported due to a progressive infiltrative disease or hypercalcemia[21]. The natural history of acute pancreatitis in hematolymphoid malignancies is modified due to the immunocompromised state when compared to normal individuals. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome may often be masked and the compensated anti-inflammatory response may occur earlier in the course. Abdominal complications include abdominal compartment syndrome, hemorrhage, infected necrosis, walled-off collections, and bowel obstruction. Endoscopic and radiological interventions in the induction phase may be precluded by thrombocytopenia due to disease or septicemia related. In a recent study, most children with treatment-related pancreatitis had genetic polymorphisms in 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (ABAT), asparagine synthetase, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) genes. Notably, these children harboured many more CFTR variants (71.4%) when compared to controls (39.1%). Identifying correlative variants in ethnically vulnerable populations may improve screening to identify which subgroup of patients with ALL are at the greatest risk for pancreatitis[22].

Implications of chemotherapy on the pancreas: Acute pancreatitis is most commonly described with the use of L-asparaginase in the induction period[13,14]. L-asparaginase-associated pancreatitis had an earlier incidence ranging from 0.7% to 24% and mortality rates of 2%-5%[23]. Incidence of acute pancreatitis is between 7%-18% in ALL. Due to the high recurrence rates of acute pancreatitis after rechallenge, it is one of the most common causes of truncation of asparaginase therapy during chemotherapy[23]. Studies assessing asparaginase-associated pancreatitis in children with ALL retrospectively reported incidences between 6.7% to 18%. Severity can range from mild to severe pancreatitis, which could be influenced by their immune suppression, frequent microbial translocation from the gut, coagulation disturbances, hyperlipidaemia associated with asparaginase-containing combination chemotherapy and the presence of leukemic infiltrations in the pancreas altering micro-architecture with most cases improving by withdrawal of the drug and conservative management[24]. Chronic complications rarely occur in the form of chronic pancreatitis or diabetes mellitus[23]. Acute pancreatitis has been reported after treatment with all asparaginase formulations[23]. A retrospective analysis of 403 children with ALL who developed acute pancreatitis after Peg-asparaginase administration revealed that patients with higher median age (10-18 years) have 2.4 times increased risk of pancreatitis than the younger ones. There was a non-statistically significant trend towards inferior 5-year event-free survival. Also 29% of patients with a known history of acute pancreatitis subsequently relapsed compared to only 14% with no prior history of acute pancreatitis[25]. ATF5 362TT and CT genotypes were associated with decreased risk of developing acute pancreatitis and have better disease outcomes demonstrating a low risk for events and superior survival[26]. Pancreatitis was more common in asparaginase-containing blocks vs non-asparaginase containing blocks (83% vs 17%; P < 0.0001). The median interval between receiving Peg-asparaginase dose and developing acute pancreatitis was 10 d. In a recent systematic review, older age, asparaginase formulation, higher ALL risk stratification, and higher asparaginase dosing appear to play a limited role in the development of acute pancreatitis. The Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group reviewed a large number of trials to investigate the risk of complications and risk of re-exposing patients with acute pancreatitis[27]. Complications noted in the 465 patients with acute pancreatitis included mechanical ventilation (8%), pseudocysts (26%), acute insulin need (21%), and death (2%). Older age was associated with more complications (10.5 years vs 6.1 years without complications; P < 0.0001). One year after diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, 11% of patients continued to need insulin, had recurrent abdominal pain, or both. Ninety-six patients were re-exposed to asparaginase, including 59 after severe acute pancreatitis. Forty-four (46%) patients developed a second episode, 22 (52%) were severe, suggesting a high risk of recurrence[27]. Presently most oncologists agree that after recovery from a documented episode of pancreatitis, re-challenge with L-asparaginase should be an absolute contraindication. Re-challenge in mild pancreatitis is fraught with a high risk of recurrence, sometimes more severe than the first episode. Hypertriglyceridemia from L-asparaginase can also predispose to acute pancreatitis. Hypertriglyceridemia can also result in gall stones causing cholangitis and biliary pancreatitis[25].

AML

In AML, the extra-medullary manifestations are seen in 20%-25% of children. These include chloromas (tumor nodules), skin infiltration, cerebrospinal disease, gingival infiltration, hepatosplenomegaly, or testicular involvement. In particular, AML-M4 and AML-M5 present similar to ALL with lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. Morphology and immunohistochemistry can distinguish the diagnosis[28].

Liver involvement: Though liver involvement as hepatomegaly is lesser than ALL clinically, postmortem studies have demonstrated up to 75% involvement of the liver[29]. Acute hepatitis may present as conjugated jaundice due to granulocytic sarcoma impeding bile flow or due to myeloid cell infiltration[30]. Acute liver failure at presentation is rarely reported with pediatric AML posing significant challenges to chemotherapy administration and invariably had poor outcomes in the cases described in the literature[31]. Coagulopathy and bleeding manifestations without other features of liver failure are the presenting features of the AML-M3 variant. This condition requires prompt institution of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) along with cryoprecipitate transfusions to surpass the consumptive coagulopathy.

Involvement of other abdominal organs: Acute abdominal pain in AML is a significant problem. Spontaneous atraumatic rupture of the spleen presents as acute abdominal pain often mimicking a surgical abdomen or gut ischemia. Kehr’s sign (acute pain in left shoulder tip) and hemoperitoneum are the hallmarks of this condition. It is more commonly associated with AML than ALL with worse outcomes. Its frequency is approximately 0.18%[32]. Possible mechanisms are rapid splenic enlargement outgrowing the vascular supply, leukemic infiltration of the splenic capsule, splenic infarction, and leukemia-associated thrombocytopenia-coagulopathy. Due to improvement in imaging techniques, the frequency of detection is 9-fold higher (0.55%) presently than in the earlier era (0.06%). There is also an increased incidental detection of “preclinical” splenic rupture. In this subset, 30% do not have palpable spleens[32]. Adolescent age group, acute promyelocytic leukemia variant, high leukocyte count at presentation, fungal infection, thrombocytopenia, and coagulopathy may predispose to pathologic splenic rupture[32]. The overall incidence of typhlitis in acute leukemias in children is 4%-5% with a higher cumulative risk in AML than ALL[12].

Implications of chemotherapy in AML: Chemotherapeutic agents used for AML include cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and daunorubicin, they can cause liver injury manifesting as hepatitis, cholestasis, and/or biliary stricture[33]. Furthermore, tretinoin and arsenic trioxide used in AML-M3 can cause hepatic impairment requiring dose modifications. Pancreatitis is seen with cytarabine therapy in 5% of AML[34].

Infantile leukemias

Infantile leukemias constitute a distinct subset of hematological malignancies characterized by aggressive presentation with high leukocyte counts, infiltration of extramedullary organs, and central nervous system involvement. Contrary to the epidemiology in older children where ALL predominates AML, in infants, the incidence is equal[35]. They are characterized by mixed-lineage leukemia gene rearrangements and frequently present with massive hepatosplenomegaly. They can present with cholestasis, elevated transaminases, or if untreated can lead to acute liver failure. Myeloid sarcoma may involve the liver particularly with chromosomal translocations involving t(1:22). Bone marrow examination may be unyielding due to marrow fibrosis, hence biopsy of the liver may clinch the diagnosis[36]. Outcomes are universally poor. Transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) affects 10%-15% of neonates with down syndrome (trisomy 21), with mutations in the GATA-1 gene. Immature megakaryoblasts are seen in the liver, bone marrow, and peripheral blood. The clinical presentation can be highly variable ranging from incidentally detected in an otherwise well infant to a disseminated leukemic infiltration (10%-20 % of neonates) presenting with hepatomegaly (40%), splenomegaly (30%), jaundice (70%), hepatitis (25%) and coagulation disturbances (10%-25%)[37]. In TAM, liver failure can occur due to idiopathic progressive fibrosis, leukemic infiltration or iron deposition. Observation is recommended for asymptomatic cases. Chemotherapy is indicated in those with a total blast count higher than 100000/μL, organomegaly causing respiratory compromise, significant anemia resulting in cardiac failure, hydrops fetalis, life-threatening hepatic dysfunction, hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, hepatitis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation[28]. The disorder usually spontaneously regresses within 3 mo. However, in 20%-30% of TAM patients, acute megakaryoblastic leukemia subsequently develops in 1-3 years[37].

Chronic leukemias

CML and JMML are chronic leukemias commonly described in children. Hepatomegaly is seen in 85% of pediatric CML and JMML. Liver dysfunction is uncommon. They have a more aggressive course in children than adults with higher leucocyte counts, larger spleen size, and an increased frequency of blast crisis[38]. Resolution of spleen size is an important follow-up criterion in CML. JMML has a relatively younger age at onset than CML with lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, increased fetal hemoglobin, and a lesser overall survival than CML[28].

Clinical impact of leukemias for the gastroenterologist

Acute leukemias that present with febrile hepatitis are often initially mistaken for infectious and immunological causes. Most patients have elaborate workup and multiple failed antimicrobial therapy before the diagnosis is ascertained. The diagnosis is often made on peripheral smear by a seasoned hematopathologist when atypical cells are identified. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity is a serious concern as many drugs are precluded and the outcome of the disease is modified. GI symptoms require prolonged proton pump inhibitor therapy till the end of the induction phase. An acute abdomen may need to be evaluated for typhlitis, pancreatitis, or spontaneous splenic rupture. Typhlitis in leukemias often leads to a complicated course requiring gut rest, prolonged antibiotic therapy. Since appendicitis is a close differential diagnosis, there is a considerable dilemma for the surgeon whether to perform a laparotomy in a state of neutropenia[39]. Pancreatitis during chemotherapy may have an underlying genetic predisposition and may need exploration before induction. Bloody diarrhea is ominous for a colonic involvement such as a superinfection with C. difficile in a neutropenia state. These complications need to be timely managed to avoid prolonged chemotherapy interruptions which may otherwise impact relapse rates. CML presenting with massive splenomegaly is often worked up for other differential diagnoses such as tropical splenomegaly syndrome, kala-azar, and extrahepatic portal hypertension in developing countries.

LYMPHOMAS IN CHILDREN

Combined, Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are the third most common malignancies in children and adolescents, with HD being the most common cancer in children between the ages of 15-18 years[40]. It is important to determine whether extranodal involvement represents a primary manifestation or is a part of a disseminated disease, which may have a poorer prognosis[41]. Extranodal disease is present in 12% of HD. Extranodal involvement is more common in older (10-17 years: 14%) than younger children (0-9 year: 4%)[42].

Hepatobiliary involvement

Hepatobiliary involvement in HD: Liver involvement is less frequent in HD than in NHL. Five percent of patients with HD have liver involvement at the time of diagnosis[43]. Usually, hepatomegaly is present when the liver is involved. However, liver size can rarely be normal despite infiltration. Smaller lesions are more common than large masses[41]. HD of the liver is almost invariably associated with disease of the spleen. The more extensive the splenic disease, the greater the likelihood of hepatic involvement[43]. In HD, lymphomatous cells may infiltrate the liver in up to 15% of patients with hepatomegaly and 45% in the later stages of the disease. Jaundice as a presenting symptom in HD is seen in 3%-13% of patients[44]. On many occasions, the diagnosis of HD can be misled by the presence of granulomas in liver biopsy specimens. A false impression of tuberculosis and unwarranted empirical antitubercular therapy is commonly encountered where there is a high community prevalence. Excision biopsy of palpable lymph nodes and imaging-guided biopsy of representative areas distinguishes the condition[45]. Acute liver failure can rarely occur in the setting of hepatic infiltration. One of the mechanisms by which malignant infiltration may cause liver failure is ischemia secondary to the compression of the hepatic sinusoids by the infiltrating cells[46]. Cholestasis can occur as a result of direct infiltration, extrahepatic biliary obstruction, hemolysis, viral hepatitis, or drug hepatotoxicity[44,47]. In HD, cholestasis in zone 3 has also been described due to vanishing bile duct syndrome where there is an irreversible destruction of the small intrahepatic bile ducts and significant liver damage[47]. The mechanism by which this syndrome occurs is poorly understood but may be a paraneoplastic effect, a defect in liver microsomal function, or a toxic effect of cytokines released from lymphoma cells[48]. Other causes of this vanishing bile duct syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis before attributing it to HD[44]. Even with adequate treatment of lymphoma, most of these patients die of progressive liver dysfunction and failure. Their course becomes further tenacious due to the preclusion of potentially hepatotoxic agents[48].

Hepatobiliary involvement in NHL: The four common childhood NHL include Burkitt lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Lymphomatous infiltration and extrahepatic obstruction occur more commonly in NHL than in HD; 16% to 43% of patients with NHL have liver involvement. Mild to moderate increases in alkaline phosphatase level and hepatomegaly commonly occur in NHL even without lymphomatous hepatic involvement[47]. As described earlier with HD, acute liver failure can also occur in NHL. The mechanism by which this occurs is likely similar to that in HD, with sudden ischemia related to massive infiltration of the sinusoids or replacement of liver parenchyma by malignant cells[46]. This condition should be suspected when a patient presents with new-onset hepatomegaly and lactic acidosis. Prompt evaluation including liver biopsy should ensue[47]. Although the prognosis is poor, there have been reports of successful treatment with immediate initiation of chemotherapy in this subset of patients. Cholestasis may be additionally be caused by compression of enlarged periportal and peribiliary lymph nodes. Ghosh et al[49] described a cohort of nine children with NHL who presented with jaundice as the primary presentation which constituted 11.2% of all NHL. Total bilirubin and liver enzymes ranged from 2.9-19.6 mg/dL and 55-654 U/L respectively. All had raised alkaline phosphatase ranging from 957-3786 U/L. Seven patients had biliary obstruction with periampullary, periportal, gastroduodenal, or subhepatic masses on imaging. Two patients had liver parenchymal infiltration without biliary obstruction. Histology of these patients with biliary obstruction was anaplastic large cell, high-grade B-cell, and Burkitt lymphoma. Biliary drainage was performed in one patient. Seven patients had amelioration of jaundice with chemotherapy alone in 10-46 d [49]. Published case reports and small series have used surgery, biliary drainage, steroids, and cytotoxic agents in various combinations and sequences. Waiting for serum bilirubin to normalize after biliary drainage or treating only with steroids may compromise the outcome of patients. Also, chemotherapy after biliary drainage has been associated with complications such as biliary leak and peritonitis[50].

Radiological patterns of hepatobiliary involvement: In NHL, discrete lesions can be noted on CT scans. Liver biopsy is the most accurate method for confirmation of liver involvement[51]. Diffusely increased or focal uptake, with or without focal or disseminated nodules supports liver involvement (Figure 1). Discrete nodular lesions are seen in only 10% of cases. HD manifests more often as miliary lesions (< 1 cm in diameter) than as masses. The diffuse or infiltrative form of the disease results in patchy, irregular infiltrates originating primarily in the portal areas[41]. In current practice, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (FDG-PET-CT) is the reference standard for both staging and follow-up of HD and NHL. If an FDG-PET-CT is performed, a bone marrow examination can be avoided for HL. Bone marrow examination may be only needed for suspected DLBCL where there is a discordance between suggestive histology but negative PET[52].

Figure 1
Figure 1 Axial post contrast computed tomography image showing retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy with encasement of celiac artery and portal vein (yellow asterisk). There are multiple hypoenhancing lesions in liver, spleen (orange arrow) and presence of chylous ascites (white arrow).

Implications of chemotherapy: Empiric dose reductions in chemotherapy are usually recommended in jaundiced patients. Guidelines recommend a 50% dose reduction of etoposide in the presence of serum bilirubin 1.5-3 mg/dL and omitting the drug if serum bilirubin is greater than 3 mg/dL. For etoposide, pharmacokinetics in the presence of hepatic dysfunction has been determined in very few studies. In the presence of elevated serum bilirubin, there is no robust data to guide the dose modification of ifosfamide and cytarabine[53]. Neurotoxicity of high-dose cytarabine may worsen with elevated serum bilirubin but there are no guidelines to suggest a modification. Methotrexate is metabolized by the liver and excreted through the kidney. In those with preexisting hepatic dysfunction, methotrexate has the potential to cause further hepatic insult and hence is mostly withheld or administered in reduced doses[53]. However, in the pediatric NHL series, some authors have used doses higher than that recom-mended without reporting any organ dysfunction or mortality due to drug toxicity[49]. Ballonoff et al[54] reviewed 37 adults with NHL and found an association between an improvement in cholestasis and complete response to chemotherapy or radiation therapy (or both).

GI and pancreatic involvement

Pancreatic HD is extremely rare and, in almost all cases, secondary to contiguous lymph node disease. Since the pancreas has no definable capsule, it may be difficult to distinguish an adjacent lymph node disease from intrinsic pancreatic infiltration[41]. The prevalence of pancreatic involvement in pediatric Burkitt lymphoma is between 4% to 10%[55]. CT shows focal pancreatic enlargement with patchy areas of non-enhancement. Marked dilatation of the biliary system can occur when a mass infiltrates the pancreatic head[56]. HD involving the GI tract is rare as compared to NHL. Extra-nodal involvement (except in the spleen, Waldeyer’s ring, and thymus) indicates stage IV HD[41].

Ascites in abdominal lymphoma

Ascites is an uncommon manifestation in lymphoma. Secondary Budd-Chiari syndrome can result from compression of the hepatic veins and/or the inferior vena cava by enlarged lymph nodes. Chylous ascites (defined as ascitic fluid triglyceride more than 200 mg/dL) may rarely occur due to malignant lymph nodes obstructing the lymph flow from the gut to the cisterna chyli, resulting in leakage from the dilated subserosal lymphatics into the peritoneal cavity[57,58]. The presence of chylous ascites in lymphoma portends a poor prognosis[59]. Peritoneal lymphomatosis (PL) is a rare tumor originating in the peritoneum and quickly engulfs the gut, closely mimicking an acute abdomen. Most cases of primary PL have been reported in adults; however, the youngest case was seen in a 4-year-old[60,61]. The differential diagnoses of peritoneal thickening include tuberculosis, pseudomyxoma peritonei, lymphomatosis, mesenteric sarcoma, and desmoid tumors. Ascites occurs in 25% of patients with Burkitt lymphoma[62]. The diagnosis can often be made by paracentesis. Ascitic fluid is characteristically white (mimicking chylous ascites) with elevated lactate dehydrogenase, protein and atypical cells. Sometimes atypical cells may be missed because exfoliated mesothelial cells may predominate the cytological picture[63]. Sonography in PL shows thickened lamellar omentum, hypoechoic thickened mesentery that encases vessels, and non-septate, echogenic ascites[64]. CT abdomen shows omental caking, mesenteric soft-tissue nodularity along the vessels, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, hypoattenuating lesions in solid organs, and thickened bowel wall[60]. The most common histology encountered in peritoneal involvement in adults is DLBCL and in children is Burkitt lymphoma[63]. The treatment of PL is similar to Burkitt lymphoma. Although Burkitt lymphoma is chemosensitive, a large tumor burden in PL can lead to tumor lysis syndrome and rapid death[61].

Clinical impact of lymphomas for the gastroenterologist

Lymphomas presenting as cholestasis need a liver biopsy for diagnosis. In a setting of thrombocytopenia, a plugged percutaneous transhepatic or transjugular liver biopsy may be required. The presence of a granuloma is misleading for other differential diagnoses. In developing countries, many months of exposure to antitubercular therapy (for assumed disseminated tuberculosis) is common before a diagnosis of abdominal lymphoma is made. Vanishing bile duct syndrome has a poor prognosis. Often major lymph nodes are found around the periportal or peripancreatic areas in cholestasis. CT-guided biopsies risk chances of gut perforation of the overlapping small bowel. In such situations, tissue sampling can be challenging. Peribiliary and upper abdominal retroperitoneal lymph nodes are best accessed by pediatric endosonography in a specialized center. Linear endosonography is difficult to perform in a very young child as appropriately sized scopes are unavailable. Hence laparoscopy or laparotomy-based sampling is the final choice especially if the above techniques fail or lymph nodes are deep mesenteric or perivascular. Therapeutic endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and stent placement for biliary drainage are challenging in children. Ascites in lymphoma requires careful evaluation for an underlying source. PL has a universally poor prognosis.

PRIMARY LYMPHOMAS IN CHILDREN

Primary lymphomas in children can involve the GI tract [primary GI lymphoma (PGIL)], spleen (primary splenic lymphoma), liver [primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL)], and combination of spleen and liver [hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL)]. The diagnosis of primary lymphomas is considered if the bulk of the tumor is restricted to the organ of its origin after thorough staging and in the absence of distant lymphadenopathy or blood involvement (peripheral blood smear or bone marrow).

PHL

Criteria for diagnosis of PHL include symptoms caused mainly by liver involvement (palpable clinically at presentation or detected during staging radiologic studies) at presentation, absence of distant lymphadenopathy, and absence of leukemic blood involvement in the peripheral blood smear. PHL usually occurs in the 5th-6th decade and has been reported rarely in children[65,66]. The most common presentation is abdominal pain due to hepatomegaly. B symptoms of fever and weight loss occur in one-third of patients. Citak et al[67] in a review of literature of 10 children with PHL reported male preponderance. The presenting features were enlarging hepatomegaly, nonspecific symptoms of anorexia, fatigue and abdominal pain. Serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels are increased in 70% of cases. The most common type of primary hepatic NHL is DLBCL, comprising 80%-90% of the cases (Figure 2). This disease may present with nodules in the liver or diffuse portal infiltration and sinusoidal spread[68].

Figure 2
Figure 2 Liver biopsy tissue showing normal hepatocytes with the sinusoids infiltrated by monomorphic round cell with darkly staining nuclei, small inconspicuous nucleoli and a narrow rim of cytoplasm. The infiltrating cells were positive for CD20, nuclear positivity for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and high MIB1 index of 90%, suggestive of a B cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Most cases of PHL present with solitary or multiple mass lesions in the liver on imaging, diffuse involvement can also occur but is less common[65]. A solitary lesion is the most frequent finding which is encountered in 50% to 60% of cases. Estimating the prognosis of PHL is difficult because the condition is rare. Nodular, as opposed to diffusely infiltrative disease, may have a more favorable outcome with chemotherapy, with 3-year survival rates of 57% and 18%, respectively. PHL has also been described more often in those with immunodeficiency states, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic hepatitis B, and chronic hepatitis C in adults[66]. Differential diagnoses of nodular PHL would be hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma, liver embryonal sarcoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, liver rhabdomyosarcoma and hepatic Ewing's sarcoma[67]. There is a shift in paradigm from primary surgery to primary chemotherapy avoiding extensive hepatic lobectomy[65]. Early and aggressive anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy may result in prolonged remissions in PHL patients[69]. In situations where lymphoma presents as acute liver failure, it is often difficult to distinguish from PHL. Liver transplantation and subsequent chemotherapy are viable options in such scenarios[70].

HSTCL

HSTCL is a rare, aggressive lymphoma that infiltrates the hepatic sinusoids. In HSTCL, there is a diffuse hepatic sinusoidal and splenic sinus infiltration with clonal populations of gamma-delta T cell receptor expressing cells. Cytogenetic analysis commonly reveals an isochromosome 7q and trisomy 8[71]. Male patients younger than 35 years with inflammatory bowel disease and at least a 2-year history of exposure to combined thiopurine and biologic therapy may be at increased risk for developing HSTCL. Diak et al[72] reported 9 cases of HSTCL in the age group of 12-22 years receiving biological therapy and concomitant immunosuppression with thiopurines with or without steroids. During immunosuppression, thiopurines induce apoptosis, and this feature allows escape from tumor surveillance possibly leading to the development of malignancy. This situation, together with the effect of biological therapy on T cells (complement-mediated lysis and apoptosis), may partially explain as to why patients treated with these agents are at risk of HSTCL. Patients typically have hepatosplenomegaly, abnormal liver function tests, fever, weight loss, night sweats, pancytopenia, and peripheral lymphocytosis[72]. Bone marrow is involved in virtually all patients at the time of diagnosis. If HSTCL is suspected, a bone marrow biopsy (including immunophenotyping) should be performed to confirm the diagnosis[71]. Lymphadenopathy is usually absent. Histology can mimic autoimmune hepatitis and may often lead to misdiagnosis. With the increasing number of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease cases and the poor outcome of HSTCL, practice guidelines suggest thiopurines should be withdrawn from combination therapy after 6 mo in ulcerative colitis and 6-12 mo in Crohn’s disease. This is preferably performed after checking adequate trough levels of anti-tumor necrosis factor agent and treatment target has been achieved[73,74].

PGIL

PGIL represents less than 5% of all pediatric neoplasms and is the most common bowel malignancy in childhood[75] (Table 2). Among its types, NHL is the most common malignancy of the GI tract in children. PGIL is less frequent than secondary GI involvement of nodal lymphoma. They are important since their evaluation, diagnosis, management, and prognosis are distinct from that of lymphoma at other sites and other cancers of the GI tract[75]. Criteria for PGIL suggested by Dawson is the presence of tumor bulk in the GI tract with minimal locoregional abdominal lymphadenopathy and characteristic absence of peripheral, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and normal blood cell counts[76]. The peak age for NHL of GI tract in children is 5-15 years. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry from United States (1973-2006) showed the frequency of PGIL < 10 years and > 10 years as 44% and 56% respectively with higher male predilection (3:1)[75]. Small followed by large bowel are the most common sites in children, unlike adult patients where the stomach (50%-60%) is the most common site[75] (Figure 3A).The terminal ileum is the most commonly reported location in children, due to the high concentration of lymph tissue in that region of the bowel[76]. The most common presenting features are abdominal pain (81.4%) and abdominal lump (76.7%). Intestinal obstruction at presentation is seen in 11.6%[77]. Due to the absence of a desmoplastic response, the tumor grows along with walls. Bowel obstruction is initially uncommon until intussusceptions occur or tumor bulk becomes proliferative towards the lumen in the later part of the disease[78]. Of the PGIL, Burkitt lymphoma is the most frequent histological subtype in children[75] (Figure 3B). A typical morphological feature in Burkitt lymphoma is lymphoblastic cells having round nuclei with clumped chromatin and multiple, centrally located nucleoli giving the characteristic starry sky- appearance[79]. Sometimes it may not be possible to distinguish PGIL from secondary involvement in advanced cases when tumor bulk is high. Nearly half of children with GI NHL have tumor infiltrate confined to the GI tract with possible regional lymph node involvement. Imaging findings on CT include a diffuse or focal thickening of the stomach and/or bowel wall (Figures 4A, 4B and 4C). Aneurysmal dilatation of the bowel can be seen in nearly one-third of patients due to irregular growth in the muscularis propria and/or destruction of the autonomic nerve plexus[76]. Almost all the reported cases of appendicular lymphoma are due to NHL, seen as young as 3 years of age[80]. Pediatric NHL staging systems are St. Jude’s and Revised International Pediatric NHL staging system[81]. The treatment approach in PGIL is debatable.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. A: Frequency of site involvement; B: Frequency of histological appearance. SEER: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma. Axial post contrast computed tomography abdomen with primarygastric lymphoma showing diffuse circumferential enhancing wall thickening (black arrow) and aneursymal dilatation of: A: Stomach; B: Ascending colon; C: Splenic flexure of colon.
Table 2 Outcome of gastrointestinal lymphomas in children from world global registries.

SEER registry, United States (1973-2006)[75]
West midlands, United Kingdom (1957-2000)[82]
Egypt cancer registry; (1997-2003)[77]
n2654443
Incidence0.199/1000000.9 million/yr-
Age (yr)< 10: 44%; > 10: 56%3-140.4-17
Male: female3:15.7:12.3:1
Distant involvement7.5%--
Surgery83.4%96%91%
Radiation12.5%71%-

Proponents of surgery in the past argued that the disease is better debulked before chemotherapy to decrease tumor lysis syndrome, lessen the spread, and lessen the cumulative chemotherapy. Opponents who favored chemotherapy felt that upfront surgery had higher post-operative complications, effectively delayed starting of chemotherapy, and lead to poor long-term outcomes. Systematic review and meta-analysis compared surgery vs chemotherapy. It was seen that upfront surgery and chemotherapy in < 10 years of age showed near similar 5 and 10-year survival (83%-85%) in both groups. In those > 10 years of age, there was a significant statistical difference in the 5 and 10-year survival rates in the upfront surgery (79%) vs upfront chemotherapy (100%) groups[75]. Systematic reviews showed better 10-year disease-free survival and lesser recurrence in the medical group but higher mortality in the surgical group[75,77,82]. Chemotherapy alone seems to be the most effective treatment option in all stages of PGIL. Presently surgery is not indicated unless there are complications like perforation, hemorrhage, or obstruction which cannot be managed conservatively[83]. Further studies are needed to evaluate outcomes for patients with localized or distant disease, partial or complete resection, and the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy[75]. In terms of location, tumors located in the stomach, small bowel, colon, and rectum have 10-year survival as 64%, 86%, 83%, and 100%, respectively[75].

Immunoproliferative small intestinal disease

Immunoproliferative small intestinal disease (IPSID) is a unique lymphoproliferative disease that presents as malabsorption, anemia, pain abdomen, and protein-losing enteropathy. It is predominantly seen in adults but rarely also in adolescents. Blunting of villi and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with atypical lymphoid cells is the characteristic of small bowel histology. Diagnostic laparotomy for full-thickness small bowel biopsy and adjacent lymph nodes sampling is required with various systems of grading. Serum alpha heavy chain abnormal immunoglobulin A is pathognomonic by immunoelectrophoresis. Advanced IPSID presenting as abdominal mass is indistinguishable from lymph nodal lymphomas with secondary bowel involvement. Early disease is treated with antibiotics with a 33%-71% response[84]. Advanced IPSID needs chemotherapy and is associated with a poor prognosis[85]. IPSID is a close differential diagnosis for enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma which is seen in adults with underlying celiac disease.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Lymphoma in post-transplant recipients has been reported with the possible mechanism of continuous B-cell proliferation, which is normally inhibited by T-lymphocytes. Both solid organ and hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients are at risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a type of NHL driven mostly by Epstein-Barr virus infection. PTLD is associated highest with heart-lung, small bowel, and liver transplantations[86-88]. Liver and spleen involvement in PTLD is not unusual, occurring in 16% of patients over 20-years[85]. If present in the liver, PTLD can cause intrahepatic cholestasis or extrahepatic cholestasis from bulky lymphadenopathy around the porta hepatis.

Clinical impact of primary lymphomas for the gastroenterologist

Lymphomas originating from the GI or HB tract have a unique presentation. Due to their rapid infiltrative capacity, the disease is usually contained within their sites of origin before spillover into the blood or distant sites. Hence organomegaly and abdominal lump are the main presentations. PHL mimics storage disorders and congestive livers. PGIL mimics abdominal tuberculosis, intra-abdominal tumors, and large fungal masses such as basidiobolomycosis[89]. PGIL located in the upper GI tract or colon is amenable to endoscopic mucosal biopsies though often unyielding. Hence radiological guided needle biopsies are necessary to sample from deeper layers. A similar problem is encountered in IPSID. Diagnostic laparotomy is often required.

LCH

The hallmark of LCH is the accumulation of LC-like dendritic cells in one or more tissues or organs. The clinical manifestations of LCH are highly diverse and result both from direct (local effects of the growth and accumulation of pathologic LCs) and indirect effects (secondary changes on normal tissues, particularly cells of the immune system). The reported incidence of LCH ranges from 2.6 to 8.9 cases per million children younger than 15 years per year, with a median age at diagnosis of 3 years[90].Pathologic LCs are clonal and nearly 60% of LCH samples carry the oncogenic BRAF V600E variant[90].The characteristic histopathology required for a “presumptive diagnosis” usually shows a granulomatous-like lesion with immature dendritic-appearing cells that have characteristic bean-shaped, folded nuclei and pale cytoplasm. Often, multinucleated giant cells are present. A “definitive diagnosis” of LCH requires the immunohistochemical identification of the presence of Langerhans cell antigen expression of cell surface CD1a, CD207 (langerin), or by the presence of cells with Birbeck granules by electron microscopy. Early in the course of the disease, the lesions are usually proliferative and locally destructive. In later or healing stages, they can become more fibrotic[91]. The skeleton is the most commonly affected system, as bone lesions are present in approximately 80% of patients with LCH, and in half of them, lesions are single[90,92]. In infants with initially localized disease, progression to a multisystemic involvement (Figures 5A, 5B and 5C) has been observed in up to 40% of cases[90]. LCH can involve almost all organ systems and clinically risk organ involvement is defined as infiltration of the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and lung with the former three constituting high risk organs[93].

Figure 5
Figure 5 In infants with initially localized disease, progression to a multisystemic involvement. A: Lower common bile duct stricture (orange arrow) with dilated duct, beading and dilatation of intrahepatic ducts on magnetic resonance cholangiography; B: Punched out lytic lesion in skull (orange arrow) on skeletal survey; C: Honeycombing cystic lesions in lung parenchyma on high-resolution computed tomography chest.
Hepatobiliary involvement

Liver is considered as a risk organ in staging of LCH with reported involvement ranging from 15%-60% and portends poor prognosis[94]. Liver involvement in LCH needs fulfillment of one or more of the following: Liver enlargement > 3 cm below the costal margin in the midclavicular line, liver dysfunction (i.e.,: Hypoproteinemia < 55 g/L, hypoalbuminemia < 25 g/L, hyperbilirubinemia > 1.5 mg/dL, edema or ascites, not as a result of other causes) or histopathological findings of active disease[90]. Yi et al[95] in a study of 31 children with LCH described hepatomegaly in 42%, jaundice in 16%, and splenomegaly in 19%. Hepatic involvement in LCH typically presents with hepatomegaly due to the direct infiltration by Langerhans cells. Hepatomegaly may also be due to Kupffer cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia secondary to a generalized immune reaction or by enlarged portal lymph nodes causing an obstruction. Presentation is typical with cholestasis and recurrent cholangitis. Biochemically there is a significantly elevated serum gamma-glutamyl transferase. Liver biopsy shows features of sclerosing cholangitis, periductal fibrosis, and bile duct proliferation. Liver biopsy is only recommended if there is clinically significant liver involvement and if the results of the same are likely to alter treatment in an otherwise diagnosed case of LCH (i.e., to differentiate between active LCH and other causes of sclerosing cholangitis)[91]. The absence of Langerhans cells or CD1a positivity usually represents a burnt-out liver and has a poor response to chemotherapy. Since the disease process is usually found around the major bile ducts, a blind liver biopsy may miss the LCH infiltration[94]. Diagnostic imaging can visualize areas of LCH infiltration that may be missed on biopsy. Findings on liver imaging correspond to four progressive histological phases: Proliferative, granulomatous, xanthomatous, and the final fibrous phase. The proliferative and granulomatous phases show periportal histiocyte infiltration, inflammation, and edema which appear as periportal hypoechoic and relatively well-demarcated lesions on sonography. On CT, these lesions appear hypodense, and post-contrast enhancement is thought to reflect portal triaditis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows hypointensities on T1-W images and hyperintensities on T2-W images. In the xanthomatous stage, periportal fatty lesions appear hyperechoic on sonography. They remain hypodense on CT images. On MRI, these lesions are hyperintense on T1 and hypointense on T2[96]. The fibrous stage is characterized by progression to periductal fibrosis and micronodular biliary cirrhosis which results from sclerosing cholangitis. In this stage, sonography demonstrates well-demarcated periportal hypoechoic lesions with spotty calcification. Dilatation and beading of the biliary ducts, consistent with sclerosing cholangitis, can be seen with conventional cholangiography and MR cholangiopancreatography[96]. The hallmark of biliary involvement is an extrahepatic or intrahepatic sclerosing cholangitis that may occur in 10%-18% of patients with the multisystem form of LCH[97]. Sclerosing cholangitis may lead to secondary biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and liver failure. Variceal bleeding is a frequent issue in portal hypertension requiring variceal banding or sclerotherapy. Braier et al[97] showed a 25% response to chemotherapy in LCH-sclerosing cholangitis. The rest either underwent liver transplantation or died. Sclerosing cholangitis is usually progressive and in these children, often the only successful treatment is liver transplantation[91,97]. Several poor prognostic factors are associated with survival like hepatic involvement, age < 1 year, and incomplete response to treatment. Three-year survival rates with and without liver involvement are 51.8% and 96.7% respectively[95]. The dominant extrahepatic biliary strictures persist despite chemotherapy and may need repeated endoscopic biliary dilatation. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and biliary stent placement may be daunting in younger children where appropriate-sized endoscopes and accessories are not available. Repeated procedures in children expose them to greater radiation from fluoroscopy and adversely affect their long-term outcomes.

GI involvement

GI involvement is seen in less than 5% of cases commonly presenting as diarrhea, malabsorption, hematochezia, anemia and hypoproteinemia[98]. In a review of literature by Hait et al[99], of 22 children with LCH having GI involvement, 86% of patients presented before 1 year and 95% before 18 mo of age with 91% showing biopsy suggestive of LCH. Those with multiorgan involvement had higher mortality. Diarrhea, malabsorption, protein-losing enteropathy, and hematochezia are common manifestations of LCH involving the GI tract[91].

Clinical impact of LCH for the gastroenterologist

LCH is a complex disorder that is easier to diagnose clinically if there is a multisystemic presentation than isolated GI or HB involvement. Tissue diagnosis is definitive and a detailed workup for multisystemic involvement is important for management and prognosis (Table 3). The current standard of care for front-line therapy of patients with multifocal LCH or unifocal disease in CNS-risk sites is vinblastine/prednisone for 1 year, with the potential addition of 6-MP for high-risk LCH. Newer drugs such as vemurafenib are used to treat BRAF V600E mutation-positive, refractory, childhood LCH[100]. For those developing life-threatening diseases during treatment, alternative aggressive treatment should be considered, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the natural history, isolated HB disease is often treated as primary sclerosing cholangitis for many years till the disease evolves into a full-blown systemic problem or involves another site (bones, lungs, etc.). Hence guidelines for sclerosing cholangitis in children require ruling out LCH effectively[101]. Recurrence rates in multisystem low-risk disease are lower in 12 mo than 6 mo of therapy. It is unclear whether further prolongation of therapy will ameliorate sclerosing cholangitis[91]. Since the majority of HB involvement is a reflection of a burnt-out disease, children on chemotherapy must be preemptively waitlisted for tentative liver transplantation. Dominant extrahepatic biliary strictures require biliary drainage for control of cholangitis and intractable pruritus that affect the quality of life.

Table 3 Workup in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.
Workup

Mandatory investigationsHemogram, complete liver function test (including coagulation), abdominal ultrasonography, chest Xray, skeletal survey (radiologic/nuclear), bone marrow examination
OptionalComplete body PET scan (at baseline and follow-up to monitor response and recurrence)
Special investigations
Liver/biliary dysfunctionLiver biopsy, magnetic resonance cholangiography
Lung involvementHRCT, pulmonary function test, bronchioalveolar lavage, lung biopsy (if necessary)
Craniofacial involvement, aural discharge, visual anomaliesMRI head, HRCT temporal bone
Diabetes inspidusUrine specific gravity, water deprivation test, MRI head
Short stature, pubertal issuesHormonal assessment, MRI head
Spinal involvementMRI spine, spinal biopsy
NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS IN PEDIATRIC HEMATOLYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES

The advances in supportive care have uplifted the survival curves dramatically in childhood hematolymphoid malignancies. Non-pharmacological management includes the appropriate use of interventional and non-interventional approaches tailored to the clinical scenario. The decision of proceeding with endoscopic or surgical intervention for an acutely ill child with cancer requires improved interdisciplinary communication and logistics in place. The various endoscopic interventions include biliary stenting by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for cholangitis due to lymph nodal biliary obstruction and endoscopic balloon dilatation for dominant biliary strictures in sclerosing cholangitis[50]. Endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy can be considered for optimizing nutrition in children with severe malnutrition, severe oral mucositis or anorexia. Similarly, antral stents can be deployed endoscopically for improving nutrition and palliation in malignant gastric outlet obstruction by lymphoma. Endoscopic closure with hemoclips (through the scope or over the scope) has been attempted in luminal perforations in GI lymphoma but this may be technically difficult and unrewarding. In ductal disruption/disconnected duct syndrome due to pancreatitis, pancreatic duct stenting can be attempted. Endoscopic or endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage for symptomatic pancreatic collections is performed in drug-induced severe pancreatitis. Radiological interventions include percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (for strictures proximal to liver hilum or after failed ERCP) and drainage of abdominal collections (after a sealed perforation or if the child is not a candidate for surgery). Pediatric hematolymphoid malignancies are both chemo and radiosensitive, hence the role of debulking surgery is limited to high-grade GI lymphomas presenting with emergencies such as bowel obstruction due to intussusception and extrinsic nodal compression[102]. Gut perforation, typhlitis and uncontrolled GI bleed may necessitate emergency laparotomy. In children with LCH, sclerosing cholangitis can progress to biliary cirrhosis necessitating salvage by a liver transplant. In liver failure, the use of liver assist devices like Prometheus, molecular adsorbent recirculation system can act as a bridge for liver transplantation.

Non-interventional approaches aim at optimizing nutrition, psychosocial support and judicious use of blood products. Nutritional compromise is multi-factorial and occurs mostly due to cancer-induced anorexia and emetogenic chemotherapeutic drugs. Hence ensuring nutritional rehabilitation through an energy-rich high protein diet and promoting a good psychosocial environment can lead to early recovery of these children[103]. In special circumstances like chylous ascites due to lymphatic infiltration by neoplastic cells, transient dietary modifications include the use of medium-chain triglycerides and restricting intake of long-chain triglycerides.

APPROACH TO COMMON GUT AND LIVER MANIFESTATIONS OF HEMATOLYMPHOID MALIGNANCIES IN CHILDREN

A summary of the clinical features and the recommendations are listed below (Table 4).

Table 4 Common gastrointestinal manifestations with their clinical possibilities and recommendations for practice.
Gut and liver manifestation
Possible reasons at diagnosis
Possible reasons during therapy
Recommendations
Jaundice Tumor infiltration and necrosis of hepatocytes; Obstruction of biliary system by enlarged lymph nodes; Transfusion related viral hepatitis; Consider possibility of HLH as atypical presentation of hemato-lymphoid malignancies; Sclerosing cholangitis in a case of LCHChemotherapy induced liver injury (e.g., 6-MP, Methotrexate); Reactivation of viral infections (e.g., HBV, HCV, CMV, EBV)Screen for HBV, HCV, HIV before starting chemotherapy; Safe transfusion practices; Exercise pharmacovigilance (chemotherapeutic drug dose modifications with underlying hepatic impairment, therapeutic drug monitoring-e.g., Methotrexate); Screen for genetic polymorphisms (e.g., TPMT, NUDT15 genotype for 6-MP)[104]; Abdominal imaging either CT angio or MRCP with MRI on clinical basis; Prioritize chemotherapy initiation for underlying malignancy over waiting for resolution of HLH with HLH treatment protocol[105]; Initiation of antivirals before chemotherapy for hepatitis B, hepatitis C infection as per standard guidelines[106,107]
Liver failurePeculiar presentation with T-ALL, AML, TAM of newborn; Overwhelming sepsis at baseline due to poor immune reservePeculiar toxicity with L-asparaginase, high dose methotrexate and anthracyclines in predisposed individuals; Viral hepatitis especially hepatitis B reactivationEarly steroid initiation at presentation for preventing further liver cell necrosis in a case of ALL; Considering chemotherapy for TAM; FFP, cryoprecipitate product transfusions for hemostasis; Screen for hepatotrophic viral markers and appropriate antiviral therapy
Visceral perforationAdvanced stage lymphomas causing gut obstruction; Typhlitis due to severe neutropenia (e.g., AML); Appendicitis as presentation (especially with ALL)Post chemotherapy initiation with high grade lymphomas of stomach or intestine; C. difficile infectionAbdominal girth, bowel sound monitoring stringently in suspect cases; Abdominal imaging by CECT enterography with oral positive contrast; Stool examination in colitis for C. difficile; Anticipatory surgical consultation in advanced lymphomas
Bowel obstructionHigh grade lymphomas causing intussusception; Extrinsic nodal compression of gutVinca alkaloid induced paralytic ileus during therapy; Septic ileus during periods of neutropeniaAbdominal imaging with CECT enterography; Adequate broad spectrum antibiotic cover; Surgical consultation for intussusception; Continuous gastric /bowel drainage above the level of obstruction
GI bleedMucosal bleed due to thrombocytopenia at presentation; GI lymphoma[77]Thrombocytopeniainduced mucosal bleeds; Drug induced coagulopathy (e.g., peg-asparaginase); Typhlitis; C. difficile colitisConservative management with blood products; Laparotomy only in uncontrolled bleed for surgical resection; In suspect cases of C.difficile colitis, stool for toxin assay, GDH and consider colonoscopy
Pancreatitis Rare as initial presentationDrug induced (Asparaginase preparations, cytarabine)Do not rechallenge with the same drug in case of AAP; Genetic testing could have a future role in predicting the risk of drug induced pancreatitis
Ascites High grade lymphomas at presentation; Peritoneal lymphomatosis; Chylous ascites in prolonged untreated Hodgkins lymphomas; Reported cases of secondary BCS due to Burkitts lymphoma; Pancreatic ascites in severe pancreatitisDrug induced liver failure (ex. Anthracyclines at toxic dose, L-asparaginase)Ascitic fluid for flow cytometry and malignant cytology can provide rapid diagnosis; MCT supplementation for chylous ascites; Octreotide and TPN for refractory chylous ascites; Lymphangiography if refractory chylous ascites
CONCLUSION

GI and hepatobiliary manifestations of hematolymphoid malignancies in children present with a multitude of symptoms ranging from subtle manifestations like asymptomatic organomegaly to moribund presentations like acute liver failure. The crux lies in establishing a diagnosis of malignancy while differentiating it from chronic infectious and inflammatory conditions. Use of invasive procedures such as guided biopsies and endoscopic interventions should be urged at the earliest window to avoid delay in therapy initiation in hematolymphoid malignancies with such atypical presentations. Pharmacovigilance should be practiced while using chemotherapeutic drugs to avoid hepatic and GI impairment. A prior thorough overview of specific manifestations and distinct drug toxicities by the physician would aid in optimal clinical management.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Oncology

Country/Territory of origin: India

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Abdelbasset WK, Saudi Arabia; Delgado-Gallegos JL, Mexico; Saito R, Japan S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang JJ

References
1.  Gutierrez A, Silverman LB.   Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia. In: Orkin HS, Fisher DE, Ginsburg D, Look T, Lux SE, Nathan DG, editors. Nathan and Oski’s Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2015: 1527-1554.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Carroll WL, BhatlaT.   Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia. In: Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD, editors. Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. London: Elsevier, 2016: 367-389.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Ebert EC, Hagspiel KD. Gastrointestinal manifestations of leukemia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:458-463.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Segal I, Rassekh SR, Bond MC, Senger C, Schreiber RA. Abnormal liver transaminases and conjugated hyperbilirubinemia at presentation of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:434-439.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Gu RL, Xiang M, Suo J, Yuan J. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an adolescent presenting with acute hepatic failure: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11:135-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Reddi DM, Barbas AS, Castleberry AW, Rege AS, Vikraman DS, Brennan TV, Ravindra KV, Collins BH, Sudan DL, Lagoo AS, Martin AE. Liver transplantation in an adolescent with acute liver failure from acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Transplant. 2014;18:E57-E63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Abaji R, Krajinovic M. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphisms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune disorders: influence on treatment response. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2017;10:143-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  DeLeve LD  Cancer chemotherapy. In: Kaplowitz N, DeLeve LD, editors. Drug-induced liver disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013: 541-568.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Hijiya N, van der Sluis IM. Asparaginase-associated toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57:748-757.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 134]  [Article Influence: 14.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Schmiegelow K. Advances in individual prediction of methotrexate toxicity: a review. Br J Haematol. 2009;146:489-503.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 152]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 166]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Rodrigues FG, Dasilva G, Wexner SD. Neutropenic enterocolitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:42-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
12.  Altınel E, Yarali N, Isık P, Bay A, Kara A, Tunc B. Typhlitis in acute childhood leukemia. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21:36-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Robazzi TC, Silva LR, Mendonça N, Barreto JH. Gastrointestinal manifestations as initial presentation of acute leukemias in children and adolescents. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2008;38:126-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Guan X, An X, Yu J, Xu Y. Incidence of upper digestive tract inflammation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:3671-3677.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Cardona Zorrilla AF, Reveiz Herault L, Casasbuenas A, Aponte DM, Ramos PL. Systematic review of case reports concerning adults suffering from neutropenic enterocolitis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8:31-38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Tamburrini S, Setola FR, Belfiore MP, Saturnino PP, Della Casa MG, Sarti G, Abete R, Marano I. Ultrasound diagnosis of typhlitis. J Ultrasound. 2019;22:103-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Kirkpatrick ID, Greenberg HM. Gastrointestinal complications in the neutropenic patient: characterization and differentiation with abdominal CT. Radiology. 2003;226:668-674.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 156]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 166]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Mullassery D, Bader A, Battersby AJ, Mohammad Z, Jones EL, Parmar C, Scott R, Pizer BL, Baillie CT. Diagnosis, incidence, and outcomes of suspected typhlitis in oncology patients--experience in a tertiary pediatric surgical center in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:381-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Ali A, Alhindi S, Alalwan AA. Acute Appendicitis in a Child With Acute Leukemia and Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus. 2020;12:e8858.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lakshmaiah KC, Malabagi AS, Govindbabu, Shetty R, Sinha M, Jayashree RS. Febrile Neutropenia in Hematological Malignancies: Clinical and Microbiological Profile and Outcome in High Risk Patients. J Lab Physicians. 2015;7:116-120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Wang Y, Zhang X, Dong L, Tang K, Fang H, Tang Z, Zhang B. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with pancreas involvement in an adult patient mimicking pancreatic tumor: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e15685.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Grimes AC, Chen Y, Bansal H, Aguilar C, Perez Prado L, Quezada G, Estrada J, Tomlinson GE. Genetic markers for treatment-related pancreatitis in a cohort of Hispanic children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:725-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Stefanović M, Jazbec J, Lindgren F, Bulajić M, Löhr M. Acute pancreatitis as a complication of childhood cancer treatment. Cancer Med. 2016;5:827-836.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Raja RA, Schmiegelow K, Frandsen TL. Asparaginase-associated pancreatitis in children. Br J Haematol. 2012;159:18-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
25.  Bender C, Maese L, Carter-Febres M, Verma A. Clinical Utility of Pegaspargase in Children, Adolescents and Young Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Review. Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2021;11:25-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Youssef YH, Makkeyah SM, Soliman AF, Meky NH. Influence of genetic variants in asparaginase pathway on the susceptibility to asparaginase-related toxicity and patients' outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021;88:313-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Wolthers BO, Frandsen TL, Baruchel A, Attarbaschi A, Barzilai S, Colombini A, Escherich G, Grell K, Inaba H, Kovacs G, Liang DC, Mateos M, Mondelaers V, Möricke A, Ociepa T, Samarasinghe S, Silverman LB, van der Sluis IM, Stanulla M, Vrooman LM, Yano M, Zapotocka E, Schmiegelow K; Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group. Asparaginase-associated pancreatitis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: an observational Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1238-1248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Berman JN, Look AT.   Pediatric Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Myeloproliferative Disease. In: Orkin HS, Fisher DE, Ginsburg D, Look T, Lux SE, Nathan DG, editors. Nathan and Oski’s Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2015: 1555-1613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Van de Louw A, Lewis AM, Yang Z. Autopsy findings in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era: a focus on lung pathology and acute respiratory failure. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:119-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Walsh LR, Yuan C, Boothe JT, Conway HE, Mindiola-Romero AE, Barrett-Campbell OO, Yerrabothala S, Lansigan F. Acute myeloid leukemia with hepatic infiltration presenting as obstructive jaundice. Leuk Res Rep. 2021;15:100251.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Nakano Y, Yamasaki K, Otsuka Y, Ujiro A, Kawakita R, Tamagawa N, Okada K, Fujisaki H, Yorifuji T, Hara J. Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RBM15-MKL1 Presenting as Severe Hepatic Failure. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017;4:2333794X16689011.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Athale UH, Kaste SC, Bodner SM, Ribeiro RC. Splenic rupture in children with hematologic malignancies. Cancer. 2000;88:480-490.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Vincenzi B, Armento G, Spalato Ceruso M, Catania G, Leakos M, Santini D, Minotti G, Tonini G. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity in cancer patients - implication for treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15:1219-1238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Trivedi CD, Pitchumoni CS. Drug-induced pancreatitis: an update. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:709-716.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 221]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Kobos R, Shukla N, Armstrong SA.   Infant leukemias. In: Orkin HS, Fisher DE, Ginsburg D, Look T, Lux SE, Nathan DG, editors. Nathan and Oski’s Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood. Phiadelphia: Elsevier, 2015: 1614-1625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Hang XF, Xin HG, Wang L, Xu WS, Wang JX, Ni W, Cai X, Zhang RQ. Nonleukemic myeloid sarcoma of the liver: a case report and review of literature. Hepatol Int. 2011;5:747-750.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Bhatnagar N, Nizery L, Tunstall O, Vyas P, Roberts I. Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis and AML in Down Syndrome: an Update. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016;11:333-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Hijiya N, Millot F, Suttorp M. Chronic myeloid leukemia in children: clinical findings, management, and unanswered questions. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62:107-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Many BT, Lautz TB, Dobrozsi S, Wilkinson KH, Rossoff J, Le-Nguyen A, Dakhallah N, Piche N, Weinschenk W, Cooke-Barker J, Goodhue C, Zamora A, Kim ES, Talbot LJ, Quevedo OG, Murphy AJ, Commander SJ, Tracy ET, Short SS, Meyers RL, Rinehardt HN, Aldrink JH, Heaton TE, Ortiz MV, Baertschiger R, Wong KE, Lapidus-Krol E, Butter A, Davidson J, Stark R, Ramaraj A, Malek M, Mastropolo R, Morgan K, Murphy JT, Janek K, Le HD, Dasgupta R, Lal DR; PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE. Appendectomy Versus Observation for Appendicitis in Neutropenic Children With Cancer. Pediatrics. 2021;147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Alexander S, FerrandoAA.   Pediatric Lymphoma. In: Orkin HS, Fisher DE,Ginsburg D, Look T, Lux SE, Nathan DG, editors.Nathan and Oski’s Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2015: 1626-1672.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Guermazi A, Brice P, de Kerviler E E, Fermé C, Hennequin C, Meignin V, Frija J. Extranodal Hodgkin disease: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:161-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 182]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Englund A, Glimelius I, Rostgaard K, Smedby KE, Eloranta S, Molin D, Kuusk T, Brown PN, Kamper P, Hjalgrim H, Ljungman G, Hjalgrim LL. Hodgkin lymphoma in children, adolescents and young adults - a comparative study of clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:276-282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Hagleitner MM, Metzger ML, Flerlage JE, Kelly KM, Voss SD, Kluge R, Kurch L, Cho S, Mauz-Koerholz C, Beishuizen A. Liver involvement in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review by an international collaboration on Staging Evaluation and Response Criteria Harmonization (SEARCH) for Children, Adolescent, and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma (CAYAHL). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67:e28365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Guliter S, Erdem O, Isik M, Yamac K, Uluoglu O. Cholestatic liver disease with ductopenia (vanishing bile duct syndrome) in Hodgkin's disease: report of a case. Tumori. 2004;90:517-520.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Shah KK, Pritt BS, Alexander MP. Histopathologic review of granulomatous inflammation. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2017;7:1-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 21.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Rich NE, Sanders C, Hughes RS, Fontana RJ, Stravitz RT, Fix O, Han SH, Naugler WE, Zaman A, Lee WM. Malignant infiltration of the liver presenting as acute liver failure. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1025-1028.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Shimizu Y. Liver in systemic disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4111-4119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Bakhit M, McCarty TR, Park S, Njei B, Cho M, Karagozian R, Liapakis A. Vanishing bile duct syndrome in Hodgkin's lymphoma: A case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:366-372.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Ghosh I, Bakhshi S. Jaundice as a presenting manifestation of pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma: etiology, management, and outcome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010;32:e131-e135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Odemiş B, Parlak E, Başar O, Yüksel O, Sahin B. Biliary tract obstruction secondary to malignant lymphoma: experience at a referral center. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:2323-2332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Huang MS, Weinstein H.   Non-HodgkinsLymphoma.In: Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD, editors. Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. London: Elsevier, 2016: 442-452.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA; Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group;  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group;  European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium;  Italian Lymphoma Foundation;  European Organisation for Research;  Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group;  Grupo Español de MédulaÓsea;  German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group;  German Hodgkin's Study Group;  Japanese Lymphoma Study Group;  Lymphoma Study Association;  NCIC Clinical Trials Group;  Nordic Lymphoma Study Group;  Southwest Oncology Group;  United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059-3068.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2850]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3198]  [Article Influence: 319.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Superfin D, Iannucci AA, Davies AM. Commentary: Oncologic drugs in patients with organ dysfunction: a summary. Oncologist. 2007;12:1070-1083.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Ballonoff A, Kavanagh B, Nash R, Drabkin H, Trotter J, Costa L, Rabinovitch R. Hodgkin lymphoma-related vanishing bile duct syndrome and idiopathic cholestasis: statistical analysis of all published cases and literature review. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:962-970.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Aftandilian CC, Friedmann AM. Burkitt lymphoma with pancreatic involvement. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010;32:e338-e340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Pietsch JB, Shankar S, Ford C, Johnson JE. Obstructive jaundice secondary to lymphoma in childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1792-1795.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Almakdisi T, Massoud S, Makdisi G. Lymphomas and chylous ascites: review of the literature. Oncologist. 2005;10:632-635.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Bhardwaj R, Vaziri H, Gautam A, Ballesteros E, Karimeddini D, Wu GY. Chylous Ascites: A Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018;6:105-113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 18.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Steinemann DC, Dindo D, Clavien PA, Nocito A. Atraumatic chylous ascites: systematic review on symptoms and causes. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:899-905.e1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Curakova E, Genadieva-Dimitrova M, Misevski J, Caloska-Ivanova V, Andreevski V, Todorovska B, Isahi U, Trajkovska M, Misevska P, Joksimovic N, Genadieva-Stavric S, Antovic S, Jankulovski N. NonHodgkin's Lymphoma with Peritoneal Localization. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2014;2014:723473.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Ravindranath A, Srivastava A, Seetharaman J, Pandey R, Sarma MS, Poddar U, Yachha SK. Peritoneal Lymphomatosis Masquerading as Pyoperitoneum in a Teenage Boy. ACG Case Rep J. 2019;6:e00116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Biko DM, Anupindi SA, Hernandez A, Kersun L, Bellah R. Childhood Burkitt lymphoma: abdominal and pelvic imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1304-1315.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  James KM, Bogue CO, Murphy AJ, Navarro OM. Peritoneal Malignancy in Children: A Pictorial Review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016;67:402-408.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Que Y, Wang X. Sonography of peritoneal lymphomatosis: some new and different findings. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31:55-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Ugurluer G, Miller RC, Li Y, Thariat J, Ghadjar P, Schick U, Ozsahin M. Primary Hepatic Lymphoma: A Retrospective, Multicenter Rare Cancer Network Study. Rare Tumors. 2016;8:6502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Delemos AS, Friedman LS. Systemic causes of cholestasis. Clin Liver Dis. 2013;17:301-317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Citak EC, Sari I, Demirci M, Karakus C, Sahin Y. Primary hepatic Burkitt lymphoma in a child and review of literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33:e368-e371.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Baumhoer D, Tzankov A, Dirnhofer S, Tornillo L, Terracciano LM. Patterns of liver infiltration in lymphoproliferative disease. Histopathology. 2008;53:81-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Noronha V, Shafi NQ, Obando JA, Kummar S. Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the liver. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;53:199-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 137]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 147]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Cameron AM, Truty J, Truell J, Lassman C, Zimmerman MA, Kelly BS Jr, Farmer DG, Hiatt JR, Ghobrial R, Busuttil RW. Fulminant hepatic failure from primary hepatic lymphoma: successful treatment with orthotopic liver transplantation and chemotherapy. Transplantation. 2005;80:993-996.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Yabe M, Miranda RN, Medeiros LJ. Hepatosplenic T-cell Lymphoma: a review of clinicopathologic features, pathogenesis, and prognostic factors. Hum Pathol. 2018;74:5-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Diak P, Siegel J, La Grenade L, Choi L, Lemery S, McMahon A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers and malignancy in children: forty-eight cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2517-2524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 196]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 207]  [Article Influence: 14.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  van Rheenen PF, Aloi M, Assa A, Bronsky J, Escher JC, Fagerberg UL, Gasparetto M, Gerasimidis K, Griffiths A, Henderson P, Koletzko S, Kolho KL, Levine A, van Limbergen J, Martin de Carpi FJ, Navas-López VM, Oliva S, de Ridder L, Russell RK, Shouval D, Spinelli A, Turner D, Wilson D, Wine E, Ruemmele FM. The Medical Management of Paediatric Crohn's Disease: an ECCO-ESPGHAN Guideline Update. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 230]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 51.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Turner D, Ruemmele FM, Orlanski-Meyer E, Griffiths AM, de Carpi JM, Bronsky J, Veres G, Aloi M, Strisciuglio C, Braegger CP, Assa A, Romano C, Hussey S, Stanton M, Pakarinen M, de Ridder L, Katsanos K, Croft N, Navas-López V, Wilson DC, Lawrence S, Russell RK. Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care-An Evidence-based Guideline From European Crohn's and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67:257-291.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 210]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 232]  [Article Influence: 38.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Kassira N, Pedroso FE, Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, Sola JE. Primary gastrointestinal tract lymphoma in the pediatric patient: review of 265 patients from the SEER registry. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1956-1964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Kumar P, Singh A, Deshmukh A, Chandrashekhara SH. Imaging of Bowel Lymphoma: A Pictorial Review. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Morsi A, Abd El-Ghani Ael-G, El-Shafiey M, Fawzy M, Ismail H, Monir M. Clinico-pathological features and outcome of management of pediatric gastrointestinal lymphoma. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005;17:251-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
78.  Qadri SK, Shah A, Hamdani NH, Baba KM. Primary gastrointestinal lymphomas in children: An experience of 12 years from a tertiary care center of North India. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53:300-303.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Bellan C, Stefano L, Giulia de F, Rogena EA, Lorenzo L. Burkitt lymphoma vs diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a practical approach. Hematol Oncol. 2009;27:182-185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Ghosal A, Acharyya S. A rare presentation of Hodgkin's lymphoma in a very young child, with involvement of the appendix. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Rosolen A, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, Guillerman RP, Sandlund JT, Patte C, Reiter A, Cairo MS. Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2112-2118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 96]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Hameed R, Parkes S, Davies P, Morland BJ. Paediatric malignant tumours of the gastrointestinal tract in the West Midlands, UK, 1957-2000: a large population based survey. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43:257-260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Erkurt MA, Aydogdu I, Kuku I, Kaya E, Basaran Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: 10 years of experience from a single center in eastern Anatolia. Med Princ Pract. 2009;18:399-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Evangelista-Leite D, Affonso Madaloso B, Shouta Yamashita B, Enrico Aloise F, Polito Verdasca L, Lopes de Mello M, Murata Hayashi R, Zimberg Chehter E. Treating chronic diarrhea: A systematic review on Immunoproliferative Small Intestinal Disease (IPSID). PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Geethakumari PR, Rizvi SM.   Gastrointestinal Lymphoma. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, editors. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021: 442-457.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
86.  Offor UT, Bacon CM, Roberts J, Powell J, Brodlie M, Wood K, Windebank KP, Flett J, Hewitt T, Rand V, Hasan A, Parry G, Gennery AR, Reinhardt Z, Bomken S. Transplantation for congenital heart disease is associated with an increased risk of Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in children. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40:24-32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Stanley K, Friehling E, Ranganathan S, Mazariegos G, McAllister-Lucas LM, Sindhi R. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric intestinal transplant recipients: A literature review. Pediatr Transplant. 2018;22:e13211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Liu Y, Sun LY, Zhu ZJ, Wei L, Qu W, Wang L, Yuan LL, Zeng ZG. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after paediatric liver transplantation. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e13843.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Ravindranath A, Pai G, Sen Sarma M, Srivastava A, Lal R, Agrawal V, Marak R, Yachha SK, Poddar U, Prasad P. Gastrointestinal Basidiobolomycosis: A Mimic of Lymphoma. J Pediatr. 2021;228:306-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Rodriguez-Galindo C, Allen CE. Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2020;135:1319-1331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 138]  [Article Influence: 34.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Arceci RJ  Histiocytosis syndromes. In: Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD, editors. Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. London: Elsevier, 2016: 407-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
92.  Heisig A, Sörensen J, Zimmermann SY, Schöning S, Schwabe D, Kvasnicka HM, Schwentner R, Hutter C, Lehrnbecher T. Vemurafenib in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: report of a pediatric patient and review of the literature. Oncotarget. 2018;9:22236-22240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
93.  Allen CE, Ladisch S, McClain KL. How I treat Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2015;126:26-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 12.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  Fu Z, Li H, Arslan ME, Ells PF, Lee H. Hepatic Langerhans cell histiocytosis: A review. World J Clin Oncol. 2021;12:335-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Yi X, Han T, Zai H, Long X, Wang X, Li W. Liver involvement of Langerhans' cell histiocytosis in children. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:7098-7106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
96.  Faden I, Avitzur Y, Abla O, Parra DA. Findings encountered in percutaneous cholangiography in a case of post-transplant recurrence of hepatic Langerhans cell histiocytosis with biliary involvement. Pediatr Transplant. 2021;25:e13838.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Braier J, Ciocca M, Latella A, de Davila MG, Drajer M, Imventarza O. Cholestasis, sclerosing cholangitis, and liver transplantation in Langerhans cell Histiocytosis. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;38:178-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Jezierska M, Stefanowicz J, Romanowicz G, Kosiak W, Lange M. Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children - a disease with many faces. Recent advances in pathogenesis, diagnostic examinations and treatment. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018;35:6-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 9.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Hait E, Liang M, Degar B, Glickman J, Fox VL. Gastrointestinal tract involvement in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: case report and literature review. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1593-e1599.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
100.  Donadieu J, Larabi IA, Tardieu M, Visser J, Hutter C, Sieni E, Kabbara N, Barkaoui M, Miron J, Chalard F, Milne P, Haroche J, Cohen F, Hélias-Rodzewicz Z, Simon N, Jehanne M, Kolenova A, Pagnier A, Aladjidi N, Schneider P, Plat G, Lutun A, Sonntagbauer A, Lehrnbecher T, Ferster A, Efremova V, Ahlmann M, Blanc L, Nicholson J, Lambilliote A, Boudiaf H, Lissat A, Svojgr K, Bernard F, Elitzur S, Golan M, Evseev D, Maschan M, Idbaih A, Slater O, Minkov M, Taly V, Collin M, Alvarez JC, Emile JF, Héritier S. Vemurafenib for Refractory Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis in Children: An International Observational Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2857-2865.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 21.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Abdalian R, Heathcote EJ. Sclerosing cholangitis: a focus on secondary causes. Hepatology. 2006;44:1063-1074.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 171]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Mehendale S, Kumar CP, Venkatasubramanian S, Prasanna T. Intussusception in Children Aged Less than Five years. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:1087-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
103.  Rogers PC. Importance of nutrition in pediatric oncology. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52:176-178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Relling MV, Schwab M, Whirl-Carrillo M, Suarez-Kurtz G, Pui CH, Stein CM, Moyer AM, Evans WE, Klein TE, Antillon-Klussmann FG, Caudle KE, Kato M, Yeoh AEJ, Schmiegelow K, Yang JJ. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT15 Genotypes: 2018 Update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105:1095-1105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 280]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 357]  [Article Influence: 71.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
105.  Lehmberg K, Nichols KE, Henter JI, Girschikofsky M, Greenwood T, Jordan M, Kumar A, Minkov M, La Rosée P, Weitzman S; Study Group on Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Subtypes of the Histiocyte Society. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with malignancies. Haematologica. 2015;100:997-1004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Indolfi G, Abdel-Hady M, Bansal S, Debray D, Smets F, Czubkowski P, van der Woerd W, Samyn M, Jahnel J, Gupte G, Zellos A, Mozer-Glassberg Y, Verkade HJ, Sokal E, Fischler B. Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70:527-538.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
107.  Ghany MG, Morgan TR; AASLD-IDSA Hepatitis C Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Hepatology. 2020;71:686-721.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 348]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 440]  [Article Influence: 110.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]