Basic Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2020; 12(3): 276-288
Published online Mar 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i3.276
Increased KIF21B expression is a potential prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma
Hui-Qi Zhao, Bao-Long Dong, Xiao-Hua Dong, Xiao-Jun Yang, Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
Min Zhang, Department of Pathology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
Yu He, School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
Shi-Yong Chen, Biao Wu, School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750000, Gansu Province, China
ORCID number: Hui-Qi Zhao (0000-0001-7810-2005); Bao-Long Dong (0000-0002-8349-1903); Min Zhang (0000-0003-4820-9412); Xiao-Hua Dong (0000-0003-2374-9826); Yu He (0000-0002-7127-3773); Shi-Yong Chen (0000-0003-2678-7019); Biao Wu (0000-0003-4792-1133); Xiao-Jun Yang (0000-0003-3770-8451).
Author contributions: Zhao HQ, Dong BL, and Zhang M contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors. All authors substantially contributed to the conception and design of the study as well as acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; all authors drafted the article and made critical revisions related to the intellectual content of the manuscript, and approved the final version of the article to be published.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81260326 and No. 81660398; the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, No. 17JR5RA034.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Gansu Provincial hospital (2019-063).
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Jun Yang, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Professor, Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China. yangxjmd@aliyun.com
Received: October 23, 2019
Peer-review started: October 23, 2019
First decision: November 18, 2019
Revised: November 24, 2019
Accepted: December 23, 2019
Article in press: December 23, 2019
Published online: March 15, 2020
Processing time: 136 Days and 6.2 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The kinesin superfamily protein member KIF21B plays an important role in regulating mitotic progression; however, the function and mechanisms of KIF21B in cancer, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are unknown.

AIM

To explore the role of KIF21B in hepatocellular carcinoma and its effect on prognosis after hepatectomy.

METHODS

First, data on the differential expression of KIF21B in patients with HCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas database was analyzed. Subsequently, the expression levels of KIF21B in HCC cell lines and hepatocytes were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and its biological effect on BEL-7404 cells was evaluated by KIF21B knockdown. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to validate the differential expression of KIF21B in HCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues from 186 patients with HCC after hepatectomy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess prognosis significance.

RESULTS

KIF21B expression levels were significantly higher in HCC tissues than in corresponding adjacent normal tissues. The expression levels of KIF21B in four HCC cell lines were higher than that in normal liver cells. Functional experiments showed that KIF21B knockdown remarkably suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. Moreover, immunohistochemistry results are consistent with The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis, with KIF21B expression levels being increased in HCC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed KIF21B as an independent risk factor for overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with HCC after hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results provide evidence that KIF21B plays an important role in HCC progression and may be a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for HCC.

Key Words: Hepatocellular carcinoma; KIF21B; Proliferation; Apoptosis; Prognosis

Core tip: The kinesin superfamily protein member KIF21B plays an important role in regulating mitotic progression; however, the function and mechanisms of KIF21B in cancer, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma, are unknown. We explored the role of KIF21B in hepatocellular carcinoma and elucidated its clinical significance. Our findings suggest that KIF21B may be a potential biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma.



INTRODUCTION

According to the global cancer statistics in 2018, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranked sixth and third in incidence and mortality, respectively[1]. In China, its incidence and mortality ranked fourth and third, respectively[2]. Patients with HCC who are diagnosed at an early stage have a relatively favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 75%[3]. However, most HCC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, and recurrence and metastasis remain major challenges in HCC treatment, leading to an extremely poor prognosis[4]. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HCC.

Microtubule kinesin motor proteins participate in a series of cellular processes, such as mitosis, motility, and organelle transportation, and are involved in human carcinogenesis[5]. Kinesins are molecular motor proteins that move along microtubule tracks and perform various functions in intracellular transport and cell division[6]. Previous studies have reported that kinesins play critical roles in tumorigenesis and the progression of malignancies[7,8]. KIF21B, a member of the kinesin superfamily of proteins, plays an important role in regulating mitotic progression. Studies have confirmed that KIF21B was found in several types of cells, including neurons and immune cells[9-11]. Genetic alterations in the KIF21B protein have been linked with several neurodegenerative diseases[12]. KIF21B performs in excitatory synaptic transmission and silencing the expression of KIF21B inhibits its function and affects its biological behavior[13]. However, no previous studies have focused on the function and mechanisms of KIF21B in cancer, particularly in HCC. The role of KIF21B in HCC and its effect on prognosis have not yet been investigated and remain unknown.

In this study, we explored the role of KIF21B in HCC and elucidated its clinical significance. We first assessed the differential expression of KIF21B using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Then, we measured its biological effect on BEL-7404 cells after transfection with KIF21B-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that KIF21B was an independent risk factor for overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with HCC. KIF21B may serve as a novel prognostic marker and as a therapeutic target in the treatment of HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical tissue specimens

A total of 186 HCC tissue specimens and matched adjacent normal tissues collected at Gansu Provincial Hospital between 2013 and 2018 were included in the study. In accordance with the protocol used to obtain the tissue samples, informed consent was obtained from all donors and recipients. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gansu Provincial Hospital. The characteristics of patients with HCC are summarized in Table 1. Two independent pathologists diagnosed HCC based on the World Health Organization criteria. None of the patients had received chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or transarterial chemoembolization prior to surgery. HCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were collected, fixed with 10% formaldehyde solution, and embedded in paraffin.

Table 1 Correlation between KIF21B expression and clinicopathological characteristics.
CharacteristicnKIF21B expression
P value
LowHigh
Age (yr)0.877
> 551154273
≤ 55712744
Gender0.286
Male1023468
Female843549
Tumor size (cm)0.229
> 5892960
≤ 5974057
Liver cirrhosis0.543
Yes1033667
No833350
TNM stage0.046a
I-II1053273
III-IV813744
HBsAg0.003b
Yes1103179
No763838
AFP (ng/mL)0.061
> 4001124072
≤ 400742945
Vascular invasion0.012a
Yes1173582
No693435
The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and analysis of differential expression of KIF21B

The KIF21B expression profile and relative clinicopathologic features of patients with HCC were selected from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/legacy-archive/search/f). The database included 50 paired cancer and adjacent normal tissues, which were used to examine the differential expression of KIF21B between HCC and adjacent normal tissues. The data were standardized using the Trimmed Mean of M-values method, and biological coefficient of variation was performed for the quality control. Differentially expressed genes were accessed using the TCGA analyze-DEA function considering a log2 fold change > 1 or < −1. The fold change was the ratio of gene expression in the cancer samples to that in the adjacent normal samples. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Cell culture and transfection

HCC cell lines Hep-G2, BEL7402, BEL-7404, and SMMC-7721 and the normal liver cell line Chang liver were purchased from Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). BEL7402, BEL-7404, and Chang liver cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). SMMC-7721 and HepG2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The cell lines were cultured in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. To further probe the role of KIF21B in HCC cells, KIF21B expression in BEL-7404 cells was silenced using lentivirus-mediated siRNA. In brief, cells were transfected for 24 h with lentiviral constructs expressing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) specific for KIF21B (shKIF21B; Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd.) or control shRNA (shCtrl; Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd.). Green fluorescence was used to estimate the efficiency of transfection. Stable knockdown cells were selected using puromycin.

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis

TRIzol reagent (Shanghai Pufei Biotech Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) was used to extract total RNA from BEL-7404 cells, which was used as a template for synthesis of cDNA using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Beijing, China). For real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), cDNA was mixed with SYBR Master Mixture (TAKARA, Kyoto, Japan) and amplified using a real-time PCR thermocycler (Agilent Technologies, Beijing, China). The PCR primers used have the following sequences: KIF21B forward, 5ʹ-GGATGCCACAGATGAGTT-3ʹ and reverse, 5ʹ-TGTCCCGTAACCAAGTTC-3ʹ; GAPDH forward, 5ʹ-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3ʹ and reverse, 5ʹ-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3ʹ. PCR amplification was quantitated using the 2-∆∆Ct method. Each sample was amplified in triplicate, and GAPDH was used as an internal control. The KIF21B and GAPDH primers were designed by Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd.

Western blot analysis

Concentrations of proteins extracted from cells were measured using a Bicinchoninic acid Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to separate the total proteins, and the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States). The membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies: Mouse-human KIF21B antibody (1:400; Sigma-Aldrich) and rabbit-human anti-GAPDH (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, United States); goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology CA, United States) and goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Cell growth assay

BEL-7404 cells were transfected with shKIF21B or shCtrl. Three days later, the cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2000 cells/well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 5 d. The cells were counted daily using a Celigo Imaging Cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience, Lawrence, MA, United States). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

MTT assay

Lentivirus-infected BEL-7404 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2000 cells/well, and cell viability was assessed using MTT (Genview, Beijing, China). MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to each well (20 μL) and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Dimethyl sulfoxide (Shanghai Shiyi Chemical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China) was added to each well (100 μL). The MTT colorimetric assay was performed to detect cell proliferation after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 d of incubation. Absorbance by the resulting formazan crystals (solubilized with DMSO) was read at 490 nm using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay

To quantify the effects of shKIF21B on cell apoptosis, the transfected cells were fixed with ice-cold 75% ethyl alcohol at 4 °C overnight. The cells were stained using an Annexin V-APC/7-AAD Kit (eBioscience, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were incubated with Annexin V–APC for 15–20 min at room temperature in the dark.

Colony formation assay

Colony formation assays were used to detect the growth of cells. BEL-7404 cells were transfected with shKIF21B or shCtrl. Three days later, 1000 cells/well were seeded into six-well plates and cultured for 14 d at 37 °C. Cell status was evaluated, and the medium replaced every 3 d. At the end of the culture period, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30–60 min. The fixed cells were washed with PBS, stained with Crystal Violet Staining Solution (Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) for 10–20 min, and washed several times with double-distilled water. The number of colonies formed was counted using a microscope and photographed.

Immunohistochemical assay

Sections of each specimen (5 μm thick) were placed on glass slides, deparaffinized, dehydrated, and boiled in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer for antigen retrieval. After inhibition of endogenous peroxidase activity by incubation for 10 min with methanol containing 0.3% H2O2, the sections were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary polyclonal rabbit-human KIF21B antibody (1:200; Bioss, Beijing, China). After three washes with PBS, the slides were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG for 30 min, reacted with diaminobenzidine, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining for KIF21B

Expression of KIF21B was independently evaluated by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinical and pathological stage of the patients. Staining results were assessed by taking into consideration both the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of staining. The positive percentage of KIF21B in the cells was evaluated as follows; 0 (< 10%); 1 (10%-25%); 2 (25%-50%); 3 (50%-70%); and 4 (> 70%). Staining intensity was considered as: 0 (negative); 1 (weak); 2 (moderate); and 3 (strong). According to the overall score of the percentage of positive cells × the intensity of staining, which ranged from 0-12, we graded the staining as follows: 0 (negative); 1-4 (weak); 5-9 (moderate); 10-12 (strong). An overall score > 5 was considered as high expression.

Statistical analysis

All the data shown are the results of at least three independent experiments and are expressed as the mean ± SD. The differences between groups were compared using Student’s t-test. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or χ2 test. Cumulative survival was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS
Differentially expressed KIF21B in HCC

Based on the screening of the 50 pairs of HCC/adjacent normal tissues in TCGA database, KIF21B expression in HCC tissue was upregulated in 31 specimens, unchanged in 14, and downregulated in 5 compared to expression in the corresponding normal tissues (Figure 1A-B). We utilized RT-qPCR to detect the expression of KIF21B in the HCC cell lines (BEL-7404, BEL-7402, HepG2, and SMMC7721) and the normal liver cell line (Chang liver). The results showed that KIF21B mRNA expression was higher in HCC cell lines than in normal liver cells (Figure 1C). The BEL-7404 cell line was selected for use in subsequent investigations due to the KIF21B expression being at the highest level in this cell line among the five HCC cell lines evaluated.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Differential expression of KIF21B in The Cancer Genome Atlas database and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. A and B: Differential expression levels of KIF21B in 50 pairs of matched hepatocellular carcinoma and adjacent normal tissues from the The Cancer Genome Atlas database (P < 0.01); C: KIF21B expression was examined in BEL-7404, BEL-7402, Hep-G2, SMMC-7721, and Chang liver cells. All the data were normalized to mRNA expression levels of human GAPDH using the 2-ΔΔCT method. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01.
Efficiency of shRNA-mediated KIF21B knockdown in BEL-7404 cells

To investigate the role of KIF21B, we knocked down KIF21B expression in BEL-7404 cells using shRNA-mediated interference. As shown in Figure 2A, at 72 h after transfection, the proportion of infected cells in both the shCtrl and shKIF21B groups had reached 80%. Based on the RT-qPCR results (Figure 2B) and Western blot analysis (Figure 2C), the expression of KIF21B mRNA and KIF21B protein in the shCtrl group was significantly higher than that of the shKIF21B group.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Knockdown of KIF21B using lentivirus-mediated small interfering RNA in hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7404 cells. A: The proportion of infected cells in both the shCtrl and shKIF21B groups reached 80%; B: Expression level of KIF21B mRNA in BEL-7404 cells was significantly decreased in the shKIF21B-treated group compared to the shCtrl-treated group; C: Expression level of KIF21B protein significantly increased in the shCtrl-treated group compared to the shKIF21B-treated group (P < 0.01). All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, bP < 0.01.
Silencing of KIF21B expression suppresses HCC cell growth, proliferation, and colony formation and induces apoptosis

BEL-7404 cells transfected with shKIF21B or shCtrl were quantitated for 5 d using Celigo Imaging Cytometer analysis to evaluate cell growth. Silencing KIF21B significantly decreased the total number of cells and the rate of cell growth (Figure 3A-B).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Growth of BEL-7404 cells detected using a Celigo Imaging Cytometer after transfection with short hairpin RNA shCtrl or shKIF21B. A and B: Fluorescence images of cells for each day post-transfection. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, bP < 0.01.

MTT analysis was used to evaluate the effect of KIF21B on cell proliferation. As shown in Figure 4, the shKIF21B group had lower cell viability compared to the shCtrl group with the difference being statistically significant at 4 d and 5 d post-transfection. Thus, silencing the expression of KIF21B inhibited cell proliferation.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Growth of BEL-7404 cells detected by MTT assay after transfection with short hairpin RNA shCtrl or shKIF21B. Cell proliferation was significantly inhibited in the shKIF21B-transfected group cells. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, bP < 0.01.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was used to determine the effect of KIF21B knockdown in inducing apoptosis. The results showed that the level of apoptosis was significantly increased in shKIF21B-transfected cells compared with that of the shCtrl group. This result suggested that knockdown of KIF21B induced cell apoptosis (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Figure 5 Apoptosis of BEL-7404 cells detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting after transfection with short hairpin RNA shCtrl or shKIF21B. Cell apoptosis was significantly inhibited in the shCtrl-transfected group compared with the shKIF21B-transfected group. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, bP < 0.01.

Colony formation assay was used to confirm the effect of KIF21B knockdown on the self-renewal capacity of HCC cells. As shown in Figure 6, the results after transfection of BEL-7404 cells with shKIF21B or shCtrl demonstrated that knockdown of KIF21B significantly reduced the level of apoptosis in the shKIF21B group compared to the shCtrl group.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Self-renewal capacity of BEL-7404 cells detected using colony-forming assays after transfection with short hairpin RNA shCtrl or shKIF21B. Self-renewal capacity of cells was significantly inhibited in the shKIF21B-transfected group cells compared with the shCtrl-transfected group. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA or t-test. The data are reported as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant, bP < 0.01.
Relationship between KIF21B expression and clinicopathological characteristics

Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the relationship between KIF21B expression and clinicopathological characteristics for the 186 patients with HCC. The results revealed that KIF21B was significantly higher in tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissue, and it exhibited cytoplasmic expression (Figure 7A-D). Moreover, the results validated the TGCA data regarding KIF21B expression in HCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. As shown in Table 1, high expression of KIF21B correlated with vascular invasion (P < 0.05), TNM stage (P < 0.05), and HBsAg (P < 0.01). However, KIF21B expression did not correlate with gender, age, tumor size, or alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level (P > 0. 05).

Figure 7
Figure 7 KIF21B expression in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and normal adjacent tissues. A and B: Low expression of KIF21B in normal adjacent tissues (magnification: ×100 for A and ×400 for B); C and D: High expression of KIF21B in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues (magnification: ×100 for C and ×400 for D); E and F: Kaplan-Meier’s survival curves using a log-rank test demonstrating the correlation between KIF21B expression and overall survival or disease-free survival. Dashed lines indicate high KIF21B expression, and solid lines indicate low KIF21B expression.
Relationship between KIF21B expression and survival

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the 186 patients with HCC was performed to evaluate the relationship between KIF21B expression and prognosis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves suggested that HCC patients with higher KIF21B expression had significantly lower OS (P = 0.0002) and DFS (P = 0.0005) after hepatectomy (Figure 7E and F). Univariate analysis showed that liver cirrhosis (P < 0.05) and KIF21B expression (P < 0.01) significantly correlated with OS while age (P < 0.05) and KIF21B expression (P < 0.01) significantly correlated with DFS (Tables 2 and 3, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that the level of KIF21B expression (P < 0.01) was an independent risk factor for OS (Table 2). KIF21B expression level (P < 0.01) and age were independent risk factors for DFS (Table 3). Overall, the univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed the potential of KIF21B as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in HCC.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in 186 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Variable

Overall survival



Univariate


Multivariate

HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
Age (> 55 yr vs ≤ 55 yr)0.4890.195-1.2250.293
Gender (Male vs Female)0.7260.291-1.8090.491
Tumor size (> 5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm)1.5360.549-4.2970.414
Liver cirrhosis (Yes vs No)2.1451.083-4.2510.029a1.1880.712-1.810.510
TNM stage (I-II vs III-IV)0.7180.387-1.3330.294
HBsAg (Yes vs No)0.8440.476-1.4950.560
AFP (> 400 ng/mL vs ≤ 400 ng/mL)1.5760.842-2.9490.155
Vascular invasion (Yes vs No)0.5540.233-1.3160.181
KIF21B expression (low vs high)0.2120.093-0.482< 0.001b0.2640.130-0.539< 0.001b
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival in 186 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Variable

Disease-free survival



Univariate


Multivariate

HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
Age (> 55 yr vs ≤ 55 yr)0.4130.188-0.9090.028a0.4640.284-0.7590.002b
Gender (Male vs Female)0.6360.281-1.4390.277
Tumor size (> 5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm)1.9280.775-4.9750.158
Liver cirrhosis (Yes vs No)1.2850.724-2.2800.392
TNM stage (I-IIvs III-IV)0.7090.423-1.1880.192
HBsAg (Yes vs No)0.7900.480-1.3130.356
AFP (> 400 ng/mL vs ≤ 400 ng/mL)1.1160.657-1.8960.684
Vascular invasion (Yes vs No)0.9050.410-1.9970.805
KIF21B expression (low vs high)0.3200.168-0.6110.001b0.3730.216-0.643< 0.001b
DISCUSSION

HCC is one of the most common liver malignancies worldwide, leading to extremely high incidence and mortality rates[4]. Due to continued tumor growth and metastasis, current treatment options are limited. Therefore, it is of great significance to determine the underlying mechanism of HCC to identify novel targets for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HCC.

Kinesins are a superfamily of motor proteins that participate in mitosis, intracellular transportation, and cytoskeletal reorganization[14]. Changes in kinesins play pivotal roles in cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of cancer[15,16]. The KIFs member protein KIF21B is a microtubule motor protein that is dependent on ATP[15,17,18]. Recent studies suggest that KIF21B is not only a classic kinesin protein but also a regulator of microtubule dynamics[19-21]. In vitro reconstitution studies show that KIF21B increases the microtubule growth rate and catastrophe frequency. Moreover, the purified protein surprisingly associates primarily with depolymerizing microtubule and microtubule ends[22]. A recent study published in 2017 confirmed that KIF21B is a potential microtubule-pausing factor[21]. Microtubules and kinesins play roles in intercellular signal transduction, transport, malignant tumorigenesis, and tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis[11,23]. Therefore, in the current study we performed specific experiments to describe the role of KIF21B in HCC.

Specifically, we evaluated the differential expression of KIF21B across human cancer types by using the TCGA database. Importantly, KIF21B expression levels were found to be significantly increased in HCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. In addition, compared to normal liver cells, the expression of KIF21B was significantly higher in HCC cell lines. Consistent with these observations, immunohistochemistry revealed that KIF21B expression was increased in most HCC tissues. We also measured the growth, proliferation, apoptosis, and colony formation ability of the HCC cell line BEL-7404 after transfection with KIF21B siRNA. The results showed that KIF21B qualified as an oncogene in hepatocellular cells by resisting the induction of apoptosis and by promoting cell proliferation and clone formation. Moreover, survival analysis demonstrated that HCC patients with high expression levels of KIF21B exhibited poor OS and DFS.

While the precise mechanisms of KIF21B remain unclear, to our knowledge, this study was the first to explore the biological behavior of KIF21B in HCC. We believe that the special cell lines used may allow KIF21B to decrease cell growth, proliferation, and self-renewal and to induce apoptosis. Furthermore, KIF21B may prove useful as an ideal target for gene therapy for HCC. More studies are needed to determine the effect that KIF21B may have on other tumor cell lines.

In conclusion, KIF21B plays a pivotal role in HCC carcinogenesis. The current cell culture studies confirmed that suppression of KIF21B expression by siRNA inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in BEL-7404 cells. Our results provide evidence that KIF21B may be considered as a novel prognostic biomarker and a new therapeutic molecular target for HCC.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

As one of the most frequent cancers, the morbidity and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing year by year. The kinesin superfamily protein member KIF21B plays an important role in regulating mitotic progression; however, the function and mechanisms of KIF21B in cancer, particularly in HCC, are unknown.

Research motivation

To explore the role of KIF21B in hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Research objectives

The study aimed to investigate the function of KIF21B in HCC and its effect on prognosis after hepatectomy.

Research methods

First, we analyzed the differential expression of KIF21B in The Cancer Genome Atlas, and used immunohistochemical staining to validate it. Subsequently, after silencing KIF21B expression, the function of KIF21B in HCC lines was investigated by cell growth assay, MTT assay, fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay, and colony formation assay. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess its prognostic significance.

Research results

KIF21B expression levels were significantly higher in HCC tissues. Functional experiments showed that KIF21B knockdown remarkably suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. Statistical analyses revealed KIF21B as an independent risk factor in patients with HCC after hepatectomy.

Research conclusion

KIF21B plays an important role in HCC progression and may be a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for HCC.

Research perspective

In the future, more studies are needed to determine the effect that KIF21B may have on other tumor cell lines and to investigate the underlying mechanism.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate Professor Li-ping Wen and Professor Feng-lei Liu for their selfless help.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Oncology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: El-Hawary AK, Shimizu Y S-Editor: Zhang L L-Editor: Wang TQ E-Editor: Wu YXJ

References
1.  Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941-1953.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3585]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4576]  [Article Influence: 762.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
2.  Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration. Akinyemiju T, Abera S, Ahmed M, Alam N, Alemayohu MA, Allen C, Al-Raddadi R, Alvis-Guzman N, Amoako Y, Artaman A, Ayele TA, Barac A, Bensenor I, Berhane A, Bhutta Z, Castillo-Rivas J, Chitheer A, Choi JY, Cowie B, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dey S, Dicker D, Phuc H, Ekwueme DU, Zaki MS, Fischer F, Fürst T, Hancock J, Hay SI, Hotez P, Jee SH, Kasaeian A, Khader Y, Khang YH, Kumar A, Kutz M, Larson H, Lopez A, Lunevicius R, Malekzadeh R, McAlinden C, Meier T, Mendoza W, Mokdad A, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nagel G, Nguyen Q, Nguyen G, Ogbo F, Patton G, Pereira DM, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Radfar A, Roshandel G, Salomon JA, Sanabria J, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Sawhney M, Sepanlou S, Shackelford K, Shore H, Sun J, Mengistu DT, Topór-Mądry R, Tran B, Ukwaja KN, Vlassov V, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wakayo T, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Yonemoto N, Younis M, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zhu L, Murray CJL, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1683-1691.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 924]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1342]  [Article Influence: 268.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Fang F, Wang X, Song T. Five-CpG-based prognostic signature for predicting survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Biol Med. 2018;15:425-433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Guo P, He Y, Chen L, Qi L, Liu D, Chen Z, Xiao M, Chen L, Luo Y, Zhang N, Guo H. Cytosolic phospholipase A2α modulates cell-matrix adhesion via the FAK/paxillin pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biol Med. 2019;16:377-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Huang X, Liu F, Zhu C, Cai J, Wang H, Wang X, He S, Liu C, Yao L, Ding Z, Zhang Y, Zhang T. Suppression of KIF3B expression inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:795-806.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Myers SM, Collins I. Recent findings and future directions for interpolar mitotic kinesin inhibitors in cancer therapy. Future Med Chem. 2016;8:463-489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Nagahara M, Nishida N, Iwatsuki M, Ishimaru S, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Nakagawa T, Sato T, Sugihara K, Hoon DS, Mori M. Kinesin 18A expression: clinical relevance to colorectal cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2543-2552.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Liu X, Gong H, Huang K. Oncogenic role of kinesin proteins and targeting kinesin therapy. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:651-656.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Marszalek JR, Weiner JA, Farlow SJ, Chun J, Goldstein LS. Novel dendritic kinesin sorting identified by different process targeting of two related kinesins: KIF21A and KIF21B. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:469-479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 115]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 121]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Moores CA, Milligan RA. Lucky 13-microtubule depolymerisation by kinesin-13 motors. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:3905-3913.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Walczak CE, Gayek S, Ohi R. Microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:417-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Anderson CA, Massey DC, Barrett JC, Prescott NJ, Tremelling M, Fisher SA, Gwilliam R, Jacob J, Nimmo ER, Drummond H, Lees CW, Onnie CM, Hanson C, Blaszczyk K, Ravindrarajah R, Hunt S, Varma D, Hammond N, Lewis G, Attlesey H, Watkins N, Ouwehand W, Strachan D, McArdle W, Lewis CM; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Lobo A, Sanderson J, Jewell DP, Deloukas P, Mansfield JC, Mathew CG, Satsangi J, Parkes M. Investigation of Crohn's disease risk loci in ulcerative colitis further defines their molecular relationship. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:523-9.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 149]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Swarnkar S, Avchalumov Y, Raveendra BL, Grinman E, Puthanveettil SV. Kinesin Family of Proteins Kif11 and Kif21B Act as Inhibitory Constraints of Excitatory Synaptic Transmission Through Distinct Mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Rath O, Kozielski F. Kinesins and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:527-539.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 337]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 372]  [Article Influence: 31.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Miki H, Okada Y, Hirokawa N. Analysis of the kinesin superfamily: insights into structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:467-476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 499]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 520]  [Article Influence: 27.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Chandrasekaran G, Tátrai P, Gergely F. Hitting the brakes: targeting microtubule motors in cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:693-698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Vale RD, Reese TS, Sheetz MP. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985;42:39-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1454]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1391]  [Article Influence: 35.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Dugas JC, Tai YC, Speed TP, Ngai J, Barres BA. Functional genomic analysis of oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10967-10983.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 227]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 261]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Labonté D, Thies E, Pechmann Y, Groffen AJ, Verhage M, Smit AB, van Kesteren RE, Kneussel M. TRIM3 regulates the motility of the kinesin motor protein KIF21B. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Muhia M, Thies E, Labonté D, Ghiretti AE, Gromova KV, Xompero F, Lappe-Siefke C, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Kuhl D, Schweizer M, Ohana O, Schwarz JR, Holzbaur ELF, Kneussel M. The Kinesin KIF21B Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Is Essential for Neuronal Morphology, Synapse Function, and Learning and Memory. Cell Rep. 2016;15:968-977.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  van Riel WE, Rai A, Bianchi S, Katrukha EA, Liu Q, Heck AJ, Hoogenraad CC, Steinmetz MO, Kapitein LC, Akhmanova A. Kinesin-4 KIF21B is a potent microtubule pausing factor. Elife. 2017;6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ghiretti AE, Thies E, Tokito MK, Lin T, Ostap EM, Kneussel M, Holzbaur ELF. Activity-Dependent Regulation of Distinct Transport and Cytoskeletal Remodeling Functions of the Dendritic Kinesin KIF21B. Neuron. 2016;92:857-872.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  He M, Subramanian R, Bangs F, Omelchenko T, Liem KF, Kapoor TM, Anderson KV. The kinesin-4 protein Kif7 regulates mammalian Hedgehog signalling by organizing the cilium tip compartment. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:663-672.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 245]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 217]  [Article Influence: 21.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]