Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 102258
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.102258
Figure 1
Figure 1 Hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemical evaluation of the obtained using a pathological biopsy. A: The preoperative pathology image showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gastric body; B: The specimen of the entire stomach, lymph node and tumor tissue removed during surgery; C: The postoperative pathology image showed no residual tumor cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic images.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Enhanced abdominal computed tomography images for evaluating the treatment response. A: Upper-row images show the changes in the size of the adenocarcinoma tumor tissue at the gastric body; Lower-row images show the changes in the size of the lymph node metastasis in the abdominal cavity; B: The maximum thickness of the tumor at the gastric body; C: The maximum diameter of the lymph node metastatic tumor.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Dynamics of carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, and cancer antigen 19-9 and timeline of treatment options. A-C: Diagram depicting the dynamic of carcinoembryonic antigen (A), alpha-fetoprotein (B) and cancer antigen 19-9 (C); D: The timeline of the treatment protocol. CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9: Cancer antigen 19-9; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; CT: Computed tomography; AEs: Adverse events; GC: Gastric cancer; PR: Partial response; BMI: Body mass index; pCR: Pathological complete response; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival.