Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2024; 16(6): 2439-2448
Published online Jun 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2439
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of patient and observation selection. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; EOB-MRI: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; APHE: Arterial phase hyperenhancement; LR (LI-RADS): Liver imaging reporting and data system; TIV: Tumour-in-vein.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Illustration of the liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic table. A: The first diagnostic table shows the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018; B-E: Show the simplified LI-RADS (sLI-RADS) A-D; F: Shows the final sLI-RADS. HBP: Hepatobiliary phase. APHE: Arterial phase hyperenhancement; F-sLI-RADS: Final simplified liver imaging reporting and data system; sLI-RADS: Simplified liver imaging reporting and data system; LI-RADS: Liver imaging reporting and data system; LR: LI-RADS.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance image of a 67-year-old female patient with hepatocellular carcinoma confirmed by biopsy. A: T1WI showing a 12 mm hypointense nodule (arrow) in hepatic segment VII; B: The nodule (arrow) exhibits arterial phase hyperenhancement; C: It has an enhanced “capsule” and no washout appearance on the portal vein phase image; D and E: In the transitional phase (D) and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (E), the nodule (arrow) exhibited hypointensity. This nodule was assessed with liver imaging reporting and data system-4 (LR-4) according to whether liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 or simplified LI-RADS (sLI-RADS) D was adopted. When HBP hypointensity was used as a major feature and according to sLI-RADS D, the nodule was recategorized as LR-5.