Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2024; 16(5): 1849-1860
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1849
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart for the selection of evaluable lymph nodes with a short diameter of within 5-10 mm. LNs: Lymph nodes; NLNM: Non-lymph node metastasis; LNM: Lymph node metastasis.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Workflow of radiomics process in study. ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; T1WI: T1-weighted imaging; T2WI: T2-weighted imaging.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curves. A and B: Receiver operating characteristic curves of the T1-weighted imaging (T1WI)-Radscore, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-Radscore, T1WI & T2WI-Radscore in the training (A) and validation (B) set, respectively. AUC: Area under the curve; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Performance of the final selected model to predict lymph node metastasis. A and B: Receiver operating characteristic curves of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) & T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-Radscore and nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) with rectal cancer in training set (A), validation set (B); C: Predictive nomogram of LNM; D: Decision curve analysis of models to investigate the clinical usefulness in predicting LNM. It indicates both T1WI & T2WI-Radscore and nomogram obtain more benefit than “treat all”, “treat none”, and the Conventional MRI model when the threshold probability is > 15%. AUC: Area under the curve; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic.