Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2021; 13(9): 1196-1209
Published online Sep 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1196
Published online Sep 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1196
Figure 1 Flow diagram.
RCT: Randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2 Quality of randomized controlled trials and cohorts.
RCT: Randomized controlled trial.
Figure 3 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival of rectal cancer patients based on a meta-analysis of six studies.
CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio; Neo-CRT: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Neo-CT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 4 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with lowering incidences of anastomotic fistula and temporary colostomy and increasing the sphincter preservation rate.
CI: Confidence interval; nCRT: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; nCT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 5 There were no significant differences in the tumor downstaging rate, overall complications, and urinary complications between the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups.
CI: Confidence interval; nCRT: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; nCT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 6 The pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group compared to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group.
CI: Confidence interval; nCRT: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; nCT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 7 Publication bias.
- Citation: Wu P, Xu HM, Zhu Z. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation as a potential alternative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13(9): 1196-1209
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v13/i9/1196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1196