Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2020; 12(7): 756-767
Published online Jul 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i7.756
Figure 1
Figure 1 Independent association of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy technique (open compared to close) on relevant post-operative outcomes based on multi-variable logistic regression. Factors included in each multi-variable analysis include age, American Society of Anesthesiology, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, completeness of cytoreduction score, and post-operative complications. OR: Odds ratio; LOS: Length of stay; ICU: Intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival and recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort (A and B), appendiceal cohort (C, D, E and F), and colorectal cohort (G and H). 1All patients had overall survival information though a small portion did not have recurrence free survival information available.

  • Citation: Leiting JL, Cloyd JM, Ahmed A, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Dessureault S, Felder S, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Mogal H, Staley CA, Zaidi MY, Patel SH, Ahmad SA, Hendrix RJ, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, LaRocca CJ, Johnston FM, Greer J, Grotz TE. Comparison of open and closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Results from the United States hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy collaborative. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(7): 756-767
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i7/756.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i7.756